• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 34
    • Topics 2696
    • Posts 12701
    • Best 792
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: "Clock Boy" lost

      The SJWs need to look into the story a bit more.    His family, especially the father, is nuts.

      The sister previously got suspended for making a bomb threat at the same school.

      All of this was planned for effect and the media jumped on it like a gold digger on a cock made of $100 bills.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: I'm a "genital'ist"

      Not one result pertaining to your point. Literally no one knows what you're talking about.

      I gave you the name of one YouTube SJW who talks about it.    Maybe you should watch the video where he coins the phrase.  He/she/it originally calls it transphobia, then later in the video calls genitalism.    Others have talked about it as well.

      I'm sure Riley Dennis could use your up vote in his videos.

      I agree, I don't see what you're trying to get out of these sensationalistic "SJW mindset" posts.

      It shows liberals for the lunatics they are.

      They demand everyone be tolerant of them, then they claim we are hateful because we have sexual orientations that are different than theirs.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • I'm a "genital'ist"

      Yep, I'm a "genital'ist" according to be the SJW mindset because I won't fuck people with certain genitals (pussy, in my case).

      That's right.  If you won't date/marry/fuck a person with certain genitalia, you are a GENITALIST.  It's just as hateful as racism and sexism.

      "I wear eye shadow, so i must be trans" Riley Dennis (and others) have made videos demanding that if you have a sexual preference for one type of crotch junk, then you are a disgusting genitalist.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Chuck Schumer - hypocrite libtard extraordinare

      So you are still refusing to admit that it was David Cameron's Tory/conservative government that put the bill forward.

      Unlike Labour's whipped vote, the Tories were allowed to vote as they saw fit.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Chuck Schumer - hypocrite libtard extraordinare

      The UK did not get marriage equality through a private member's bill.    It was done through a government bill.

      So again, which Prime Minister gave the UK marriage equality?!

      I'll give you even more help.  It wasn't any fucking liberal government that did it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Chuck Schumer - hypocrite libtard extraordinare

      @Loki100:

      @raphjd:

      Still refusing to admit which party put the bill forward.    Typical liberal.

      Liberals wouldn't give us marriage equality, so they get the credit for it.

      Still refusing to admit who actually voted for the bill and who actually voted against it. Typical conservative.

      Conservatives voted against the bill, so they get credit for it.

      Please tell us the name of the UK Prime Minister that gave us marriage equality and the party he or she was the leader of.

      I'll give you some help.

      Tony Blair (Labour/liberals) gave us "separate but somewhat equal"  and said he saw no reason to go further with it.

      Gordon Brown (Labour/liberals) said he agreed with Tony Blair, so he wan't going to move it further either

      Now here's where you're on your own.  Tell us which one gave us true marriage equality.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Chuck Schumer - hypocrite libtard extraordinare

      Still refusing to admit which party put the bill forward.    Typical liberal.

      Liberals wouldn't give us marriage equality, so they get the credit for it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Maxine Waters finally ADMITS NO RUSSIA COLLUSION EVIDENCE

      Maxine Waters is all about race.  That is her claim to fame.

      It's like a thread about David Duke liking ice cream.  Are you saying that no one is allowed to bring up his racism?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Identity Politics and trans trnders

      I haven't seen anyone be anti trans people.

      What I have seen is people be anti "look at me, I'm pretending to be trans" people.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Chuck Schumer - hypocrite libtard extraordinare

      Which government put it forward and which government said "separate, but somewhat similar" was enough.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Maxine Waters finally ADMITS NO RUSSIA COLLUSION EVIDENCE

      I still love how you declare everything you disagree with as "irrational".

      It's sad that you are blaming me, when she is the one talking down all blacks.

      When it comes to anti black conspiracy theories, she beats the all the truthers and birthers combined.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: PROOF TRUMP COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA

      Most trump haters hate him based on things they've been told by others, not things Trump actually said/did.      This is why they refuse to do interviews on their talking points.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Maxine Waters finally ADMITS NO RUSSIA COLLUSION EVIDENCE

      Maxine Waters is an idiot and an enemy of black people.

      "black people are too stupid to speak proper english, they can only learn in ghetto slang (aka ebonics)".

      "black people are to weak to resist taking drugs, so the CIA exploited them into doing it".

      Every time she opens her mouth, she makes blacks look like fools, losers and clowns.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Identity Politics and trans trnders

      LOL,  the mental gymnastic needed to even ask that question.

      Watch the various interviews, she's not masculine in the slightest and her clothes are also feminine.

      Why would an openly trans boy wear girls' clothes on a daily basis?!

      You're right.  Maybe she's a trans boy cross dresser.

      OR, maybe she's the girly girl she always presents as, and not actually trans anything.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Chuck Schumer - hypocrite libtard extraordinare

      It was still the conservative government that gave it to us.

      Labour thought that we had enough equality with "separate, but somewhat equal" civil partnerships.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Should #45 Be Impeached and Removed from Office?

      I have no loyalty to any politician.  If they do criminal acts, throw their ass in jail or whatever the law allows.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Feminists demand we JUST BELIEVE

      NOPE.

      Feminists say we shouldn't have trials or investigations.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Feminists demand we JUST BELIEVE

      …No, it actually says the exact opposite. The feminist narrative pretty blatantly states that a rapist will lie in order to get out of trouble, which is exactly what happened in this case.

      Of course criminals will lie.  That is not in dispute.

      I was talking about an innocent man being arrested.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Chuck Schumer - hypocrite libtard extraordinare

      In the UK, it was the conservatives that gave us marriage equality.    Liberals were happy with "separate but some what similar".

      It was the liberal government of New Labour that constantly fought against equality in the courts.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Why is Communism not as hated as Nazism?

      I don't feel like this response, or my original input, is attacking anyone, or judging. So please, calm down; I was just trying to be part of a conversation by giving thoughts about historical context.

      Clearly you read more into my post than was my intent.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 508
    • 509
    • 510
    • 511
    • 512
    • 635
    • 636
    • 510 / 636