Posts made by raphjd

@sutieday:

@raphjd:

"IT" refers to rule violations by liberals while crying about rule violations.

Let's use your example of Fred and Sutie.

They get into a slagging match.   Sutie and other liberals will complain in the forums, the help desk, reported topics and site email.     I'll be called "alt-right" and accused of abusing my powers and whatnot.    Fred won't complain and just get on with it.

Why are you insistent on limiting it to "Trumptard" vs "libtard"?    Expand it out and you'll see that both sides are pretty equal in name calling.

I was called a racist simply because I pointed out 2 proven lies told by Rep John Lewis.  I didn't mention race, just that he lied.   That was enough to make me a racist.   Why do you want to ignore things like that, if you want to talk about facts.

How about ban all name calling and just use "liberal" and "conservative"??? But, I'm sure you get a kick out of the incivility.

I'm sorry, but I can't take any you say seriously.

Why should I bother, you're gonna excuse it away anyway.

I've travelled too.  So what.

Islam loves gay people, maybe you should move to a muslim country.

BTW, you are full of shit.  I never said ALL.

As for not being open to new ideas, you are the last person to complain about that.  "Oh me, Oh my, I have to posts by my enemies so I can down vote them.  Who cares what they say, they must be down voted."    You're pathetic.

@sutieday:

@Frederick:

Republican Ralph Norman won a special election Tuesday to fill the South Carolina congressional seat

Republican Karen Handel won a special election Tuesday to fill the a Georgia congressional seat.. her win was over a democrat who was using the vote as a mandate against Trump, and spent a record amount for a congressional campaign. 
Oh.. and the polls said Jon Ossof would win.

It would seem that the overwhelming animosity directed at Trump by the media moonbats is fizzling and backfiring.

Can Frederick go one post without using "moonbat"? Nope.

And with that post, are you really sure you want me to follow the rules like you demand?

Someone who has nothing to do with islam, because muslims don't do things like that, was shot dead while attempting to do a "peace attack".

Nazi puppets (police)  shot and killed him after he set a suit case on fire (can be seen in the photos).  When the Nazi puppets (police) inspected his body, they found that he was wearing a "love vest".

"IT" refers to rule violations by liberals while crying about rule violations.

Let's use your example of Fred and Sutie.

They get into a slagging match.   Sutie and other liberals will complain in the forums, the help desk, reported topics and site email.     I'll be called "alt-right" and accused of abusing my powers and whatnot.    Fred won't complain and just get on with it.

Why are you insistent on limiting it to "Trumptard" vs "libtard"?    Expand it out and you'll see that both sides are pretty equal in name calling.

I was called a racist simply because I pointed out 2 proven lies told by Rep John Lewis.  I didn't mention race, just that he lied.   That was enough to make me a racist.   Why do you want to ignore things like that, if you want to talk about facts.

MATAL, INTERIM DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE v. TAM, (2017) No. 15-1293

See more at:  http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/15-1293.html#sthash.mHieS4Eb.dpuf

In a unanimous vote, the US Supreme Court ruled against liberals when it comes to free speech.

"Offensive" logos (trademarks) are protected under free speech.

While this case had nothing to do DIRECTLY with Dick Gregory's autobiography NIGGER, if the case had gone the other way, the book would either be banned or forced to recall them and change the name/cover.

Hate speech is protected speech.

@sutieday:

Many are voting against the Republican woman as a vote against Trump.

Doesn't that make them women haters?

Here's a quick one.  It's biased in that it uses "fake news and clickbait" to justify what was done.

https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/31/facebook-tweaks-the-feed-to-bury-fake-news-and-clickbait/

I wonder if they did everything possible to ensure he would win like they did with Hillary.

CNN should change it's name to DNC News.

20 years ago CNN was one of the world's most respected news sources, now it's a fucking joke.

Oh the irony.

It's liberals who claim they are on the right side of history, just like ISIS.

It's liberals who cover their faces to "protest", dressing just like ISIS.

It's liberals, just like ISIS, who do not have a problem with using violence to get their way.

@sutieday:

@raphjd:

@sutieday:

Btw, those people downvoting are essentially saying it is acceptable to attack Muslims and not have the President respond in a timely manner to such acts.

You are a typical bike lock liberal, with your blatant hypocrisy.

You spam the fuck out of the down vote button against your enemies no matter what they say.   You don't care what is said, you look for the name of the poster.

I never knew that disagreeing with a poster implied that you would want to hit them with a bike lock ???

And I know why you and Frederick have yet to respond to the initial post. Both of you have no problem with Muslims being attacked by bigoted/hateful people because you think they're all terrorists. And you probably support actions by racist white supremacist stabbers, such as this:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/28/brave-and-selfless-oregon-stabbing-victims-hailed-as-heroes/

For ages I have asked liberals to condemn the violence and it took ages but finally 6 or so stepped forward to condemn it.    You weren't one of them.  Not surprisingly, the liberals who condemned the violence got as many down votes as conservatives do.    I'm betting it was you, DrWas, wafflez and a couple others.

In 23 days, peaceful, loving muslims have killed 1,246 people in "peace attacks".  And we now have another, thankfully thwarted, "peace attack" in Brussels.

Was it you or your fellow bike lock liberal DrWas who said you don't have to condemn violence because you aren't the President?

The fact that you search out posts by your enemies to down vote them, no matter what they say, shows the mentality you have.    At least RoyalCrown89  has the decency to actually read the posts and vote on them based on what is posted.

@flozen:

@raphjd:

If I started enforcing the rules in the way liberals want, you'd be crying on the help desk far more than you guys do now.

This feels very much like you're drawing an assumption, in the belief it absolves you from doing your job.  It doesn't.

@raphjd:

Oddly, liberals violate the rules as much, if not more, than the conservatives but complain about the rules not being followed/enforced almost exclusively.

This is observationally untrue, but since you made the claim, go ahead and share the method by which you can prove it.  Or, are we back to alternative facts?

We see it here in various threads.

However, you'll need to become a staff member to see the Reported Posts section, help desk and others.

If I started enforcing the rules in the way liberals want, you'd be crying on the help desk far more than you guys do now.

Oddly, liberals violate the rules as much, if not more, than the conservatives but complain about the rules not being followed/enforced almost exclusively.

Well, he does you his social media platform to showcase bike lock liberal ideas, while banning classic liberal and conservatives.

Facebook was caught and finally admitted to burying things that made liberals look bad, while promoting things that made conservatives look bad.

@Matie:

BTW, I don't claim that Islam is a religion of peace. Actually that is a fundamental misunderstanding. I believe it means more correctly, 'submission'. Rather, Islam is (and always has been) a religion of 'pacification', that is, you can be treated 'peacefully' once you submit (become a Muslim) and become an adherent of Islam (submission). Or accept dhimmi status (only open to 'peoples of the book', and never gays)

I wasn't really directing anything at you.  I just continued on from your statement that I quoted.

Afraid you might see something you might not like?    Perhaps muslims acting like entitled cunts?

@abcddddd:

Normally I'd just keep it to myself and move on, but I'd like to save some of the more functioning forum-goers some unnecessary stress.

At the very least, Frederick and mhorndisk are straight up trolls. In the sense that they're behaving like rabid Trump supporters on a gay forum for behind the scenes chuckles. Possibly raphjd too. Some (most) of the stuff they say is borderline caricature and completely written for provocation and outrage.

Just consider this a possibility before you respond to anything they say.

I'm gonna leave this up here for a bit, then delete this bullshit thread.

You do realize that if this thread were reversed, you and your fellow bike lock liberals would be spamming the report button and crying on the help desk.  It shows just how fucking hypocritical you clowns are.

@sutieday:

Yup, my motto is downvote and leave.

Finally, you are starting to be honest.

Well, the boot could be on the other foot. Whenever the religion of pieces attacks the west or western targets, we are told 'not all Muslims'.

Bike lock liberals claim muslim terrorists have nothing to do with islam.  It's the same when liberals do bad.  They aren't part of the group, they are individuals.

If a conservative does something wrong, it's all conservatives.

BTW, try reading the quran before claiming it's the religion of peace.