Posts made by raphjd

Certain people are too stupid to realize/remember/admit that Obama also did deals with Saudi, even though they were known to fund terrorism.

@magentas:

@raphjd:

@magentas:

@pppucci:

Also I do not think any other ridiculous name calling is conducive to discussion, but then again, I guess we are not engaged in discussion, but flame throwing.

Correct. Frederick does not discuss. he is incapable of that. we are basically witnessing someone having a rage-induced mental breakdown on this forum, based on his internalized homophobia. He is a gay man from an alt-right background of bigots, so he thinks if he is even more bigoted towards all of the other minorities then the masters will accept his "flawed" sexuality.

He desperately wants the people who will never consider him an equal to accept him, by constantly attacking the people who would accept him as he is.

If a conservative wrote that post about a liberal, the site would be broken from all the liberals smashing the hell out of the REPORT button.

And with that comment, pretending both sides are equal and can just flip-flop, you show you do not even know what liberals and conservatives ARE.

Conservatism IS bigotry. Liberalism IS tolerance and acceptance of diverse people and positions.
Conservatism IS narrow-mindedness. Liberalism IS open-mindedness.

When people like yourself make some post about some individual who said or did something bigoted, and pretend he did it in the name of Liberalism, It is like posting an article about a man raping a woman and claiming he is gay, and is somehow typical of all gay men.

You are pathetic.

You demand that conservatives owh the actions of their own, yet you losers refuse to accept that you can do any wrong.

@magentas:

@raphjd:

It was liberals …

None of that is even slightly true.
As I have explained to you repeatedly, you have been brainwashed by extremist partisan propaganda, which takes the actions of individuals and pretend that they represent entire groups- and you blindly fall for it, because for some reason known only to you, you have this emotional need to want to hate the people who would accept you, and love the people who would condemn you.

You are so full of shit.

You want everyone to blame individuals when they do bad, but when they do something that might be considered good, you want everyone to worship the group.

Modern liberals are scum with no redeeming qualities.

@Thesock:

Most Americans pledge allegiance to the constitution and country but Republicans don't, they pledge fealty to the party like communists.

The day of reckoning is coming from Republican traitors and even Trump can't stop it.  Call it the "deep state" or call it "justice" but it's coming and it's unstoppable.  Traitors and their enablers are right to be afraid.

So delusional.

It's funny watching liberals demanding we impeach Trump because they don't like him, not because there's no proof he did anything wrong other than not being Hillary.

@magentas:

@pppucci:

Also I do not think any other ridiculous name calling is conducive to discussion, but then again, I guess we are not engaged in discussion, but flame throwing.

Correct. Frederick does not discuss. he is incapable of that. we are basically witnessing someone having a rage-induced mental breakdown on this forum, based on his internalized homophobia. He is a gay man from an alt-right background of bigots, so he thinks if he is even more bigoted towards all of the other minorities then the masters will accept his "flawed" sexuality.

He desperately wants the people who will never consider him an equal to accept him, by constantly attacking the people who would accept him as he is.

If a conservative wrote that post about a liberal, the site would be broken from all the liberals smashing the hell out of the REPORT button.

It was liberals who set a building, with people inside, on fire to prevent Milo from exercising his free speech.

It was liberals who set a girl's hair on fire because she exercised her free speech by wearing a Trump hat.

It was liberals that threatened violence if Ann Coulter was allowed to give a lecture.

Liberals all over the west are have/try to criminalize speech they don't like.

@raphjd:

Muslim culture is just as rooted in their religion as it is for everyone else.

Clearly, by the down votes, liberals believe that unlike every other culture, muslim culture isn't influenced by it's religion.

OR, they are just partisan hacks who just down vote anything their "enemies" post, regardless of what it is.

But liberals flip flop on whether they hate jews or not.

The Three Stooges were more sensible than any liberal could be.

@abcddddd:

@mhorndisk:

I was actually banned from Google Plus a few years ago. I was just pointing out that Rabbis drink the blood from the baby's circumcised dick. Some of those babies got herpes and died. It's a whole story but banned from talking about. It's called Metzitzah. You're NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT. So just don't. The Rabbis suck baby's dicks. Sounds like a new post to see if it gets banned here too.

LMAO. I'm trying really hard to give you the benefit of the doubt on how you came across this information. But the only sites I can think of that would allow it are white supremacy sites. Or you were just googling for an excuse to hate Jews?

If you weren't such a feminist cuck and misandrist, you might google CIRCUMCISION as well.

It's extremely telling that rather than googling it yourself, you accuse the poster of being a white supremacist and jew hater.

@Frederick:

@pppucci:

@royalcrown89:

This is the Politics & Debate thread; therefore, if someone posts a news article or quotes from a news article, why not frame an argument against what the article says or begin a debate about the facts or false assumptions of the article? In my opinion, the only "low quality shit posts" are the ones where childish insults are thrown or massive generalizations are made such as "[certain person] makes all [certain group of people] look bad." This isn't about being politically correct, it's about being civil adults. Someone on here kept saying I deemed everything I didn't agree with as irrational and that simply wasn't the case. I deemed specific arguments irrational only after making my argument why I believed they were irrational, not by simply stating they were irrational just because or only because I disagreed. Instead of forming their argument to counter mine, they just claimed I call everything I disagree with irrational, and then they proceed to flame other posts of mine with irrelevant points that are clearly meant to derail and deflect. If you do not know how to be civil then you should rethink participating in this thread, simple as that. How can we expect to debate when one side is being extremely childish?

I  totally agree. :cheers:

The two of you are being hypocritical here.  You are offering no substantial input, but intstead just attacking other member - whomever they might be.  That is actually against the rules.  If you got a complaint, complain to the moderator.   Don't rinse out your period stained panties in the forum.

"Name calling" as you put it.. is essentially done on a mass scale by such institutions as the Quinnipiac University, which keeps churning out polls showing Trump and his policies being more and more unpopular.  For those who are not aware of it.. Quinnipiac University is known to be one of the most liberal Universities.  As we learned from the 2016 election.  Poll results are often completely WRONG.

RoyalCrown's post is directed squarely at me.

I saw something on YouTube, that talked about losing $26 million.  I'm not sure if it actually happened or just purposed.

@royalcrown89:

This is the Politics & Debate thread; therefore, if someone posts a news article or quotes from a news article, why not frame an argument against what the article says or begin a debate about the facts or false assumptions of the article? In my opinion, the only "low quality shit posts" are the ones where childish insults are thrown or massive generalizations are made such as "[certain person] makes all [certain group of people] look bad." This isn't about being politically correct, it's about being civil adults. Someone on here kept saying I deemed everything I didn't agree with as irrational and that simply wasn't the case. I deemed specific arguments irrational only after making my argument why I believed they were irrational, not by simply stating they were irrational just because or only because I disagreed. Instead of forming their argument to counter mine, they just claimed I call everything I disagree with irrational, and then they proceed to flame other posts of mine with irrelevant points that are clearly meant to derail and deflect. If you do not know how to be civil then you should rethink participating in this thread, simple as that. How can we expect to debate when one side is being extremely childish?

See, you had a point for a second there, then you went on the attack.    Now I see you as a liar, who is only pandering to your fellow liberals.  You are just a partisan hack.

@royalcrown89:

…......................................

Also ***tard and other variations have been banned, yet I'm still seeing it posted in threads. Why is that?

Because I'm not going to waste my time hunting down all the posts from before that rule was put into place.

I would love to see proper debates/discussion here.

HOWEVER, I don't see that happening when certain liberals follow me (and others) around down voting EVERYTHING we post no matter what the topic is or what I happen to say.  I made a factual post about the London attack that it was 1 attack with 2 parts and the usual ass clown liberals down voted it.

Also, liberals keep reporting me on the Help Desk making up lies about me especially, but others as well because we don't agree with the liberal mind set.

You need to educate yourself about FC.  There are 3 categories, whether you like it or not.

You are a misandrist by justifying it happening to boys, but defending the western ban on it happening to girls.

I hate how feminist (women and their cucks) screech about equality, but ignore areas where females have special rights.  They then get butt hurt that men fight for gender equality for men.

@abcddddd:

Don't even pretend like "evidence" or "facts" have any place in your vocabulary. Those concepts are meaningless to people who maintain blind loyalty to a party.

The same goes for those that blindly cling to an ideology.

@pppucci:

The blatant racism in this thread is quite disturbing.

Please show me the racism.

@abcddddd:

Also, did this topic really need two threads in the same 5 minutes? Holy shit.

Technically, they are 2 different topics.