• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 34
    • Topics 2696
    • Posts 12703
    • Best 792
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: James Comey - "The New York Times story, it was not true"

      FEELZ, NOT REALZ  - the leftist mantra

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Impeachment nonsense

      Your penchant for hanging opponents just proves you are a fascist.

      Funny coming from a liberal.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Evergreen students turn on diehard liberal prof for dissent on "day of absence"

      Not the video I was talking about, but it seems to be the latest one on the topic.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Masked left-wing brownshirt attacks conservative reporter while his friend films

      I'll reply for the liberals;

      It wasn't a liberal, but individuals because liberals can do no wrong.  If they did something good, then they were liberals.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The name calling and lack of civility…

      I was talking about John Lewis the Congressman (his job for the last 30ish years).  Nothing I said had anything to do with civil rights.  You made it about racism.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The name calling and lack of civility…

      You are a liar because you claim to want civility, but attack me.

      If I, or another conservative, did that to a liberal, the site would be broken from you guys smashing the hell out of the REPORT button.

      I noticed you didn't go into the John Lewis conversation, where I pointed out recent 2 proven lies by him and you went bat shit crazy claiming I hate black people because of it.

      You and your leftist friends are thread Nazis who think they control each and every topic.  We're only allowed to talk about Obama and Hillary if it's in worshipping tones.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Sponsors of terror ‘falling victim to evil they promote’ ‒ Trump on Tehran attak

      Certain people are too stupid to realize/remember/admit that Obama also did deals with Saudi, even though they were known to fund terrorism.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Two terror attacks in London today.. aka - more problems for libtards

      @magentas:

      @raphjd:

      @magentas:

      @pppucci:

      Also I do not think any other ridiculous name calling is conducive to discussion, but then again, I guess we are not engaged in discussion, but flame throwing.

      Correct. Frederick does not discuss. he is incapable of that. we are basically witnessing someone having a rage-induced mental breakdown on this forum, based on his internalized homophobia. He is a gay man from an alt-right background of bigots, so he thinks if he is even more bigoted towards all of the other minorities then the masters will accept his "flawed" sexuality.

      He desperately wants the people who will never consider him an equal to accept him, by constantly attacking the people who would accept him as he is.

      If a conservative wrote that post about a liberal, the site would be broken from all the liberals smashing the hell out of the REPORT button.

      And with that comment, pretending both sides are equal and can just flip-flop, you show you do not even know what liberals and conservatives ARE.

      Conservatism IS bigotry. Liberalism IS tolerance and acceptance of diverse people and positions.
      Conservatism IS narrow-mindedness. Liberalism IS open-mindedness.

      When people like yourself make some post about some individual who said or did something bigoted, and pretend he did it in the name of Liberalism, It is like posting an article about a man raping a woman and claiming he is gay, and is somehow typical of all gay men.

      You are pathetic.

      You demand that conservatives owh the actions of their own, yet you losers refuse to accept that you can do any wrong.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Why liberals love so much islam?

      @magentas:

      @raphjd:

      It was liberals …

      None of that is even slightly true.
      As I have explained to you repeatedly, you have been brainwashed by extremist partisan propaganda, which takes the actions of individuals and pretend that they represent entire groups- and you blindly fall for it, because for some reason known only to you, you have this emotional need to want to hate the people who would accept you, and love the people who would condemn you.

      You are so full of shit.

      You want everyone to blame individuals when they do bad, but when they do something that might be considered good, you want everyone to worship the group.

      Modern liberals are scum with no redeeming qualities.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Impeachment nonsense

      @Thesock:

      Most Americans pledge allegiance to the constitution and country but Republicans don't, they pledge fealty to the party like communists.

      The day of reckoning is coming from Republican traitors and even Trump can't stop it.  Call it the "deep state" or call it "justice" but it's coming and it's unstoppable.  Traitors and their enablers are right to be afraid.

      So delusional.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Support For Trump's Impeachment Is Now Higher Than His Approval Rating

      It's funny watching liberals demanding we impeach Trump because they don't like him, not because there's no proof he did anything wrong other than not being Hillary.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Two terror attacks in London today.. aka - more problems for libtards

      @magentas:

      @pppucci:

      Also I do not think any other ridiculous name calling is conducive to discussion, but then again, I guess we are not engaged in discussion, but flame throwing.

      Correct. Frederick does not discuss. he is incapable of that. we are basically witnessing someone having a rage-induced mental breakdown on this forum, based on his internalized homophobia. He is a gay man from an alt-right background of bigots, so he thinks if he is even more bigoted towards all of the other minorities then the masters will accept his "flawed" sexuality.

      He desperately wants the people who will never consider him an equal to accept him, by constantly attacking the people who would accept him as he is.

      If a conservative wrote that post about a liberal, the site would be broken from all the liberals smashing the hell out of the REPORT button.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Why liberals love so much islam?

      It was liberals who set a building, with people inside, on fire to prevent Milo from exercising his free speech.

      It was liberals who set a girl's hair on fire because she exercised her free speech by wearing a Trump hat.

      It was liberals that threatened violence if Ann Coulter was allowed to give a lecture.

      Liberals all over the west are have/try to criminalize speech they don't like.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Why liberals love so much islam?

      @raphjd:

      Muslim culture is just as rooted in their religion as it is for everyone else.

      Clearly, by the down votes, liberals believe that unlike every other culture, muslim culture isn't influenced by it's religion.

      OR, they are just partisan hacks who just down vote anything their "enemies" post, regardless of what it is.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Metzitzah: Rabbis Drink Baby's Dick Blood

      But liberals flip flop on whether they hate jews or not.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: How to spot a libturd moonbat

      The Three Stooges were more sensible than any liberal could be.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Why I was BANNED from GOOGLE PLUS: CIRCUMCISION

      @abcddddd:

      @mhorndisk:

      I was actually banned from Google Plus a few years ago. I was just pointing out that Rabbis drink the blood from the baby's circumcised dick. Some of those babies got herpes and died. It's a whole story but banned from talking about. It's called Metzitzah. You're NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT IT. So just don't. The Rabbis suck baby's dicks. Sounds like a new post to see if it gets banned here too.

      LMAO. I'm trying really hard to give you the benefit of the doubt on how you came across this information. But the only sites I can think of that would allow it are white supremacy sites. Or you were just googling for an excuse to hate Jews?

      If you weren't such a feminist cuck and misandrist, you might google CIRCUMCISION as well.

      It's extremely telling that rather than googling it yourself, you accuse the poster of being a white supremacist and jew hater.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The name calling and lack of civility…

      @Frederick:

      @pppucci:

      @royalcrown89:

      This is the Politics & Debate thread; therefore, if someone posts a news article or quotes from a news article, why not frame an argument against what the article says or begin a debate about the facts or false assumptions of the article? In my opinion, the only "low quality shit posts" are the ones where childish insults are thrown or massive generalizations are made such as "[certain person] makes all [certain group of people] look bad." This isn't about being politically correct, it's about being civil adults. Someone on here kept saying I deemed everything I didn't agree with as irrational and that simply wasn't the case. I deemed specific arguments irrational only after making my argument why I believed they were irrational, not by simply stating they were irrational just because or only because I disagreed. Instead of forming their argument to counter mine, they just claimed I call everything I disagree with irrational, and then they proceed to flame other posts of mine with irrelevant points that are clearly meant to derail and deflect. If you do not know how to be civil then you should rethink participating in this thread, simple as that. How can we expect to debate when one side is being extremely childish?

      I  totally agree. :cheers:

      The two of you are being hypocritical here.  You are offering no substantial input, but intstead just attacking other member - whomever they might be.  That is actually against the rules.  If you got a complaint, complain to the moderator.   Don't rinse out your period stained panties in the forum.

      "Name calling" as you put it.. is essentially done on a mass scale by such institutions as the Quinnipiac University, which keeps churning out polls showing Trump and his policies being more and more unpopular.  For those who are not aware of it.. Quinnipiac University is known to be one of the most liberal Universities.  As we learned from the 2016 election.  Poll results are often completely WRONG.

      RoyalCrown's post is directed squarely at me.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Evergreen students turn on diehard liberal prof for dissent on "day of absence"

      I saw something on YouTube, that talked about losing $26 million.  I'm not sure if it actually happened or just purposed.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The name calling and lack of civility…

      @royalcrown89:

      This is the Politics & Debate thread; therefore, if someone posts a news article or quotes from a news article, why not frame an argument against what the article says or begin a debate about the facts or false assumptions of the article? In my opinion, the only "low quality shit posts" are the ones where childish insults are thrown or massive generalizations are made such as "[certain person] makes all [certain group of people] look bad." This isn't about being politically correct, it's about being civil adults. Someone on here kept saying I deemed everything I didn't agree with as irrational and that simply wasn't the case. I deemed specific arguments irrational only after making my argument why I believed they were irrational, not by simply stating they were irrational just because or only because I disagreed. Instead of forming their argument to counter mine, they just claimed I call everything I disagree with irrational, and then they proceed to flame other posts of mine with irrelevant points that are clearly meant to derail and deflect. If you do not know how to be civil then you should rethink participating in this thread, simple as that. How can we expect to debate when one side is being extremely childish?

      See, you had a point for a second there, then you went on the attack.    Now I see you as a liar, who is only pandering to your fellow liberals.  You are just a partisan hack.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 495
    • 496
    • 497
    • 498
    • 499
    • 635
    • 636
    • 497 / 636