Posts made by raphjd

You are probably right. I think CNN is over-reacting.  I personally feel Trump thought it was clever and re-tweeted it.

I agree.  Someone found it, showed it to Trump and he re-Tweeted it.

That is the problem I have with CNN.  For the last 15 - 20 years, they have gone from being unbiased and just reporting the news, to being the mouthpiece of the DNC and SJWs.

If it's a liberal doing it, they over reach and declare it's done for the very best of reasons and make it sound like it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.    Take the exact same thing and have a conservative do it, they over reach and declare that it's based solely on evil intent and that it's shit on a stick.

Think of it this way–the president cannot insist that all states strictly enforce speeding laws, even though that probably would save thousands of lives a year.

Reagan did with the drinking age.  He said that any state that didn't raise the age to 21 wouldn't get Transport funding.

Similar thing with the 55mph speed limit.

++++

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_foreigners_to_vote_in_the_United_States

According to that, it's federal law that prevents non citizens from voting in federal elections.

The President is the top enforcer of federal law.

State, county and local elections are up to them, not the federal government.

San Francisco, for example, will allow anyone over 18 and meeting residency requirements to vote in the school board elections from 2018.

If you scroll down the page, California has an extremely worrying way of allowing non citizens to vote in federal elections, violating federal voting laws.

I personally know someone here in the UK who, despite the truth, signed a similar thing to be allowed to vote in UK/EU elections.

I'm a dual national so I can legally vote in in the US/UK/EU.

Voter fraud isn't hard to do since Voter ID and proof of citizenship is deemed racist.

Stop changing my username.  I don't call you Frederadick.

:police:  agreed  :police:

Hmmm, the first 30 seconds shows a clear agenda against Trump, trying to link Trump to a hate group/person.

Ok, so voting is a states' rights issue, so what is to stop them from allowing illegals to vote?

Many states already pander to illegals by giving them driver's licences and countless other rights.

They need to prosecute both city and EPA officials.

I'll give you that, but I also demand the public executions of those that failed to do their job properly, that lead to poisoning all those people for decades (lead pipes), as well as the ones responsible for the 10 years of toxic water even for those not affected by lead pipes.

Illegals voting is a states' issue?

Griffin- that wasn't a threat.  It was a fake head.

Depp- He didn't break any laws.   US law doesn't extend to foreign countries.

I have no idea what Cusack or Madonna did so I won't comment.

Pro wrestling is fake.

Madonna said she wanted to blow up the White House at the butt hurt women's march.

What good are the regulations and agency when none of it is enforced.

Snopes doesn't have the honesty it did 10 years ago.    They have been caught in some lies that favoured the left.

I'm not saying that is the case with this story though, but a warning not to blindly trust them.

I just watched the video and it's a cheesy edited copy of Wrestlemania where he beat up Vince McMahon.

For whatever reason, some states are refusing to prove they are obeying federal voting laws.

If this happened under Obama, liberals would lose their minds, more than they already have.

I do feel that some states are only doing this to cuck to the anti- Trump crowd and others are falsely playing the "states' rights" crowd.

@sutieday:

I'm Surprised, so Trump supporters here to defend his various conflicts of interest?

Trump using his businesses to generate funds….while President.

If Trump used a hotel that had nothing to do with him, you'd still complain.

I can't afford to live in London, so I don't live there.    The same goes with many other areas of the UK.

So, why should I subsidize dole scum living in those areas?

So you think that fewer regulations would have prevented the problem is Flint?

Ok, let's look at the EPA and \flint.

Lead pipes have been illegal for several decades, but a sizable portion of Flint still has them.   It's not city wide so MAYBE we can excuse it away.    Oddly, the EPA seems to know how many buildings still have them now.

Flints entire water supply was extremely toxic for 7 years and the EPA did nothing about it.   Using the EPA's own rules, they should have caught the problem within 2 years through regular testing.   However, since Flint switched it's water supply, the EPA was supposed to test it every 6 months for the first 2 years of the new supply.

Both Flint and the EPA failed the people.   Neither followed the rules that would have kept people safe.

The USA is famous for getting into one-way treaties which are only honored on OUR side.

Look at our extradition treaty with Israel.

The EPA didn't do anything for 7 years, in Flint.  It was even longer if you specifically look at the lead pipes that were used and remained for decades.

a computer science professor at the University of California at Berkeley

And that is where you lost the argument.

Anything and everything associated with Berkeley (the town and/or university) can not be trusted.    It'd be best if we nuked the place and were done with it.

I'm surprised MSN.com didn't quote Yvette Felarca and Eric Clanton for the story.

I thought liberals were supposed to be the better people.    You know, that's why they cover their faces to have "peaceful protests".