Maybe we should force everyone to buy car insurance too. After all, it's not about need according to leftists.
Why does my anti abortion Christian uncle have to subsidize abortions? He's not against subsidizing preventatives like "the pill" and implants, but he is totally against paying for abortions. In fact, my dad's entire side of the family is like this.
I knew the quote before reading the article.
He (don't want to spoil it) was a notorious racist and only did "good" things for blacks if it furthered the parties agenda.
This issue is one of the biggest reasons I hate Obama.
He fucking lied to the people to get elected. He promised to stop most of the GWB era programs. The reality is that Obama ramped the shit up far beyond anyone's dream/nightmare.
He promised to stop the "no bid contracts" but he still used them.
Obama only hates Snowden because he proved that Obama was nothing but a fucking liar and enemy of the people.
++++
There are aspects of Obama's flip flopping that I don't like, but I kinda understand it as a political ploy to get elected.
As a state level politico, he could support gay equality because the people in his area supported gay equality.
To become a US Senator, he had to get the vote of the southern half of the state, so he severely backed of his support for gay equality. Running for US president, was similar to running for the Senate.
He did lie though and took credit for things he had nothing to do with. He took credit for a group of protections that took effect on 1 Oct, which was more than a month before he was even elected.
It wasn't insurance as such. It was just a program that you could sign up for.
Employee's got free health insurance through work.
Hillary claims that 2 of them are her idols though.
Millions of people worship Hillary. So they are worshipping her politics that were shaped by her racist heroes.
I love referring to he who shall not be named as #45
Hehehe. Me too!
Me too! #45 is doing great!
I also like to refer to Hillary Clinton as "She Who Has No Number"
Hopefully she'll have a prison number soon.
LBJ, a democrat, called black people "niggers" all the time.
Byrd was a KKK grand dragon.
The Planned Parenthood founder called black people "weeds".
Too often, the argument here is: The young, beautiful and virtuous shouldn't have to pay for insurance coverage, since their premiums go to provide care for nasty, old, dissolute people whose need for health care is their "fault," because of bad choices that made them overweight, smokers, etc.
A company I used to work for in the US had a program like this, as a "benefit".
It was an annual "complete check up".
Young people would pay astronomical amounts, while older people would pay very little. This is despite young people getting very few tests and older people getting lots of tests. It's a complete rip off for young people just starting out on much lower salaries.
A doctor friend, who I showed the paperwork to, told me not to do it until I was 55yo because it was a rip off til then.
As long as it's only in pieces of clothing or equipment for work, it doesn't bother me.
There is a company in Wisconsin that has microchips that they implant in employees at work "parties". Supposedly, it's a totally a voluntary system. There's video of this on Facebook and Twitter. They get the implant in the back of their hand between the thumb and index finger.
The Rome Statute only applies to those who force/recruit/etc under 15yo to fight.
The Child Soldier Protocol applies directly to the soldier themselves. If they are under 15, they are not responsible for their actions. If they are 15yo and over, they are responsible for their actions.
The Paris Protocol is not part of international law because only a few countries have signed up to it. As for this thread, it's also after the fact, so it wouldn't apply anyway.
The International Red Cross's Optional Protocol means nothing because it's a voluntary thing with no backing in the international legal system. This is same issue with the Paris Protocol.
All the above is why Canada has not labelled Kadhr as a child soldier. In no way can he qualify as such under international law.
NOTE: The Paris Protocol of 2007 is not related to the Paris Protocol of 2015 on climate change, which dominates most of Google's fist countless pages.
Read my earlier post. I explain the international law.
It's the Rome Statute that makes 15yo and up responsible for their own actions, under international law.
The UK varies by "country".
England and Wales used to force you to pay upfront if you had any assets. This included forcing you to sell your house, even if one spouse was still living in it. Now they wait until both spouses die and take their 100 pounds of flesh.
Of course, this only applies to government funded places. Private facilities do their own thing, which almost always means paying upfront or being chucked out.
As expected, the number of government beds is falling short of need and getting worse every day.
Ain't socialism so much better than capitalism.
New England states also get subsidized heating.
Leftists attack Trump 1,000 times more than righties attacked Obama.
LOL, you are so pathetic.
You are using the definition from the Paris Principles of 2007, which is after the fact.
The International Red Cross refers to an OPTIONAL PROTOCOL to raise the age to 18. They also talk about 15yo soldiers being completely legal.
The Child Soldiers Protocol …....... also refers to inclusion as a war crime in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court “the conscripting or enlisting children under the age of 15 years or using them to participate actively in hostilities in both international and non-international armed conflicts. Why is this? Because "children" are classed those under the age of 15.
I know you're a leftist, but do you really need to try so hard so cuck to terrorists and their lovers?
How about being discriminated against for being a white male? I've been the victim of that. A month or two ago I posted a long message about how it was impossible for a white male to get a job working for the county where I live.
Maybe it wasn't because you are white, or male… maybe it was because you're a homo... or just grossly incompetent.
Since affirmative action, it's most likely due to having a white penis. Civil service tests are treated like SATs where you get to score less points to get then job by the more oppression points you have.
Under international law, he was old enough to be responsible for his actions.
You are extremely desperate to make him not guilty of being a terrorist and war criminal. "he was RAPED mentally"
Again, he is a terrorist and war criminal. He doesn't have the same rights under international law that a jaywalker in his home town would.
Still defending terrorist love Trudeau, I see. That asshole cares more about terrorists than he does about the victims of terrorists, as this incident shows.
I wonder who the coward liberal is that keeps downvoting their enemies posts, but won't leave the shadows to comment.
I'm not sure I support joining the military so the taxpayer has to pay for your transition. Not to mention all the time you will not be able to work.
Why not? The military actively advertises that it will pay for your education. They use it as a recruiting tool. Why should healthcare be any different?
Also the military spends 10x the amount on viagra that they spend on transgender healthcare (not just reassignment surgery but all healthcare)
The military trades education for time served.
Trans-sexuals don't exchange anything for their transition, except less working time. This can be over a year of no duty to very light duty if the transition isn't done in a single operation, which isn't normal. Of course this doesn't include time off for the required mental evaluations and whatnot.
Those getting Viagra are still working.
So, where are the feminist groups on this?! The silence is deafening.
We had the feminist riot/near riot over a discussion about male suicide and we had Chanty Binx and her lot pull the fire alarm to prevent a discussion on male specific health issues.
Yeah yeah, I know, feminists are great and anyone who disagrees is evil. Never question feminism/feminists is the left's dogma.
