The Guardian is a very far left rag, so anything they say has to be taken in that light.
One example is that they reported that 24% of the homeless in the UK was women. They deleted any comments that reminded people that 76% of the homeless were men. They also deleted comments about how the UK, despite gender equality laws making it illegal, gives women priority over men when it comes to getting help not to be homeless.
I'm sorry, but it's the left who sets occupied buildings on fire to prevent speech they don't like.
It's the left that smashes people over the head with bike locks who disagree with them. They even smash people over the head for trying to prevent fighting.
It's the left that claims the moral high ground but needs to hide their faces.
It's the left that fakes hate crimes for whatever reason du jour.
I don't care about being on a side, but I do care about truth.
The author admitted that most of the stuff is unprovable and he wrote the narrative that suited his opinion of what happened.
There's plenty of videos on YouTube about this, many even show him admitting it.
So, let's do an honest examination of that stupid "poster".
It's not about being inclusive since it ridicules a group of people.
It would have been simpler and taken less writing to say; "you're not a good fag unless you're a fag we agree with".
I also forgot that the rainbow flag was a single color.
Isn't it "superficial" to demand that everyone in the gay community be exactly the same?
As we see in the Politics section here, if you don't worship the lunacy from the left, you are a self-loathing homophobe, nazi and every other name common from the hive mind.
And you don't see the irony of my access to the site being threatened for something I said in argument against your argument against freedom of speech on social media? I see 60 is an overestimate.
Fred can't threaten anyone's access to the site. He can warn people that their actions might lead to being blocked from the site for breaking the rules.
More nastiness from the left.
Sadly, social media is run by a bunch of brain-dead assclowns on the far left.
I'm far more pissed off about the way universities are taking federal $$$$ while denying those they disagree with their right to free speech.
I would not refuse to employ someone simply because they are Christian, Muslim, Hindu etc.. but if I learned that a person disapproved of me because of my sexuality based on their religious beliefs, even if I just learned it from their personal social media, they would be out the door in a second.
That would be illegal in most of the west.
Even in countries that include both sexual orientation and religion in their non-discrimination laws, religion is given a much higher priority than sexual orientation. Non-discriminiation laws allow believers to refuse to hire gays in certain areas, but gays have no such allowances, even when the person wanting to be hired is telling you that his religous beliefs say you should be killed for being gay.
Censorship is only illegal by a government body (excluding courts), in the US. The US is the only country with "free speech".
While we (GT.ru staff) believe in free speech, we do have rules about certain things.
and still you've found nothing. as your pathetic president would say, "Sad!"
It's more than the Hillary lovers have found on Trump.
He used to be good, now he's ranting about how good religion is.
These aren't to the video, but of a series of critiques of the video. Devon hasn't made the final part yet, but should have it up in a few days.
Why is it that racism is always allowed against whites, but nobody else?!
My Congresswoman.
I heard about this earlier. It turns out she's done this before.
Well, Harry is good looking so he can join the "team".
The left keep telling us that she doesn't matter, but clearly she does or no one would be talking to her.
Well, 3 of her self confessed heroes are well known racists.
She has also made a few racist comments herself, that are a lot more blatant than the tweets.