Posts made by raphjd

I'll give you guys a hint.

Despite what someone says publicly, running to the helpdesk crying about something shows you care.

We pretty much had this conversation, with different specifics, several times before.

I'm gonna paraphrase RoyalCrown89;  "while I get what he's doing and agree to some degree, he should be a stoic figure and let others do the dirty work".

That's not the person who was elected.

People tried to change the way Jimmy Carter spoke because his accent was deemed by some as too "hillbilly" to be President.

The use of sock puppets (fake accounts created by "you" [generic]) to support yourself and/or your side, is pretty shameful.

It appears this happened here.

I won't mention any names, but I will tell you it wasn't Fred.  It is a current member though.

Anyway, a member here created 3 accounts (I guess didn't know about our Dupe-warrior software).  While slagging me off, a virtually brand new account suddenly popped up and slagged me off too.  I don't remember if the 3rd account slagged me off too, but I know for a fact that at least 2 of the accounts did.  Even worse, is praising your sock puppets for attacking enemies too.

If it had nothing to do with the topic, then YOU want off topic when you brought it up as a lame attempt to insult me.    YOU should follow your own "advice" and do better, much, much better.

I do love how you keep showing you are a hypocrite though.

The UK doesn't have free speech like the US does.    "Causing offense" is a crime in most of Europe.

I don't get why the left would even be talking about this case, since they only support free speech they agree with.    You guys protest pro free speech rallies in the US.

This is an example of trying to start a fight. You didn't make any contribution to the topic though it is important to you. Instead, you made an unrelated comment. As an Admin you should do better. You are supposed to be the one setting the correct tone on how to behave and yet here you are giving an example of how not to behave.

This is a good example of why the red/green reputation bar has no meaning. You have a long green bar but you go off topic constantly. The number of thumbs up/down correctly reflect your contribution.

Still, I won't put a thumb down because I reserve that for bad content related to the topic. That's why I have given so few.

My comment in that thread was not "off topic" because YOU mentioned thumbs down and I explained it, then you got all prissy.

And fuck off with your constantly telling me what I must and must not do.

If you have absolutely nothing better to do than constantly attack me, then maybe you need a vacation.

Personally, I don't care about any of it. I'm posting this because my comment got into someone's psyche and they obsessed on it all weekend. I've set this post up to let all of you say what you think and let him vent all he wants.

You really do worship yourself, don't you.

If you want to bring up "thumbs up/down" then you should learn the history of it, rather than just spouting off about something you have no clue about.

Your leftist buddies used to follow their enemies around the forums and blindly thumbs down everything they posted, even posts filling porn requests or answering question in the Support section.  They would do the same, but the opposite for their own side.    It still happens, but not as much as it used to.

When they would get called out on it, they would cry.

Also, leftists would lie and try to get me fired because of things I never ever did.  They are too fucking stupid to know that the site records EVERYTHING, including staff actions.    One leftist (who I had never heard of before) claimed I called him a "fucking faggot nigger", which I never did and the proof was there that I never did.  He finally admitted that I never did, but that he accused me  of it because I was critical but factual about BLM and the DNC.  He couldn't point to a single thing I said that was false, so he emailed the site owner and claimed I called him those names.

Don't think he was the only one.  Leftists contacting the Helpdesk and/or other staff claiming that I'm screaming pro-nazi stuff in the forums.  It was rampant.  It still happens, like with the thumbs down bullshit, but nowhere near as much as it used to.

Leftists hate statues, but now they want to erect a statue of former mayor, Marion Berry.

He was a racist (hated whites and asians) anti-LGBT, a race-baiter, a crackhead, he routinely fucked prostitutes which was a crime on both sides and countless other things.

So, my question to leftists is this;  Why is it ok for someone like him to have a statue, then why are you so butthurt over other statues.

++++

We put Susan B Anthony (mother of the suffrage movement) on coins and give her statues, but she was a massive racist, sexist and elitist.

Similar thing in the UK with Emmiline Pankhurst (mother of the feminist movement).  She was a massive racist, sexist and elitist.    Like feminists the world over, she never, ever believed in gender equality.    She still wanted men to do all the shit jobs and women to be kept on a pedestal.  She believed it was men's job to die on the battlefield to protect women, while women got to pick and choose what they wanted to do or not.

The founder of Planned Parenthood called blacks "weeds that need to be exterminated" but we must worship her.

AGAIN, what is the leftist criteria for who gets a statue and who doesn't?

Of course CNN is going to race-bait the issue, that's all they do.

I would say it's more common for women to say "I was gonna kill myself in front of him, but the gun accidentally went off until it emptied in his head, and I ended up having to reload 40+ times and it still kept accidentally going off into his body.  BUT, see this almost invisible scratch, that proves I tried to commit suicide."

Women, now matter how feminist they are, they always aim for the pussy pass when it court.

I haven't verified it, but from many accounts, Smugglypuff didn't go to court as a trans-male but as a girl for attacking that retired couple who were simply walking their dog.

Karla Faye Tucker told the police she orgasmed every time she buried the pickax in her ex-boyfriends back.  When it came to actually execute her, she was just an innocent little girl who let things get out of hand.  of course, feminists and feminist groups came to try to help her no be executed, because somehow not executing women is "gender equality" in the feminist mindset.

As to the thread topic;  YES, they should be forced to fulfill their contract.

They willingly and knowingly signed the contract.

From what I've read about the porn industry, they don't really have any long term contracts, except "exclusive" ones meaning they can't work for another company while the contract term is valid.

Bel Ami, for example, doesn't offer long term contracts until they have used the guy in a few videos.  Part of it is in case they decide they don't want to do porn anymore, but also for the obvious business reasons.

it's pathetic that feminists will get butthurt about man-spreading, which isn't a gendered thing if you look on line, but they don't cry about the abuse women in muslim countries face.

Nor will feminists campaign to end the gender sentencing gap in the west.

Linda "the Cockroach" Sarsour says that women should have FGM and any woman who disagrees with her should have their vagina taken away, is praised by feminists.

Original Beiber was such a girly boy.  It was kinda creepy watching gay guys drool over him/her.

I haven't really paid attention to him, but he definitely fuckable, at least for a while, though.

Nope, I'm just bored.  I have nothing to do right now as it's too early/dark to do any outside work.  So it's coffee and GT.ru forums.

A lot of these stories come from "I said you could fuck me if you promised to get me (insert whatever here), but you never kept your side of the deal".

Lot's of celebs sold/sell their soul through their ass/dick/vag to get what they want.

I mentioned the "ultra left" so you got the context of the story.    The slant would be different if it was in, oh say, the Daily Mail.

And YES, political leanings do matter in political discussions.

See, you're a dickhead and you keep trying to pick fights, while playing the victimized saint.

If my Congresswoman Shiela Jackson-Lee would stop all the race baiting bullshit, then she would be great.

Many, many moons ago her office helped me out with a problem I was having.  I bought a car from GM and financed it through GMAC, with their insurance too.  My mom worked for GM as a car designer, then and at the time as a designer of "personal mobility items" so she she could stay in our hometown and only travel twice a year, not the countless times as a car designer.  So I got a huge discount.

Anyway, I was in a wreck that wasn't my fault.  There was a wreck in the intersection that I stopped for, but got rear-ended and pushed into the wreck ahead.  Anyway, GMAC wanted me to keep paying my car payments, but didn't want to pay out on the wreck and medical bills until everything was sorted with the other insurance companies, and even then they wanted to wait until 6 months after that.

I had bill collectors coming after me, including GMAC.  I took GMAC to court and won.  The judge ordered them to pay up and clear my credit report.  They did.  Then they snuck it back on.  We we went to buy our house in Houston, I found out.  I tried to get it removed, but the credit agencies wouldn't remove it, without GMAC OKing it.    They refused.  So I went to SJL's office and within an hour it was removed forever from my credit reports.

Now you are trying to play the saint.  It's not going to work, sorry.