Posts made by raphjd

Lesbians only became a thing with Bill Clinton's Don't Ask, Don't Tell.  Prior to that it wasn't an issue and as far as I know it wasn't a "crime" like being gay.

++++

If a woman gets pregnant, she's treated like someone who broke their leg or some other serious injury that makes them unable to fulfill all of their duties.

Oddly, if a guy admits to purposely breaking his leg to avoid duty and a girl admits to purposely getting pregnant to avoid duty, only one will get thrown out with a dishonorable discharge.    For the clueless, it ain't the one with the vag.

For this thread, let's just focus on the main point; do dead people feel pain.

++++

The reason only a few are put on death-row, is because until they get to a certain point in their appeals process, they are kept in "Gen Pop" if it's safe for them to be there.

Texas, for example, executes 5 to 6 times more men each year than they have death-row cells.

The BBC is pretty SJW.  Name any SJW talking point and they report it as fact.    They de-muslim stories whenever they can.

Without a direct and blatant call for debate, clearly there is a call for debate here.

Does Colin deserve to be MAN OF THE YEAR of GQ or anything for that matter?

I wonder if the SJW loonies ever down voted each others for lies, such as the one Suitieday posted claiming that Anthony Weiner was innocent 2 days after he plead guilty to ALL charges.

Even with their supposed high moral standards, I seriously doubt if they had any problem with it.  Contrast this with flooding the report system if a conservative posted an article that could be in disute because all the facts aren't out yet.

@flozen:

@raphjd:

If you look at my down votes, you will see the same 6 people (only shows the top 6) for Fred.   Someone, I won't mention Flozen's name (oops, that just slipped out),  in this thread is in my top 6 down voters.

I'm glad you noticed.  I assign Thumbs Down for a variety of reasons, but chief among them are:

• Potty mouth

• Absence or weakness of citations

• Intentional leading of threads off-topic as a diversion when "losing"

• Inability or unwillingness to evaluate new facts presented by others

Well, the list could go on and on.

LOL.

Why did you leave out "not worshiping feminism and all it's religious dogma"?

Anyway, it says volumes that you are up there with Suitieday, Wafflez, DrWas and the other rancid SJWs who would follow me around and proudly down vote me for filling porn requests or helping people in the support section.

@flozen:

@cteavin:

You're not going to answer the question yourself?

Yes, Frederick, please respond.  The highly regarded contributors of YouTube deserve the credit.

YouTubers, even the SJW crackheads, are probably more honest than anything on CNN

If you look at my down votes, you will see the same 6 people (only shows the top 6) for Fred.  Someone, I won't mention Flozen's name (oops, that just slipped out),  in this thread is in my top 6 down voters.

Of course, virtually all the down voters are SJWs of one stripe or another.  As admin, I'm sure a small amount are people who didn't like my answer to a question or comment they had about the site.

Even RoyalCrown89 got down vote bombed by his fellow SJWs when he said he supported free speech as defined by the USSC ( I agree with him on that).

Same thing when I finally got 6 or so leftist to condemn the violence.  SJWs down vote bombed their asses for it.

If you are demanding the rocket science version of the answers, you'll have to go else where for that.

Reputation is given/taken just like thumbs.

The only difference is some ass clown can't login, search for every single post you made, regardless of content and spam the shit out of the negative rep.  You have to spread the love/hate AND rep others.

I don't remember all the details since it's coded into the forum software.

Say you want to rep someone twice; good or bad, it doesn't matter.

There is a minimum amount of time you have to wait between the reps 2.  You can do it sooner if you rep others; good or bad.    Even at it's shortest time, we're still talking several hours.

Rep levels are given/taken by others, post count doesn't matter.

That is some serious mental gymnastics to justify Marion Barry and Susan B Anthony being praised, while others are demonized.

I must be a loser.  I only have 82 fb friends.  Of course I know all of them either personally or have extremely close ties to them online.  None of that bullshit of "the person with the most fb friends wins" for me, thanks.

++++

Fred makes and excellent point about how shitty the thumbs system is.  A person can spam the thumbs down button, targeting a single person, then cry that they are being bullied.

I think it's obvious.

A group of people with very little reputation and very low thumbs up ratings (compared to what I had) were able to destroy my over 15k thumbs up rating.  All combined, their thumbs and reputation scored didn't add up to even a quarter of what I had.

However, because their relatively low reputation scores, they weren't able to do the same thing to my reputation rating.

With the thumbs ratings, you can have the absolutely worst rating and still destroy another person's rating.    The same can't be said for reputation.

1.  The more rep you have, the bigger the hit/boost is to the other person.

2.  NOPE.  Everyone is treated equally.    If an admin has 10k rep and a user also has 10k rep, the effect on others is the same.

3.  The stars are your forum level, as are the colors.  Newbs have the lowest with admins having the highest.

4.  Titles (except staff) are based on post counts.

Thumbs mean nothing either when a handful  of users can destroy over 15k in thumbs up surplus in a few months, simply by following their enemies around and down voting EVERYTHING they post, even filling porn requests and helping others use the site.

Anyone can ruin a positive thumbs rating, but it's harder to do that to reputation.    The same goes the other way, anyone can artificially inflate their thumbs rating when they clump together, but it's a lot harder to do that with reputation.

Let me just point out, if you didn't care, you wouldn't be asking.    I don't care about the tax rates in INDIA, so I don't look it up or ask.

Just looked and only the main and the "ghetto" accounts were used to attack me.

The 3rd account was used to post rubbish in other parts of the forums.

The problem is, the identity politics is coming from one side; the LEFT.

It would be "racist" if it was the other way around, but of course the left never, ever believe that whites can be the victim of racism even when it clearly meets the made up definition leftists used so that only whites could be racists.  The same goes for sexism.

Imagine the shit storm if it was 3 white men and a VOC, "at the eleventh hour", decided to run and people started to tell her she couldn't run because she isn't white and has a vag.

If it was reversed, it would be international news, not just local news that happened to make it to YouTube.

Don Lemon and Simone Sanders would be screaming "OH HELL FUCKING NO!!!  CRACKERS NEED TO FUCKING DIE!!!!  WE TOLD YOU ALL HONKEYS ARE RACISTS!!!".

Let's ignore this specific tax plan for a minute.

The headline and mantra of the article are common place regardless political party and/or leanings.

In the UK, under labour, taxes went up and when people struggled to pay their bills because wages were stagnant, while taxes and inflation skyrocketed.  Gordon Brown (the then tax man) told the nation to put their bills on their credit cards.

@cteavin:

@raphjd:

What facts did flozen bring?    The white guy is running against VOCs, aka identity politics.     You told me that i wasn't supposed to talk about identity politics

You were the one to bring up thumbs, so I explained the history of it and how your leftist buddies abused it.  Now you are praising it as the better system.

LOL, you are so full of yourself.   When I'm bored I re-read current threads to see if there is something I might have missed.

It always amazes me when people like you come to the site an think EVERYTHING revolves around you.    Oddly, we've had about a dozen in the 12ish years the site has been going.    The site existed and did well before you got here and will continue after you leave.    You aren't special

I don't bully people.  Unless you mean I treat them equally.

You have the same information on loop: X happened on a college campus + feminism = the white male is oppressed. That's it. That's all you ever bring to the table.

Flozen brought up the fact that the white dude had zero qualification and accepted that it was identity politics; you bring up college politics + feminism = the white man is oppressed. (It really comes off as that repetitive.)

And you forget you brough up the thumbs two days later after making posts that were not replied to. Why? It's not important. Ah, because you're bored. Sounds like you should make better life choices.

The bolded is exactly what I told you in a different post. Do you feel original for bringing up what I told you? Do you feel empowered? What is the point in telling me what I already told you? Again, you can not be fifty. I can not accept that.

And yes, you do bully people. Those aren't my words. Those are from other members. That's how you make them feel. Go look into my PM folders.

Ah, you really are getting butthurt aren't you?!

LOL, "bully" has lost all meaning over the last decade.  Everything is "bullying" according to the left for at least 15 years now.

It is extremely telling that you can't argue anything I say, so you have to argue me.    You try to shut me down by insulting me,  like leftist always do.

I noticed that since you and I got into it over your stance on murdering innocent men in hopes it might prevent a crime, that you became the darling of the leftists on the site.    If you ever agree with me on anything, they will stab you in the back quicker than you can blink an eye.  Ask RoyalCrown89 about the "love" his fellow leftists showed him when he supported free speech as defined by the USSC (which I also support).  As the 6 or 7 leftists who finally, after several months, finally condemned the violence by both sides.

So what you are saying is, your "facts" are the same as mine, just from the opposite side.

IDENTITY POLITICS

We can't ignore the very real fact that identity politics is the main reason that this WHITE MAN is being told that he can't run is because he's running against 3 VOCs.    No one would have batted an eye if he too was a VOC.

Your buddy cteavin even had to strawman my argument by claiming that I was claiming he was the most qualified.    I never said that.  I only talked about the left and their blatant use of identity politics at every turn.

It wasn't as elaborate as that, but that is the general idea though.

The sock puppet accounts have been disabled.

The worst part was that one of the sock puppets was pretty "ghetto"  and the creator of the sock puppet was white.

++++

I love debating topics with people, but we need to have it be fair.

What facts did flozen bring?    The white guy is running against VOCs, aka identity politics.    You told me that i wasn't supposed to talk about identity politics, because in your delusional mind, if the opposing side stop opposing it, it will magically go away.    You have double standards for your leftist buddies.  They can run rampant with their identity politics bullshit, but the other side must never mention it.

AND?!

You were the one to bring up thumbs, so I explained the history of it and how your leftist buddies abused it.  Now you are praising it as the better system.

LOL, you are so full of yourself.  When I'm bored I re-read current threads to see if there is something I might have missed.

It always amazes me when people like you come to the site an think EVERYTHING revolves around you.    Oddly, we've had about a dozen in the 12ish years the site has been going.    The site existed and did well before you got here and will continue after you leave.    You aren't special, despite what your momma told you as she bundled you off on the short bus each morning.

I don't bully people.  Unless you mean I treat them equally.  Like you and your buddies, I am allowed to thumbs and rep anyone I want.    I'm allowed to disagree with you on topics, such as the murdering innocent men in hopes it might prevent crimes.  I don't have to only focus on the specific parts you demand I focus on so your point of view looks better.

I'm far more lenient than most staff when it comes to the crap being done by people on the site.  Do you really want me to get all YouTube and enforce blanket rules, regardless of which side violates them?  Of course you don't.  You only want me to enforce the rules you like, against the people you don't like.  I've been doing this for 11 years on this site and I know how people work.