In the UK, the brats get rewarded for being a little less bratty, while the good kids get nothing.
There's a program to teach kids, who are usually total cunts, to be race car drivers. Nothing like this exists for good kids.
Another thing you see is that kids of recent immigrants tend to do better in school and behave better than kids from the same background who's family has been in the UK for generations.
When people of any race, religion or orientation make deliberately false statements alleging hate crimes against them, it's a reprehensible act.
But these examples are outliers when viewed on a cumulative, national level.
What I see in this thread, and MANY more like it here in Politics & Debate, is a fixation – bordering on obsession -- with outliers, while the number of real hate crimes has been rising across the United States in the Trump era.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/sorry-hatersa-handful-of-hoaxes-doesnt-debunk-the-hate-crime-reality
And when people spend such an overabundance of time speaking only of the outliers, it makes one wonder how much they care about the majority of proven hate crimes. These injustices seem to be of little interest to them.
You're linking to the Huffington Post, who urged male employees, in an attempt to show how much they love "diversity".
Also, why is it that all the stories that make international "news" seem to be false flags? All the major rape cases in the international media have been false rape claims. The various hate crimes have all been lies. Why is Cenk, the Armenian Genocide denier, the only leftist to condemn false flags? OK, sure, as I pointed out, he also plays into the very thing he claims to hate. He too "reports" on stories that are supposed to be hate crimes by the evil people (whites, heteros, men, etc) and as soon as the truth comes out, he drops the story like it never existed. When you call him out on this, he blocks you on Twitter for being a "nazi".
Why is it when a white guy shoots up a black church we never hear the end of it, but when a black guy shoots up a white church we barely hear about it?!
Where have I heard the word "outliers" before? Hmm, I'll let everyone ponder that for awhile.
Hate crimes are on the rise, but leftists ignore them. Leftists love to ignore all the hate crimes committed by their side, with the bullshit that you can't commit hate crimes against whites, heteros, males, etc, etc, etc.
Just because more people are reporting hate crimes, does not mean more are happening. It could mean simple that more people are reporting them, but no increase in rates of victimization. OR, it could simply mean that people are making more and more fake claims.
We do have plenty of evidence that hate crimes are being committed, AGAINST NON SJWs. It's amazing how feminists and their cucks are totally silent on the physical violence Lauren Southern (and many others) have faced at the hands of SJWs. In fact, if you watch the videos, SJWs and whatnot protect those who committed violence against these women. Asking a simple question justifies punching someone in the face? You would think that vagainalists and their cucks would be totally outraged that some evil penis possessor would dare punch a woman in the face for simply asking a question. But NOPE, no outrage by the vaginalists, their cucks or SJWs.
How many months did it take for the SJWs here, on this site, to condemn the violence on both sides? I lead the way and condemned it immediately with the rest of the conservatives following right behind. Leftist refused to condemn the violence, until nearly a year later and their fellow leftists freaked the fuck out. RoyalCrown89 spoke out in favor of free speech and the leftist went nuts and shit on him for daring to support such a vile thing.
If this was real "racist grafitti" then they would have named and shamed the asshole.
HOWEVER, since it's a false flag, they won't.
Kinda racist in its own right not treating the guilty person the same way regardless of race and/or motives.
@Icc:
AH, so you claim that your "teenager" comments aren't ad homonyms, are you sure you're not an SJW?
Ok, oh superior one (rolls eyes in disgust) you are praised for your insulting comments about me, that you deny are ad homonyms.
BTW, you act like a child, but that's not an insult, just a fact.
You were burned in the post before. Very good burn. Insult but not insult at the same time. He is right, no integrity.
This topic is kind of dumb because nothing can be changed but interesting because very different views.
At least I'm not a coward who's afraid to state my views.
You only pop in to sling a few insults at those who aren't SJWs like yourself, but you are too much of a coward to state your views on any topics.
:police: As I said before, either leave this section or post something worthwhile. If not, you could get muted for posting spam. :police:
Odd, I've never been to a "men only" or "gay men only" event.
Events are either ALL or women only.
AH, so you claim that your "teenager" comments aren't ad homonyms, are you sure you're not an SJW?
Ok, oh superior one (rolls eyes in disgust) you are praised for your insulting comments about me, that you deny are ad homonyms.
BTW, you act like a child, but that's not an insult, just a fact. 
I noticed the leftist, AGAIN, downvoted my comment but are too afraid to touch it.
Emanual Samson is a racist cunt, just like Dylann Roof, but no one on the left will mention him or his vile deed because it doesn't fit their anti-white narrative.
Are you really that pathetic that you don't realize what you said? For one, you called me a teenager. But whatever, we'll just let you run with it to justify your call to execute innocent men.
++++
Umm, you and they (SJWs and feminists) want to imprison/execute innocent men.
++++
LOL, you want to murder innocent men, but I'm the bad guy in your fucked up head.
You haven't called for fixing the "justice" system like I have. Instead, you call for murdering innocent men.
You think that murdering innocent men (let us not play the politeness game of calling "executing", it's murder) because someone else might be prevented from committing a crime.
You are advocating murder by proxy.
I honestly hope someone you care about is murdered for a crime they didn't commit.
Do you masturbate to stories of lynchings? It's the same thing you are advocating, just done by the state.
Where's the fucking outrage now that we know it was a ton of shit, done by a black man?!
Funny (typical though) how the leftist media and SJWs have dropped this topic now that it's been proven to be a false flag.
The left got the message out that whitey is racist and evil, so now they can just drop it now that the truth is known.
Shockingly, (I've mentioned it before) Cenck of TYT is also against false flags. Sadly though, it doesn't stop him from reporting on stories like this and get all shouty about whites being racist and evil, then drop the story when it's shown to be a crock of shit false flag.
While the article is about the recent Texas church shooting, it brings up an interesting point that fits perfectly with this topic.
Under federal and military law (and some state laws), it's illegal to kill a fetus unless it's in your pussy. If it's in your own pussy, then you can stab the shit out of it with knitting needles all day long.
You don't want to be a mom, you can kill it. I don't want to be a dad, oh fucking well.
Hmm, I think I see an issue of gender equality that feminists need to fix. But you know they won't because they are vaginalists.
I wonder if those vile race-baiting anti-Gillespie ads had anything to do with him losing?
It's like the recent church shooting in Texas. The media kept making references to Dylann Roof, that racist assbag, but they never mentioned the black racist cunt who shot up the white church. Everyone knows the white racist cunt's name, but no one knows the black racist cunt's name.
Even more telling is that Roof is simply a racist, but Samson is "mentally ill". That's how the mainstream media portrayed the stories, when they could be bothered to even mention Samson's evil deed.
The left has nothing but race-baiting.
Let's drop the "health" argument as that's done through various outlets, including health clinics for the poor run by cities and counties.
When we lived in Houston, I used to take a friend with HIV to the city health clinic in our "area" of town. That clinic provided services for anyone who was poor. If you needed hospital treatment, they sent you to the county hospital. Same thing in Chicago. My hometown turned the old hospital into a medical center for the not so well off. You pay on a sliding scale, based on ability to pay.
++++
As I've previously mentioned, there's the video of the vaginalist being questioned by Congressman Trey Gowdy in a Congressional hearing. She admitted that PP is not needed as it's services are available through other means. She also grudgingly admitted that PP is a problem in abortion funding because it's a flashpoint on the topic.
++++
If you listen to black identitarians, you will hear how abortion is genocide against blacks because of the high abortion rates for blacks compared to other races. Of course, they blame whites for the rates of abortions by blacks.
++++
Crime rates have been declining. That is true. HOWEVER, it doesn't match abortion rates.
If you look at year on year crime rates, then compare that to the years abortions have been legal and a number of abortions, you will see that crime rates kept going up after Roe v Wade.
In 1960, violent crime rates were much lower than they have been since. 1990 - 1994 were the years with the highest violent crime rates. That's 20 years after RvW.
Between 1973 (RvW) and 2002, violent crime rates spiked. Only 1974 and 1975 had lower violent crime rates, but barely. Oddly, 1975 had an overall spike in crime rates, but a minor drop in violent crimes.
Even with the current downward trend of violent crimes, it's still more than double that of 1960.
I'm betting that you looked at the Justice Department's graph on violent crime since RvW. Of course, you would still have to ignore the 20 years spike. You need to look at the longer graphs to get a true picture of the violent crime rates.
SO, DOES ABORTION LOWER CRIME RATES?! FUCK NO!!!
Mexicans in the US and the fear of offending them is a major part of why Americans get things wrong about Mexico.
Most Americans learn what Cinco De Mayo is from Mexicans in America. Even if you have been to Mexico and know it's different, you can't say anything if you are white, because that's somehow racism.
As a Mexican, what's your view on taking exams?
Does taking exams equal white supremacy?
Taking exams has nothing to do about white supremacy. I feel it's a very, very poorly thought and shitty excuse. Exams just show how much you've learned from your courses.
I knew that was gonna be your answer because you are a normal person.
I just wanted you, as a Mexican, to post that to show the SJWs what you thought about it. Also, it shows normal people that not all Mexicans are freaks.
If you want to whine about ad hominem attacks, maybe you should go back and reread your posts, especially to me.
++++
You are willing to execute innocent men to prevent some other men from committing a crime, but you can't see how fucked up that is.
You don't care about fixing prosecutorial misconduct, etc, etc, etc. You just want to punish innocent men. Misandry much?
You are willing to ignore police corruption like we saw in the OJ case. You don't give a fuck that police plant evidence. You don't give a fuck that evidence was left to cook in a hot crime scene van. Not to mention all the other shit that happened in that case.
Your stance is also extremely classist since only the extremely wealthy can afford a good legal team to keep them out of prison, let alone being executed. We could also call it racist since, as we here from black identitarians, "POCs" are poor and whites are wealthy.
You still haven't answered the question. In your mind, saving the life of 1 person is worth how many lives of innocent men? What's the acceptable ratio for you?
Are you gonna follow feminists and say that for every 1,000 rapes, we need to imprison 1,000 men, regardless of the fact that most rapes rape part of a serial thing, not one-off rapes? Ok yeah, that changes with the modern redefining everything rape, but that is a different thread.
Are you gonna go down the JUST BELIEVE route, despite the fact that we know that people lie?
You don't want to execute people for being gay, but you want to execute people for simply existing because someone else might commit a crime.
++++
What makes me a better person than you is that I'm not willing to trade innocent lives in hopes that it prevents crimes.
"The Boy Next Door" serial killer killed at least 10 people in about 4 different states. Chicago PD was gonna pin it on someone else, which you would support because, in your warped mind, it would stop the real killer or someone else from committing a crime. Even the LAPD pinned it on the wrong guy, but let him out of jail when more murders happened with the same MO. Catching the real killer was a fluke and linking him to the other cases was even a bigger fluke. You'd be happy if 10 people got executed for the 10 known murders he committed.
I'm also against willful wrongdoing in the "justice" system, unlike you.
In every scenario you used, I'm not willing to trade innocent lives in hopes it prevents crimes. As fucked up as the crimes you used are, it's even worse to murder innocent men in hopes that it prevents crimes they had nothing to do with.
You support murdering innocent men. I do not.
You want to take the focus off murdering innocent men because it does make you look like a vile asshole. "Don't look at that part, just think of the victims it'll save". Umm, feminists use that exact same argument to justify their JUST BELIEVE bullshit. You and they, both, have a totally fucked up way of "crime prevention".
Oddly, you don't use actual crime stats and target the people with the highest violent crime rates and murder the entire group. Of course, this would be RACIST, but does that really matter in your worldview of crime prevention? 3% to 5% (13-40 yo black males) of the US population commit 50% of all the violent crime.
This links into your stance on abortion. You don't care about abortion being a racist issue (not even counting the "blacks are weeds that need exterminating" comment of PP's founder). Blacks have the highest abortion rate.
So, why are you so scared to be in favor of killing blacks men en masse, but you have no problem with blacks having abortions at such high rates?
Lot's of women are on the pill, until the "opps" moment. This is especially true if you are rich and famous.
Your whole premise is based on executing innocent men so some guilty men don't go free. I can understand why you don't want us to think about executing innocent men. It makes you look like an asshole.
How many innocent men are you willing to allow to be executed in order to prevent 1 crime? Give us a number.
You want innocent men to be executed to prevent a rape or carjacking. How many innocent men need to be executed before you are willing to say "that's fucking enough" to prevent a single carjacking?!
Ok, so you admit that some innocent men are executed. That is why I made my original post. I said I support the death penalty in principle, but not in practice because innocent people get executed. You support the death penalty and say who gives a fuck about the innocent men who get executed, I don't know them. That is the difference between our stances.
But those are real cases, that you support happening exactly like they did. Also, if you want to complain about "emotion" then why did you set up the scenario about my family? It was for emotional reasons. Do you really not get that?
++++
Ok, so which male members of your family and loved ones are you going to sacrifice to this "justice" system you support? Come on, you can't be willing to throw everyone else under the bus if you aren't willing to do it to your own. And NO, I'm not talking about Uncle Jim that everyone hates. It has to be someone you actually care about.
In your child molestation example, how does executing innocent men have anything to do with piss poor sentencing and the refusal to build more prisons? In Europe, they don't "punish" they "rehabilitate". This means they are weak on criminals, actual fucking criminals. It has nothing to do with executing innocent men.
In the US, to get out on parole, you only have to claim to be sorry and a believer of one of the big 3 religions. In the UK, you have to say sorry and admit you are guilty. You won't get out on parole unless you admit you are guilty, in the UK. You also have to sign a document stating that the conviction was just.
Instead of focusing on executing innocent men, make the justice system really about justice.
Stop focusing on executing innocent men and focus on prosecutorial misconduct, police corruption and the like.
Not once have you advocated fixing the system. Your stance has always been, the system if fucked, so execute innocent men.
++++
I believe OJ is a murderer. HOWEVER, the stench of shit by the LAPD, et al, never left my nostrils. The cop that admitted on tape that he (and other cops) would routinely plant evidence was glaring when he is the one that found all the main evidence. Blood evidence items left in a crime scene van with a broken cooling system.
While I do believe he's guilty, I would vote NOT GUILTY if I was on that jury.
It appears to be a family depute that turned deadly. The killer shot up the church his wife's family went to.
It's been reported that the wife's grandmother was shot (no word on current status) and her mother was also there but no word on her (injured or not).
Disney Florida has an age limit. Kids under a certain age have to be with a parent or legal guardian. I can't remember what it was (too long ago) but my guess would be 15yo.
As a Mexican, what's your view on taking exams?
Does taking exams equal white supremacy?
ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=U.S.&pgtype=article