No duh, the Supreme Court has been clear on free speech.
Are you saying I would be totally within my right to ban you and the rest of the swamp monster?
Twitter has set rules for what is allowed and what is not allowed, as a publisher would do.
Ironically enough, Twitter says kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS, but saying "but they aren't women, though" does violate their TOS. What does it say about you that you are defending them.
NYT is a publisher. They control what is published, therefore they are liable for what is on their site.
Twitter is a platform, so they have no legal liability for what is posted. HOWEVER, they act as a publisher by controlling what is published.
Has anyone seen AOC's video where she compared her being the victim of sexual assault to Cruz and Hawley disputing the Electoral College votes?
It's as if she is trying to get people to view Cruz and Hawley as rapists. I do believe it's intentional.
@swegay said in What gives you the best orgasms?:
What makes you enjoy the best orgasms ever?
Netiquette dictates that when you ask a question, you also give your own answer.
There is an exception when it's for research, but you would need to clarify this.
@bc22
What are you asking?
I'm always interested in this kind of thing.
@bc22
He already had pneumonia and then he tested positive for C-19.
At 100yo he probably would have died of pneumonia even without C-19.
At least he was able to die with his loved ones by his bedside. Most people die alone in a hospital ward due to the ban on visitors.
What do you think about the woman Trump talked about in that conversation who led him on so he would buy her a bunch of furniture, despite knowing she wouldn't sleep with him?
This is where you give her the pussy pass.
Arianne Zucker was there for most of the conversation and she didn't seem offended, but I guess you are offended for her.
If you are dressed like a hooker and hanging out in the hooker areas, it's extremely likely that you are a hooker.
Why don't they just legalize prostitution so it can be regulated and taxed.
Street hooking is a large part of how they end up dead.
Ok, if you say so, dearie.
Let me guess.
You view the people that stormed the Capitol as treasonous as well but don't think there was anything wrong with storming the Senate building and trying to storm the Supreme Court during the Kavanaugh hearings.
And we all know someone like you thinks the summer of love was a good thing.
I never implied that it didn't happen to Obama. All I did was point out that it's extremely hypocritical to whine about it being done to Biden.
It's also IDIOTIC to call someone treasonous for something that is part of the rules.
Section 230 abuses are rampant.
Clearly, you have no idea what the problems are with 230. You choose whether to be a publisher or a platform. If you are a publisher, then you are responsible for the content on your site. If you are a platform, which social media claims to be, then you are not responsible. Social media acts as both.
If you can find it, Tim Pool was on Joe Rogan with Jack Dorsey and his top legal person. It's explained quite well. Also, in the Congressional hearing on the topic.
As for Parler and the like, that was big tech collusion. Zuckerberg admitted that they all talk and work together
You still sound like a swamp monster.
Very few things can change from within.
The EU is a prime example. Hell, they are so morally corrupt that they are even getting remoaners in the UK to turn on them.
What has the swamp done about Section 230 abuses? Most have ignored it. While some Democrats want more abuses. Only a few Repubs have called for either ending it or reforming it.
Nothing in government changes.
For 30 years, there has been a push to make pet theft a crime in its own right, like livestock theft. But the government refuses to budge from treating it like stealing a plastic spoon.
LOL, "Treasonous".
Liberals crack me up.
What about the "treasonous" Democrats that objected to the last 3 Republicans elected President?
2001, 2005 and 2017
You are correct.
Even after being in the Marine Corps, I still think of Navy Captain (eagles) and not the railroad tracks.
The CNN has an error.
He made it to Major in WW2.
Queen Elizabeth made him a Captain when she knighted him last fall.
As I said, people like you don't want to drain the swamp because you don't like change.
Your fellow RINOs support social media abusing Section 230.
You guys are in bed with the liberals in only allowing speech that you like.
There is no real push to end or reform Section 230, because the swamp loves things as they are.
Obama lied to his voters, me included, I'm ashamed in retrospect to say.
He promised that he was going to reverse most of the crap GWB did due to 9/11. Obama expanded all that crap, not end it as he promised.
I already pointed out Mad Maxine's disputing the Electoral College votes for GWB, but against the rules doing it without a Senator co-signer. She said that she didn't give a damned about the rules, GWB was not going to be President.
I didn't, and still don't, like GWB. He was a shitty Gov and a worse President.
I was pointing out that she played the victim in both cases.
Of course, everything isn't absolute, except that Dems (except a few) and RINOs are swamp rats.
Realists, under your definition, means don't fix anything and just accept that most politicians are scum.
If those of us who actually cared, just acted like the swamp monsters, then we can just sit back and say "oh fucking well, the swamp is gonna swamp".
Everyone knows the term "casting couch". Not only that, but Asia admitted she knew all about Harvey before agreeing to go to his room to give him a naked oil massage.
Harvey may be a pig, but she knew what she was doing. Harvey being a pig was no secret in Hollywood.
What is the difference between selling your ass for $20 or a $5 million movie role?
Ongoing abuse? End that transaction and quit.
I see your stance as hypocritical.