Remember how everyone went mental because the media lied and said the pictures of kids in dog cages where from Trump, but it turned out they were from Obama?
Welp, St Biden is bringing kids in dog cages back.
I hope liberals get as butt hurt as they did when they thought Trump did it.
Of course, only an idiot would believe they will. It's only bad if Trump does it.
Let's try this one more time and try to be honest.
Did Twitter say to this family that kiddie porn does not violate their TOS?
If you say NO, you are a liar.
If you say YES, then you proved me right.
Twitter even fought the kid and his parents over removing the kiddie porn.
Twitter only did the morally (and legally) right thing because the mom got Homeland Security involved.
If the mom didn't have a contact who knew someone in HS, then Twitter would still be refusing to remove the kiddie porn.
Hell, kiddie porn isn't even legal, EVER, but Twitter didn't care at least in this case.
I have to wonder how many other cases there are that we haven't heard of.
Jack Dorsey has a long history of saying "we made a mistake" after the fact, but Twitter keeps doing the same crap over and over.
It's like how they banned the New York Post for reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop. They also banned anyone who tried to repost the article.
They also listed the official US House website as a hacker site because they posted about the incident.
All of this was a mistake too, but only after being called in front of the Senate, again.
The excuse was that they thought Hunter's laptop was "leaked", which is against the rules. Jack didn't have an answer to why they allowed anti-Trump leaks to be discussed, including Trump's leaked taxes.
Jack couldn't explain why NJ Women for Trump and all 36k of its members were banned, except that it was a mistake and they would unban them.
Diamond & Silk (the black sisters who support Trump) also got banned by Twitter (and Facebook). When asked in the Senate hearing at the time, Jack said it was a mistake and they were already unbanned. Zuckerberg said a similar thing. Both lied as they were still banned on both platforms.
I, and many others, got community strikes for uploading or reTweeting videos of blacks being critical of BLM. Posting a video of Candace Owens, Larry Elder, Thomas Sowell, Terrence Williams, etc, etc, etc being against BLM is deemed racism. Oddly enough, they don't have a problem with whites posting that they hate whites.
But there are so many idiots on the left.
"All I want for Christmas is a white genocide"
*I love the thought of teaching future dead cops"
"My penis is biologically female"
"I'm trans-racial"
"I'm a 6yo girl"
"you can't criticize me, I'm trans"
"white lives don't matter and never have"
"After watching a show about the Philipines, I realized I was a Philipino woman"
https://www.thecollegefix.com/cornell-vaccine-mandate-only-applies-to-white-students/
Typical liberals.
They prove they aren't racist by being racist.
This liberal honkey is who is saying let white people die for racial balance;
https://ldi.upenn.edu/expert/harald-schmidt-phd-ma
Maybe he should kill himself to get the ball rolling toward his goal.
@bc22
Vote totals shown are only for the original post, not the rest of the posts.
My husband is learning Norwegian.
He takes internet classes.
His tutor is a Chinese woman who lives in Dubai.
Biden's Press Sec, Jen Psaki's homophobic tweet calling Sen Lindsey Graham "LadyG" has resurfaced.
Not surprisingly, the wokest ever Administration refuses to talk about it.
MSM, except Fox, has also been silent.
Just like with Joy Reid's homophobic tweets that she claimed was due to her account being hacked and called in the FBI only to later admit she lied, liberals didn't care because she was anti-Trump. The FBI didn't charge her with filing a false report, either.
It seems you can be as shitty a human as you want to be, as long as you hate Trump, and liberals will ignore your shittiness.
You could rampage through a maternity ward raping and eating all the babies and it would be ok with liberals because you are wearing an "I hate Trump" t-shirt.
I wonder why MSM isn't tearing into this guy.
Also, why isn't social media banning him for disputing the election results, per their rules?
HHHHHMMMMM, what could possibly be the reason.
It's always the same, rich liberals demanding we change our lives for climate change, while they live high on the hog.
As already said, we are a sharing site so this kind of thing isn't allowed.
I'll be deleted this in a couple of days
Twitter's response is shite since they didn't do any of that in at least this case.
It's like that Tx police department with all the dirty and violent cops who refused to fire the bad cops until the feds got involved and only 2 cops out more than 10 weren't fired and/or charged with crimes.
Ok, let's try something.
Did Twitter tell the family that the kiddie porn of their son does not violate their TOS?
YES!!!
So how am I wrong or as your buddy claims, a liar?
It amazes me how the pair of you need to use such extreme mental gymnastics in hopes of proving me wrong.
Thanks, but no thanks. I'll trust actual experts.
Even leftist rag NYT admits that the spirit of the law say that it should not be about political censorship. It's even in the 1st section of 230.
The 2nd section talks about a free and open market, which the cabal prevents.
And that is why I call you a swamp monster loving RINO. You, rightfully, believe that life isn't fair, however, you also believe that we should never, ever do anything to make it fair. This is why you voted for swamp scum rather than vote for Trump.
Twitter does force you to agree with their liberal bullshit ideas or get banned. Watch the Joe Rogan podcast with Tim Pool, Jack Dorsey, and Twitter's top legal person. It's clear that Twitter has an agenda and they enforce it strongly. They banned a person for "hate speech" for saying "but they aren't women though" referring to transwomen.
I really think you believe you are much more educated than you really are.
It's like the Betsy DeVos discussion, you knew she was controversial, but you didn't know why, just that you believed it was bad. She was controversial because she was reversing Obama-era shite that harmed male students and other woke crap Obama put in.
You don't know about Twitter's actions. You don't know how they censored reporting about Hunter Biden's laptop, claiming it was "leaked" but allowed discussions of leaked things that they deemed harmed Trump and Co. All the heads of social media claimed: "we made a mistake" when in front of Congress. The mistakes kept happening. Project Veritas showed that those were not "mistakes" or "accidents" but intentional. One liberal admitted knowing that Trump's account was not to be banned, but he did it anyway.
They are saying that all acronyms are racist, so they just changed the acronym.
You're an idiot.
I have to question if you still have the coat hanger in your head.
You admit that just because Twitter wrote some shit down, that they don't have to follow it.
Twitter told this family that kiddie porn does not violate their TOS and refused to remove it. Twitter only removed it once Homeland Security got involved.
The fact that you have such a pathological need to fight me over this says volumes about you.
Twitter totally disregarded their own TOS on kiddie porn, but for some reason you need to fight me over this, claiming I am a liar.
EDIT: Looking at this discussion, I'm not sure if you are special needs or simply a troll.
I did not lie.
Twitter told the family that they would not remove the kiddie porn because it did not violate their TOS. Twitter only removed it because Homeland Security got involved.
That is the truth, but you call it a lie because you are mentally ill.