• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 34
    • Topics 2700
    • Posts 12746
    • Best 800
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!

      @bi4smooth said in Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!:

      @raphjd said in Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!:

      @bi4smooth

      Blah, blah, blah

      You are a fake-ass Libertarian, unless they decided to support hivemind bs, that you demand.

      Mitch is a do-nothing, useless swampie.

      BTW, dumb ass, communists are on the left.

      Sad that your 1st Grade Education felt that that was in error! However, SOCIALISM is what's leftist, not communism... Google is your friend, ask her!

      The point was that it didn't matter where your position was on ANYTHING except Trump... if you don't agree with Trump, you're a Liberal!

      AH, so you decided that communism is on the right, so it must be.

      I asked Google and she said you're a clown.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Too late for this guy... will you be next?

      @bi4smooth

      You are such a clown.

      You voted FOR Biden. The very same man who has made a political career of lying about absolutely everything. He is a self-confessed dictator.

      You are just so fucking clueless. Psaki has even admitted Biden and Co flag people and posts they want to be removed and/or banned.

      I hate Fauci because of what he has done, which I have pointed out. You worship him for those same fucked up deeds.

      You can't say why you hate Trump other than "because he's Trump". I can point out exactly why I hate Fauci.

      Let's be clear, despite your bullshit, the vaccines are still not approved for general use. So stop the lies and diversions.

      The FDA is no more or less political than any other federal department and we have seen how political they are.

      Other than illness rates, C-19 isn't really changing much.

      The Mayo Clinic clearly, in their own words said that getting the vaccine will prevent you from getting C-19. That is a lie. You keep defending a lie. I quoted exactly what they said on their website and provided the link. You are the one making up shit to defend them.

      Social media is where lots of your fellow liberals get their news. This is why they are so important.

      Ah, because I disagree with you, I am incapable of independent thought. Ok, dearie.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: 'Let them die,' Washington state middle school teacher says of the unvaccinated

      @bi4smooth

      As expected, you defend this kind of shit.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!

      @bi4smooth

      Blah, blah, blah

      You are a fake-ass Libertarian, unless they decided to support hivemind bs, that you demand.

      Mitch is a do-nothing, useless swampie.

      BTW, dumb ass, communists are on the left.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Carl Sagan's advise on Critical Thinking

      @bi4smooth

      You still have your head up Fauci's ass making excuses for him, that is dedication.

      How does Fauci's shit taste?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: 99.7% Survive, so why a vaccine when TB kills x1000

      @bi4smooth

      You forgot D, where the President's Admin tells them what and who to ban, as we have now.

      Also under D, they ban speech that runs counter to the liberal agenda

      C is extremely dishonest because, as you and I have discussed before, prior to Section 230, they were only liable if they moderated the speech (publisher) but they were NOT liable if they acted as a platform. In either case, it was their duty to remove illegal content, such as kiddie porn and whatnot. This is still the case under Section 230.

      Section 230 is the special right for "big tech" to be cunts to those they disagree with.

      Let's not forget that Parlor was found not to have been the platform where your beloved 6 Jan was set up. That was FB and Twitter.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 'Let them die,' Washington state middle school teacher says of the unvaccinated

      https://thepostmillennial.com/let-them-die-washington-teacher-unvaccinated?utm_campaign=64470

      More "loving and tolerant" liberals

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Too late for this guy... will you be next?

      @serenity

      In most countries, you are a liberal. In most counties, I am a conservative.

      OK, so you did not and can not vote for them, but you do support them because Biden's not Trump.

      Biden said; "if you ain't for me, you ain't black". My sister, niece, and brother-in-law ain't black according to that statement, despite their skin color.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: 99.7% Survive, so why a vaccine when TB kills x1000

      @serenity

      Like it or not, both of you are quoting someone.

      I don't agree with what he is saying, but your source has also been caught lying to us.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!

      @kinkyrican

      Funny how you do what you claim not to like.

      I smell a liberal.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!

      @kinkyrican

      No discussion, just name-calling.

      Says everything about you.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 'Fact checking' website Snopes on verge of collapse after founder is accused of fraud, lies, and putting prostitutes and his honeymoon on expenses

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html?fbclid=IwAR3z2PNHk9qnwooPQZh_pqtqqJasFNhtZitNKgeti_5lBsnvEabB4OrZhYA

      Remember, our resident fake conservative says that it's completely ok for "fact-checkers" to lie because they are private companies.

      But, being a liberal, he knows that they tend to always lie in his side's favor.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Too late for this guy... will you be next?

      @bi4smooth said in Too late for this guy... will you be next?:

      @raphjd said in Too late for this guy... will you be next?:

      It doesn't matter who was President when COVID-19 hit - even if the Chinese manufactured the virus and then lost control of it, it is not, has never been, and I could not fathom how it could become the US President's fault that COVID-19 hit us! I've never blamed Trump for COVID-19!

      I didn't say YOU blame Trump, but your fellow liberals have, and still do. Remember, you people constantly blame Trump for everything. It was the Dems that no matter what Trump did, it was always wrong, even if he did what they wanted.

      I do blame Trump for "giving up" on the Scientific approach to a response to COVID-19, though! His initial responses to COVID-19 were coming DIRECTLY from the scientists (who were wrong, but their viewpoints were the "accepted science" of the time)... but Trump (like you) seemed to think that if the scientists got it wrong once, they're just a "bunch of losers" and couldn't ever be trusted again, so he looked elsewhere for answers - answers that supported HIM in his re-election campaign! Nevermind any kind of FACTS, it quickly became about DEFLECTION and the CAMPAIGN! (And that cost us many thousands of lives... the fact that COVID-19 also cost him the election was pretty much a foregone conclusion by May/June of 2020... there just wasn't going to be a way - science-based or fairy-tale-based - to "recover" enough from COVID-19 to NOT get blamed by the electorate. It wasn't fair, but life ISN'T fair! Never was, shouldn't ever expect it to become fair!

      The "accepted science", as you admit was garbage.

      I credit Trump for looking at everything that might help and not just listening to the asshole who funded GOFR in the very lab that C-19 came from.

      It's also the same asshole who said that GOFR was worth a global pandemic or 2.

      I'm not a member of the DNC, and you know it.

      Just because you aren't "officially" a member,.....

      I am not the straw-man you're looking for...

      Correct, you are not a strawman. You are the person HERE that constantly defends the DNC.

      The Pfizer vaccine is a couple of weeks, if not just days, away from getting FULL FDA approval (beyond the emergency approval). The Moderna vaccine is just a couple of weeks behind that. The FULL approval process is just paperwork at this point. 300-million+ doses have been given out in the US alone, and the health/safety protocols are already very well known.

      Still not fully approved and classed as experimental with the drug companies full exempt from any harm caused.

      And to be clear: These are vaccines created by, funded by, and spurred by the Republican President - Project Warp Speed was created in April, 2020 by the Trump Administration. Honestly, if the first vaccines had been ready in Sept or maybe even Oct 2020 (instead of getting their original emergency approval in Dec, 2020 - a month AFTER the election), it could have easily have swayed the Election in Trump's favor. Woulda, shoulda, coulda... didn't happen that way. Wasn't fair (see above on fair).

      I'm sure the FDA delayed the authorization on purpose.

      That's just bullshit - especially when looking at the DELTA variant, which - unlike the original virus - IS making kids sick (deathly so). Even kids under 12 who CANNOT get the vaccine!

      You are all over the map. You demand we believe (and worship) the CDC, but when you don't like what's on the website then fuck 'em.

      It reminds me of your bizarre claims that the Mayo Clinic didn't really mean that getting the vaccine would prevent you from getting C-19, despite them actually stating that on their website.

      You're so focused on your social media feeds... a GREAT DEAL of what you read on social media is bullshit - people who (not unlike you) will see a story, don't even bother to read it (beyond the headline or 1st paragraph), but reference it in their own fact-deficient diatribe about how they see things!

      Hey, you are a massive defender of social media and muh science. You previously said you were against spreading misinformation, but you have no qualms about your beloved social media dictating what is truth and what is a lie.

      You've been extremely silent on the fact that Biden has been working with social media, making them a de facto government agency, to block and ban people that they don't like what they say. No 1st Amendment concerns from you.

      I'm so sorry you got butt-hurt for re-posting something that you think was perfectly OK... it wasn't my call, I honestly have no idea about the facts (or, more correctly, about your post) - because I just don't care! But, you are also (apparently) butt-hurt that I don't want to shoot the social media platforms in the head because you got your feelings hurt. C'est la vie. I can live with that. LOL

      If AOC cared, so would you.

      You need a better spelling and grammar checker... LOL Still:

      Grammarly, is pretty rubbish despite how expensive it is.

      • He's only my President in so far as he is EVERY American's President - so I won't argue your perspective there... but the idea of the Government supporting private enterprise in dampening the actual harm being done to our country - in many MANY cases by foreign adversaries! - by removing posts that contain mis-information about COVID-19 isn't scary to me...

      You voted for him.

      Let's not forget what your fellow liberals have said about the last President.

      What would be scary would be if the Government overreached and:

      • Decided for itself what was TRUE and what was FALSE, and then FORCED the companies to comply. This ain't that: the companies police themselves, with nothing but the verbal support of the Government - essentially saying "good job! what you're doing is good for our country!"
      • Decided for itself that the companies COULD NOT police their own (private) networks.
      • Government TELLING (forcing) private companies how to run their business is a bad idea.Government thanking and supporting private companies for stepping up and doing the right thing is a GOOD idea!

      Here we are once again.

      You can't stop defending Biden and social media.

      Another example of this is the recent number of corporations deciding - on their own - to take initiative on global warming. Cool! All in favor, say Aye! All opposed? choose to buy from other companies if you must, but its THEIR company, they can run it however they like! BUT! The Government "Green New Deal" that seeks to FORCE companies into making GREEN initiatives is overreach, and a BAD idea. Companies in an open and free marketplace make the right moves... even if it takes a while.

      My party is trying to figure out what to do Post-Trump, and is being sidelined by the notion that we may not yet be Post-Trump.

      I didn't know that the Raving Looney party has a branch in the US. I thought it was only in the UK.

      If Trump declares his candidacy for President in 2024 before the 2022 midterms, he will DOOM the party's hopes of retaking the House and/or Senate.. and his chances in 2024 are NIL! He has reduced the size of his support base every year since 2016, and it's smaller still than it was in 2020...

      Did you get that from Rachel Maddow or the BBC? Maybe the CBC or ABC? Maybe you got that from when CNN was faking Chris Cuomo was on his deathbed from C-19 but was caught being a dickhead and arguing with a cyclist because Chris thinks bike lanes aren't for bikes. Maybe you heard if from Don Lemon during one of his anti-white man tirades, just before he went home to get fisted by his white husband.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Voter Suppression - a new twist

      @bi4smooth

      AH, we excuse Fauci's antics over the last few decades. You are still ignoring and/or excusing what, as a scientist, Fauci has done.

      I bet you wish Fauci would plop out a turd or 2 while you are sucking his ass.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: 99.7% Survive, so why a vaccine when TB kills x1000

      @bi4smooth

      You and Arnie are the same, fake as fuck conservatives.

      Both of your share the same vision of liberty.

      nazi-germany-nazi-ss-troops-marching-everett.jpg

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Carl Sagan's advise on Critical Thinking

      @bi4smooth

      Clearly, you are a Fauni worshipper.

      Take 2 documents and compare them and if they match, they are talking about the same thing. That is what Rand Paul did.

      The official NIH definition of GOFR and what Fauci paid Bill Gate's Eco-Health to do in Wuhan matched.

      You don't need to be an expert to know that the 2 things matched.

      Seriously dude, pull your head out of Fauci's ass.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!

      @bi4smooth

      McCain was nothing special, unless you are a warhawk.

      You support Romney, who is clearly a RINO.

      You love all the liberal causes.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Voter Suppression - a new twist

      @bi4smooth

      Fauci said that GOF research was worth a global pandemic or 2 and here we are after he funded Bill Gate's Eco-Health doing GOFR in Wuhan, since it was banned in the US.

      You love to ignore this.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: 99.7% Survive, so why a vaccine when TB kills x1000

      @bi4smooth

      You and Arnie are the same "screw your freedoms".

      Not surprisingly, it's the same mantra from the left.

      You and Arnie claim to be Republicans.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Carl Sagan's advise on Critical Thinking

      @bi4smooth

      Fauci was a POS then and is still a POS, but you worship him.

      Your liberal, Pelosi panty sniffing idiocy is showing.

      Rand Paul, read directly from the NIH website, the definition of GOF research. He then read the section of the work to be funded by the NIH for Bill Gate's Eco-Health. Even you can do that.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 280
    • 281
    • 282
    • 283
    • 284
    • 637
    • 638
    • 282 / 638