Posts made by raphjd

https://resistthemainstream.com/pro-wrestling-legend-dead-at-79/

He's been arrested on a 3rd count of Grand Larceny, for another theft of luggage.

@blablarg18

It could be, but it happens so often that some of it has to be real.

Social media is full of people that really seem to think Meghan Markle is some sort of royal that she isn't.

Let's not forget that we were recently gaslighted that liberals don't like communism.

Youtube Video

Quora used to be a cesspit of liberals getting butt hurt about everything. Even the moderators were limp wristed sissies who couldn't handle any answer that wasn't absolutely pro-leftist dogma.

Thankfully, this seems to have changed.

HOW-FUCKING-EVER, the insane question just keep coming.

Today, there are;

Is it illegal to break into someone’s house to get free things?

Why isn't Princess Meghan the Princess of Whale and next in line to be Queen? (yeah, the spelling is how it was posted)

Is Princess Meghan's mom the Queen Mum?

Why didn't Charles stop his coronation ceremony so they could have a ceremony for Archie's birthday?

++++

I weep for humanity.

NOTE: Anyone who derails the conversation will have their posts deleted and may get a vacation.

++++

https://thepostmillennial.com/baltimore-blames-hyundai-and-kia-for-making-cars-too-easy-to-steal-launches-suit

So, it's not the actions of the criminals, it's the actions of the product. Well, sometimes depending on the race of the person doing it.

So if a person rapes someone, and uses a condom, it's the fault of the condom?

Not surprisingly, the left isn't consistent with this. If a non-white kills someone with a gun (regardless of reason), it's the fault of the gun, but if a white person kills someone with a gun (regardless of reason) it's always the white person's fault.

I need to apologize to everyone, but we have a mentally disabled person (liberal) who can't help but to derail EVERY discussion that doesn't discuss things in the way he wants them discussed.

If we discussed raping children and said it was a good thing. He'd be extremely happy and not even both posting. Hoever, if we posted that raping kids was bad, he'd be in here within 2 seconds trying to derail the discussion.

@Spintendo

You are dumb, aren't you? You need to learn how to read.

Only in the absolute most extreme cases do they list te extreme far left as far left. DUH!!!

The fact checkers are the IFCN. Your beloved Media Bias uses the IFCN as their fact checkers.

"They" are Facebook.

I mention Candice Owens and then later in the same bit I mentioned her as CO.

You know, with each post, you prove you are nothing but a troll.

@Spintendo said in Former Prosecutor Against Trump Takes the Fifth in Deposition Before GOP Committee:

Facebook used the company Science Feedback to fact check their posts. That company has nothing to do with mediabiasfactcheck.com

WRONG

Facebook//META's own page on fact checking clearly says it uses the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). This is the same "fact checker" group that Media Bias uses.

Science Feedback may be one of the 125+ members of the IFCN.

Science Feedback is related to Climate Feedback and Health Feedback.

They claim that "scientists" have proven that modern climate change is solely by humans. They don't show any proof of their "fact checking", so we only have their word for it.

I mean, the earth has had climate change for the 4 Billion years the planet has had an environment, but we have to believe these people based solely on their say-so.

10,000 climate scientists have shown that tliberals molest children. You have to believe me because I claim to be a fact checker.

Our resident leftist discussion derailer, loves to bring up "fact checking" and claims that conservative sites are constantly failing the so-called "fact checks".

International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) and its users claim that they are certified "independent" and "unbiased". Strangely, Facebook claims that they are "fact checkers" and do not get into opinion and political biases. This is important later when I discuss 2 of the lawsuits based on Facebook's use of "fact checkers".

Leftists uses a (IFCN) of "fact checkers" which consists of over 125 (not sure of the current number but it keeps growing) member orgs of "fact checkers".

Anyone who kept their eyes open over the last several years will have seen that Democrats were rarely, if ever, fact checked on social media sites. That is until Elon Musk bought Twitter

Liberals could spew whatever shit they wanted and the fact checkers never did their "unbiased" job. We know how insane they were trying to fact check conservatives. They would even change the quotes by conservatives so they can fact check them wrong.

Tim Pool was often the victim of this and he did several podcasts showing the actual video of him saying something and how the fact checker changed the quote, then fact-checked the altered quote. These fact checkers even blatantly lied in a fact check, claiming he was a speaker at some event in Iran. Not only was Tim not there, the event didn't exist.

A lot of "fact checkers" have been caught in scandals. Even Snopes, who used to be good, has turned to shit.

Several years ago, a fact checker from either The Atlantic or The New Yorker (can't remember which, but it's posted here) bragged that she used her position as a fact checker to lie about things and people. Not only did she admit to falsifying "fact checks" but she also admitted that she would lie on social media claiming she knew truth because of her job, which was agenda driven by whatever she wanted people to believe.

Back to Facebook, in 2 separate lawsuits, they claimed that their "fact checkers" (the IFCN) did not in fact "fact check" but rather they stated OPINION. Strangely, but not surprisingly, on Facebook's page discussing their "fact checkers", they still claim that the fact-checkers are stating facts and are unbiased.

Twitter 1.0 (when Jack Dorsey was the king of Twitter) had internal fact-checkers, but even they were extremely biased in favor of the left.

Twitter 1.5 (corporate Twitter) moved to using the IFCN.

Twitter 2.0 (Elon Musk as King) uses public fact-checking and liberals are losing their minds because FINALLY being fact-checked, without bias. You will find that the Twitter community fact-checking both sides. No more free rides for liberals.

Twitter 2.5 (the female CEO of part of the WEF, in charge of Twitter) is unknown because she won't take over fully until June.

Media Bias (worshipped by our leftist troll discussion derailer), a site that claims to be unbiased, MIGHT list 1 or 2 failed fact checks by leftist sites but will list a large number of failed fact checks, even if they have to distort dishonesty to do it. They don't mention that leftist sites lied about Trump's taxes, Russian Collusion, and countless other things. These people claim that things we know are the truth, as failed fact checks. These are things like COVID-19 coming from the Wuhan lab, gain of function, and countless other things. Not surprisingly, they don't mention claims about the environment, COVID-19, and countless other things that have been proven despite leftist claims.

@Spintendo

When you first used that shit site, we discussed their bias.

Everything is shifted to the right.

Far left sites are shifted to the right to make them appear less extreme, while conservative sites are shifted to the right to make them appear more extreme. We went through this before.

We also see that they fail to cite as many failed "fact checks" for leftist sites as they do for conservative sites

Once again, they are part of the leftist bias OPINION spewers. They do not state any facts, per Facebook in 2 lawsuits.

We know the org of leftist "fact checkers" have no issue with allowing direct competitors from "fact-checking" someone they admit to wanting to drive out of business, as we saw in the Candice Owens case. In the CO case, the courts agreed that the "fact checkers" were merely spewing opinions and therefor it was protected under the 1st Amendment. IF they tried claiming they were stating facts, CO would have won the case.

So, which the fuck is it? You losers want it both ways. You want to claim they got "fact checked", while they claim they only stated opinion. Talk about some leftist fuckery.

@Spintendo

Is that all they said about CNN?

Clearly, they weren't even trying.

CNN has been discussed here many, many times and I don't see you leftist "bias checker" mentioning any of the lies posted here.

I mean, they staged a fake protest in London, using actors and were outed by the local shopkeepers and workers.

They lied about Trump's taxes.

They lied about Russian collusion.

They have lied non-stop about countless things.

Your beloved leftist "bias checkers" keep proving their leftist bias by not fully reporting on leftist bias in leftist media.

And yet again, you refuse to discuss the actual topics of any threads, because you know you and your side are shit.

Since our resident sniveling little leftist bitch who can only derail conversation posted about this before, I thought I'd discuss this.

The loser ass clown used a proven leftist "bias checker" who is also part of the same leftist "fact checkers" Facebook and other leftist sites use. Zuckerberg, in 2 lawsuits, used the defense that these assholes were not stating FACTS, but rather they were just spewing their opinion under the guise of facts.

Part of the leftist lies, these losers are trying to get you to believe is that an article that came from another site is the words of a site that reposts it, such as this article. Of course, this only applies to conservative sites.

Anyway, let's get on with the article (one of) little miss leftist bitch mentioned; "Why Martin Luther King Was Republican"

Little miss useless bitch and his leftist bitch girlfriends want us to believe that MLK Jr. was a Democrat, in the south.

He thinks we are so fucking stupid to believe that MLK Jr. was a Democrat. You know the same cunts who created and run the KKK.

YES, according to this leftist idiot, he thinks that MLK Jr was a black Klansman and lover of Jim Crow. Next he's gonna try to convince us that MLK Jr. and Jim Crow were fuck buddies who had sex between the segregated water fountains.

Next, he will try to get us to believe that Emmit Tills killed himself and it had nothing to do with the racist Democrats in the South.

None of the stuff MLK Jr stood for was what the Democrats stood for. If it were, MLK Jr would have saved his beloved Dems and killed himself so they could have clean hands.

BTW, you can google the thread title and see how many sites reposted the article. But I know the liberals won't look because they love to believe the lies, their fellow leftists spew.

@Spintendo

Ah, so that means that you get to use a leftist site to derail every topic you don't like?

You really are a sniveling little leftist bitch.

BTW, John Durham says that all your beloved leftist sourced are lying partisan cunts. Many of them are extremely anti-white racist as well. Oh and lets not forget that some of them are extremely homophobic, too.

Kyle Rittenhouse never shot or killed any black men, despite what your leftis bullshit artists love to claim.

@Spintendo

OH, and every site you and Media Bias like have been proven to spew blatant lies and bullshit.

So suck it.

@Spintendo

All you have is derailing conversation by spewing your leftist bullshit.

Try staying on topic for once, you sniveling little leftist bitch.

@Spintendo

Ah, poor poor baby doesn't like yet another link I provided because it's conservative.

Let's not forget that your beloved fact checkers are leftist, like you, and your girlfriend Zuck the Cuck said they only state opinion, not facts.

Of course, you are too stupid to understand how easy it is for your "fact checkers" to claim that site made false claims, by lying about what was actually said.

We've discussed this quite often here.

But, as always, you refuse to discuss the actual topic because you are a sniveling little leftist bitch.

https://thepostmillennial.com/seattle-homeless-committee-co-chair-glad-pedophile-applied-to-serve-on-board-overseeing-federal-housing-funds-screams-at-wheelchair-bound-vet-who-objects

Liberals do love their sex offenders.

At least, this time it's not a trannie or drag queen. Nope, it's just the average liberal who like to fuck youngins.

Strange how abusive the other liberals got when it was pointed out that the liberals nominated a child fucker to be on board to combat homelessness.