There will be riots, fire, and bloodshed if NYC tries to fight crime.
It goes back to the video I previously posted where BLM admits that they are there solely to protect black criminals.
There will be riots, fire, and bloodshed if NYC tries to fight crime.
It goes back to the video I previously posted where BLM admits that they are there solely to protect black criminals.
@edudorado said in BLM threatens riots if Mayor-elect Adams reinstitutes NYPD anti-crime units:
@raphjd Why u are so obsessed with black people?
You only starts discussion involving these people...
Umm, you have no idea what you are talking about.
I made it freeleech since it only has 2 seeders. 
Did you even see the video?
He clearly said, "We will take to the streets. There will be riots, there will be fires and there will be bloodshed".
You insist on trying to discredit me, while you are a CCP/DNC agent.
That's all I was saying.
Trust me, the guys in this section love to help others out and if it's possible, they will find it.
In a world where we don't prosecute BLM and Antifa, it's disgusting that we would prosecute someone for defending themselves.
Your comments remind me of when Lauren Southern was in Australia and the top cop of the area said that her presence was going to cause the muslims to get upset, so she would be charged with and arrested for the crime of "disturbing the peace". Likewise with Tim Pool, in I believe Malmo.
Why is it that it only applies in 1 direction?!
It's the ISM of low expectations that allows certain groups to run amuck and put the blame on others for their bad actions.
Correct.
The driver of the truck was injured. I think he became paralyzed.
He was speeding around a corner, hit black ice, and hit 2 mailboxes, one of which was the one in question.
https://thepostmillennial.com/north-dakota-man-axe-antifa
Tell me that there isn't a liberal bias in federal courts.
Feng Feng and the other liberals will be defending this person and the federal courts, because as they love to tell us, it's only bad when conservatives do it.
Go Fund Me, allows this twat to do a fundraiser, but not Kyle Rittenhouse.
So their policies only apply selectively.
Trust me, I know Feng Feng will be here spewing liberal bullshit at me for posting this.
Do you mean like even after the trial, liberal media was stating that Kyle Rittenhouse killed 3 black men?!
You do know that The Daily Beast is a far-left rag, don't you?
The Daily Dot is also a far-left rag.
Terrorists can act alone.
Terrorists can be motivated by a movement, even if they are not directly a part of it.
A BLM Activist (Vaum Mayes) said that Brooks' actions had to do with the Rittenhouse verdict. Why isn't your liberal media calling him "far-right"?
Your sources claim that everything is white supremacy and black oppression.
Even ultra-liberal Debra Messing is against the MSM narrative.

DO NOT LIE.
Kyle Rittenhouse DID NOT kill any black people.
Kyle Rittenhouse DID NOT kill 3 people, of any race.
He only killed 2 people, lawfully.
Stop spreading your liberal lies.
@bi4smooth said in Waukesha Christmas Parade SUV Attack:
To be perfectly clear: Kyle Rittenhouse absolutely DID kill 3 black men.
What he did NOT do, according to the jury, was murder them.
Facts and word choice matters!
I'm quoting this for posterity, in case you try to edit your post claiming you never said this.
Kyle, despite what your liberal "news" outlets want everyone to believe even after the trial, DID NOT kill 3 black men.
He lawfully killed 2 white men and shot another white man.
Either you are a blatant liar, or you are just a tool who listens to liberal "news" and repeats the bullshit lies they spew.
Back on topic.
Shane Ferro on social media said that we need to blame the fact that we have SUVs for the attack, not the driver.
Liberal "news" outlets are still calling it an "incident", "crash" and "accident" despite all the evidence showing it was intentional.
Imagine how hysterical they would be if the races were reversed.