@blablarg18 Begins with "Tucker fanboy" which explains lack of comprehension skills.
Posts made by jaroonn
-
RE: France enriched by diversity, while Poland suffocatesposted in Politics & Debate
-
RE: France enriched by diversity, while Poland suffocatesposted in Politics & Debate
@raphjd I'm not "on a side." The world is much more complicated than that.
-
RE: France enriched by diversity, while Poland suffocatesposted in Politics & Debate
@blablarg18 So what's your point? Criminals represent their entire cultural group? That might be Tucker Carlson logic, but it doesn't work in the real world.
As for your, once again, erroneous understanding of Poland, exalting the "Christian" xenophobia of some of her citizens would appear to go against what JC taught, wouldn't you agree? And the religiosity of Poles, as in most enlightened nations, is on the decline. It's really only popular amongst the elderly and the less educated. As in most enlightened countries.
-
RE: Muslims attack LGBT school materials...in heart of USAposted in Politics & Debate
@MrMazda Amen! Also just about any music award show.
-
RE: USSA watch: Biden took foreign bribe, so indict Trumpposted in Politics & Debate
@blablarg18 A grand jury examined the evidence and concluded that there was enough there to indict. End of story.
Didn't you once way something about believing in a nation of laws? Bingo.
-
RE: Tucker back, higher ratings than everposted in Politics & Debate
@blablarg18 said in Tucker back, higher ratings than ever:
What a stud
A Tucker fanboy, as well? Hysterical!
-
RE: Tucker back, higher ratings than everposted in Politics & Debate
@blablarg18 You seem to be obsessed with pedophilia. No matter what the topic being discussed is, you relate it to pedophilia. I certainly know that I've never defended it, and in fact. it is the root of my disdain for the Catholic church. Some people might wonder why you seem to like to talk about pedos, so much. Some might even think you are projecting. Maybe this topic is unhealthily interesting to you. I'm not saying that, but it would make sense if some people did.
- Tucker Carlson
-
RE: Tucker back, higher ratings than everposted in Politics & Debate
@raphjd Hope you have a good supply of carrots.
-
RE: Tucker back, higher ratings than everposted in Politics & Debate
@raphjd This has nothing to do with liberal or conservative. Carlson, a self-confessed liar, paid 20 million a year to peddle conspiracy theories, is in a class all his own. He is the crooked televangelist of "nooz."
-
RE: Tucker back, higher ratings than everposted in Politics & Debate
@blablarg18 Wow. This, and the god stuff, explains everything. Tucker bloody Carlson. Holy shit.
If you seriously cannot see through this asshole's scam, you are so far down the rabbit hole, there is no hope.
-
RE: Liberals are more intelligent than conservatives.posted in Politics & Debate
@blablarg18 Sorry. I don't understand babble.
-
RE: Liberals are more intelligent than conservatives.posted in Politics & Debate
@blablarg18 You need to find some new memes to support "your research."

-
RE: Liberals are more intelligent than conservatives.posted in Politics & Debate
@blablarg18 I assume most of the graded materials you read have pictures.

-
Liberals are more intelligent than conservatives.posted in Politics & Debate
"...more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8."
"Liberals do control the media, show business, and academia, among other institutions, because, apart from a few areas in life (such as business) where countervailing circumstances may prevail, liberals control all institutions. They control the institutions because liberals are on average more intelligent than conservatives and thus they are more likely to attain the highest status in any area of (evolutionarily novel) modern life."
No surprises here.
-
RE: Happy Pride!posted in Politics & Debate
@blablarg18 said in Happy Pride!:
I wish you could hear yourself - how retarded you sound.
You can take anything 'Fox' and cram it up your crusty wrinkled vagina.
I am not going to bother responding to you anymore. You are vile and rude and your hatred is truly disturbing. You may think your playground insults win you arguments, but they don't. Childish insults are the last resort of someone who's lost the argument.
But I try to understand you because it's not your fault.
-
RE: Happy Pride!posted in Politics & Debate
@raphjd Edited clips from Fox Nooz? You've got be joking.
I meant that anti-vaxxers were saying the vaccine wasn't necessary because herd immunity would kick in. Fauci and others were saying it MIGHT be achievable, but in the meantime, get vaccinated to protect yourself from serious infections. That's all.
-
RE: Happy Pride!posted in Politics & Debate
@raphjd said in Happy Pride!:
The paper referenced is from Nov 2022. That's nearly 3 years for them to change their tune.
Changed their tune? I never heard Fauci or any other scientist say that the vaccine would definitely stop the spread of or prevent Covid, or any other kind of corona virus. In fact, they said the opposite because corona viruses are like influenza viruses; they can be mitigated not eliminated. I heard others say it, or claimed it had been said. I heard anti-vaxxers talk about "heard immunity" which also doesn't work and is why we have flu "seasons." I personally argued with people who were saying all kinds of crazy shit. But Fauci...no. If I'm wrong, just show me where he said it.
-
RE: Happy Pride!posted in Politics & Debate
@raphjd Did you read it? It talks about what Fauci actually said as opposed to what others claimed he said.
I really have nothing more to say beyond that.
