Posts made by hubrys

@raphjd said in Epstein document dump - bad for Clinton, Prince Andrew; sorry libs it's ok for Trump:

That still does not say that he did it with the Miss Teen.
According to Pageant Planet, Miss Teen is 13 to 17.
While 18 and 19 are technically "teenagers" they are legally adults.
As I have pointed out in previous posts, both gay men and hetero women have been shown in photos of young male models in various states of undress backstage at fashion shows. No one seems to care. Is it because it's not Trump or they believe that it's ok because it's boys, therefore "feminism."

Wow, you're making excuses for a groomer. Trump's behavior is groomer behavior.

Where's the other nutball with his groomer memes, or does he only post those against gay men out of his self-loathing?

Fratmen Micky and Ajay?

@raphjd said in Epstein document dump - bad for Clinton, Prince Andrew; sorry libs it's ok for Trump:

The 4 anonymous sources can't be verified. They could be lying to make Trump look bad. We can't verify if they were even in a pageant.

Don't like anonymous sources? Okay, how about the source being Trump himself. To quote Trump from a 2005 Howard Stern interview:

“I’ll go backstage before a show, and everyone’s getting dressed and ready and everything else... You know, no men are anywhere. And I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant. And therefore I’m inspecting it… Is everyone OK? You know, they’re standing there with no clothes. And you see these incredible-looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that..."

Remember, the contestants at the Miss Teen USA pageant ranged from 14 to 19.

LINK: A Timeline of Donald Trump’s Creepiness While He Owned Miss Universe

@raphjd said in Epstein document dump - bad for Clinton, Prince Andrew; sorry libs it's ok for Trump:

Also, your quote doesn't include the infamous "grab them by the pussy."

Scroll back up and read the post again. It clearly includes the quote.

@raphjd said in Epstein document dump - bad for Clinton, Prince Andrew; sorry libs it's ok for Trump:

I haven't heard of him concerning anything "teen" but I have heard of him with the adult version.

LINK: Donald Trump boasted about meeting semi-naked teenagers in beauty pageants

Comes from his statements on the Howard Stern show back in 2005 before he'd even thought about running for president. He was a lot more honest about his sleaze before he had presidential aspirations.

@raphjd said in Epstein document dump - bad for Clinton, Prince Andrew; sorry libs it's ok for Trump:

"Grab them by the pussy" is missing the 2nd part, as always. The full quote is "You can grab them by the pussy because they let you."

I think you need to read the transcript again, because that's not what he said.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

Bush: Whatever you want.

Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.

He's describing sexual assault; not pre-confirmed consensual activity. He's relying on post-act retro-consent because he's a celebrity. And judging from the number of Confidentiality Agreements he's paid women to sign, I don't think he always got the post-act retro-consent.

And I notice you ignored him looking at naked little girls at his beauty pageants.

@blablarg18 said in Media Matters gets 75% of budget from 5 megadonors:

cry more

I don't care about Media Matters. As far as I can recall, I don't think I've ever seen any video they've made.

My comment highlights your absurd reasoning, i.e., high executive pay and funding from megadonors makes an organization questionable.

I do hope Musk adds the donors to his lawsuit, but I'm pretty sure his attorneys will explain to him how stupid that is before it happens. Not only is that not how liability works, but also I can guarantee you that all of their donations were made thru a trust (likely a Delaware Trust), which is a legally distinct person and won't get at the individuals whose name is on the trust.

But maybe Musk will make his lawyers do it, in which case I wonder how much money those trusts will extract from him in damages, sanctions, and attorneys' fees when they are summarily dismissed.

Wait until you discover that the president of the Heritage Foundation made twice what the president of Media Matters, and that it received most of its money from mega-donors like the Koch Brothers and Philip Morris. If we're using high executive pay and large donors as evidence of a non-profit being biased and bad.

@blablarg18 said in Documents prove President's son took foreign monies...:

You @hubrys are such a dolt, your understanding SOOooo weak, you get burned in thread after thread.

You're so crazy and/or stupid that apparently I'm likely the only one with the patience to even read most of your posts. You're so desperate to have me be a springboard for your nonsense and bullshit, that you tag me in threads I'm not even involved in. That's how cloyingly lonely you are. I'm the only one that will play with you, and I only do that because I find your madness humorous. Pity the day you stop being entertaining.

@raphjd said in Epstein document dump - bad for Clinton, Prince Andrew; sorry libs it's ok for Trump:

Are you equating fucking trafficked minors with fucking a 2-bit porn star?

Actually, I was insinuating that he likely partook in the fucking of trafficked minors while flying on Epstein's Lolita Express the seven confirmed times we know he used it or during the time period he admits he was friends with Epstein; while also pointing out that he's also a sleazeball who pays for sex with porn stars.

But there's also his court-affirmed sexual abuse. His recorded admittance that he likes to grab women by their pussies.

Or the fact that he apparently had a habit of walking into the changing rooms backstage at the Miss Teen USA pageants he owned, involving rooms with girls aged 15-19 years old naked and changing clothes.

And as to Clinton...fuck Bill Clinton. I don't know why you assholes on here think I'm some fanboy for Bill Clinton. He's a molester, abuser, and manipulator....just like your buddy-boy Trump. I don't carry water for Bill Clinton.

I do find it funny the lengths that you hacks will go to to maintain your voluntary ignorance of the immoral behavior of your Savior, Donald Trump.

ARTICLE LINK

Can you believe that the businesses overseen by the President's son took in almost $8 million in funds from foreign governments, with $5.5 million of that coming from China? And that's just the money we know about! Boy, we should really do something about this corruption involving the President's son.

Did any of the protestors previously take an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution, and are now seeking an office of the United States? If so, then treat them just like Trump I guess. Just so long as you're consistent.

Good job, buddy! Here's your gold star for extra effort. I mean, we already had the Epstein flight logs proving Trump took at least 7 flights with Epstein in the 90's, and that Trump himself admitted in the late 2000's that he used to be friends with Epstein until they had a falling out...

But besides all that, good job, buddy! Way to prove something no one cared about to begin with. We don't need Epstein dirt to know Trump's a sleezeball. We have the receipts for him paying a porn star to fuck him for that.

But again, way to go champ!

LINK: Maine Secretary of State says home ‘swatted’ after Trump removed from ballot

Looks like your buddy Greenwald had to issue a retraction/clarification for his fake news.

@raphjd said in Georgia cops respond to ‘swatting’ call at home of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene:

Nowhere to the degree that it exits on your side.

That's just your confirmation bias showing.

@raphjd said in USSA watch: CO court rigs ballot to benefit Regime; Vivek protests:

The question is, did they look for evidence or just take the word of the side they support?

I see, so in your political hack world, it's innocent-until-proven-guilty for Trump, but guilty-until-proven-innocent....and-then-still-guilty-anyway-because-we-don't-like-her for Pelosi.

I'm trying to learn the rules of your madness.

@raphjd said in Georgia cops respond to ‘swatting’ call at home of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene:

Unactioned death threats are not the same as actioned swatting.
Also, your side has been actively engaged in acts of violence for a long time.

Oh, no doubt there are crazies on the liberal, Democrat side. However, I find it funny how you're so much of a political hack that you can't even acknowledge that it exists on your side as well, whether it be violently attacking the capital, plotting to kidnap the Governor of Michigan, or having their assassination attempt of Obama foiled by the ATF in Denver.

@raphjd said in Georgia cops respond to ‘swatting’ call at home of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene:

It always shocks me that liberals love violence to get their way.

The irony...

LINK: Colorado supreme court justices face death threats after Trump ruling

@raphjd said in USSA watch: CO court rigs ballot to benefit Regime; Vivek protests:

Do you mean the staged video by Pelosi's daughter?

If you had read the article:

Neither Pelosi nor the House sergeant at arms could have stopped an ordered deployment of National Guard troops because Congress doesn’t control the National Guard, legal experts say. Guard troops are generally controlled by governors, though they can be federalized, said William C. Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University.

@raphjd said in USSA watch: CO court rigs ballot to benefit Regime; Vivek protests:

Trump tried to get the National Guard in, but Pelosi refused.

LINK: Trump did not sign an order to deploy 20,000 troops on Jan. 6

Why do you keep repeating false, easily-debunked lies?