Trump relented on allowing undocumented immigrants who came to the USA as small children.. and has decided to let them stay. So, did the LEFT praise Trump for this decision? OF COURSE NOT! They are attacking him for breaking his campaign promise to deport them!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sometimes I wonder whether the alt-right guys really just want to create an all-white ethno-state for themselves.
There you go again! Making caca up! .. and being EXTREMELY racist.
Where did you ever get the idea that alt-right guys really want an all-white ethno state for themselves?
You are trying to pigeonhole anybody with functional brain cells as being alt-right all whites.
I have no idea why the mods in this section allow the alt-right guys to usurp the general rules. Literally all alt-right posts start with insults to their opposition. For example, "Moonbat" this and "lib****" that.
Because you have a very long established reputation of being a lib**** moonbat, a liar, ignorant pain in the ass that consistently posts false statements.. and on top of that.. you give everybody you don't like a thumbs down on all their messages without even reading the messages.. and then deny doing it!
You have any more questions? I wonder why someone like you can break every rule consistently, never contribute anything that is thought provoking and correct, complain about everybody else, complain about the moderator, lie about your complaints.. and remain on the site. I beg you to behave this way in the chatroom. You will last about a day before you are banned.
Again, flame posts like this do not add to the discussion. Thanks for proving my point Frederick.
I don't recall you EVER adding anything relevant to any discussion.
Go plant your turnip in a minefield Sutieday.. I hope the fleas from a cross-eyed camel pitch woo in your petunia patch.
What what? He uses Jared's back channel? This thread is getting racier all the time
About that channel allegation.. it seems to me that there SHOULD be back channels to communicate with other governments without having the communications made public. Of course that can sort of be done through ambassadors, but that has big problems too.
Here is one example that I can think of at the moment: In Iran, they have elected leaders.. HOWEVER, the elected leader is actually a puppet. The non-elected religious leader is the true power, and the elected leader governs with the permission of the religious nut leader. It's very much like a King who has governors. The governor is the one operating the government, but must answer to the King. Likewise, it is virtually impossible to have a rational, meaningful communication with another leader when it is done in public or the leader is not able to speak freely.
In the case of Jared Kushner, it was the Russian ambassador who was suggesting a back channel. Yes, a back channel was discussed, but it wasn't Jared that initiated it.As for leaders initiating sneaky back channel deals with Russia… watch this:
Youtube VideoAnd don't forget Slippery Hillary's deal with Russia.. which benefit herself.. in which she sold Russian 20% of the USA uranium reserves! In exchange, the Clinton foundation got $31 million and a pledge for another $100 million!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHiuGbwvDww
LOCK HER UP!No one is arguing that back channels are an essential and appropriate part of international diplomacy. Most even grant that it was appropriate for Jared to lay the groundwork for one with the Russians. However, considering using Russian facilities to hide the communications from the American national security apparatus borders on treason.
The Hilary allegation is old news. She is not president and her political career is over. Move on.
Hillary is not old news until this nonsense about the 2016 election is put to rest. It sure isn't put to rest now is it? Oh wait, I forgot.. according to moonbat rules, the left can attack all they like about anything going back to the "big bang", but nobody else can refer to anything to counter their attacks.
Apparently it was the Russian ambassador that came up with the idea for the back channel.. so whatever the plan was.. is not Jared's fault and certainly not Trump's fault. Also, since this back-channel was never implemented, nor were even any plans made - it is completely baseless and irrelevant. The world has not yet gotten to the point of prosecuting ideas.
Lastly, I fail to see why the act of communicating with another country is treason. Again.. an examples of treason are Hillary selling Russia 20% of the uranium in the USA to Russia in exchange for $131 million paid to the Clinton Foundation… Or Obama giving hundreds of billion$ to Iran - in exchange for.. well.. we got NOTHING in return for that apparently.
I saw a thread in another forum about duplicate accounts, so I re-read the general site rules. I know that the interpretation of rules can be subjective, but banned content anywhere on the site includes, and I quote:
**_Inappropriate communications that are perceived as inflammatory, hateful, harassing and/or threatening
Inflammatory comments or disruptive behavior anywhere on this site will result in a System Warning that temporarily prevents downloading for a specified period of time. Repeat infringers will be banned.
The posting of expletives anywhere is prohibited._**
Let's all try to follow these rules.
I see you picked a few rules from the GENERAL SITE section that you like.
Obviously those are GENERAL guidelines, that have common sense applications.. which is why there are moderators.. to moderate.
There are rules specific to the FORUMS, and even other rules for the POLITICS and DEBATE section.
Obviously one of the most prominent expletives "FUCK" is used extensively on this site. However, in the future I will replace "FUCK" with "PITCHING WOO", "A bit of the old in-out, in-out", "chopping celery", "Bam-bam in the ham", "Shaboinking", "Bonking", "Driving Miss Daisy", "Making Whoopee", "Planting the Parsnip", or "Heaving Hillary".
It's painfully obvious that the libt**** in this forum and in life demand the freedom to say and do whatever THEY like, but are also the first to complain about anybody they oppose saying anything at all. I have zero tolerance for people that take facts and twist them into lies.
So, in the future.. if someone really ticks me off.. rather than say "FUCK YOU!" I will say "Why don't you go plant your parsnip in a mine field?" or "Go have a 4 way with Hillary, Huma, and Weiner".
I have no idea why the mods in this section allow the alt-right guys to usurp the general rules. Literally all alt-right posts start with insults to their opposition. For example, "Moonbat" this and "lib****" that.
Because you have a very long established reputation of being a lib**** moonbat, a liar, ignorant pain in the ass that consistently posts false statements.. and on top of that.. you give everybody you don't like a thumbs down on all their messages without even reading the messages.. and then deny doing it!
You have any more questions? I wonder why someone like you can break every rule consistently, never contribute anything that is thought provoking and correct, complain about everybody else, complain about the moderator, lie about your complaints.. and remain on the site. I beg you to behave this way in the chatroom. You will last about a day before you are banned.
What what? He uses Jared's back channel? This thread is getting racier all the time
About that channel allegation.. it seems to me that there SHOULD be back channels to communicate with other governments without having the communications made public. Of course that can sort of be done through ambassadors, but that has big problems too.
Here is one example that I can think of at the moment: In Iran, they have elected leaders.. HOWEVER, the elected leader is actually a puppet. The non-elected religious leader is the true power, and the elected leader governs with the permission of the religious nut leader. It's very much like a King who has governors. The governor is the one operating the government, but must answer to the King. Likewise, it is virtually impossible to have a rational, meaningful communication with another leader when it is done in public or the leader is not able to speak freely.
In the case of Jared Kushner, it was the Russian ambassador who was suggesting a back channel. Yes, a back channel was discussed, but it wasn't Jared that initiated it.
As for leaders initiating sneaky back channel deals with Russia… watch this:
Youtube Video
And don't forget Slippery Hillary's deal with Russia.. which benefit herself.. in which she sold Russian 20% of the USA uranium reserves! In exchange, the Clinton foundation got $31 million and a pledge for another $100 million!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHiuGbwvDww
LOCK HER UP!
And listen to the silence… so Raphjd... care to comment? Something about idiots?
I have a story about idiots.. a person who makes a new account 3 months ago for the sole purpose of posting comments in the forum.. and has only used that account to transfer 3 gigs. That's a pretty stupid, bold and risky move.
There's a lot of things about that Orlando shooting that have been ignored to make the police look good.
Here's some of the facts.
1. Although that is a gay club, it was a Mexican appreciation gathering that evening. The regular crowd at that club had mostly gone home, leaving the Mexicans there with there families and friends. Very few of the victims were regulars at that club. At least 7 of those killed were female. I could only find two that were white. There were 103 people shot, 50 of whom died.
2. Every night, that club has a minimum of two police cruisers parked outside of it at all times. This is probably because of neighbors bitching about people parking on their property, being loud, and because police like to stalk adult businesses.
3. A cop noticed the shooter being very suspicious, and at least one cop followed him into the club. When things heated up, the cop(s) quickly exited the club, and waited for backup.
4. As they waited for backup, believe it or not, people (I would assume on the instructions of the cops) decided to barricade the exits to prevent the whacko from escaping the club and any accomplices he may have had.
5. They had plenty of time to deal with. In fact, the shooter had time to make several calls. At no point did it occur to the moron cops to cut the power, and the lights to the club. One would assume that a SWAT team would have night vision goggles, flashlights, gas canisters, etc.
6. The massacre took place 30 minutes after the incident began. Shots were ringing out all over the place. There was never an accounting done of how many victims were shot by the police. Certainly they had to be.. if not at least by ricochet.
7. While the 103 people were being shot, many multiple times, the gunman had time to reload!
It turns my stomach to watch reports of this event a year later, and they portray this as an attack on gays, and that the police acted heroically.
It was an attack upon Mexicans by a whacko gay muslim who was married and in the closet who had a radical muslim father. The motive was to kill as many Mexicans as he could, because the shooter's boyfriend was Mexican. The police could not have acted more cowardly nor incompetently if they tried.
Oh.. one last thing… Not long after that day of massacre.. the ultra muslim father of the shooter was invited by members of the DNC to attend a rally, hundreds of miles away, of (wait for it.. drumroll) SLIPPERY HILLARY CLINTON! He was photographed standing in the same frame with this bitch and smiling ear-to-ear. Hillary was their to try and get votes from the LGBTQ and Mexican community. She blamed the whole thing on guns of course. The shooter had visited his father just 1 hour before going to the club.. and most likely assisted in acquiring the weapons. The man's wife is currently being investigated for HER role in the event. She may be charged as well.
Comrade Comey may be moving to Moscow! :ok2:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/15/europe/putin-annual-phone-in/index.html
This thread is severely misleading because that act wasn't introduced into Congress until after the "covfefe" mess. #45 posted the tweet on May 31, 2017 and the act was introduced on June 12, 2017. So, you're arguing that the president tweeted about something that did not exist at the time?
Apparently so. But facts never stopped them before.
It's the democraps confusing things. It was explained that the meaning of COVFEFE was in inside joke amongst Trump's closest staff.
What is absurd is that some moron congressman thought it would be cute to introduce a bill using that word as an acronym. The Congress should not be used to play silly little games. There are already laws which cover what that "COVFEFE" act does. It doesn't take much to archive comments that are at most 140 characters in length. The moonbats will probably create some agency that has an annual budget of $10 million just to archive Trump's tweets.
Well, he is a liberal.
And David Duke is a conservative.
And "Auntie" Maxine Waters, John Lewis, Chuckie Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and Al Green are lib*****…
It's the libtards who are responsible for all the discord and not getting along.
The election is over. The republicans have won control of everything:
The executive Branch
The Senate
The House of Representatives
The Supreme CourtAnd yet they haven't passed a single piece of legislation. Really makes you wonder who the adults are.
That is mostly Paul Ryan's fault. I don't know why they don't replace him as House Leader. He is wishy-washy at best.
For some reason, this site isn't letting me report you anymore (possibly raphjd's bias) but I'd wish you would give it 24 hours before you politicize the assassination attempt on Steve Scalise's life. This is not the time for disgusting political statements when people's lives are in critical condition as a result of this morning's shooting. Tomorrow, post all the mean-spirited disgusting posts you want but please not today. There needs to be a higher level of civility following such a tragic day.
How do you report the assassination attempt on a US representative in Congress.. at a republican event.. without getting political?
And that my friends, is a liberal.
In his lunatic rage, he admits he lied about me calling him a "faggot nigger", but then he later claims I did call him that.
While this is extreme, it's very much in the vain of stuff I get from liberals in PMs, post reports and Helpdesk requests.
Who does he think you are? Don Lemon? He is the king of FNN - FN News
I welcome an investigation into Trump. Whether he's innocent or guilty, I want this crap over with.
Unfortunately, since the Moonbats are all asshoes, they have an unlimited supply of crap. That's what asshoes do!
They take bits of reality.. chew it up.. digest it with caustic acid, mucus slime, and bacteria.. and voila.. CRAP!
I do have an idea though. There should be a yearly pool of money.. say $100 million.. which is allocated evenly to each member of Congress to be applied to investigations. If the Moonbats want to spend their allocated money on overblown, silly investigations.. let them! Then any money left over at the end of that year can be used in some other way - such as donating to charities - or even funding the DNC or RNC rather than having the DNC and RNC to solicit donations.
Decades ago, publications such as newspapers and magazines tended to be credible, and reflected reality.
The exception was tabloid journalism, such as that done by various publications you find in the checkout line of a grocery store. They mix current news with fiction to produce tantalizing headlines of bullshit. A few examples: Enquirer, Globe, Sun, Inquisitor, etc.
Those publications are entertainment to some, and "news" to the mentally challenged - such as Moonbats.
I'm sorry to say that Elvis is not still alive.. The Queen is not a lizard shape shifter.. Bea Arthur was not a descendant of BigFoot.. and Regis Philbin was not abducted by a UFO.
I lived in London, England for nearly a year, and I am well aware of how their "fake news" works. They have a LOT of publications, all competing with each other.. so they write the most absurd crap to grab people's attention to get purchased. They figure if they throw enough shit against the wall, often enough, that SOME of it might actually stick!
The same thing is happening in the USA now. Forget about truth and reality.. its BORING! News reporters stopped reporting the news long ago. Now, they are all self-appointed commentators and interject their own twisted, biased agendas into everything. If you have a strong stomach - try to get through an episode of Don "Sour" Lemon on CNN and you will see what I mean.
Decades ago, ONLY the most senior members of news organizations such as the editor or news director would offer their opinions on current events. Now, every yoyo whose ass fills a seat in a studio is given the free rein to pollute the airwaves with their nonsense.
…And then they wonder why DrWas' polls are always skewed to the absurd side of things... It's because the media have become a source of Disinformation rather than Information.
You should really try reading the full article before you spout off your opinions so you don't get caught in a blatant lie. A few republicans, including Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, voted against the sale. So much for your "guarantee." ::)
“Today I stand up for the thousands of civilians who are being killed in Yemen,” Mr. Paul said on the Senate floor before the vote. “Today I stand for the millions of voiceless children in Yemen who will be killed by the Saudi blockade. Today I stand up for saying we, the United States, should no longer be fueling the arms race in the Middle East. It’s come to no good.”
BTW, are you saying that we should be selling arms to Saudi Arabia, which has been using some of the money to support the Islamic state?
This is not an exclusively left or right issue: people from both political parties, like Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, have been helping Suadi Arabia and perpetuating the war and this is something we should all be concerned about.
You say I am wrong.. at the same time you just confirmed that what I said was RIGHT!
I said that I guarantee that all the democrats voted against it. I have also mentioned that the democrats all stick together and vote as a block - regardless of their own free will. Republicans don't stick together and vote like mindless zombies. There are a few - actually quite a few - that are flakey and don't go along with the rest of the republicans.
Regardless, what I said was entirely correct.
Fox News is reporting the story as "according to the Washington Post".
The Washington Post bases it's story on 5 anonymous sources.
"Officials said"
I don't trust a story based solely on "officials said".
CNN is fake news; "ah poor poor white people" "It aint no hate crime" "we did everything possible to ensure Hillary would win"
Trump most likely is under investigation for obstruction, but to be fair, that does not mean that the evidence will support it. I think we all need not to get ahead of our skis here. We have all been spoiled by 5 breaking news items in a day. These investigations usually take months, if not years.
That might actually be a good thing for Trump. Rather than have a daily slew of silly attacks on Trump, the moonbats will be stuck with that big turd of Mueller's investigation that is going nowhere. The longer it goes on, the more it will look like a Witch Hunt, and the more foolish the lib***** will look.
This is entirely "fake news".
No, it's real news. Several outlets have already confirmed that Mueller is investigating Trump for obstructing justice.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/14/politics/robert-mueller-donald-trump/index.html
No.. it's all fake news. Yes, they are doing an investigation.. an investigation of nothing. They might as well investigate if the Tooth Fairy really exists.. and if so, can the Tooth Fairy sue for slander for being referred to as a "Fairy"?
In fact.. you have inspired me to write a new topic related to this.. "Tabloid News"
