Posts made by Frederick

Frederick

Everyday, the moonbats feed me more ammunition to further put them in their places.
They post their garbage.. which is like saying "Check" in chess…
Then I or someone else with a functioning brain corrects them.. and that is 'Checkmate!"

Frederick

@aadam101:

Trump has flip flopped again. Trump has now decided that to reinstate the embargo and travel restrictions to Cuba. This is a complete turnaround from his treasonous acts he committed in the 90's when he violated the embargo as a citizen and did business in Cuba. He should be in jail.

Again, you are lying, and misstating the facts.
An independent consulting firm did business with Cuba. Trumps organization later reimbursed the consulting firm. Nothing illegal about that.

Frederick

@aadam101:

It's true what they say. Conservatism is a mental disorder. Once again it is proven what a bunch of perverts Republicans are. In the 90's these people were obsessed with who Bill Clinton was canoodling in the Oval Office but they are perfectly willing to look the other way when it comes to Russian collusion.

"Technically, the president of the United States cannot obstruct justice,'" he said, adding, "If he wants to fire the FBI director, all he has to do is fire him."

But as House speaker in 1998, Gingrich argued the opposite point. As reported by the The Times and other news outlets at the time, when referring to the investigation into President Clinton after his repeated denials of having an affair with Monica Lewinsky, Gingrich described Clinton's actions as "obstruction of justice."

"What you have lived through for 2.5 long years is the most systematic, deliberate obstruction-of-justice cover-up and effort to avoid the truth we have ever seen in American history," he said. Video of that statement was resurfaced in a 2011 CNN profile on him after he announced the launch of his presidential exploratory committee.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-essential-washington-updates-newt-gingrich-says-president-cannot-1497636327-htmlstory.html

It's cute that you chopped off the last paragraph of that article - which turns your comment around:

Ultimately, Gingrich's House charged Clinton with obstruction of justice, as stated in Article III of the House Judiciary Committee's report that urged his impeachment: "Although, the actions of President Clinton do not have to rise to the level of violating the the federal statute regarding obstruction of justice in order to justify impeachment, some if not all of his actions clearly do."

Frederick

@flozen:

While the percentages vary by study, mhorndisk is correct in noting the world's growing consumption of "food animals," and the sizable amount of methane they create, is a particularly harmful element related to climate change. There's a lot of supportive data out there, but here's a nice article from NPR…

http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2014/04/11/301794415/gassy-cows-are-warming-the-planet-and-theyre-here-to-stay

Bearing in mind that agriculture accounted for nine percent of greenhouse gasses by sector: "In 2011, methane from livestock accounted for 39 percent of all the greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, according to a report that United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization released Friday. That's more than synthetic fertilizer or deforestation."

So yes, mhorn's numbers are inflated. And yet, animals/methane remains an important part of the climate change equation.

mhorn, it's my sense that you get downvoted – even here, on a topic in which many of us agree with parts of your position -- because your forum manners are so very poor. And yes, we know you don't care.

Why the need, on this thread, for umpteen little, enraged, complaining replies to your own message? When you routinely type with all those screaming caps -- here, DEAD FLESH and such -- you do your case more harm than good. It's called self-control, and until you learn some, you'll get down-votes -- even on issues where you might have unexpected allies.

Here's a thought.. to cut man made emissions.. put the brakes on population growth.

For now,
"Gassy cows are here to stay, the skies above are dark today.
Let's stick a cork in Elsie's ass, she's been grazing on too much green grass.
There's a heap of dung coming out her ass.
Between the moonbat guano and bovine shit.. Gassy cows are here to stayyyyyy! "

Youtube Video

Frederick

Earlier today, Bill Cosby's trial was declared a mistrial.
The media are acting as if this means Dr. William Henry Cosby is acquitted.
As shocking as this is to even me, lawyers and judges are often ignorant of the law.
Unless the mistrial was the fault of the prosecution, a mistrial means there will be a NEW trial.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/bill-cosby-rape-case-ends-in-mistrial-actor-was-facing-10-years-behind-bars/ar-BBCOagy?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

Frederick

@sutieday:

@mhorndisk:

Dude. Those disclosures don't SAY anything! Why are you acting like they are relevant? Why can't you look into Anderson Cooper's family? Why can't you look into the Hillary dealings with Russia? Because you just don't want to hear it. It's fine. It's why Trump won. Because you guys can't handle the Truth.

Why do you hate facts, science, and logic?

No, he loves facts, science, and logic.
He hates YOU.
I hope you at least have a nice ass. They you are good for something.

Frederick

@aadam101:

@mhorndisk:

Dude. Those disclosures don't SAY anything! Why are you acting like they are relevant? Why can't you look into Anderson Cooper's family? Why can't you look into the Hillary dealings with Russia? Because you just don't want to hear it. It's fine. It's why Trump won. Because you guys can't handle the Truth.

Trump disagrees with you.

"I released the most extensive financial review of anybody in the history of politics. … You don't learn much in a tax return."
— Donald Trump on Tuesday, September 6th, 2016 in an interview with ABC News

There you go again! Twisting people's comments 180 degrees.
Youtube Video

You know very well that he meant that the disclosures didn't say anything damaging about Trump.. they are nothing. They are irrelevant.

Frederick

@aadam101:

We want to kill them too. We do it all the time.

It turns my stomach how you are comparing apples with oranges. There is no comparison between their actions and ours.
Oh.. with one exeception.. when Obama was using drones to attack wedding parties to incite retaliation from the muslims.

Frederick

@pppucci:

@Frederick:

Seems that Comey stole a lot of top secret / classified / confidential documents that are the property of the United States after he was fired. That's a massive no-no. Bad boy, bad boy.. what's he gonna do? What's he gonna do when they comey for him? :police:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/16/judicial-watch-seeking-documents-unlawfully-removed-by-comey.html

Youtube Video

The article refers to the unclassified memos that Comey wrote himself about his conversations with the President. No matter what you believe about the deliberate release of these to the public, don't imply it is more than it is.

Don't know the specifics.. however, Comey had no business removing anything. Even his own memos are the property of the United States.
There is more to this. After being fired, Comey handed over a big fat package of documents related to Trump to Herr Mueller. It was illegal for him to do that. Those were not his documents to give.. he stole them.

I actually find this witch hunt amusing. A witch hunt that goes nowhere winds up making fools of those perpetrating it.

Frederick

@pppucci:

@Frederick:

@pppucci:

I saw a thread in another forum about duplicate accounts, so I re-read the general site rules. I know that the interpretation of rules can be subjective, but banned content anywhere on the site includes, and I quote:

**_Inappropriate communications that are perceived as inflammatory, hateful, harassing and/or threatening

Inflammatory comments or disruptive behavior anywhere on this site will result in a System Warning that temporarily prevents downloading for a specified period of time. Repeat infringers will be banned.

The posting of expletives anywhere is prohibited._**

Let's all try to follow these rules.

I see you picked a few rules from the GENERAL SITE section that you like.
Obviously those are GENERAL guidelines, that have common sense applications.. which is why there are moderators.. to moderate.
There are rules specific to the FORUMS, and even other rules for the POLITICS and DEBATE section.

Obviously one of the most prominent expletives "FUCK" is used extensively on this site. However, in the future I will replace "FUCK" with "PITCHING WOO", "A bit of the old in-out, in-out", "chopping celery", "Bam-bam in the ham", "Shaboinking", "Bonking", "Driving Miss Daisy", "Making Whoopee", "Planting the Parsnip", or "Heaving Hillary".

It's painfully obvious that the libt**** in this forum and in life demand the freedom to say and do whatever THEY like, but are also the first to complain about anybody they oppose saying anything at all. I have zero tolerance for people that take facts and twist them into lies.

So, in the future.. if someone really ticks me off.. rather than say "FUCK YOU!" I will say "Why don't you go plant your parsnip in a mine field?" or "Go have a 4 way with Hillary, Huma, and Weiner".

Site rules do not trump (pun intended) forum rules.
As far as this site goes, FUCK is not only an expletive and is most often used to describe a sexual act, like Jack fucks John, But if you say, "FUCK OFF Drwas!" then that clearly is an expletive. If you search for that word in the forums, you will see the difference in use between this forum and all the others.

In terms of twisting facts into lies–-people in glass houses....

And now, I am off to plant my parsnip in a mine field and then off to the four-way. :crazy2: :cheers:

This is for the moonbats - a muslim explains the proper usage of the word "FUCK"
Youtube Video

Frederick

Seems that Comey stole a lot of top secret / classified / confidential documents that are the property of the United States after he was fired. That's a massive no-no. Bad boy, bad boy.. what's he gonna do? What's he gonna do when they comey for him? :police:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/16/judicial-watch-seeking-documents-unlawfully-removed-by-comey.html

Youtube Video

Frederick

@sutieday:

Seven US sailors are missing and the commanding officer of a US destroyer is among the injured after the warship collided with a merchant ship off the coast of Japan, the US Navy said Friday.
The USS Fitzgerald suffered damage to its starboard side above and below the waterline in the incident.
Cmdr. Bryce Benson was one of three injured sailors who needed to be flown to a naval hospital in Yokosuka, Japan. He is in stable condition, the Navy said.

US Navy Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson said three sailors were medevaced.
Other injured sailors are being assessed, the Navy said.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/politics/us-navy-destroyer-collides-with-merchant-ship-japan/index.html

–-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How does a US navy ship collide with a merchant ship? A navy ship with weapons, radar, and navigation tech vs a trading vessel???

US wouldn't even need to be there if it weren't for Tomahawk Trump.

"Tomahawk" Trump? Hmm.. sounds like you are being racist here.. attacking our native American Indians? That's against the rules you so often are wailing about.

This story has me puzzled. The media are reporting this as the Navy destroyer colliding with the merchant ship. Yet, the pictures don't show that. There is a massive difference between being the one that is hit.. and being the one that did the hitting.
The photos show that the front (bow) of the merchant ship is damaged, while the side (starboard / right side) of the Navy Destroyer is damaged. In other words, the merchant ship rammed into the side of the Navy destroyer unless the captain of the destroyer has some secret method of travelling through the water sideways.

Frederick

@aadam101:

Trump lied about releasing his tax returns. He said he would release them when they were not under audit. His 2016 return isn't under audit since he filed for an extension a couple weeks ago. He has not submitted them yet.

Don't be that stupid.
Obviously if previous returns are under audit, then subsequent returns also are tied to those audits.

Besides that, there is no obligation for a president to submit their tax returns. Do you submit your tax return to your employer or publish it in your local newspaper?

I don't recall the news media being upset that Obama did not provide a birth certificate until 1.5 years AFTER being elected president.. and even then.. (cough cough).

Frederick

@mhorndisk:

I'm not sure why all you liberals want to act like Sharia Law is like something out of a Disney movie. It's not. They literally are ruthless in their pursuit to murder every last homosexual on the planet. How can you possibly be so deranged? It's disgusting. Aladdin is a fairy tale, a fantasy. It's not an accurate reflection of Islam or their die-hard beliefs. I am not saying that all Muslims are bad or evil, but the majority of them in fact want you dead, and that's a fact. Why you aren't getting it is unbelievably stupid.

They think Sharia Law is a Stevie Wonder song
Youtube Video

Frederick

@sutieday:

@raphjd:

@sutieday:

Sometimes I wonder whether the alt-right guys really just want to create an all-white ethno-state for themselves.

Such a dumb ass statement.

No, many on the far-right (alt-right) want to ban immigrants from all countries except Europe, and even then only allow those that are white. Conservative extremists like Ann Counter have suggested this. So to claim that some may have this idea of a whites only ethno-state is not so farfetched.

It is farfetched honey.
Also, if you are going to say things like that, you need to provide a link to what you are talking about. I know you like to make things up yourself, and don't want to be constrained by actual facts.

I went ahead and looked up for you. What Coulter said was there should be a TEMPORARY ban on immigration from ALL countries. She didn't exclude Europe, and said nothing about white people.
Just how long do you think you should be allowed to post blatantly false statements in this forum without being muted? What's that thing you are always doing to other people? Oh yeah.. I remember..

Frederick

@pppucci:

@Frederick:

Trump relented on allowing undocumented immigrants who came to the USA as small children.. and has decided to let them stay. So, did the LEFT praise Trump for this decision? OF COURSE NOT! They are attacking him for breaking his campaign promise to deport them!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-will-allow-%E2%80%98dreamers%E2%80%99-to-stay-in-us-reversing-campaign-promise/ar-BBCLECc?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

The article you cite has has one paragraph about half-way down that states

" A decision to maintain the DACA program would be a reversal from Mr. Trump’s anti-immigrant language during the campaign and would disappoint some of the president’s most ardent supporters, who view the program started by Mr. Obama as an illegal grant of amnesty. During the campaign, Mr. Trump repeatedly agreed with that sentiment. "

How is that an attack?

The gist of the article is the ambiguity between DHS and White House statements, implying Trump has yet to decide on the issue.

In this case, you got understandably confused by the sequence of messages. What happened is that ding-bat Sutieday was attacking Trump about this in another thread, and again in this thread (she does that a lot). That article isn't attacking Trump. The moonbats including Sutieday are.

Frederick

@sutieday:

@Frederick:

@sutieday:

@Frederick:

Trump relented on allowing undocumented immigrants who came to the USA as small children.. and has decided to let them stay. So, did the LEFT praise Trump for this decision? OF COURSE NOT! They are attacking him for breaking his campaign promise to deport them!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-will-allow-%E2%80%98dreamers%E2%80%99-to-stay-in-us-reversing-campaign-promise/ar-BBCLECc?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

So, you want the media to ignore Trump's flipflops? If he didn't flipflop, you could argue that he's just doing what he said he would do.

He didn't flip-flop. A flip-flop would mean that he is now for something he was against.. or vice versa. I guarantee you that Trump is not encouraging illegal immigrant children to stay in the USA. He is just softening his stance on illegal immigrants. He is still doing his best to stop illegal immigration.. but he's making a concession in the case of children. Now, aren't you going to praise him? Isn't Trump a nice guy? Go ahead.. say something nice about Trump.. it won't kill you.
Hmm.. I take that back. It probably would kill you to say anything nice about Trump.

Trump is a flipflopper in chief, and you can't "guarantee" anything because you are not part of Trump's inner circle. Jeez, Trump shills will spin anything.

If there was even one person on this site that had the guts to agree with you.. I would be upset. But since nobody gives a diddly doo about what you say.. I will just ignore you this time for repeating the same thing 3 times.

Frederick

@brettw97:

Our policy on Chechnya makes it a dumpster fire. When the Sovet Union fell apart, Chechnya fought a war a separatist war to break away from Yeltsin's Russia. Yeltsin fought to keep Chechnya. When Putin came to power, the war was raging, and the US forced a settlement down Russia's throat, who was weak at that time, to allow Russia to keep Chechnya in exchange for Muslim autonomy in Chechnya. Any change on our position in Chechnya permits Putin to reopen that can of worms. We never should have forced the original Chechnya settlement on Russia.

Be careful. The liberals have made up their own rule that they won't discuss anything from the past on which we now know the facts. All they want to talk about is speculation, anonymous sources, and current investigations. Do not antagonize them with facts! How DARE you disrupt their fantasies!
To redeem yourself, I suggest you purchase a case of Play Doh and a box of coloring books, and donate them to your nearest liberal college. And do NOT forget to include crayons! In fact, include EXTRA crayons because they like to chew on them.

Frederick

@sutieday:

@Frederick:

Trump relented on allowing undocumented immigrants who came to the USA as small children.. and has decided to let them stay. So, did the LEFT praise Trump for this decision? OF COURSE NOT! They are attacking him for breaking his campaign promise to deport them!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-will-allow-%E2%80%98dreamers%E2%80%99-to-stay-in-us-reversing-campaign-promise/ar-BBCLECc?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

So, you want the media to ignore Trump's flipflops? If he didn't flipflop, you could argue that he's just doing what he said he would do.

He didn't flip-flop. A flip-flop would mean that he is now for something he was against.. or vice versa. I guarantee you that Trump is not encouraging illegal immigrant children to stay in the USA. He is just softening his stance on illegal immigrants. He is still doing his best to stop illegal immigration.. but he's making a concession in the case of children. Now, aren't you going to praise him? Isn't Trump a nice guy? Go ahead.. say something nice about Trump.. it won't kill you.
Hmm.. I take that back. It probably would kill you to say anything nice about Trump.

Frederick

@brettw97:

Actually, the police did screw up royally here. Several family members in law enforce. New SOP for active shooter/mass casualty situations is not to wait and establish perimeter. Post-Columbine the SOP is to immediately charge in, neutralize the threat, and secure the scene for EMS. None of that occurred here. The police held back waited for SWAT, tried to negotiate. None of this is SOP.

May a new virgin twink appear at the foot of your bed every evening!
I would add one thing though.. this situation didn't blow up into a mass casualty situation until well AFTER the SWAT team arrived. Had the cop done his job to begin with, this massacre would have been avoided. I would also add that not one of the police suffered a significant injury. 103 people injured, 50 of them killed. I wouldn't be surprised if over 1000 rounds of ammunition were bouncing off the walls in there, and yet not one significant injury to a cop? I cannot believe that any of the cops put themselves in any great danger. Should a cop put themselves in danger? Well.. YES! That is what they are PAID for. If my job is to clean a restroom or be a plumber, my job would include dealing with human feces. If my job is to fight a war, I have to fight that war and not hide in an underground bunker.
Last year, a cop chased a car with young girls in it at very high speeds. That is mistake #1. They should have kept their distance and waited for other patrol cars to intercept them. Instead, they went chasing them like an episode of "The Dukes Of Hazzard" putting pedestrians and other cards at risk. The 3 girls - perhaps only the one driving was a criminal - wound up driving into a retention pond. The car started to sink. 20 officers surrounded the retention pond and not one of them went in to attempt any rescue.. not even the cops that were hired as trained divers. It was night time, and they were afraid their might be snakes in the retention pond. All 3 girls drowned. The criminal sheriff defended the cops actions (and got re-elected on Nov 8, 2016).
Being a cop is one of the most difficult jobs there is.. and sadly.. there are very few cops who do their job competently. If I call a cop.. I expect Joe Friday and Frank Gannon to show up.. not Barney Fife or the cast of Reno 911.