Posts made by Frederick

@pppucci:

@mhorndisk:

The only reason you don't like it is because you were finally forced to admit you were wrong, and Trump was right. He was right, but you just can't give him that, because you are full of nothing but hate for the guy. It doesn't matter if he was right. You are just going to hate him regardless. If he cured cancer, you'd still hate him.

What was he right about? That he would win the election?  Yes I admit he was right about that.  That Hillary is a criminal?  No I won't admit that.  Everyone in this country is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.  Not in the court of public opinion.  And the FBI did not even recommend an indictment.   So why don't you admit that you were wrong?

"Everyone in this country is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law"?  Are you that naïve?  Tell that to all the people that cops kill for no good reason at all.    Tell that to all the people put into prison with convicts.. before they even go to trial.

@pppucci:

Her husband, Sid Williams is an ex-NFL star.

Sigh..here we go again…
Her husband Sid Williams did play football.. 50 years ago.  he was hardly a star.. and back in those days, football players weren't paid squat, especially black ones.  He is most famous for speaking out in defense of Cassius Clay for being a draft dodger.  Interesting that Cassius never spoke out against the Vietnam War or OTHER people being drafted until AFTER he was drafted.  Muhammad Ali had no problem bashing in people's brains with his fists, but didn't want to get in any fight that he might get hurt.

In his entire NFL career, Sid had 1 touchdown, 1 interception, 1 recovered fumble.  He played a total of 70 games.  I'm pretty sure that if my grandmother played football, she would have better statistics than that.

Sid then went on to be a car salesman for 15 years.. then went on to be the ambassador to the Bahamas for 8 years.. and apparently has been sitting his ass on the couch for the past 19 years.    So again.. where did Maxine Waters get that $4.3 million?

Members of the House of Representatives are paid roughly $174,000 per year… so how does Auntie Maxine afford an mansion worth $4,300,000?   It's also ironic that she does not LIVE in the district she represents, and that the district she does live in is only 6% African American.. making it extremely segregated.  Yet another hypocrite, lying moonbat fraud.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5493622538001/?#sp=show-clips

@pppucci:

@mhorndisk:

I'm not reading a report written by Democrats. I'm listening to the families of the victims. It's heart breaking, and yet you ignore their testimony.

EDIT: These are the people that give their lives to defend you, and you're calling them liars. Hillary never offered her life to defend anyone.

EDIT: If you'd like to put the points of the report you linked to in your own words, in a summary, I might consider it.

You not only reject known facts.  You are ignorant of them.  The lin I sent you is the famous subpoena you keep mentioning.  That was issued by a a Republican-Chaired Congressional Committee.  It is not a report.  You did not even click on the link, did you?  And I am the one spouting lies and ignoring facts?  This is exactly what I am talking about.  And I am starting a new thread so you cant rant there and get off of this one.

Oh, I can't wait for you to start your "new thread".  That gives me an excuse to show how wrong you are.. AGAIN.. as always.  I have a hunch you will forego starting your new thread on this topic. Not even you are that much of a glutton for punishment.

@pppucci:

@mhorndisk:

I'm replying to YOU. Because you can't answer why it's ok for Hillary to delete 30K emails after an investigation is launched against her. Answer the question. I don't want to hear your excuses about the democrat Comey who didn't recommend an indictment. I want you to tell me WHY you think it's ok for her to delete those emails after a subpoena. Go ahead… How is that not an obstruction of justice? I want an answer.

Here is you answer, plain and simple.  And see if you will accept this fact.  Read the damn subpoena:
http://benghazi.house.gov/sites/republicans.benghazi.house.gov/files/Kendall.Clinton%20Subpoena%20-%202015.03.04.pdf
It asks for emails from her server that were relevant to the Benghazi investigation.  It did not ask for every email on that server.  
You again are just repeating the accusations made by Trump.

And, BTW, I told you to start a new topic.  This discussion does not belong here, and I have fallen into your trap.

AGAIN.. you are twisting and spinning reality:  
Here's REALITY for you:

For the time period of January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012  
ANY and ALL documents in your posession, and/or sent from or received by the email address "[email protected]",
"[email protected]," or any other email address or communications device used by you or another on your behalf,
referring or relating to (Libya)

Let me break this long winded statement down:
It orders Hillary to turn over all her documents emails from the years 2011 and 2012.
This is to also include communications made by her or on her behalf related to Libya.

I will grant you that this is a bit confusing.  This is typical of government speak.  
You are interpreting this order as being restrictive in that they only wanted those e-mails that were related to Libya.
That is not what it says.  It says it wants ALL of HER communications of 2011 and 2012.
It also wants the communications made on her behalf if they are related to Libya.

It is absurd to interpret that as giving her the right to not only DELETE, but also make it impossible for anybody, including the FBI and CIA, from getting physical possession of her hard drives to retrieve that DELETED information by using "bleach bit" software.  There is a world of difference between not turning something over and DELETING it so it can't be turned over.
She had no business deleting any communications off that server which she illegally had in her own home.  This is one reason why it is illegal for the servers to be in private homes such as Hillary's basement.  It's not only for security from hackers, but also to ensure that the private person can't go and delete things that don't belong to them.  Imagine if Nixon just deleted or burned those "Watergate" tapes.  That would put him in prison if he was not a President at the time.  Nixon didn't even delete / eliminate the tapes.  Perhaps he WOULD have if he could have done it without anybody finding out.  In Hillary's case, she wasn't a president, and we DID find out.  
Additionally, Hillary told several lies about the e-mails and devices, including that she only used ONE mobile communications device, when in fact she used something like 15 of them.  (She destroyed them with a hammer which was to cover up what she was leaking.  The information on them would have already been leaked.. so wouldn't it be nice for the US Government to KNOW what was leaked?  Not possible since she took a hammer to them.  Now only the hackers know what was leaked).  She lied about the number of e-mails.  She had a private computer firm without security clearance going over those communications.  
Even if Congress had not subpoena's those communications, she STILL had no legal authority to delete them.  As it turns out, there were many very damaging e-mails coming and going out of her e-mail accounts - including how they plotted to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders, and pay people to disrupt Trump's rallies (those were obviously not part of thw 2011-2012 subpoena, but she still had no right to DELETE them.. they probably would have been subpoenaed later.. you can't subpoena something that no longer exists.. )  
Also, we later found out that COPIES of these deleted e-mails were floating around all over the place, including on the computers of pedo Anthony Weiner, husband of Huma Abedin (Hillary's closest advisor).

I could go on, but clearly Hillary grossly violated the law, and she should never had been eligible to be a candidate while under investigation.  This is why that corrupt former Attorney General Lorettta Shudbee Lynch, used the word "matter" instead of "investigation".

@sutieday:

The topic of this post was a critique of the observed activity constantly occurring on this board, as described by the OP.

Why is it that posters like mhorndisk can just interject into a board and redirect the topic to something non-relevant to the OP's topic? Isn't that hijacking? This among with other issues is why this board is going under.

This board IS going under.. as far as the loser moonbats are concerned.  You are fighting a losing battle.  
Sometimes I wonder if DrW is actually Kim JongUn.

@pppucci:

@mhorndisk:

He also attacked Psycho Joe, but of course you guys wanna make it an attack on women. These Hollywood elitists need to learn how to age gracefully and quit trying to act like their 20 years old. Mika as well as Joe constantly attack Trump every day and call him all sorts of things. They deserved it. It's actually long overdue. If anyone in the media had said the kind of things they did about Obama, or his aides, everyone would have told them to chill out. Defend him? Nope. Encourage him? Yep. They are sick puppies and need to be spaded for their bullcrap. I'm sure now she's embarrassed and that's what she gets for going up against the President. She kept pushing and pushing in order to create a spectacle and drama and so did Joe. So I'm glad. Fuck 'em both, their garbage. They're not even reporters, they don't report facts, they speak their disgusting opinions while pretending that it's journalism. So if you don't like that we love it, too bad!

I'm done with words here.  A picture is so much more eloquent:

What you didn't mention is that Obama got pretty much an 8 year free pass by the media.  There has never been a president that has been protected by the media the way Obama was.  Not even Hillary got the special "hands off" treatment that Obama got.  There was a prominent person, whom I won't name, that HATED Obama, but when interviewed, he would often say that his greatest fear is that Obama might get assassinated, because if that happened, he would become a martyr rather than have people eventually realize what a horrible president Obama is (was).  We are seeing Obama's legacy now.  Even after winning the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, Obama managed to lost them both.  Obama also succeeded in propping up the corrupt dynasty of the Castros in Cuba, the evil mullahs in Iran, allowed China to militarize the South China Sea, gave birth to ISIS, and potentially forced the world into WW3 by allowing the cancerous North Korea to grow out of control.

@pppucci:

@Frederick:

@pppucci:

@royalcrown89:

Yes, a lot of the posts on here need to be moved to rants & raves. Topics like, "NWO can suck my dick" and "Obama a Satanic Whore" need to be moved to rants & raves immediately. There is no way we can have meaningful debate with a topics that have such toxic titles. How can we expect others on this site to want to participate in the Politics & Debate forum when it's filled with spam about nonsense? It would be okay if it was just one time but mhorndisk is posting like ten topics based on the same thing in the same day, and then he's constantly replying to himself to drown out other topics. It's becoming too much and something definitely needs to be done. Should we appeal to someone higher up?? I still want to participate here but how can we with this level of toxicity?

Out of respect for raphjd, who I think is a reasonable man and has been doing this for over ten years, I would give him a chance to take action.  Failing that, I think we should appeal to someone higher up, especially if several of us do it so it does not seem the complaint of a single disgruntled user.  As far as I know, the site owner is Joker and there is no higher authority.  A post in one of the general forums should get his attention, should that become necessary.

You are a fool.  When things don't go your way, you stomp your feet and pout.  Making threats and ultimatums to the moderator is a good way to find yourself looking on xtube for 15 second porn clips instead of the content that is here.

If I don't see you on the site anymore.  Aloha!
Youtube Video

What gives you this sense of entitlement, that only your views are valid? Even if you owned the site, your attitude is not conducive to discussion.  You make it clear that you intend to bully anyone who disagrees with you off of this board.  And no one is threatening the moderator, but we are frustrated with the likes of you and are considering our options.

Overlooking the fact that your posts are consistently garbage.. that is not the primary issue here.
You are a fool for trying to twist someone's arm, threatening them, and tattling on them to the almighty one.  The almighty one is extremely loyal to his helpers.. which is why you won't ever find me in the chat room.  You also blatantly deny the truth - something that is called "lying" by less sophisticated people.  What you are doing is tantamount to the accusations that Trump colluded with Putin.

I'm surprised the great thunderbolt from above has not struck you down yet.  You keep tugging on his enchanted holy robe and I expect you will get an unpleasant surprise.  There IS a button to handle such matters confidentially.  (Which you have also used).  Yet, that isn't good enough for you, and you talk as if you are a mutineer.  "Argggh!  Yo ho ho and a handful of cum!  Gobs of sixteen semen on a hairy man's chest!"  Now be a good butt pirate and behave.

@pppucci:

@royalcrown89:

Yes, a lot of the posts on here need to be moved to rants & raves. Topics like, "NWO can suck my dick" and "Obama a Satanic Whore" need to be moved to rants & raves immediately. There is no way we can have meaningful debate with a topics that have such toxic titles. How can we expect others on this site to want to participate in the Politics & Debate forum when it's filled with spam about nonsense? It would be okay if it was just one time but mhorndisk is posting like ten topics based on the same thing in the same day, and then he's constantly replying to himself to drown out other topics. It's becoming too much and something definitely needs to be done. Should we appeal to someone higher up?? I still want to participate here but how can we with this level of toxicity?

Out of respect for raphjd, who I think is a reasonable man and has been doing this for over ten years, I would give him a chance to take action.  Failing that, I think we should appeal to someone higher up, especially if several of us do it so it does not seem the complaint of a single disgruntled user.  As far as I know, the site owner is Joker and there is no higher authority.  A post in one of the general forums should get his attention, should that become necessary.

You are a fool.  When things don't go your way, you stomp your feet and pout.  Making threats and ultimatums to the moderator is a good way to find yourself looking on xtube for 15 second porn clips instead of the content that is here.

If I don't see you on the site anymore.  Aloha!
Youtube Video

@mhorndisk:

Who wants to be part of a new televised series? US? Why not? We are the game changers. Let's talk about it. We kicked all the asses of the liberals. Let's get together and make it a show. Like the View. Who's with me? PM.

Instead of Barbara Walters as the host.. Ted Nugent.  And on the panel.. the late Sam Kinison.

@flozen:

@mhorndisk:

Wow would that really make you feel like you won something for a change?

Here is why I add new replies:

Because people have already READ the original post, and when you "Edit," the people who have ALREADY read it, don't realize that it's been edited and new information has been added, so they don't read the edited additional part.

You just want this because you aren't able to defend yourself. Sorry if it's CONFUSING. You should learn how to pay attention to what's being said.

Oh, m, you are being disingenuous as to your current role as the P&D forum's serial multiple self-repeating poster.

You heap replies upon your own replies, ad infinitum, usually because you are in full-rage mode.  Rather than adding new information, you are usually repeating the same idea or insult, five or six times in consecutive posts – which does not, however, increase its merit or legitimacy.  Only yesterday, you were spinning like a top and posting the same trash talk, repeatedly, on the second page of:

https://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=51052.20  "Trump cuts $22 Million from White House Budget"

So yes, this forum REALLY needs some numerical limitations, and/or warnings given, when these one-person daisy chains occur.  It has a negative effect on the proper functioning of the board.

Funny.. I don't recall you complaining about a month ago when DrWas posted 13 new topics in one day.    Is it possible you are selective about who you complain about? 

@raphjd:

:police:  TONE IT DOWN   :police:

Simma dah nah!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CH_Js_5SpB8 :laugh:

Colin Kaepernick got famous for his wild mega afro and refusing to stand for the National Anthem with the rest of his football team..
He was considered one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL, but is now out of work.. and no team will sign him. 
He says he will now stand for the National Anthem, but too bad for Colon.. he burned too many bridges and no team wants him! 
Get out a box of Kleenex and say BOO HOO!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/watch-colin-kaepernick-goes-home-to-ghana-to-find-his-independence/ar-BBDLKlK?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

@Spintendo:

@beast775:

Once signed, the next step in the ratification process is to send the treaty to the US Senate

The Paris Agreement's authority derives from the [desc=United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change]UNFCCC[/desc] treaty which the Senate ratified 25 years ago.

@mhorndisk:

Time to celebrate!!!

You're a little early to the party. The withdrawal from the Agreement doesn't take effect until November, 2020.

Although you are technically correct, there is something that must be pointed out.  When it comes to making contributions in FUNDING things such as the Paris Agreement, and NATO.. the overwhelming contributor is the USA.  If the USA pulls out, it's dunzo.  Other countries don't honor the agreements they make anyway.

It was feared that North Korea might have nuclear weapons.
It was feared that North Korea had ICBM's capable of reaching the USA.

Well, now we know that they have both nuclear weapons and the ICBM's capable of reaching the USA.

Kim JungUn should construct a giant statue of Barack Hussein Obama and put it prominently in Pyongyang.  
Without Obama, there would be no ISIS, and no ICBM nukes for North Korea.  Iran probably has them too.  It has been said many times that once North Korea had nukes, they would sell them or at least the technology to Iran instantly.

So, if you wake up to WW3 one day.. you know who's to blame.  OBAMA.  
H-Bombs and A-Bombs from ol' O-Bomba

Meanwhile, at CNN, they are still going ape-shit over a 10 year old clip of Trump fake hitting WWE's Vince McMahon…

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5492183101001/?#sp=show-clips

In the special election in Georgia to pick a new congressman, OUTSIDE donators contributed an unprecedented amount of money to defeat the Republican.  That is the scandal.  The democrat couldn't even vote for himself because he didn't live in the district he was running for!
Anyway.. the democrat lost.. and the sour grapes started.  Now there is a lawsuit saying the election results should be thrown out because of the touch screen voting machines.  If they had a problem, they should have complained BEFORE the election.  Even if there was a problem, it would result in FUTURE elections not using that voting method, and not affect the outcome of this election.  The republican won big.. 52 to 48.  That is not close as elections go.  In fact, the biased media kept reporting that election as it was in progress and afterwards and saying it was so close that it could not be called.  Baloney.. 52 to 48 is NOT close.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/lawsuit-seeks-to-void-georgia-congressional-election-results/ar-BBDLAK9?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

@pppucci:

There are a couple of users on this board (you know who you are) and occasionally others who reply to their own posts, sometimes several times in a thread.  This makes the thread difficult to read and follow, especially when another user is replying to pst #1 while the other is posting #2 and #3 before the second user can get his reply up.
Can we get some guidance from the moderator on this, and perhaps a rule–such as waiting an hour before replying to your own post, or better yet, using the edit button to add additional thoughts.  Otherwise, it is confusing and comes off as a wild rant.

I sometimes edit my posts to ADD additional information, but not to change anything other than keyboard errors, and other faux pas. 
But then, suti was complaining about editing posts.. so some people are never happy.

@pppucci:

@mhorndisk:

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/06/29/nyt-finally-retracts-russia-gate-canard/

That's right. And yet they keep on keepin' on with this retracted story by the New York Times that "17 Agencies Found Trump in Collusion with Russia."

It was FAKE, Very FAKE, and FRAUDULENT. It was NEVER True. But you guys believed them and used it to base ALL your conclusions. Sorry, you LOST AGAIN! And I'm really sorry for those of you who aren't paying attention to the REAL news, just because it isn't what you WANT to hear!

Here is the correction:

Correction: June 29, 2017

A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.

So I guess you don't believe the CIA, FBI, DNI and NSA?  The others did not deny the intelligence, they just did not approve it.  Keep dreaming.

Pussi,
You are really stupid..  But then, so are a lot of people.
I'm not going to waste my time dissecting all of this, but let's be aware of some things.  Those 17 organizations or 4 organizations do not go making assessments, nor can they make assessments on information that they haven't even investigated to any degree.  Even when they do make assessments, they not only don't make them public, they don't even share their assessments with the other agencies!  The FBI and CIA are notorious for not sharing any information with each other. 
Also, at the time, the FBI had that nitwit Comey as it's director, whom neither the left nor the right nor other FBI agents trusted.    The rest of those buffoons were appointees of Osama's eight years occupying the White House.

So.. go plant your turnip in Rosie O'Donnell. 
 Stop altering user names to be rude.

Youtube Video

@pppucci:

@Frederick:

@pppucci:

@raphjd:

Snopes doesn't have the honesty it did 10 years ago.    They have been caught in some lies that favoured the left.

I'm not saying that is the case with this story though, but a warning not to blindly trust them.

I also cited the original Breitbart article which itself cited a third source.  I have no objection to discussing the issue of governmental glut and budget cuts as long as we stick to the facts.  But relying on Wellness Natasha  as the source for those facts is ridiculous.

It's funny to see you showing concern for "facts"… you are a disciple of "fake news"  pppussi

Stop changing my username.  I don't call you Frederadick.  Second, give me one example of "fake news" that I have mentioned on this board.  Just defending CNN does not make me a disciple of fake news.

Thanks for the idea!  Just about every one of your messages contains references to "fake news" sources.  I will have to start pointing that out.  Great idea!