If you want to talk about meddling in elections… you can't ignore these two incidents...
Bill Clinton blatantly interfered with the Russian elections to get drunken Boris Yeltsin elected
https://lewrockwell.com/2017/02/bionic-mosquito/clinton-interferes-russian-elections/
Hillary Clinton blatantly interfered with the Russian elections to prevent Putin from getting elected, but as always, Hillary FAILED.
http://time.com/4422723/putin-russia-hillary-clinton/
This guy was doing an election day projections on MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Show
He concluded that Hillary would win the electoral votes with some uncertain states
363 to 84
Actually, Hillary lost with just
232 306
In fact, after the electoral college officially cast their votes, some electoral votes were flipped making it a Hillary loss of
228 309
To make that more clear.. this idiot on MSNBC projected that Hillary would win at least 67% of the electoral votes - which would be at least 34 points more than Trumps 33%
In fact, Hillary got only 42% of the electoral votes - which is 16 points LOWER than Trump's 58%
So…. this guy was OFF by 34+16 = 50 points out of 100!
Youtube Video
Many people wondered in January and February why Trump was so uncharacteristically loyal to Micael Flynn. They did not have a long-tern relationship and Trump is always quick to jettison people who are no longer useful to him. Now we know Trump was not trying to let Flynn off easy, but trying to protect his son and perhaps himself. Who knows what Flynn could reveal to harm either of them?
It is incredible how just one little fact (Donnie's meeting) can throw so many other fuzzy facts into clear focus.
I don't know why you keep harping on this Trump Jr. meeting. Who gives a shit? I know the demoboobs do, which shows that they don't have anything substantial to attack trump with. It's very much like the scene in "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" where the king (Trump) chops off both arms and both legs of the black knight (the democraps), and the knight refuses to give way even though he can't do anything but drool on the king.
I have yet to hear anybody point out how Russia interfered with the election.
Maybe someone in this forum has some idea?
In all fairness to Frederick and Trump, the NYC police and Mayor Bloomberg refused to settle the case for 12 years because they asserted that the five must have been accomplices to the original crime. They certainly were not upstanding members of the community, but they were jailed for a crime they did not commit. For those of you who are fans of the death penalty, they might have been executed before they were exonerated, which would have been a real tragedy
The president still holds the belief that they should be executed to this day. He has not walked back his position and last year, he doubled-down on it. Election or not, he is on the record calling for the execution of five innocent Americans. He has the backing of our current Attorney General. Once again, this is indefensible. Am I missing something? Did he walk back his statements or even apologize for currently holding the belief? How is it okay for a sitting U.S. president to call for the executions of people who were exonerated? What happens if he decides to collude with some hate group or makes a top secret order to have those men killed? This president has no credibility whatsoever and he is loyal to no one, not even himself. This is quite scary. If anything happens to any of those men, he should be the prime suspect since he's on the record calling for their deaths.
It's heartwarming how you stick up for those five shit stains in NYC in a 28 year old crime. You think it's a good idea to hand over $41 million to 5 thugs.. great.
As for "doubling down", let's talk about a much more recent case of someone "doubling down" which has resulted in the deaths of several million innocent people. Your heroine.. Hillary Clinton.. in the 3rd and final presidential debate in 2016, doubled down on her support of guilt-free, taxpayer subsidized, abortions on demand, of babies in the THIRD trimester, which would have survived if a c-section was done, up until the very day of delivery. I would say that anybody who believes in a heaven and a hell, earned themselves a one-way ticket to hell if they voted for Hellary.
In all fairness to Frederick and Trump, the NYC police and Mayor Bloomberg refused to settle the case for 12 years because they asserted that the five must have been accomplices to the original crime. They certainly were not upstanding members of the community, but they were jailed for a crime they did not commit. For those of you who are fans of the death penalty, they might have been executed before they were exonerated, which would have been a real tragedy
There should be no death penalty..
It is cheaper to keep them in prison than to execute them.
There have been a LOT of mistakes made in which a person was executed and later found to be not guilty.
The judicial system is far too corrupt and faulty to be making such decisions.
It's barbaric and medieval.
In fact, any penalty that is extremely severe - such as life in prison, or execution - creates more crime because instead of raping someone, kidnapping someone, or committing a burglary and letting the victim go free.. they wind up killing the victim so that the witness is silenced. Believe it or not, the purpose of incarceration in the USA is supposed to be rehabilitation, not punishment. It is punishment, but that is not it's stated intent.
Listen to her attempt to say "Sequestration" she says "Seacrestration"
http://media.merriam-webster.com/audio/prons/en/us/mp3/s/seques04.mp3
George W. Bush couldn't get "nuclear" right
Neither could Jimmy Carter.. and Jimmy Carter has a degree in "nucular physics"
Maxine Water's has an ebonics level mastery of the English Language.
In high school, when I was 14. I once had a black english teacher. She didn't like me much.. because I was often correcting her english.
Yo Neither could Jimmy Carter.. an' Jimmy Carter has uh degree in "nucular physics"
Maxine Water's has an ebonix level mastery o' da cracker ass english Language.
In high skoo, when ah wuz 14. ah once had uh black cracker ass english beotch. She didn't like me much.. cuz ah wuz often correcting her cracker ass english you know das right!
Interesting that the left is always being blamed for playing "identity politics.," yet you are willing to throw 50% of the population under the bus on the basis of gender alone.
That is because 50% of the population vote with their vaginas…
Far too many women base their votes upon women's healthcare and abortions.
This withered old crone has got to go.
(edited for brevity…)
Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Elizabeth Warren are four fantastic examples why a woman should never be president. They don't have any regard for the truth, and will say anything at all and defend it like it was their own baby (unless hey had it aborted - then fuck it).
As far as Maxine Waters (great photo montage), or moonbats from either far edge of the political spectrum, the reason for their "life terms" can be summed up in a single word: gerrymandering.
Now, I have to take issue when you cite four female politicians you don't like, and extrapolate it to a blanket prohibition about women being president. Let's take that a step further, to a global perspective, and here's an interesting article about current and "cumulative time of" women leaders in various countries:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/08/women-leaders-around-the-world/With a little more research, you would see that many of these women leaders hold very positive poll numbers from their citizenry. I look at someone like Angela Merkel of Germany, and while you may not like her immigration stance, she has been a fixture for several terms. And looking back, did you, as a conservative, think that Margaret Thatcher did a shitty job in Great Britain for all that time?
Now, there have been two recent, and very prominent disasters concerning female leaders that come to mind: former Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff, and Park Geun-hye of South Korea. These were largely financial mismanagement and corruption (bribery) issues.
YET… when we compare this pair of naughty dames to, oh, say, North Korea's Supreme Leader, Kim Jong-un; and current Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, I find the idea of bashing women as leaders to be a very weak cause.
I'm not going to disagree with you in this post.. but rather add some to it.
In regards to Angela Merkel, she started out fine, but she is way past her prime and needs to go. 12 years of her is about 4 too many. Also, she was extremely disrespectful of President Bush.
In regards to Thatcher, she was great for a long time, but she stuck around too long also. She was PM for 11 years. Her support of Pinochet and that horrible Poll Tax were inexcusable. By the way.. Obamacare is essentially a poll tax.
The President of the United States still believes the Central Park Five–-5 exonerated men who spent years in prison for a crime they did not commit as teenagers---deserve to be executed and has continuously called their wrongful conviction settlement a "disgrace." This is disgusting and indefensible. There is a new documentary film being made about this situation and it will focus on the president's continuing fight against these five innocent men. The current Attorney General backs up this disgusting opinion by our president. How can anyone support the condemnation of innocent men who were wrongfully convicted for a crime they had absolutely nothing to do with? #45's supporters want us to view him as an honorable man and someone deserving of the presidency, yet he supports the idea that five innocent men should be executed or imprisoned for life for something they did not do. Further, he calls their wrongful conviction settlement a "disgrace." They were wrongfully convicted and lost years of their lives because of a wrongful conviction. Forensic evidence has exonerated them. Why does our president and his Attorney General believe otherwise and will they do something to harm the lives of these five innocent men?
By the way.. it is impossible to PROVE someone is innocent. You can only fail to prove that they are guilty. I would agree that Trump should have kept his mouth shut in this case.. but we are talking about an event that happened 28 years ago.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/17/central-park-five-donald-trump-jogger-rape-case-new-york
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/06/politics/reality-check-donald-trump-central-park-5/index.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/21/donald-trump-central-park-5_n_5517784.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/08/donald-trumps-doubling-down-on-the-central-park-five-reflects-a-bigger-problem/
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/donald-trump-central-park-settlement-disgrace-article-1.1838467
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/sen-sessions-praises-donald-trump-central-park-5-controversy-article-1.2756902
http://uproxx.com/news/donald-trump-central-park-five/
Not so quick there… all 5 of them confessed, and implicated each other. While it is true that the DNA found in the woman's cooch was not a match for any of them means what? It means that none of those 5 had an orgasm inside that woman. There are things called "condoms" there is also the possibility that they raped her without having an orgasm, or that the 5 of them didn't rape her at all, but took part in the beating. Yes, some other guy did cum forward and confessed to raping her and his DNA was a match. So, that guy is definitely guilty.. although was not charged because of the statute of limitations had expired. Trump was outraged over the $41 million settlement handed over to those hoodlums. The rape was in 1989. The other guy came forward 13 years later.
You must really be desperate to attack Trump about this. If you want to attack someone.. attack the crooked cops and crooked judicial system. HOWEVER.. I do agree that Trump has a tendency to stick up for the cops way too often. I wouldn't feel too sorry about those 5 hoodlums that were convicted of the crime. Granted, had that other man come forward 13 years earlier, the other 5 probably would not have been convicted, but that doesn't mean they didn't beat the crap out of that woman - and possibly even raped her.
Go make up some other fake news to attack Trump with. They had tornados in Texas.. that must be Trump's fault as well.
This withered old crone has got to go.
It's typical that a moonbat would be ranting about losing 170 million jobs when there are only 134 million jobs in the country!
Listen to her attempt to say "Sequestration" she says "Seacrestration"
Youtube Video
Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Elizabeth Warren are four fantastic examples why a woman should never be president. They don't have any regard for the truth, and will say anything at all and defend it like it was their own baby (unless hey had it aborted - then fuck it).
I have never presented CNN commentary as facts. You, however, have called CNN commentary fake news and examples of the network's bias.
That is because CNN is fake news.. even you won't stick up for their commentary.
The Democrats were created by President Andrew Jackson in 1828.
Jackson was a complete bastard who actively worked to kill off all native Americans through a system of genocide. He wanted all American Indian men, women, and children killed. To this day, many native americans refuse to accept $20 bills because they have Andrew Jackson's face on them.
http://www.iiipublishing.com/politics/us/jackson/1825-1828.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson
The Republicans were created by anti-slaveray activists let by President Abraham Lincoln in 1854.
Lincoln was a unifier.
http://guardianlv.com/2013/10/the-republican-party-of-abraham-lincoln/
If women wanted a woman President, then there would be a woman president.
Also, if we didn't vote for 50% of Obama, we were racist. If we didn't vote for Hillary's vag, we were sexist.
Social engineering never works.
In the election between Richard Nixon and JFK, Nixon would have won if the mafia had not arranged to have dead people voting. Just a one state difference would have inserted Dick into the Oval Orifice. But then, when JFK put RFK in as Attorney General (massive nepotism), RFK proceeded to destroy the mafia. Then for some reason, both JFK and RFK got assassinated. Anyway… getting back on topic.. JFK would have won easily if he were not Catholic. But, even with that problem, he did get elected. Forget about Obama being black. I don't have a problem with black. However, it is inconceivable to me that a man with the name Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro) who was raised in Indonesia as a muslim until the age of 13 could ever become president.
The thing that terrifies me about Hillary is that it is obvious that a large number of people voted for her simply because they want their precious god given right to have a subsidized, guilt-free, no questions asked, abortion on demand, even up until the day of delivery. That is disgusting.
The moonbats try to stigmatize anybody that votes for a white man as being racist. That is ironic, because THEY are the one's being racist! People forget that the democrats are the party of the KKK during it's darkest days of lynchings, etc. Go find a native American Indian and ask them about President Andrew Jackson - who created the Democratic Party in 1828. Who created the Republican Party? Abraham Lincoln in 1854.
No other former president followed the president around the world - stalking him.. and running his mouth.
Funny, but the clip shows a righteous indignation, but does not mention the places Obama was supposed ly stalking Trump. If they are referring to Trump's trip to Europe in May, when Obama appeared with Angela Merkel in Germany,
"The Obama Foundation says the former President accepted the invitation before the US election, so the overlap with Mr Trump's first presidential trip to Europe is purely coincidental."If they are referring to rumors that he followed Trump to the G20, that was rated as "Pants on Fire" by Politifact
Yet, speaking of respect among presidents, no president in history since Andrew Jackson and John Adams has attacked his predecessor so often and so personally as Trump has with Obama. You may not consider Trump a true conservative, but his eyes are in the back of his head. He should look to the future and actually try to lead.
You know.. I notice patterns… and I think other's should notice them also.
Compared to the constant stream of ultra left wing bullshit that pppucci puts out... people like Sutieday, Flozen, and aadam101 are moderates.
I'm not even going to waste my time proving you are wrong about everything. If people don't realize that by now, they never will.
In support of this new thread, I'm moving over the questions I have for Frederick, who had expressed interest in the Republicans getting busy with health care.
My questions for him follow. While I am hoping to benefit from Frederick's response, these are questions that anyone can feel free to "borrow" to express their own views.
"Frederick, just curious:
"Do you support the current Republican health care plan being promoted by McConnell in the Senate? If so, what changes from the Affordable Care Act are you the most excited about? If you support the Senate bill with some reservations, what would you change to improve it?
"To what degree do you believe or disbelieve the Congressional Budget Office projections that under the Senate health care bill, 22 million Americans would lose their coverage over the next decade?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/cbo-senate-republican-bill-22-million/531663/
"For the sake of discussion, if the CBO projections did hold true, how would you feel about that effect on Americans and their access to health care?"
They need to focus on reducing health care costs instead of providing insurance for everyone. Whenever you insure something, they raise the costs to take advantage of that insurance.
They also need to repeal Obamacare, because until that is done, a large segment of people will fight any improvements to the system even if it benefits them. They don't want change.
Healthcare costs are obscene. I would say that healthcare costs are often 10 times what they should be.
No other former president followed the president around the world - stalking him.. and running his mouth.
If you moonbats want proof of Obama insulting marines.. just say the word. There are a LOT of examples of that.
I wish she would go away too. Ignore her and maybe she will.
Not a bad idea, but it didn't work with Lord Voldemort
Even if that were true(which in my opinion it is not. I think the enthusiasm has more to do with the possibility of a female president, rather than the person herself.) does that justify the continual attacks. The election is over, as is her political career. Ding Doing the Hillary witch is dead! (at least in politics–Super PAC or not)
Why should there be enthusiasm for having a female president? That is a nightmare.