Posts made by eobox91103

@Yura2k3:

anyway, onto my question -
I think it's totally effing hot whenever I see in a vid that the bottom is enjoying himself almost MORE than the top.  Like, you can tell that he's cumming by the tempo of his exclamations…

Anyway, is there a word for this - like creampie, only different? (and if anyone can point me to some videos where this happens - preferrably with raw fucking - that would be super nice!)

Hi Yura2k3, and welcome!

I think what you're referring to is called a "hands-free cumshot," where the bottom cums just from the fucking, not even touching his dick.  There are several videos you can download through this site that have this…just do a search on "hands free" and you should find them.  PM me if you need some further help finding these.

I agree that it's really hot to see that...and even hotter in person.  I'm a total top, and I love to see a bottom shoot from fucking alone...maybe it's an ego thing, and I'm congratulating myself for doing a good job.

Some videos have the opposite of this...a bottom that is clearly not into getting fucked and doesn't even have an erection (or maybe he's on drugs and can't get it up).  Sometimes the director has these guys hold a hand over their dick/balls so the flaccidity (?) isn't seen by the camera, but that just calls more attention to it.

@leatherbear:

An assistant principal at Harritan High
School recently complained to a sophomore student, Blake Robbins, that he had
been engaging in "inappropriate behavior" with the laptop, which remains the
property of the school. The principal provided a photograph of the student,
taken in his home by remote activation of his laptop's webcam, as proof of the
student's "inappropriate behavior."

If the "inappropriate behaviour" in question was anything at all sexual, then it's quite possible that the alleged evidence held by the principal could be deemed kiddie porn (since the student is clearly under 18).  If that's the case, I'd love to see the principal and his/her minions arrested (in full view of the students), handcuffed, and charged with felony possession of child pornography.

@MasterDave:

I just noted that Raw Entry Club (famous for rereleasing other studio's videos with new names) has released "Artem's Bareback Friends."  The cover shows "Jeffrey Radden" (his Eurocreme name) who is identified as "Tony" (his name when working with Dolphin).  It also shows a boy identified as "Martish" who is also a Dolphin model.  This leads me to believe that this video is yet another rerelease, this time of a Dolphin video.  Anyone have any idea if this is correct and, if so, which Dolphin video it might be?  Thanks!

I recently seeded that video.  I think it's a compilation of scenes from several other videos, although none of them look familiar to me.  When I wrote up the description, I used the name "Jeffrey Radden" instead of "Tony" (as he's billed in the credits) because I thought more people would recognize him by that name.  (I also thing he's about the hottest thing on screen, but that's another topic.)

@leatherbear:

This is an unusual paragraph. I'm curious as to just how quickly you can find out what is so unusual about it. It looks so ordinary and plain that you would think nothing was wrong with it. In fact, nothing is wrong with it! It is highly unusual though. Study it and think about it, but you still may not find anything odd. But if you work at it a bit, you might find out. Try to do so without any coaching!

It doesn't have any words with the letter "e," the most commonly used letter in the English language.

@leatherbear:

COMMUNICATE both verbal and non verbal and a good time will be had by all involved!!!

I'd like to reinforce what LB is saying here:  Good sex requires communication, even if he's your BF/partner and you've done it together a thousand times.  Although I like porn (don't we all, or we wouldn't be here!), I think it's unreal to have guys screwing away with no communication about what they like/want/don't like/don't want/etc.

As a top for the last ten years who started out as a bottom, I think the guys you meet who have loose, floppy arses that don't stimulate your cock are probably trying too hard to relax–they've mastered that [relaxation] technique very well, and just need to be asked to clamp down a bit.  After all, they are able to tighten up when avoiding a bowel movement!

For guys who are "too tight" and in pain, they're on the other side of this situation:  They need to learn to relax their sphincter.  But this is not intuitive for many guys–relaxing the sphincter is usually associated with taking a shit, and that's not something a guy--especially a novice--wants to do in the middle of sex.  But if he's empty and clean inside (which we hope is the case), nothing will come out.  I remember one college guy who had so much trouble relaxing this way that I led him into the bathroom, had him sit down on the loo, and try to shit.  When he saw that nothing would come out regardless of how much he relaxed and even pushed, he was more confident about relaxing in bed and we had a great time.

A final note:  One time I hooked up with a bottom who had a genuinely small arsehole.  He relaxed completely, enjoyed immensely getting fucked, but it was so tight around my cock that I'm the one who was in mild pain--I kept putting on more lube, but it was still too tight.  I was happy when he finally came so I could pull out, and then he finished me off with his mouth.  But this guy is the exception rather than the rule, and no, I don't still have his phone number 

Cut or uncut, both are fine with me…as long as they're clean.  A little rinse under the hood isn't that difficult, guys!

As for hairy/trimmed/shaved...it's all good, although I'm a little turned off if a guy is completely shaved.  Not that I would throw him out of bed...but some natural hair is nice.

You can't tell how old a guy is by looking at him.  I've taught in middle schools, high (prep) schools, and universities.  I remember two 13-year-old guys who looked old enough that they had no trouble buying alcohol in the states (where the drinking age is 21).  I've also met juniors/seniors in university (likely 20 or 21) who looked five years younger.

Bear in mind also that mainstream media (i.e., Hollywood movies and TV) usually casts five or more years over the age of the character–characters who are supposed to be 18 are played by guys 23 or older; university students who are supposed to be 21 are usually played by actors 26-28 years old.  So a "real" 18 year old will often appear to be a lot younger than he is.

Some studios (e.g., Cobra) claim that they have "accidentally" filmed underage models; others (e.g., GayTeensStudio, now defunct) did so repeatedly and were shut down. So there is indeed some material out there that will claim to be legal, but in fact has underage models.  My suggestion is that if you have a film or scene with a model that you think is underage, just delete it.  If you think it's a really flagrant situation, report it to a moderator, but don't post the name of the torrent in the forum...or you'll get people who actually like that sort of thing to download it, and the problem just gets worse.

and don't forget Daniel Radcliffe from Equus:  (Harry Potter won't seem quite the same again)

It seems that in most gay porn, the guys really enjoy getting off.  But I've seen clips of straight guys either jerking off solo, or getting jerked, or getting sucked…and they seem bored when they finally blow their load, almost as if it's a chore that they've now finished.  Of course, this isn't a general rule, but seems to happen a lot.  Has anyone else noticed this?

You can also find several videos here with DP scenes, such as "Double Pleasure" at http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=18029

I think it's wonderful that we can give seed to each other online…although it's not quite as much fun as in person. 

Some videos are released under multiple names.  I suggest checking hXXp://www.wtule.net/Intro hXXp://www.gayeroticvideoindex.com/ and seeing what other names your video might have, and check to see if it's already here under a different name.

*Edit: Changed the link as per [desc="The website I mentioned previously is now located at hXXp://www.gayeroticvideoindex.com/ – it's the same information, just a different address and a different look."]Reply #6[/desc] by eobox91103 himself - aaliass

EDIT: (MrMazda 2010-12-15) - Corrected color tag

@jay230:

The proof I am talking about is the proof we can see with our own two eyes i.e., the actors in said torrents. NOT A FUCKING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT.

I believe Jay is saying, "if an actor looks under-age, then the material is inappropriate for this site, even if there is a compliance statement."  To be safe, I think this is a good approach, but we have to acknowledge that there's a lot of uncertainty here.  While a 10-year-old is clearly a 10-year-old, it's a lot less clear when guys are older.  I've taught at the junior/senior high and university levels, and I've seen lots of guys who were 20 and looked 16, as well  a few who were 16 who looked 20.  Mass media tends to distort our concept of age, because high school students are often played by actors who are 20, and college students are played by actors who are 25-30.

If this were a court of law, we could presume that a file is appropriate unless proven guilty.  Unfortunately, we don't have any means of getting proof here–so the real question is, "how do we decide if something is inappropriate?"  It comes back to instinct and subjective evaluation, which will never be perfect.  If we err on the safe side (which I think is a good idea), we have to accept that some torrents with entirely legal content are going to be deleted or excluded.  That's just the cost of doing business on a site like this.  I think it's a small price to pay--and there's no shortage of other content available through this site.

On a related note, I would suggest that we use judgment in how we deal with people who upload considered-to-be-inappropriate content:  It's one thing if the material is explicitly banned from this site or contains unquestionably underage actors--those people should probably be banned.  But in the case of the video that started this thread--from a now-defunct website that claimed to be compliant with US age limits--I think the user seeding that material can be counseled about the site's policies and permitted to stay.  I think we can be quick to condemn material, but we should be more cautious about condemning members.

@trentreviso:

Microsoft has made the Windows 7 Release Candidate available for FREE download and FREE USE FOR 13 MONTHS!
….

The Windows 7 RC will run normally with your product key until 1 March 2010. Then, between 1 March 2010 and 1 June 2010, it will limit you to sessions of no more than two hours at a time. Effective 1 June 2010, your Windows 7 RC installation will shut down and refuse to operate until you pay Microsoft a ransom (still no word on what Windwos 7 is going to cost).

....

Note that this is "free" for one year, but then you must pay Microsoft some undetermined (and probably large) amount of money to continue using the operating system.  (Or, if you remember in time, you could re-install your previous operating system.)

This doesn't quite count as "free" in my book.  I'll stick with what I have.

PS:  It's like the joke that ends: "First prize is a new Microsoft product.  Second prize is two of them."

All this discussion of disk images and iso files is interesting…but I keep thinking back to the question that kicked off this thread:

"Should I continue posting in ISO format only for porn ... or should I ... switch to clips and rips?"

If one looks at the statistics for items seeded in the last month, rips in .avi format often get snatched hundreds of times, while DVD's in ISO format seem to get snatched maybe 50-70 times.  (This is from a casual inspection, not a detailed analysis.)  So, it would seem that most people, including myself, prefer .avi format.

Of course, we're a community that honors diversity and difference in opinion, so I'm not saying that the majority has ruled and therefore people "should" seed only .avi format.  Maybe one solution is to seed both--upload a torrent with full DVD, whether native or ISO or split ISO or whatever--and then do a high quality rip and seed that, too.  This way everybody can enjoy the film.

@Slippery:

I like the Full DVD so I can make quality AVI if I want to or I can watch it in full quality on my widescreen TV.  I  much prefer the Full DVD given the one choice.

and to celebrate our diversity…I prefer a good quality rip from DVD to AVI, defining "good quality" as (1) the same resolution as the DVD, and (2) minimal or no compression of the video.  These will play on many new DVD players and give the same result as playing the original DVD.  (I have a Philips DVD player that will play .avi files from a DVD, or from a drive plugged in to the player's USB port.)  These .avi rips are also easier/faster to download, because they're usually about 1.5 GB for a full-length film, instead of 4 GB.

But...it's important that the DVD rip be done with quality of the end-product in mind.  I don't have the software to rip DVD's myself, so I'm not going to criticize anyone who has ripped a DVD and seeded it here.  But I would suggest that people "rip for quality."

@amice:

before taking HIV+ shots they have to agree with this freely and as i know some of them, they don't care too much. some other studios, the "better ones", strictly reject HIV+ guys from shooting completely.

Then there are some studios (such as Hot Desert Knights, I believe), that will only use HIV+ guys in their scenes.  This is troublesome, because someone who is infected with one strain of HIV can conceivably get superinfected with another strain, which would managing the infection much more difficult.

@pinokio:

are they banned ? Azov ,Baikal , POjkart videos ?
they are naturist videos ,for those that dont know .

I downloaded some films through another file sharing service with the words "baikal" and "azov" in the description.  When I played them, they were clearly child pornography (i.e., age = << 18).  I think these words are used as code for kiddie porn, even if the film is not from those studios.  I suggest that you do not seed this material…or even keep it on your computer.  This is only my opinion.

I still have the file on a backup drive.  It's only 1 minute 28 seconds, 10MB file, not large enough to seed here.  It's small enough to be emailed, so if anyone's interested, send me a PM and I can email it to you.  I'll try to attach a screenshot to this posting.

@Sedric:

Does anyone know anything about the clip that was going around that was supposedly Ben Affleck?  I know it wasn't really him, and I'm not really looking for the clip itself, just some info on it.  Like: does anyone know who it really is (his name) and what site (if any) it came off of originally?

I downloaded a copy through another file sharing service.  There's a "Bedfellow.com" logo that appears at the end of the video; I don't know if they were the original producers or maybe they added it to a clip they found.  I think it was shot (!) by a better-than-amateur but not really professional group…the guy is sitting in an easy chair covered by a blue sheet, but it's done with ambient lighting and there's only one camera active, seemingly hand-held.  The style is similar to that of Fratmen.tv, but not as professionally done.