Posts made by blablarg18

"Germany has accused Russia of leaking an intercepted call between German military officials on how to support Ukraine in the war...."

https://humanevents.com/2024/03/04/leaked-call-reveals-german-military-officials-discussing-shipping-long-range-missiles-to-ukraine-to-hit-targets-in-crimea

NOTE: Germany doesn't deny. They only go "WAAAAAaaaaahhh! It's not fair to expose us!"

We've seen it before. Standard Lib-Nazi tactic.

In 2016 when Wikileaks exposed Hillary..... Dems never denied one bit of their (& her) many crimes. Dems only went "Ruuusshia!!"

Germany has confirmed the authenticity of the call and has launched an investigation into what it called an act of eavesdropping by Russia.

As if mutual spying isn't 100% normal. smh

In the call, German Air Force Chief Ingo Gerhartz spoke with three high-ranking Luftwaffe officials on the possible delivery of the missiles, an act that Chancellor Olaf Scholz has rejected.

Again: Luftwaffe eager to bomb Crimea.

But OK, we can give credit to Scholz who said no - THIS TIME.

"The recording itself says that within the Bundeswehr, plans to launch strikes on Russian territory are being discussed substantively and concretely," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters.

"Here we have to find out whether the Bundeswehr is doing this on its own initiative. Then the question is: how controllable is the Bundeswehr and how much does Scholz control the situation?"

@raphjd Indeed. No libs can keep their Party dogma straight.

Right now, libs call Sotomayor, Kagan & Ketanji Jackson "corrupt" and "illegitimate" judges who should be "dissolved"......
because, for once, this one time (Trump case), those 3 DEI hires also couldn't keep Party dogma straight & didn't do what White libs wanted.

Reality intruded on libs yesterday, and their heads are bruised.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-house-democrats-working-to-remove-trump-from-the-ballot-through-legislation

Makes plain: USA "Democrats" & libs are against democracy, and those who support their anti-democracy efforts are vicious extremists, insurrectionists & terrorists who threaten democracy worldwide.

I want free speech, democracy, & common-sense centrism, anti-racism & anti-Nazism.

To me it's only natural that USA "Democrats" & libs should support Azov Nazis, & various other racists, for example Alexei Navalny who was exposed as Russia-racist & CIA agent. All peas in pod.

Ukraine has no elections. USSA has rigged/fake elections. They go together.

@jaroonn Your fellow extremist just said that 3 Diversity Hires, Ketanji Jackson, Kagan, Sotomayor, are CORRUPT, ILLEGITIMATE, INEPT, TRAITORS TO DEMOCRACY who can't read.

He's only a White male - but still - he's your compatriot so - Who are you to argue?

@raphjd Fair enough.

What amuses tho, is how @jaroonn got all pompous about infer vs. imply - and got them backward.

HAHAHAHAhahahahahahaha!

To be fair - infer may be taken nowadays taken AS SYNONYM for imply.

infer /ĭn-fûr′/
intransitive verb

1. To conclude from evidence or by reasoning.
2. To involve by logical necessity; entail. [identical to imply #3 above]
3. To indicate indirectly; imply. [literal synonym]

When DEI flies right out window!

A three-judge panel of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Justice Department’s argument that convicted rioters merited lengthier prison sentences for interfering in the “administration of justice”...

“[T]he phrase ‘administration of justice’ does not encompass Congress’s role in the electoral certification process,” Judge Patricia Millett wrote in the court’s unanimous ruling.

Note: Biden Regime DOJ knew it all along. Laws & guidelines have never before been so warped, to do what Regime DOJ wants.

Regime DOJ chose to do the most unjust thing possible.

imply /ĭm-plī′/
transitive verb

To express or state indirectly.
"She implied that she was in a hurry."
To make evident indirectly: synonym: suggest.
"His fine clothes implied that he was wealthy."
To involve by logical necessity; entail.
"Life implies growth and death."

@jaroonn You implied President Trump is a homophobe. You claimed he couldn't have reason, beyond money, to celebrate with a gay couple - what homophobes are like.

As dumbass coward, you often imply things - rather than say them.

If you think it reflects credit on you: It doesn't.

It reflects discredit on you.

In addition to dumbass coward who smears people by false implication: You're also pro-groomer & a racist-extremist - we now know.

Sad day for our lib-extremists.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-trump-cannot-kicked-colorado-ballot-rcna132291

The court said the Colorado Supreme Court had wrongly assumed that states can determine whether a presidential candidate or other candidate for federal office is ineligible.

The ruling makes it clear that Congress, not states, has to set rules on how the 14th Amendment provision can be enforced against federal office-seekers. As such the decision applies to all states, not just Colorado.

Colorado fucked pooch so bad, NO State can suppress President Trump from ballot & even Ketanji Jackson says so.

Slight twist:

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-supreme-court-unanimously-reverses-colorado-court-ruling-trump-to-stay-on-the-ballot

...three justices argued, “The majority announces that a disqualification for insurrection can occur only when Congress enacts a particular kind of legislation pursuant to Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

“In doing so, the majority shuts the door on other potential means of federal enforcement," the justices added. "We cannot join an opinion that decides momentous and difficult issues unnecessarily, and we therefore concur only in the judgment."

This [minority view, IF held by majority - but it isn't, c]ould leave the door open for others to be prosecuted at the federal level for “insurrection” without a law first being passed in Congress to define what that means...

So: Along with 9-0 result against Colorado, they decided 6-3 that ONLY Congress can say what Insurrection clause means; for instance, Federal prosecutor or Special Counsel cannot.

Hey - Guess When your AI is not allowed to insert non-Whites?

One special time. One guess when.

See pic below.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68440150

Here, BBC wants to create false narrative.

BBC labels fake pic as fake - which is GOOD of them, technically, since yes AI faked it.

Except Trump has tons of Black supporters IRL.

BBC false-implies opposite, suggests reports of Trump's Black support IRL would be "disinformation" blah blah.

Common media trick. Wrap -technical- truths in a giant -narrative- lie.

Anyway, here's what they claim is outrage or not possible IRL:

Balance of firm & polite - perhaps too perfect, I mean, too bad they didn't beat her.

https://twitter.com/WojPawelczyk/status/1764572301234667577

@raphjd No biggie - but I think Hillary did run in favor - difference is, Trump won.

Trump was first USA prez to run & be elected while openly said he favored gay marriage.

Obama for sure, was NOT.

Neither was Obama a Black president - since Obama comes from White slave-owners on mom side & Black slave-owners on alleged-dad's side - on NEITHER side from former slaves - but, story for another time.

DEI Threat - remember it spells DIE -

USA airlines, manufacturers & FAA have prioritized diversity hiring over safety - at a time when "US airports saw 19 almost catastrophic near-misses in 2023, highest since 2016" - https://thepostmillennial.com/us-airports-saw-19-almost-catastrophic-near-misses-in-2023-highest-since-2016

I could make this thread a catolog of how DEI is unsafe, as well as racist & extremist.

But maybe I'll do it in new one.

@raphjd Shocker: Author thinks kid will know what is Scylla, Odysseus & intertextual.

Note also, "spirit cooking" & anti-male language is weaved in.

& lengthy adverbs, so beloved by retard-libs who think they work What a hoot

Yet Huckleberry Finn must be banned - greatest novel in English of 19th century, that raised conscience against slavery.

Also ban Lord of the Rings - a great novel of 20th - since it says "faggot" - yes it does, 2-3 times - and talks about escaping "Black men" and excluding them from inns, alongside depictions of White men doing heroic & good things.

@raphjd White people such as "Trump!" or "conservatives!"

In Lib Hive Mind: if only such people could be eliminated through re-education-or-death camps, we would finally achieve paradise where (again, to libs) Good Little Darkies listen faithfully to lessons of their white-lib masters, then provide sex.

@jaroonn "never claimed he was a homophobe" - No, you merely implied he was a homophobe.

You claimed he couldn't have reason, beyond money, to celebrate with a gay couple - which what homophobes are like.

As dumbass coward, you often imply things - rather than say them.

If you think it reflects credit on you: It doesn't.

It reflects discredit on you.

In addition to dumbass coward who smears people by false implication: You're also pro-groomer & a racist-extremist - we now know.

Extremism alive & well at MSNBC.

MSNBC legal analyst says First Amendment makes US ‘vulnerable,’ calls for ‘common sense’ speech restrictions

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1763218444646744428

And natch, extreme libs are to decide what "common sense" restrictions are.

It should not need to explain, all this goes way against democracy.

https://thepostmillennial.com/new-trump-leads-biden-among-hispanic-voters-by-6-points-nyt-siena-poll

Do Latinx already in USA, hate border crisis as much as anyone?

Or, are invaders flowing in by border crisis really conservatives?

@raphjd A moment of sanity & common sense? How is that possible?