@jaroonn Wow, you think it isn't done to little girls?
On purpose, I avoided pic of little girl because that could be too exploitative. BUT - yes: It's what you "beautiful" Wokies do to little girls also.
RETARDED MONSTER.
@jaroonn Wow, you think it isn't done to little girls?
On purpose, I avoided pic of little girl because that could be too exploitative. BUT - yes: It's what you "beautiful" Wokies do to little girls also.
RETARDED MONSTER.
Read whole transcript. Trump was JUST briefed by government experts about emerging light disinfection technologies - including internal to body.
I know you are really really dumb @jaroonn - but wow this is stupid, even for you.
Read entire transcript. See what government experts said, alongside Trump that day.
RETARD.
No, lying retard. YOU failed to include the whole quote. YOU
Here it is again:
"We hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just
very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn’t been checked,
but you’re going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought
the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin
or in some other way. And I think you said you’re going to test that
too. Sounds interesting, right? And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me. So, we’ll see, but the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute. That’s pretty powerful
Light disinfection technology, external or internal: mentioned 3 times. Clearly the referent of "it". Disinfectant effect of technologized light.
Chemical disinfection: mentioned 0 times. Not once.
and @jaroonn : Lying retard, as always. Stupid beyond description.
Granted, it wasn't "bleach,"
gives away whole game
It doesn't get more WOKE than this! What Wokies do to little girls, in name of "Trans".
@raphjd They tried word "migrant" but it wasn't enough, reality burned it etc.
Reality will burn word "newcomer" too - if libs stick with it, in a year it will become emotionally bad/tainted word - just watch.
@raphjd I have long observed that Drag & MTF are misogynist at heart.
Standard lib hoax: Quote out of context.
JUST BEFORE, government experts & Trump talk again & again about UV light applied to covid infection, outside or inside human body.
https://scottadams.locals.com/post/5120768/how-the-drinking-bleach-hoax-was-created
On April 23rd, 2020, President Trump held a press event to talk about progress in
finding Covid solutions. A major focus of the event involved the concept of killing
Covid on external surfaces using sunlight and UV light. Light as a “disinfectant”
was collectively mentioned 21 times by the experts – Dr. Bryan and Dr. Birx...
Trump clearly specified light as the disinfectant when he began his speculation
about “moving it inside the body,” but at one point in his comments he used the
word “disinfectant” without specifying light. He wrapped up his speculation by
reminding the audience he was talking about light.
Trump transcript: "we
hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just
very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn’t been checked,
but you’re going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought
the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin
or in some other way. And I think you said you’re going to test that
too. Sounds interesting, right? And then I see the disinfectant, [ie. disinfectant effect of this light technology,]
where it knocks it out in one minute....[rest of lib-mangled quote, which even MENTIONS "LIGHT" ONCE MORE - right in libs' own mangled quote - yet libs skip over it]
What lying retard you are @jaroonn You just couldn't be more ignorant or dishonest.
@raphjd maybe you were holding this bit (UV light) in reserve. but if you'd forgotten it, ok take note
Scott Adams' debunk is definitive.
He does all the lib hoaxes - will post link when I find it.
Remember when BLM burned down hundreds of cities across USA?
Here, they burn a police station in Oklahoma City. So Woke, so "beautiful"
@jaroonn Like I said: There's a million different instances. There's a LOT you'll have to say is "wrong", before we're done.
"I said it was wrong" - you'll be saying it a lot more.
"There are violent people everywhere. I don't condone it." - Sure you do - until & unless you are given no other choice.
If I weren't here to give you no other choice, you'd ignore-deny it - same as condone it.
Before, your tune was it "grows more beautiful every day". Remember? HAHAHAHahahah
You condone 400,000 people being killed in Ukraine just because UK-USA-CIA decide to party with literal Hitler-worshippers & cross giant Red Lines that were known for decades if not centuries.
In other words: You're bloodthirsty.
All Wokies or lib-extremists are bloodthirsty - because all Woke-lib policies come down to INNOCENT person getting burned or killed or cut up.
Only libs who aren't bloodthirsty are maybe - maybe - Useful Idiot or "normie" libs, who live in fake media bubble.
But even with them, question exists: how much of their ignorance & unconsciousness is by choice? - Maybe they're just very very good at free-riding on the Woke-lib extremists?
Eric Clanton had many victims - and is Antifa-linked, ie. Woke as can be.
"Court papers later revealed that Clanton struck at least seven people in the head, according to authorities. One person received a head laceration that required five staples to fix...."
Moving from Netflix histo-drama to Recent history... Here is what Wokies did to Andy Ngo.
Remember: This guy is MINORITY as well as GAY, plus JOURNALIST.
Woke idea of "beautiful" and "good"
@jaroonn there's a million other instances, could keep 'em coming.
You're the one who made RETARDED claim to virtue & goodness - so easy to disprove! Mere pics will expose Woke
@jaroonn ...said Azov Nazi Retard to mirror.
Again: BOTH ur pro-war, and ur Woke, can be explained (common root) by ur Bloodthirsty. So enjoy those pics! Luxuriate!
I did it to put a smile in your life
"Woke is beautiful...Woke is good" - for the BLOODTHIRSTY.
New historical drama clip - https://twitter.com/i/status/1771689454924599696
@jaroonn Don't worry - When this happens in your city, since you're a soulless retard & all, u'll be safe as part of Faceless Crowd.
Ur neither principled enough nor intelligent enough nor important enough, to be anything other than Faceless Crowd.
@jaroonn ...said Azov Nazi Retard who knows nothing of me.
Which is my wish. While not perfect, I try to keep biography out of this place.
@raphjd Other thing is: ISIS is known CIA asset.
As is CNN.
& CIA media technique is often to embed technical truths in a false narrative arc.
So - again I'm just spitballin' - who knows? - but the following could happen:
A. Sneaky Toria goes to Kiev and in a vague general way, says, hey, let's use asymmetric warfare to give Putin nasty surprises. (All phrases from her)
B. CIA-Ukraine alliance (existence admitted by New York Times) says, OK, but let's have plausible deniability.
get our ISIS asset to hire some Tajik assets, stage them for an attack, but they're not really suicidal, so promise them an escape route to Ukraine.
since we know all about it - we're planning it, after all - we'll "share intelligence" specifics to Russia & others. Only tell them wrong date.
so now we warned them, but we didn't really warn them, but later we can pretend we warned them.
reschedule our attack to slightly later date
do it
get our media assets to state, CORRECTLY (but incompletely haha), that attack was by ISIS & not CIA because CIA "warned" Russia
C. If anyone sees pattern: CIA media efforts activate their dumbest supporters in populace - like @jaroonn - to blather all incoherent & irrelevant, for instance say "Tucker Tucker" randomly out of blue, with foaming spittle.
See?
That CNN says it was ISIS!! & CIA sorta-warned Russia!! - those things might even be true - yet, still leave clever CIA as central planner.
BUT, we'll see. More info will drift out.
journalist Aaron Mate saying ISIS is CIA asset
"But why would CIA warn Russia of CIA's own attacK? That's crazy." - because plausible deniability. They gave Russia mostly-correct specifics except wrong date
"But why would CIA want such a dumb attack? That's crazy." - because Sneaky Toria said in a vague general way, hey, let's use asymmetric warfare to give Putin nasty surprises. Her words - Go ask her.
Tucker Carlson isn't relevant. For this one, he was not tiniest bit on my radar................... ........ until Azov Nazi Retard now just conjured him..
Plus, ANR thinks CNN is real
@jaroonn WOW you are dumb. DUMB dum dum. SO dumb.
Is there any thread where you won't flaunt your supreme & absurd stupidity?
RETARD.
Dragging in Tucker.... SO far off
@raphjd But I'm gonna say, systemic racism is real - just 100% opposite of what libs claim.
Black Privilege - which is real - was largely created by by Whites. (Libs)
It's gaslighting - encourages targeted group to freak out & be bad people. It's anti-Black racism, created by White libs who do 'pro-Black' as evil game for their own amusement & power, like in horror movie Get Out.
In USA, since 1960s libs targeted Black communities & families for destruction.
Dole programs.... raised single Black moms from 25% to around 60%.... and Pres Johnson has quote, where admits he wanted to lock in Black vote & cared about nothing else.
Abortion.... racist Margaret Sanger made Planned Parenthood to target Black communities. & super-easy abortion is literal family destruction.
Drugs.... Libs love drugs. But it's known that USA elites in bed with drug cartels, pushed worst drugs into Black communities, horribly on purpose.
Affirmative Action, especially as it devolved into DEI (Didn't Earn It), CRT, Woke, quotas, Defund The Police etc.... hurt Blacks with "racism of low expectations" or again, the gaslighting insane racism of Black Privilege.
Things beloved by libs, but combined, they created a subset of Blacks who are 3rd World-feral. Haiti-like.
That's systemic racism - & White libs made it.
Doctors & scienticians are baffled. Baffled!
What could possibly cause worldwide rise in cancers amongst young people?
not since 2020 mind you (covid time).........but only since 2021 (vaxx time)? WHAT??????????
OK - CA & Newsom repealed AB 2098 in Oct 2023, after legal challenges threatened to overturn it.
Back to FDA topic - well - you can't fault Dr. Pierre Kory who takes victory lap
@raphjd Looking for update on CA law - it may have been partly reversed.
I do recall, Newsom signed it with the usual empty hand-wringing, where he says "this could affect Free Speech & Medical Privacy" then goes ahead.
Under that CA law, a doctor could have his license stripped for saying things that CDC later endorses. Yup.
Example - if a doctor said "covid is just another respiratory virus, no big deal" - he would have been pilloried for "misinformation" in the four calendar years 2020-23, only to see CDC reverse & admit same in fifth year, 2024. (https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/64479/cdc-admits-covid-is-just-another-respiratory-virus)
This one's twisty, here is a summary.
USA FDA, Food & Drug Administration, is supposed to test claims of safety & effectiveness, but NOT give medical orders
2021 FDA's famous "Stop It" propaganda tweet against ivermectin, could be reasonably taken as medical order
FDA was brought to court about it....and, so to speak, agreed to Stop It
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24495557-fda-stipulation-of-dismissal
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has agreed to remove social media posts and webpages that urged people to stop taking ivermectin to treat COVID-19, according to a settlement dated March 21.
The FDA has already removed a page that said: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.”
Within 21 days, the FDA will remove another page...
FDA can continue to say:
“The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals,”
...because of course they haven't. Not FDA job. Never was.
It's up to prescribing doctors. Anyone with a serious medical condition knows, good doctors prescribe "off-label" medications ie. medications with a different or unintended use, for a specific patient - and it's nobody's business. Surely not FDA business.