• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. bi4smooth
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 53
    • Posts 2138
    • Best 333
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by bi4smooth

    • Here we go again: Fox hosts say Omicron Variant is a Democrat plot!

      Read it here: THEN tell me how WORSENING COVID-19 issues HELPS the Dems next fall?

      I used to say "You can't make this shit up" - but clearly, I was wrong! Fox (and Friends) CAN (and does)!

      Once again, tho - to be clear: the REST OF THE ENTIRE WORLD is conspiring against the Trumpite Conservatives and the Republican party!?!?!?!

      Whatever they're smoking, the effects are clearly lingering!

      So... we don't know yet if the existing vaccines protect against Omicron (they said we were lucky that they worked reasonably well against Delta)... but, let's say the protection level gets down to - say 50%... would THAT be better for the DEMS or the Republicans?

      How about this...

      It'd be BAD for ALL of us!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: For a million dollars would you?โ€ฆ

      @panurgic said in For a million dollars would you?โ€ฆ:

      @hottie124 Yep, maybe with emote work I would have two income :pig
      For a million would you allow cameras to follow every moment of your life 24/7 for the rest of your life?

      This chain has nearly died -- so let me restart it...
      I would certainly let cameras follow me 24/7 for $1M - but I wouldn't change my behavior either... I'm not ashamed to be a habitual porn watcher and "wanker"... people who watched would certainly see an awful lot of "spilled seed" ๐Ÿ™‚ But for $1M, I'm happy to share! ๐Ÿ™‚

      My real concern for that 24/7 monitoring (aren't we approaching that already?) would be the people around me...

      For $1M, would you: be the "secret lover" to:

      • Donald Trump if you're a Democrat (or otherwise left-of-true-center)?
      • Joe Biden if you're a Republican (or otherwise right-of-true-center)?

      In other words: would you "sell your body" to the opposite political view from your own for $1M? (Assuming you HAD to retain the secret, or lose all your money!)

      posted in Chit Chat
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Waukesha Christmas Parade SUV Attack

      @raphjd said in Waukesha Christmas Parade SUV Attack:

      Back on topic.

      Shane Ferro on social media said that we need to blame the fact that we have SUVs for the attack, not the driver.

      Liberal "news" outlets are still calling it an "incident", "crash" and "accident" despite all the evidence showing it was intentional.

      Imagine how hysterical they would be if the races were reversed.

      If you want to have someone to argue that Liberal media is biased, you'll have to find someone else... I've never claimed that Liberal media isn't biased - only that Conservative media is also!

      Virtually ALL media is biased these days - because they went from public service organizations (all-but required by the FCC of old) in the 60's and up even thru the 90's and 2000's... to being required to be "profit centers" for their corporate masters. As "profit centers" they have to draw viewers from other "news" centers - and to do that, they have to sensationalize EVERYTHING!

      Fox was the first to recognize that you could cater to a political viewpoint and quickly gain a "loyal following"... they were the first, also, to realize that news wasn't news anymore, it had become entertainment! As such, the old rules of reporting the truth were discarded... it didn't take long for the other news media to follow.

      It'd be nice to have some path BACK to where "news" was interested in "public service" and "facts" - but I don't see where that would come from - certainly, it cannot come from the Government! IMHO, the only way we get back to "news you can believe" will be when viewers decide truth is more important than supporting their views...

      That's gonna happen the same time children eschew candy for sugar-free granola bars and rice cakes!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Waukesha Christmas Parade SUV Attack

      @raphjd said in Waukesha Christmas Parade SUV Attack:

      @bi4smooth said in Waukesha Christmas Parade SUV Attack:

      To be perfectly clear: Kyle Rittenhouse absolutely DID kill 3 black men.

      What he did NOT do, according to the jury, was murder them.

      Facts and word choice matters!

      I'm quoting this for posterity, in case you try to edit your post claiming you never said this.

      Kyle, despite what your liberal "news" outlets want everyone to believe even after the trial, DID NOT kill 3 black men.

      He lawfully killed 2 white men and shot another white man.

      Either you are a blatant liar, or you are just a tool who listens to liberal "news" and repeats the bullshit lies they spew.

      Dude... you've done it again... He did not kill... followed by he did kill -- unless your issue is with 3 vs 2... so he killed 2 and nearly killed the 3rd... again, tho. the point of the trial was NEVER whether he shot at and killed anyone - he did.. the question at trial was: was it legal for him to have done so.

      In Illinois, it was perfectly legal for him to do so (and in the same breath, you want to blame the Chicago (IL) mayor for all the homicides in her city! You kill me (jokingly) with the situational ethics!)

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Waukesha Christmas Parade SUV Attack

      @raphjd said in Waukesha Christmas Parade SUV Attack:

      ...
      He only killed 2 people, lawfully.

      Re-read your own post... he didn't kill... he only killed...
      Why... you're Humpty Dumpty!

      โ€œWhen I use a word,โ€ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, โ€œit means just what I choose it to meanโ€”neither more nor less.โ€
      โ€œThe question is,โ€ said Alice, โ€œwhether you can make words mean so many different things.โ€
      - Lewis Carroll: Through the Looking-Glass, ca. 1871

      YES! He (Rittenhouse) most certainly DID kill those men. But, YES, he was justified in doing so - according to the jury! Thus, it was not murder (nor manslaughter)... in legal terms, it was "justifiable homicide."

      And in our legal system, THEIRS (the jury's, not yours, and not mine) is the decision/opinion that matters!

      That he (Rittenhouse) killed them was never in doubt! There was plenty of evidence of that. The trial was about whether it was justified, not whether it ever happened!

      If you believe in the jury system (and I do), then you have faith that the Rittenhouse jury got it right, and you equally must have faith that the Arbery jury did so as well!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Waukesha Christmas Parade SUV Attack

      To be perfectly clear: Kyle Rittenhouse absolutely DID kill 3 black men.

      What he did NOT do, according to the jury, was murder them.

      Facts and word choice matters!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: hello

      @kristian1000 said in hello:

      What to do when I am charged on the page for a file that is not downloaded

      The tracker counts bits/bytes transferred, not complete files. If you download 99.99% of a torrent, but fail to get the last few bytes, that doesn't "nullify" the content you DID get... otherwise, all files would be collections with pics in them - and leechers would just mark the pics as unwanted... when you GOT the movie, but not the rest of the torrent, you'd just quit and get a "refund" for the incomplete torrent...

      Nope - doesn't work that way... you get "charged" for every byte transferred - even if the torrent never completes.

      Sorry!

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: NEW RESEEDING PROCEEDURE TUTORIAL!!! (link)

      @ezekiel22 said in NEW RESEEDING PROCEEDURE TUTORIAL!!! (link):

      I tried everything... doesnt work... its so complicated now, is it me or it was easier few months ago ?

      If you think about what using a torrent really is, then re-seeding shouldn't be all THAT complicated.

      Remember, tho: a torrent file is a DESCRIPTOR of content (including a checksum to ensure validity). Whether you have created the .torrent or not, the fact is: if you add a torrent to your client, and the content is ALREADY THERE, you will immediately begin to SEED that torrent.

      Now: already there has to be an exact match! All the folder and file names have to match, and all of the file-part-checksums have to match! But if the contents check out, re-downloading a torrent is a re-seed!

      Mind you: because this is a private tracker, and therefore your ID has to be added to every seed/leech activity (for accountability), you actually re-seed your uploaded torrents!

      • When you upload a new torrent, the tracker builds a NEW .torrent file (not the one you uploaded) that you have to use to re-seed your torrent! Otherwise, it's never seeded to begin with.
      • Because you're downloading a new .torrent file for content you already have, you're techincally re-seeding your upload! ๐Ÿ™‚

      If you're still having issues, contact the HELP DESK. Staffers there are usually helpful!

      posted in Rules and Information
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Is FOX even "news" anymore?

      @raphjd said in Is FOX even "news" anymore?:

      @eobox91103

      Hillary had more Russian collusion than Trump did.

      It was the FBI that repeatedly lied to the FISA court. One FBI agent even illegally altered an official email to further the anti-Trump agenda.

      Hillary Clinton was an awful candidate for President - I voted against her, and would again (gleefully!). That said, she didn't have any ties to Russians - or any other Foreign Governments - in the 2016 election cycle. And neither did her campaign.

      Why? Because they were "old school" politicians who knew and understood the rules-of-engagement.

      Trump and the Trump campaign did not - so when the Russians came a knockin' they didn't report it to the FBI (the way they were supposed to), they jumped at the chance! It was wrong of them, and it nearly got Trump impeached! (That is not what the first impeachment trial was about - the Dems never did get any evidence that Trump himself colluded - or even met with or talked to - actual Russians himself - so there were never any actual charges raised... and the "Special Prosecutor" admitted that he didn't file any charges against Trump - not because he was guilt-free, but because as the sitting President, he was untouchable.

      But why let FACTS get in the way of your argument - you never have before! Hell, you've made them up before! I'm sure you'll make up some more now!

      Even Derek Jeter admitted after he cheated and successfully claimed that a foul ball actually hit him on the hands... the real fault was, after all, the umpires, no? (that's an open question for Sports Fans to argue about for decades to come!)... the point is, mistakes happen... the real question (in my mind) isn't so much whether the amateurish Jared Kushner actually MET with the Russians (he did)... the real questions are:

      • Did he know it was illegal when he did it?
      • When did he learn/discover that it was illegal?
      • Did he do it again after this discovery?
      • How much and when was Trump himself involved.

      Some of that may have been uncovered in the special prosecutor's investigations, but it hasn't been made public.

      But this "our hands are clean" act - after SO MANY have been charged and convicted - is not fooling anyone!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Why is everything new being deleted from the "Fan Sites" category?

      @mabbo said in Why is everything new being deleted from the "Fan Sites" category?:

      @dilemmax I haven't noticed the same but, at a guess: it's Thanksgiving. Perhaps whoever is working to submit DMCA notices has a couple of days off.

      I have mentioned before (though it is far too early to tell if this is the case yet), but these things tend to ebb and flow...

      Not too long ago, Corbin Fisher's parent company was actively pursuing both seeders and leechers of their content - in court! These days, they don't even DMCA their content much... they accept the torrent "losses" as part of the business model, and I suspect OF will come to the same conclusion eventually as well...

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Greetings!

      @kalayaan said in Greetings!:

      @sisowith

      333354,xcitefun-v.png

      Enjoy this site๐Ÿ˜Š

      Ha! Nice graphic! ๐Ÿ™‚ I love it!
      Welcome to both @tanducho234 and @sisowith to the Forums... while certainly not as active as the torrent-side of the house, there is much to entertain and titillate here! Enjoy!

      posted in Introductions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: PREP problem with STD

      @paulflying said in PREP problem with STD:

      PREP problem with STD

      If you are on PREP and do bareback, then STD has chance.

      How do you think of that?

      PrEP is a defense against only 1 STD: HIV. That said, of the FOUR STD's that are not otherwise curable (the other being: HPV, Herpes, and Hep-B), only this one (HIV) is generally ALSO fatal if not detected and treated quickly.

      Let me say at the onset of this reply: whether to take PrEP or NOT to, along with the separate decision whether to wear condoms during sex, or not to do so, is an intensely personal decision. A decision that should be made with the input and consultation of your own personal physician, and based on your own morals, beliefs, and risk acceptance.

      What I write below is my own set of beliefs, and is shared as an example: one man's path... and not as an attempt to persuade or dissuade any one from coming to a different set of conclusions in their own path!

      IMHO: A great deal of DAMAGE to the male sexual psyche was perpetrated in the 1980's and 1990's in the name of promoting "safe sex" - when, truth be told, sex has never - in the history of mankind - been truly SAFE.

      The correct term, and the only one used by medical professionals, is (and always was) safer sex - as in: less risky vs. riskless.

      As a result, a generation of men (and some women can be included as collateral damage) have been "raised" to believe that sex is unnaturally risky and downright dangerous! I can't count the number of younger men I've met who are essentially AFRAID (even TERRIFIED!) to have sex! (with or without condoms!)

      I'm sorry, but if humanity had ALWAYS been this afraid of sex, then - as a species - we'd have died out a long, LONG TIME AGO!

      Do the math: Nearly every one of the 7.7 BILLION people on this planet were put here because some pair of humans had sex - not just any sex, but they fucked! Assuming straight sex produces a pregnancy that goes full term only 1 in 20 times, that's 154 BILLION straight fucks alone in the past 75 years or so... add in the gay sex, and the sex with birth control, and there have likely been about half-a-TRILLION acts of fucking on this planet in the past 75 years! And that doesn't count the non-fucking kinds of sex!

      Again: If sex was THAT dangerous, we (as a species) simply would not exist!

      That doesn't mean we should go back to the 1970's "free love" era when we (especially we gay men) were fucking almost anyone who would let us! That kind of promiscuity really CAN be dangerous! But surely we - as sensible people - can understand that sex is a natural, instinctive act - even if we're gay! There is nothing "wrong or dirty" about it! It's as basically human as eating food and drinking liquids!

      As you can imagine from my writing above, I take PrEP - to prevent HIV infection - because I prefer not to die of HIV (though it is a largely treatable disease today - thankfully!). I have had sex (recently) with an HIV+ person, who was on medication and was undetectable... and we didn't use condoms.

      In my opinion, the safest people to have unprotected (condomless) sex with are the people on meds: HIV- on PrEP and HIV+ on HIV meds and are undetectable. These people are actively working to protect themselves and others from HIV, and because of their medication regimens, they routinely get tested for HIV - as well as other STDs.

      Men who proclaim themselves HIV- but haven't been recently tested - and who are not using condoms - are playing Russian Roulette with their HIV status... they put themselves and others potentially at risk by not using condoms. Further, they play this "risk-game" essentially "trusting" that their partner is telling them (or even knows) the truth about their HIV (much less other STD) status.

      Men who know that they are HIV+, and either are not on HIV medication, or haven't yet achieved "undetectable" status are putting others at real risk by not using condoms. There are some men out there who are perfectly willing to do this, and to LIE to their partners while doing so. I personally think lying about your HIV status is criminal... your mileage may vary.

      As for the other (non-HIV) STD's, I take my chances... tho, I do take some precautions - like not hooking up with every Tom, Dick, and Harry who hits me up on Grindr or Tinder - but, when there is a genuine attraction, I have sex... without condoms usually, though I honor and respect the wishes of my partner should they prefer the use of condoms.

      I want to re-iterate: the decision to NOT use condoms is my personal choice, and it is a decision made with the input of my doctor of choice.

      If you'd have made a different decision, I respect that... but I no more want to convince you that my choice is right for you than I want to hear you try to convince me that your decision is right for me.

      FINALLY: Before anyone goes there - this is totally NOT analogous to COVID-19; HIV is an STD, where COVID-19 is a highly communicable, aerosol spread disease. The only similarity is that they're both caused by viruses. That said, the common cold has more in common with COVID-19 than the HIV virus!

      In closing:
      I want to say again that I appreciate the differing beliefs and experiences of others - so long as they are shared, as I have shared here, as an example of what decision you made (and, perhaps why). But in any case, not as an attempt to persuade or dissuade others from making their own, informed decisions and choices.

      posted in Health & Fitness
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Stalled

      @dandylion said in Stalled:

      @bi4smooth said in Stalled:

      @dandylion said in Stalled:

      Hello,

      The tracker issues aside, QBittorrent does not behave with our tracker very well because we do not have "Scrape" enabled. I'm going to be honest, I'm not entirely sure what that means, but it was explicitly mentioned in a training document about QBittorrent acting strangely because of it.

      Thankfully the fix is easy, if a download is "Stalled", right click it and click "Force Resume". This should resolve the issue ๐Ÿ™‚

      Thank you,
      DandyLion

      The qBitTorrent "scrape" issue only comes into play when you complete a download.

      "Scraping" is essentially a re-announce to the tracker that you have the complete torrent and are now a seeder, not a leecher.

      In qBitTorrent, there is a simple fix: set your client to force re-check upon completion. It will seed properly AFTER the re-check.

      I learned something new, Thank you very much, I will update my training materials and pass that information along ๐Ÿ™‚

      To be completely clear - the part in qBitTorrent about the scrape isn't all there is to a scrape...

      Read a full description of a scrape here

      But where it comes into play with qBitTorrent is that it "scrapes" at the conclusion of the download - and our tracker doesn't support scrapes - so the qBitTorrent client sits there saying to itself "I'm a seeder" while the GTru tracker says "he's a leecher still"

      When you set the force-recheck, and it completes, the qBitTorrent sends a fill ANNOUNCE to the tracker, which is accepted and voila! You're a seeder!

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Support Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Stalled

      @dandylion said in Stalled:

      Hello,

      The tracker issues aside, QBittorrent does not behave with our tracker very well because we do not have "Scrape" enabled. I'm going to be honest, I'm not entirely sure what that means, but it was explicitly mentioned in a training document about QBittorrent acting strangely because of it.

      Thankfully the fix is easy, if a download is "Stalled", right click it and click "Force Resume". This should resolve the issue ๐Ÿ™‚

      Thank you,
      DandyLion

      The qBitTorrent "scrape" issue only comes into play when you complete a download.

      "Scraping" is essentially a re-announce to the tracker that you have the complete torrent and are now a seeder, not a leecher.

      In qBitTorrent, there is a simple fix: set your client to force re-check upon completion. It will seed properly AFTER the re-check.

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Support Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Stalled

      @jkshrs3 said in Stalled:

      Same here

      As I noted in another, similar thread - I'm currently connected via Canada (thru a VPN), and I'm getting over 7MB/s from 6 different seeders on this tracker.

      Restart your client and maybe even consider changing the ports used....

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Support Discussions
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: copyright infringement

      @bi4smooth said in copyright infringement:

      @lololulu19 said in copyright infringement:

      It's a load of manure.

      I have posted many videos which were taken down for copyright infringement because someone complained.. yet the same titles posted by other people in different sizes remain on the site.

      I think one reason is because the poster of the other sized videos doesn't want there to be other versions posted - taking download points from theirs.

      They don't verify if the complainer is a valid complainer before removing the torrents. They should delay removing torrents until at least 24 hours after the fake complaint is made to verify it.

      Actually, this does not happen much anymore. It used to be that I could not upload ANYTHING without it being taken down almost immediately.

      I have explained this before: It doesn't work the way you think it does... a DMCA notice doesn't come in and say "take down all your OF content please!"

      They have to provide the actual links to the actual infringing material - AND they have to be legal representatives of the copyright holder.

      I've mentioned before, I have a friend who works for a non-porn related site, and they've had re-posts of pics and short videos DMCA'd, but the original - from which they were copied, are not mentioned... and so can stay!

      So, let's say you post "OF ABC Part 1 of 3" in 720p, and someone else posts "OF ABC Part 1 of 3" in 4k... when the DMCA notice comes in, it has to mention BOTH VERSIONS, or else ONLY the version mentioned is taken down.

      Believe me - this works in our favor - even if you are the one (of multiples) whose upload was removed!

      I can't speak for this site, but at my friend's, they literally click on the URL to make sure it's exactly what they claim is in violation... then they remove ONLY that material. Sometimes, it's a picture in an array of pics, and they only show 1 or 2 in the DMCA notice.. so there are holes in the array - often of the same person - and the other pics are all left alone!

      If you are the person processing the DMCA request, this is how its' done - you don't go LOOKING for material to remove, you remove only what is specifically and legally required to be! NOTHING MORE!

      posted in Uploading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: copyright infringement

      @lololulu19 said in copyright infringement:

      It's a load of manure.

      I have posted many videos which were taken down for copyright infringement because someone complained.. yet the same titles posted by other people in different sizes remain on the site.

      I think one reason is because the poster of the other sized videos doesn't want there to be other versions posted - taking download points from theirs.

      They don't verify if the complainer is a valid complainer before removing the torrents. They should delay removing torrents until at least 24 hours after the fake complaint is made to verify it.

      Actually, this does not happen much anymore. It used to be that I could not upload ANYTHING without it being taken down almost immediately.

      I have explained this before: It doesn't work the way you think it does... a DMCA notice doesn't come in and say "take down all your OF content please!"

      They have to provide the actual links to the actual infringing material - AND they have to be legal representatives of the copyright holder.

      I've mentioned before, I have a friend who works for a non-porn related site, and they've had re-posts of pics and short videos DMCA'd, but the original - from which they were copied, are not mentioned... and so can stay!

      So, let's say you post "OF ABC Part 1 of 3" in 720p, and someone else posts "OF ABC Part 1 of 3" in 4k... when the DMCA notice comes in, it has to mention BOTH VERSIONS, or else ONLY the version mentioned is taken down.

      Believe me - this works in our favor - even if you are the one (of multiples) whose upload was removed!

      posted in Uploading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: all gaytorrent.ru trackers not working

      @johnearl3 said in all gaytorrent.ru trackers not working:

      I am unable to download torrents from only this website and its winding me up. every torrent is sating timed out

      Hmmmm - restart your client and switch ports?
      I'm currently connected thru canada (all of my connections go thru VPNs around the world!), and am connected to 7 different seeders @ 5+Mbps (combined).

      posted in Downloading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: Screencap Inquiry

      @djsoapbubble said in Screencap Inquiry:

      @bi4smooth Well, I still hear you on that front and it doesn't bear repeating, but my work is my work. I should know my work as it's my signature stamp. Granted, copyright and blah, blah, blah. No. These screenshots looked like they came from someone who lives in a trailer parker in Biloxi, Mississippi. It's one thing taking over an hour (well, for me anyway) to upload things for this site as it takes a considerable amount of time, but it's another thing to have someone else butcher my layout and presentation and all in the name for a couple of seed points. Seriously? No. Someone needs to have a psychiatric evaluation and it's not me.

      Believe me, I'm trying to look at things from both perspectives and I'm really trying. However, I have this instant mentality of "house respect". I don't own this site of course, but when people upload and share their content, that immediately becomes THEIR house. That's THEIR house. What they do with THEIR house is none of my business. Sure, compliments by others are very nice and always welcomed. I guess what I'm trying to say is that it's very intrusive when people post additional screencaps when it's not needed. How would they like it if I physically went to their home and immediately frowned upon their living room curtains?

      No. Whoever uses a screenshot maker or generator and posts them in someone else's house for a couple of seed points needs to have a psychiatric evaluation.

      As aforementioned, I'm trying to look at things from both perspectives. Okay, so 3 or 5 seed points get you where? What does it do?

      LOL - I'm with you brother! If I were king, I would try to do this:

      • IF the uploader provides 5 or more images with the upload, THEN they have an option to LOCK their torrent - so that no other users can modify it.

      Mind you, I'm equally baffled when I upload a collection of content, obfuscating the name of the source to avoid DMCA spider detection... only to have some schmuck fully identify everything - in plain English - in the comments... and sure 'nuf, 2 days later it gets DMCA'd! GRRRRR!!!! If I had access to that users' name and a drone.... GRRRR!!!!

      posted in Uploading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • RE: copyright infringement

      @djsoapbubble said in copyright infringement:

      So, who are these people who report? Are you saying people like Tim Kruger or Cutler X monitor gay torrent sites and click the report button? If not, then do they hire someone? I thought GayTorrent.ru was private now and only open to an invitation. I am so confused right now, lol!

      Honestly, if I had a job position from what I just described above, then I would be bored to heavenly tears.

      There are likely programs in place (called spiders [or spyders]) that do it for you... my guess is that it's the OF site itself running the spider, not any single or group of models. (Though it may also be an opt-in for the creators - after all, it protects THEIR cash-flow!)

      posted in Uploading
      bi4smooth
      bi4smooth
    • 1
    • 2
    • 39
    • 40
    • 41
    • 42
    • 43
    • 106
    • 107
    • 41 / 107