• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. twinkletoes
    3. Posts
    T
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 52
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 1

    Posts made by twinkletoes

    • RE: Judged and banned as "Non-gay related movies"

      @twinkletoes:

      @Uwe:

      On the question of an upload being gay enough or not it might just lead to a long polemic without exit:
      to much grey zone of appreciation.
      Because of that we don't allow basically Gay Interest movies.
      We just can't define objective criteria what makes a movie special Gay Interest and isn't just interesting much gays
      or is of much interest to others, too.

      If the staff here were just consistent on this point, it wouldn't cause so much discontent.
      When the following torrent was posted
      http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=117296
      I wrote to the staff, saying that it had NO gay content, just some male nudity.
      The torrent was still allowed.

      And now we have 2 episodes of "Young Soldiers"!
      Why???
      Again, no response from the staff to a complaint

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Judged and banned as "Non-gay related movies"

      @Uwe:

      @twinkletoes:

      …
      When the following torrent was posted
      http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=117296
      I wrote to the staff, saying that it had NO gay content, just some male nudity.
      The torrent was still allowed.

      Yes, it was me who decided to leave it on because of what is said on IMDb about this movie and I added to the description.

      Surreal tale of a 14 year-old boy who dreams of escaping the loneliness from an unhappy home & sexual abuse (from his mother's boyfriend who is also his school swimming coach). One day his back mysteriously sprouts feathers and he can metaphorically fly away from it all. Written by Len Massaar

      If we would take it off, most certainly the uploader or seeders will shout on us, why it wasn't gay enough. Whatever we do with grey zone movies, it will be wrong.

      To better appreciate a movie, we would need to have watched it. That is just impossible. Still it would be an individual appreciation.

      The "abuse" the boy suffered "from from his mother's boyfriend" was purely physical
      There was no sexual content to it
      "his mother's boyfriend" is strictly heterosexual and expresses no sexual attraction to the boy
      Look at the IMDB "plot keywords" - you will find only Gay Interest & Teenager Nudity & Boy Nudity

      If a site member takes the time to report a torrent as inappropriate,
      why don't you at least have the courtesy to contact that member if there is any doubt about the validity of the objection
      The issue is not one of "individual appreciation", it concerns objective criteria

      I bought that DVD because it was purported to have gay content
      I felt cheated

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Judged and banned as "Non-gay related movies"

      @Uwe:

      On the question of an upload being gay enough or not it might just lead to a long polemic without exit:
      to much grey zone of appreciation.
      Because of that we don't allow basically Gay Interest movies.
      We just can't define objective criteria what makes a movie special Gay Interest and isn't just interesting much gays
      or is of much interest to others, too.

      If the staff here were just consistent on this point, it wouldn't cause so much discontent.
      When the following torrent was posted
      http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=117296
      I wrote to the staff, saying that it had NO gay content, just some male nudity.
      The torrent was still allowed.

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Gay Mall Shooting :(:(:(

      That is so very tragic!

      But the 2 articles are very confusing

      The first article mentions "the gun holder described to be 16 to 17 years old"

      Whereas the second article says "a 13-year old boy killed a 16-year old boy"

      Who killed whom?

      The second article also seems to imply that the whole killing may have been based on a misunderstanding
      (i.e. younger boy's "jealousy over a third party"
      whereas the older boy "is happy with the relationship with the younger boy")
      That would make it even more heartbreaking

      posted in Gay News
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Judged and banned as "Non-gay related movies"

      I don't want to exacerbate the situation, but this does seem to be pretty unworthy treatment
      of a well-behaved uploader by the staff here

      I don't know what film is involved, but just read the staff's own assessment:

      @Uwe:

      When looking to IMdB, "Bob" the gay seems to be an important character.
      IMdB is givung quite a few "gay" keywords (click "See more" there):
      Coming Out
      Gay Character
      Homosexuality
      Male Nudity
      Gay Straight Relations
      Male Rear Nudity
      Gay Club

      but in a long list of other keywords.
      There is a certain chance that I would approve such upload, but not sure, 50% chance.

      How can any film whose IMdB Plot keywords include
      Coming Out & Gay Character & Homosexuality & Gay Straight Relations & Gay Club
      NOT be considered sufficiently gay?

      @Uwe:

      Believe us, we are not happy about that situation of being unable to clean clear cut gay non gay decisions.
      I am for example wondering for what the "Spartacus" TV series have their place here.
      No gays, just male bodies … AFAIK

      Precisely!
      Then too why, for example, is this torrent allowed?
      http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=29585

      NO gay content at all but "loads of straight sex"
      (quoted from one of the torrent's 'Comments')

      Is the nudity of two pretty teenage boys enough to qualify?

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: What's your experience with .mkv files here on the tracker?

      avi, mp4 and mkv are just containers!
      the container chosen has no effect on the quality
      xvid encoded video can be placed in any of the 3 containers
      the final size and quality will be essentially the same
      how the video is encoded/compressed determines the quality
      avi is the oldest container - it is VERY old
      it has many limitations
      hence, the need for the newer containers
      mkv is the least restrictive of the containers
      one can place just about anything in a mkv container
      (yes, even RealMedia compression can be placed in mkv, but not in mp4)
      that's why it is popular

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: PDF Translation

      One possible approach: convert the PDF to HTML
      For example, free software -> hXXp://pdftohtml.sourceforge.net/

      posted in Books & Magazines
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Max Adler - Glee

      @notquiteme:

      Hey, I've always thought he looked good, but he's kind of mean in the series, so it's a bit sad.

      He's an actor
      Please don't confuse the person with the role he plays
      He's hardly a homophobe in real life
      hXXp://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010/11/16/glee-bully-max-adler-becomes-anti-gay-bullying-advocate/

      posted in Chubbies and Chasers
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Kentucky Kicks Two Men out of Public pool for Being Gay

      hXXp://biblebeltblogger.com/index.php/religion/in-kentucky-god-is-in-charge-of-homeland-security

      According to the Lexington Herald-Leader’s John Cheves: “The 2006 law organizing the state Office of Homeland Security lists its initial duty as ‘stressing the dependence on Almighty God as being vital to the security of the Commonwealth.

      “Specifically, Homeland Security is ordered to publicize God’s benevolent protection in its reports, and it must post a plaque at the entrance to the state Emergency Operations Center with an 88-word statement that begins, ‘The safety and security of the Commonwealth cannot be achieved apart from reliance upon Almighty God.’”

      The language was inserted into the homeland security bill by a Southern Baptist minister who is also a state legislator.

      posted in Gay News
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Most Americans Disagree With Church Teaching On Homosexuality, Abortion

      @fancydude:

      abortions due to rape are a tiny tiny percentage of all abortions.  
      And it still murders a child.

      Those of us who support a woman's right to choose, do NOT accept that a fetus is identical to a child.
      Do you also accept your Church's teaching that a fertilized egg is identical to a child?

      The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in the 2008 Instruction Dignitas Personae stated that:
      "Alongside methods of preventing pregnancy which are, properly speaking, contraceptive,
      that is, which prevent conception following from a sexual act,
      there are other technical means which act after fertilization,
      when the embryo is already constituted, either before or after implantation in the uterine wall …
      Therefore, the use of means of interception and contragestation fall within
      the sin of abortion and are gravely immoral"

      posted in Religion & Philosophy
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Most Americans Disagree With Church Teaching On Homosexuality, Abortion

      @raphjd:

      The catholic church only allows sex that creates more catholics.   
      That is why it hates gay sex and abortions, because neither fills it's coffers and power base.

      That is also why it hates contraception

      posted in Religion & Philosophy
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Most Americans Disagree With Church Teaching On Homosexuality, Abortion

      @fancydude:

      one thing seems to be clear - it is not so much about the "choice" of the woman or what is best for her
      as it is about making money for the abortion industry.

      Why would any doctor whose primary motivation is "making money" choose a field which makes them
      the target of religious fanatics who would like to shoot them dead?

      @fancydude:

      Every woman I have discussed abortion with who has had one, adamantly insists she did the right thing. 
      Sure, not a scientific poll, but no regrets?

      That is one strange comment from someone with your beliefs.
      You do know about Norma McCorvey, right?

      Norma Leah McCorvey … better known by the legal pseudonym "Jane Roe",
      was the plaintiff in the landmark American lawsuit Roe v. Wade in 1973 ...
      she married Woody McCorvey, but claimed he was abusive towards her.
      Subsequently, McCorvey left him during the pregnancy with her first child,
      Melissa (born 1965).  The following year, McCorvey again became pregnant,
      eventually giving birth to a baby that was placed for adoption.
      She then returned to live with her mother, but when Norma intimated
      that she was sexually attracted to women, her mother disowned her
      and took custody of Norma's daughter, Melissa.
      In 1969, at the age of 21, while working low-paying jobs and
      living with her father, McCorvey became pregnant a third time ...
      She attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but the
      respective clinics had been closed down by authorities.
      Eventually, McCorvey was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington.
      The case took three years of trials to reach the United States Supreme Court.

      In her first book, the 1994 autobiography, I Am Roe, McCorvey wrote of her sexuality.
      For many years, she had lived quietly in Dallas with her long-time partner, Connie Gonzales.
      "We're not like other lesbians, going to bars," she explained in a New York Times interview.
      "We're lesbians together.  We're homers."
      That same year, she converted to Christianity and expressed remorse
      for her part in the Supreme Court decision.
      McCorvey has worked as part of the pro-life movement, such as Operation Rescue.

      At a signing of I Am Roe, McCorvey was befriended by evangelical minister Flip Benham.
      She was baptized on August 8, 1995, by Benham in a Dallas, Texas, backyard swimming pool,
      an event that was filmed for national television.
      Two days later she announced that she had become an advocate
      of Operation Rescue's campaign to make abortion illegal.

      McCorvey's second book, Won by Love, was published in 1998 ...
      Shortly thereafter, McCorvey released a statement that affirmed her entrance
      into the Roman Catholic Church, and she has been confirmed
      into the church as a full member.
      She has also stated that she is no longer a lesbian.

      from hXXp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norma_McCorvey

      posted in Religion & Philosophy
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Downloader Inspires Uploader to Take File Down

      @raphjd:

      The fact that someone came back after watching the video and gave you more SB, is an extremely rare thing.

      I can't speak for others, but I can assure you that I have returned to torrent listings
      to give seedbonus points after viewing videos.
      Am I that atypical?
      I have no way of knowing.

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Downloader Inspires Uploader to Take File Down

      @ballard1:

      So you're the guy who offers all these great movies? Cool!

      ♥

      :thankyou:

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Downloader Inspires Uploader to Take File Down

      @pigtucket:

      Oh, Annelle…you gotta lighten up.   ;D

      That wasn't a very Christian thing to do

      (I love Steel Magnolias too)

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Downloader Inspires Uploader to Take File Down

      @ballard1:

      I am sorry to hear that you had experienced belligerent comments.
      Strange. I rarely come across any of these.

      Here is one example from 2 years ago but still visible, before I started posting anonymously
      (and before seedbonus points were offered)
      http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=44822

      Here is a more recent example
      http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=92926

      The "Rating" is "3.3 out of 5 with 3 vote(s) total"
      3 votes!  Is that a representative sample?
      The 5 "Comments" are mostly negative.
      But 35 people chose to thank me and gave me 207 seedbonus points.
      I'd like to direct raphjd's attention to the comment from almaral:
      "After watching the movie I decided to give more seeds bonus."

      @ballard1:

      But now that you are anonymous anyway, why do you care?

      I upload almost exclusively in the Themed Movie category.
      Far fewer comments are posted there than in the porn categories.
      I put a great deal of effort into my uploads.
      So, I am concerned that some jerk with an ax to grind will post one nasty comment,
      which will stop many people from giving the movie a chance and all my effort is for nought.

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Downloader Inspires Uploader to Take File Down

      @geographer:

      I believe improving doesn't always mean removing.

      And you imply that I do believe that "improving .. always mean(s) removing"?
      This is what offends me about your attitude/remarks.

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Downloader Inspires Uploader to Take File Down

      @ballard1:

      @twinkletoes:

      Whereas, in my experience, much of the "Comments" and "Rating" is snarky, serving only to antagonize uploaders.

      Some uploaders have to be antagonized!
      Like the guys uploading files knowing very well that they are corrupted!
      This is not acceptable IMHO.
      They are dumping unusable files on everybody just to improve their ratios.
      Now that we are all anonymous it's not possible anymore to single them out and avoid them.
      Where else, if not in the comment section, can you voice your frustration?

      Wanna try an experiment?
      I have a corrupted file of a video everybody wants to see.
      I bet it will be downloaded like crazy.
      And then it's only a matter of time until the comment section fills up and the rating goes to zero.
      Ah well, I don't want to antagonize innocent downloaders…  😉

      First of all, my response was not intended as an attack on you personally.
      Actually, it was prompted by some belligerent comments which I received in response to a few of my uploads.

      Corrupt files and other objective problems with an upload should be reported directly to moderators, in my opinion.
      Just use the option
      "Report Torrent Click here to report this torrent to staff for violation of the rules"

      My problem lies with the subjective comments.
      As you said earlier "Most people are too lazy to comment anyway."
      That makes the "Comments" highly skewed

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Downloader Inspires Uploader to Take File Down

      @geographer:

      @twinkletoes:

      This thread illustrates my reasons for suggesting that the torrent "Comments" section should be removed

      Don't want to sound rude, but following many of your posts - you would just remove everything from this site except the Download button.

      I am sure that you don't want to sound rude, but you are.
      I am a great supporter of showing appreciation for an uploader's effort by using the
      "Say Thank You! and give Uploader XX Seedbonus Points" option

      It is simple to use and many downloaders on this site do invoke it, unlike the "Comments" and "Rating" options.
      As such, I believe it gives a far better indication of the value of an upload.
      Whereas, in my experience, much of the "Comments" and "Rating" is snarky, serving only to antagonize uploaders.

      May I remind you that you made a similar observation: "the site has a 5 star torrent rating system.
      Though we have to face facts - it is dead, no-one, or very few and very seldom, rates torrents
      and no-one takes into account that rating when choosing a torrent to download."
      http://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=15585.0

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • RE: Well Prepared Torrent Upload Rewarding

      @danijelr15:

      due to the latest development at GT.ru (hiding uploader's username) you will never see me giving any seed bonus to some anonymous people, who might not even need it or deserve it.

      Why do you need to know an uploader's username in order to determine if some upload deserves a reward?

      posted in GayTorrent.ru Discussions
      T
      twinkletoes
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 1 / 3