@raphjd:
There's a lot of it going on.
I think that that makes up 99.9999999999999999999% of the rise in "hate crimes" we have seen since Obama.
The left hate talking about false flags because it defeats their narrative.
When I hear about rape claims, I think back to my own case, Jackie at UVA, Duke LaCrosse, and countless others. There is virtually nothing that happens to these lying cunts, like there are for other cases of lying about being victims of crime.
False flaggers, like false rape claimers, are protected by the system. We keep seeing this in these hoax cases where the guilty are never named and/or prosecuted for the shit they pulled.
When writers for rags such as TEEN Vogue, say they have no problem with men being destroyed by false claims, you get an understanding of the mentality of the left and those who protect them.
Feminist Rebecca Watson broke the mold and was one of the first, if not the first, to say that false rape claims are 8% of all rape claims vs the old 2%. HOWEVER, she still wants a JUST BELIEVE system where men are automatically sent to prison on a woman's say so, becaue 8% isn't that many men.
The West, either officially or unofficially, uses the Duluth Model that says that even with extreme proof that the woman is the agressor, the police are still supposed to arrest the man. California got rid of the Duluth Model, but quickly switched back to it when it started to have women being arrested at higher amounts. This is the kind of shit the left see as gender equality.
You sparked a memory in my brain…
In that murder case I often refer to in which a man is in prison as a result of a fraudulent trial and the evidence being ignored, etc. There was another incident involving that same man years earlier. This man was charged with using the credit cards of his friend's parents and making $16,000 in purchases. The man was accused of raping the daughter of these people, and illegally using the credit cards. He would have been put away for a LONG LONG time if he was convicted of what he was being charged with. The charges were so absurd, that the JUDGE had enough and reduced the punishment to 40 hours of community service and a year of probation. As in the murder trial, the man's own defense attorney threw him under the bus.
Anyway.. this is what really happened. The man who was using the credit cards to purchase $16,000 worth of stuff was basically set up. His "friend" was actually a guy, and that guy had a sister. The parents of that guy and the sister were quite wealthy. They came up with a scam to have the man use their parents' credit cards to buy things.. and then sell those items to make money. They said the parents never check their credit card statements. This scheme worked for a long time. It was not until after $16,000 in charges were racked up that the parents noticed what was going on. The parents' own son and daughter set up the scheme. The parents had to find a way to get out of being held liable for those $16,000 in purchases, since their OWN children were the one's who came up with the scheme. So, they tried to place the blame on the man who wound up getting charged for the crime.... and they claimed that the man RAPED their daughter.
There is a big problem with that claim.. because the man that they claimed RAPED their daughter was very good looking, an escort, and totally gay.
