What what? He uses Jared's back channel? This thread is getting racier all the time
About that channel allegation.. it seems to me that there SHOULD be back channels to communicate with other governments without having the communications made public. Of course that can sort of be done through ambassadors, but that has big problems too.
Here is one example that I can think of at the moment: In Iran, they have elected leaders.. HOWEVER, the elected leader is actually a puppet. The non-elected religious leader is the true power, and the elected leader governs with the permission of the religious nut leader. It's very much like a King who has governors. The governor is the one operating the government, but must answer to the King. Likewise, it is virtually impossible to have a rational, meaningful communication with another leader when it is done in public or the leader is not able to speak freely.
In the case of Jared Kushner, it was the Russian ambassador who was suggesting a back channel. Yes, a back channel was discussed, but it wasn't Jared that initiated it.
As for leaders initiating sneaky back channel deals with Russia… watch this: Youtube Video
And don't forget Slippery Hillary's deal with Russia.. which benefit herself.. in which she sold Russian 20% of the USA uranium reserves! In exchange, the Clinton foundation got $31 million and a pledge for another $100 million!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHiuGbwvDww
LOCK HER UP!
No one is arguing that back channels are an essential and appropriate part of international diplomacy. Most even grant that it was appropriate for Jared to lay the groundwork for one with the Russians. However, considering using Russian facilities to hide the communications from the American national security apparatus borders on treason.
The Hilary allegation is old news. She is not president and her political career is over. Move on.
Hillary is not old news until this nonsense about the 2016 election is put to rest. It sure isn't put to rest now is it? Oh wait, I forgot.. according to moonbat rules, the left can attack all they like about anything going back to the "big bang", but nobody else can refer to anything to counter their attacks.
Apparently it was the Russian ambassador that came up with the idea for the back channel.. so whatever the plan was.. is not Jared's fault and certainly not Trump's fault. Also, since this back-channel was never implemented, nor were even any plans made - it is completely baseless and irrelevant. The world has not yet gotten to the point of prosecuting ideas.
Lastly, I fail to see why the act of communicating with another country is treason. Again.. an examples of treason are Hillary selling Russia 20% of the uranium in the USA to Russia in exchange for $131 million paid to the Clinton Foundation… Or Obama giving hundreds of billion$ to Iran - in exchange for.. well.. we got NOTHING in return for that apparently.
First the legitimacy of the 2016 election has been put to rest. No one has ever suggested that the Russians were able to change vote tallies. They just tried to screw with us and our thinking.
Second, how are you so sure the use of Russian facilities was the ambassador's idea? Jared should have known better. And how are you so sure it was never implemented? Are you a Russian spy?
Third, the Clinton foundation is not the Clinton Personal Wallet. I admit some family members get salaries and they fly around the world on private jets, but the vast majority of the money goes to pay for HIV drugs for poor children.
Fourth, the billions for Iran was always their money, we just released it from sequester.
BLM is so entitled that they feel that they can hijack anything and everything.
Ok, it's an off shoot of BLM called No Justice No Pride. They don't care about the LGBT community, just the bullshit BLM narrative.
Last year they hijacked the Orland shooting vigil and turned it into a racist anti white people thing.
More proof of black privilege.
I think BLM is actually hurting the democraps. The people who support BLM were already democraps.. but by going public with a visible group called "Black Lives Matter", they have ignited the resolve of the right to actually vote instead of staying at home.
Andraya Yearwood is trans m2f in name only. He has done absolutely nothing to transition, not even shave his mustache. This the same with Elliot Cope, but at least AY isn't using all kinds of mental gymnastics to justify the non change "trans".
It seems like the best thing to do, for SJWs and feminists, is to eliminate all gendered sports and have "whatever you are" football league and whatnot. This would allow everyone to compete however they identify and it would also prove feminists right that there is no difference between males and females.
You need to educate yourself about FC. There are 3 categories, whether you like it or not.
You are a misandrist by justifying it happening to boys, but defending the western ban on it happening to girls.
I hate how feminist (women and their cucks) screech about equality, but ignore areas where females have special rights. They then get butt hurt that men fight for gender equality for men.
I know why no one replies, my questioning it is rhetorical.
I was mostly commenting on the liberals who love to hide in the shadows down voting those they don't have they courage to debate. They even down vote their own for wrong think by condemning the violence by both sides.
expecting liberals to explain their contradictory logic?
lol theyll just thumb down everything they dont like
More silence from liberals when confronted with their hypocrisy.