Most of my early exposure to the word queer is in victorian literature. Soooo, no male-on-male connotations for me.
Damned you're old.
I'd give you a hug, but I'm afraid you'd break a hip.
Most of my early exposure to the word queer is in victorian literature. Soooo, no male-on-male connotations for me.
Damned you're old.
I'd give you a hug, but I'm afraid you'd break a hip.
I've read a variety of articles and watched SJW videos on YouTube.
Google: dunkirk movie is racist
You'll get a bunch of articles.
Last week the South African government voted to steal land from white people, without any compensation.
The mayor of Port Elizabeth was removed from office simply for being white.
The leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) Party, Julius Malema, said “go after the white man” and to "cut the throat of whiteness.”
++++
No, that's not racist because whites are the NON-victims of this.
If it was white on black, the left would be going fucking crazy. Instead the left is spunking all over their screens while reading the black hatred and abuse of whites.
Oddly, where is the outrage over Rachel Dozel's (trans-black) racism in that she has never and and would never date anyone who isn't black. Same thing with Shaun King aka Talcum X. Nobody on the left cares when you won't date/fuck white people. In fact, that makes you a wonderful person, in thier horribly fucked up eyes. That is the racism of the left.
Without googling it, how many people know who Emanuel Samson is? I bet only an extremely tiny fraction know who he is compared to Dylann Roof is. They both did the same thing, just with the races reversed. The media won't shut up about Dylann Roof, but won't mention Emanuel Samson.
We can't get away from the term "toxic whiteness". It rears it's head every time a white person does something bad. Now look for CNN or anyother media outlet say "toxic blackness" (or anyother race) when they do something bad. You will never, fucking ever see it because that never happens. What you will see if 4 black teens kidnap an autistic white teen and abuse him for hours on end and the liberal media jump throw hoops to pretend away the extreme anti-white racism the blacks were showing throughout the live streaming. The mainstream media refused to cover it until the story got too big to ignore. Mainstream media, especially CNN, was desperate to make sure that everyone knew that it wasn't a hate crime, despite what was being said throughout the live stream. As we kept being reminded, only whites can commit hate crimes and be racist. You know, the whole fucking dictionary fallacy thing where leftists pick and choose what dictionary definitions they like (ie feminism) and hate (ie racism).
According to the idiot left, my very average middle class whiteness oppresses Oprah's extremely wealthy multibillionaire blackness. Poor white kids living in the middle of nowhere oppress wealthy black members of Congress and our former US President.
I want a world where everyone is treated equally (opportunity) and liberals want a world where on whites don't exist, except them because they believe that non-whites can't survive without them.
The silence of the left defending their BS is deafening.
Shouldn't the left be screaming about THE TUSKEGEE AIRMEN not having enough women and white people, despite historical truth?
Don't worry, we know the reality of the situation. If it's historical truth about whites, only then it's racist/sexist/transphobe and every other stupidity the left can come up with. Only historical truth (unless the left are triggered by the truth) of other groups is ok to show as it is.
This is especially true when we talk about the Amistad situation. The story always stops when they are sent back to Africa, because leftists are triggered by what the returned "kidnapped Africans" (as the US Supreme Court ruled at the time) got up to after they got back to Africa. Leftists refuse to let you know that many of the returned became deeply involved in the slave trade.
On 1 July 2016, the UK's Labour Party appointed Angela Rayner as their "Shadow" Education Secretary.
Her previous Minister job (vag and equalities) last 3 days(27 June 2016 to 1 July 2016) before she was moved.
Anyway, she dropped out of school at 14 because she was pregnant and never got any kind of qualificiations; GCSE, A-Level or University. Somehow, Labour thinks this makes her "qualified" to be in charge of the education of the nation's kids. She was so uneducated that she wasn't even qualified to change old people's diapers (nappies in the UK). She was only "qualified" enough to help the person who changed old people's diapers. But somehow Labour thinks this makes her qualified to make decisions about everyone's kids education.
Like Jess Phillips, the notorious man hating feminist and many others, Angela was also elected as part of the women only (excluding incumbents) 2015 election cycle for Labour. Labour loves these all vag election lists because somehow that's gender equality. None of the UK political parties has had a male only election list in the last 60'ish years, but have had a large number of vag only election lists in that time. Of course, this doesn't include the lesbian femi-nazi party, because any man that is a member of the party is so self loathing he probably already cut off his own dick to show he's a good cuck.
NOTE: I use Gramarly and because this post is about an uneducated spastic, Gramarly didn't notice that I spelled "secretary" wrong.
"Casual racism" is a loaded term and depends on who you are talking to as to how it's viewed.
As a white man, I find the blatant anti-white racism of the left disgusting. Oddly enough, according to the left, that alone makes me a racist.
It's like how it's deemed "sexist" to comment on how man-hating TV is, especially in sitcoms, where all men are idiots who couldn't survive for more than 2 minutes without woman and kids doing everything for them.
Maybe not for "queer", at the moment. However, let's not forget that the left has gotten Canada and NYC to make the use of certain speech mandatory, with the full weight of the law behind them. Also, many college campuses have some extremely leftist rules for speech.
Of course, there are "radical" groups on both sides. The problem is that moderate liberals still refuse to call out their own because they are terrified of their own people. The left has a habit of eating their own. We saw it here when I finally convinced liberals to condemn the violence by Antifa.
I'm a classic liberal, but to modern liberals that makes me a nazi/fascist.
Since the state pension (social security in the US) started, women have been extremely privileged and a few years ago the UK govemernment tried to make it a bit fairer by equalizing the retirement age for men and women.
Every women's group, including feminists, fought against it and got mixed results.
Previously, women got to retire 5 years earlier than men. Female teachers got to retire at 50, while male teachers retired at 55. Most everyone else was 60/65.
They also needed 20 fewer years of working "credits" than men (17 for women vs 37 for men). This is now equalized at 30 years for both, but keep reading.
Women also get "credits" for being stay at home moms. Men do not get this privilege. This results in men not wanting to be stay at home dads. This is then used in courts and whatnot to justify women getting custody of the kids.
As I previously said, it was a mixed victory for equality, while feminists and women's groups got some other victories.
If you compare me and a women born on the same day as me, she will still get to retire 2 years earlier than me 66 vs 68. She will still get to get a full state pension with only 25 years while I need 33 years. This is because the government agreed to a sliding scale to the "equal" point.
Anyhoo, feminists and women's groups are now trying to reverse the entire thing so that women get all the state pension goodies/privileges they got before the changes were made. If they get their way, I'll have to retire at 68 while a female born the same day will retire at 60.
Not a single feminist group has been against this move to reverse the change and several are publicly supporting it.
I wonder if any leftists here have the courage to defend this "gender equality" as seen through the eyes of feminists and the left.
The UK has a very good breast screening program and other female specific health programs.
The UK has no prostate cancer screening program.
Bizzarely, though totally expected because #Feminism, they claim that they don't have a prostate cancer screening program because it's not totally reliable. Here's the good part. Reliability of prostate cancer screening is about the same as it is for breast and vag cancer, according to the NHS when you do a bit of digging.
If women got prostate cancer, you know they'd be dumping trillions into it like they do with female specific cancers and whatnot.
As we see from Blackwing it seems that the change from gay to queer is hatred of non-leftists, by the leftist facists.
Calling me a homophobe for not liking "queer" and flaging my YouTube video explaining why I hate the word as "hate speech" even though I'm gay, shows the mentality of the nazi left. It's not about reclaiming a word. It's about a sub-group shitting on the group that fought hard to get the rights the facist left now enjoy and abuse.
So, who's gonna tell Morgan Freeman that he now has to use "nigger(s)" when he speaks about black people?!
I know that any reply will either ignore the comparison or do some crackheaded justification for "queer" but not "nigger".
I wouldn't have any "bad days" if the left didn't exist.
The left are telling white people to stop breeding so the other people can have more stuff, but that's not racist.
The left keep screaming about "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" while an opressed woman is allowed to be convicted 18 times for physical assault, with the last time "glassing" a guy in the face, and she hasn't been sent to prison for any of it.
I complain about the extremely barbaric meat trade in many countries, only to be called racist by vegans who justify certain cultures meat eating while demonizing me for meat in a place with strict anti cruelty laws in the animal slaughter. Twitter and facebook have some wonderful videos of these people preparing their food, that shows how they are better than westerners.
The left if extremely guilty of racism by low expectations for non-whites and their extreme hatred of whites.
Leftists keep saying that whites need to stop breeding so that non-whites can have more of everything.
Well, leftists could cull their own in the supreme sacrifice so their bodies can be ground up to feed the hungry. This will end animal cruelty, lessen the white burden on the world and leftists can show us how much better people they are.
As I'm not a racist, unlike the left, I am for ALL leftists to make the supreme sacrifice, for the benefit of the world.
Don't worry, I'm more than happy to make sure your face coverings and bike locks don't get into the food chain.
Since it's acceptable, according to the left, to punch those they disagree with (punching nazis), doesn't that mean they would also support non-leftists punching them?
Of course, it doesn't mean that. Leftists are the supreme hypocrites and cry babies of the world. Only they can hit those they disagree with, because "equality".
It's the same bullshit logic that we see with feminism, veganism, refugee status, and everything else.
Europe has long had a housing shortage, even before Merkel invited all the economic migrants of the world to come flooding into Europe.
It's racist, according to the left, to complain that we can't find homes for the homeless in our own countries, but we can find homes for "refugees" (aka economic migrants).
So, you are willing to shit on your own, while willing to spend taxes on those who want more money.
We could claim it's a sexist issue since homeless, in the UK, is 76% male. But this doesn't work either since over 90% of the "refugees" that the UK has been letting in are male.
The homeless issue is a sexist one in that despite gender equality laws making it illegal in the UK, women have priority to housing over men.
We could argue that this proves feminists hate women, as they don't mind economic migrant men getting welfare housing that "should" go to women.
It would be best if you did a post with your stance and let people reply.
I'm an omnivore.
I don't have an issue with eating meat as long as it's not abusive, like with the dog/cat meat industry in the far east and elsewhere. Then again, 2nd and 3rd world countries are extremely barbaric when it comes to their meat industries.
I'm not sure what you mean by your post.
Liberals claim that you can be trans anything you want to be.
Here are some of the people we've talked about;
A white guy who is a trans-Phillipino woman
52yo man who is a trans 6yo girl
Girl who's a trans gay boy who identifies as a hetero girl
a girl that claims she's trans (doesn't say to what) because she wears boys' underwear
Dude that wears makeup and tight girls' tops claims to be trans lesbian and calls any lesbian who won't suck his cock a transphobe and homophobe. It also claims that claims that sexuality doesn't exist and the reason people are whatever sexuality they claim to be is that they are actually "genitalists" (similar to racists). Has lots of lunatic ideas that the left absolutely love.
I'm not into twinks that look like children, but I don't want muscle heads other.
Terms for model types do tend to have a lot of overlap.
Twinks, Youngbloods, and Frats are all the same age group (under 25'ish) but having different body types and appearance.
There's nothing wrong with being young, per se.
The problem comes when you (generic) demand that everyone accept your ideas without question while refusing to listen to those you demand things from. This is like the use of the word "queer".
Imagine if young black people demanded that all blacks like and use the word "nigger" because they want to "reclaim" it and anyone who disagreed with them was labeled a racist, Uncle Tom, coon and every other name they can think of.