• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 35
    • Topics 2703
    • Posts 12781
    • Best 807
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: Whites Only, Heterosexuals Only: What's the Difference Again?

      In theory, I do.

      I believe that "freedom of association" is an all or nothing deal.

      HOWEVER,  I am against any body (business, charity, college, college cafe, etc, etc, etc) that takes public money from any sort of bigotry.    If it's something that is funded by student tuition, then it is included in this restriction.

      When it comes to private businesses like YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and the like, I think that they should be more centrist and at the very least, much more honest about their bigotry.    Both sides of the political debate in Congress share my concerns of such mega companies having such massive influenece on politics around the world.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Photo narrative know to be a lie from the start

      I'm not really concerned with the TIME cover.

      It's the so-called "news" reports about the original photo, that were a total lie, that piss me off.    Not surprisingly, it's a massive patern by the leftist media, where they lie about Trump.

      AGAIN, for the mentally deficiant, I don't like Trump and never have.  That doesn't mean the left should lie about him at every turn.  How can we trust any news outlet that constantly lies?!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Dog meat "festivals"

      Leftist say I'm a worse than Hilter.

      I'm against these horific dog meat "festivals".

      What does that make leftists?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Photo narrative know to be a lie from the start

      The infamous photo of the crying 2yo girl at the border was always known to be a not what was claimed by the leftist media.

      The reported who took the photo kept quiet about the truth when his fellow leftist media lied about the context of the photo.

      More facts about the situation;

      1. The mom illegally tried to cross the border in 2013, so this time it was a felony.

      2. The mom kidnapped her 2yo daughter while the rest of the family was asleep, leaving her other kids at home.  It seems she thought she would be part of the Obama "catch and release" program if she had the little girl.

      3. The husband of this woman has a very good job and there is no domestic violence.

      4. The mom tried to enter illegally and not at an official border crossing.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Leftists are blatant liars

      Gotta love lefts.  They have no courage to debate the issues, but they downvote posts in secret.  It's like how they hide their faces to show they have the moral high ground.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Leftists are blatant liars

      Ok, so leftists are butthurt over Trump winning so they will lie about everything, but it's getting wearing.

      Just with the detained kids crap, we have seen plenty of lies.

      Canada's supreme cuck Trudeau lied and said Canada doesn't detain kids, but Rebel media, using the government's own website proved that was a lie.

      The leftist media used photos from Obama to blame Trump.  When the truth came out about the photos, they deleted the articles but only a tiny fraction posted a retraction to correct the lie.

      The photo of the little girl is given a totally fake narrative.  She was never separated from her mom and dad.

      The little boy in the cage isn't anything to do with ICE, but a protest about ICE.

      The left has told soooooo many lies about all this (not counting every other topic), that they can't be trusted with telling us if it's day or night.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Dog meat "festivals"

      Why are the left so silent on these grotesque and extremely brutal, inhumane dog meat "festivals"?!

      Is it because of the left's racism of low expectations?

      Clearly, fake ass "man-splaining" and the like is far worse than the horrific dog meat festivals.

      Western vegans are extremely butthurt about me having a leather belt, but silent on these vile dog meat festivals.

      Screams volumes about the left.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Peter Fonda the voice of the left

      Funny how you can Tweet saying you want a 12yo boy to be "caged with pedos" and the left not bat an eye, but don't you dare make a comment about an adult.

      The left support people losing their jobs over unproven accusations, but don't care what their own actually say/do.

      This is why I hate the left.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Fake/annoying moaning in porn

      Yeah, you're lucky if you missed it.  Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to get it up for a month.

      posted in Rants & Raves
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Who is the Porn Star that turns you off ?

      Muscleheads turn me off.    There is such a thing as too much muscle.

      posted in Chit Chat
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: I agree with Giuliani!

      And you said you agree with him that people in the Porn industry aren't credible.

      Own your own comment and stop trying to blame others for it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: President Trump Proposes Space Force (Again)

      Extremely dishonest.

      "Separate but equal" in this context is about this new "space force" not being a bitch service to another branch like with the Navy/Marine Corps and how the Air Force used to be the Army's sub-bitch.

      It will have it's own Secretary of the Space Force, like every other branch has their own, except for the Marine Corps who falls under the Sec of the Navy.

      You gotta love the way the left has a pathological need to demonize everything Trump does, even when there is no evil intent.  "Oh my fucking gawd, he's drinking water, he's literally Satan!!!!!"

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Jackie Chan's lesbian daughter homeless due to 'homophobic parents'

      Pathetic "journalism" by Gay Star News.

      There is absolutely no evidence that her parents are homophobic.  In fact, her dad's comment about it was positive.

      I agree with the previous poster.  She's a spoilt brat.  It also seems that she might have some mental issues.

      posted in Gay News
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Trudeau a hypocrite over sex assault claims

      Clearly, the left has no idea how to deal with this.

      Clearly, "just believe" and "me too" mean absolutely nothing if one of their own, especially a supreme cuck like Trudeau, is accused of wrongdoing.

      You're willing to do $25,000 damage to a frat house over a total lie, but you completely ignore it when Trudeau is accused.

      Does anyone still wonder why I hate the left?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: I agree with Giuliani!

      It makes you a flip-flop merchant of the hypocritical left to be on a porn site slagging off people in the porn industry.

      You would agree with him if he said the same thing about your profession if you thought you could use it to demonize Trump.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: I agree with Giuliani!

      Like everything else, you clearly can't see what kind of person comments like these make you.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Scottish Independence - why it's BS

      I've debated this for years, but as time goes by, I see that Scottish Independence is a bunch of shit.

      People that demand Scottish Independence can't make up their minds and are massive hypocrites.

      They believe that at every UK wide election, they have to win.  Apparently, that's how things will work in an independent Scotland; ie no one will lose an election.

      Hypocritically, I hate the SNP but I can't be "independent", despite the SNP controlling Scotland for the last 11 years.

      The Scottish government treats the region I live in like complete shit, but we're not allowed to call for independence from Scotland.

      While claiming they want self-rule, they also want to be ruled by the EU which in most cases prevents the individual country from deciding its own laws.  This is even worse in that most of the EU is completely anti-democratic in how it's run/organized.

      While having a say in all England only things, they demand that only Scotland should have a say in Scotland things. (the West Lothian Question)

      They don't understand what being a part of a "union" means.  They believe that anything originating in Scotland belongs to Scotland only, but anything originating in England should be shared out, with England getting the least ££££££ per person by a long shot.  (the Barnett Formula)

      Only 2 parties support "independence"; the Greens and the SNP.  The Greens are blatant whores to the EU and the SNP are a bunch of fucking idiots that don't have more than 2 brain cells among them.

      A lot of stuff is devolved to Scotland, yet they refuse to use the powers they have.

      The SNP (and the Greens) are mentally retarded.  Plastic q-tips are ending up on the beaches after getting flushed down the toilet.  Logic says that you would go after the sewage plants and demand that they follow the law and make sure they filter them out.  NOPE!!!  Instead, ban plastic q-tips.

      If your area stinks of shit due to a sewage plant not following the rules (been going on in my area for nearly 30 years now), claim that nothing needs to change, despite the local sewage plant constantly violating the law.  This problem is in many areas of Scotland.

      To settle a dispute between communities and the sewage plants, the government hires an expert of their choice then fires him and buries he report he made siding with the communities.  OOOPS, the report got leaked.

      After 11 years you can't pass an all-party supported parking bill that makes it illegal to block dropped curbs and not leaving enough space for normal pedestrian traffic to pass.  This keeps people out of the busy streets.  Then you lie and lie some more claiming that it's not a devolved issue, which it clearly is under Roads (Scotland) Act.  Notice the " (Scotand) " bit, that shows that it's devolved.  Obviously, the other side would be why did you fucking waste all that time and money over 11 years messing with it if it wasn't devolved?!

      They can import 2,000 economic migrants, give them immediate welfare and housing, but can't find the same for the 36,000 official government amount of homeless already in the country.

      They raised taxes, claiming it will help improve welfare.  Welfare is unchanged, claiming it's controlled by the UK government.  BULLSHIT.  It's devolved.

      As part of the tax changes in Scotland, you can now get up to £20 less income taxes per year if you're poor.  That's the max "discount" you get on your income taxes, but only if you make less than £24k.

      Show that you love business by massively increasing their "business rates", which are the taxes they have to pay each year, in full before they can even open their doors.

      If you want to tackle air pollution in a residential area, then you punish the car drivers while exempting the commercial vehicles.  This despite your own studies showing that less than 20% of vehicles (commercial) create over 80% of the air pollution.    On top of that, claim you care about the poor by flooding their neighborhood with toxic air pollution from things like incinerators and whatnot.  Let's not forget about allowing the nearby industrial estate to "spill" toxic waste which flows into the park area making it unsafe for it to be used.

      The SNP and their fanatics can't do basic math.  During the last independence referendum, they outlined their post-independence budget and spent every penny they had/will have several times over.  The plane of existence I live in doesn't work in such a utopian money from nothing sorta way.  If I only have £10, it means I only have £10.  In independent Scotland, it means I have as much cash as I want and never have to borrow any.

      This is the mentality of the Scottish independence side.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • UK - social housing - semi-political question

      The UK, like the rest of the west has "social housing" more commonly known as "council housing" but that term is going away as the housing stock is being, more and more, transferred to charities.

      Rather than having the rents set at 100% market value and subsidize base on need, the government put a 60% market value cap and subsidize from there.    This was set by the UK government and when it was devolved to Scotland, they kept it as well.

      Previously, once you got into a council house/flat, you were in for life and your rent never went up, only ever down.  You could also leave your council house/flat in your will.  Over time the list of people you could leave it to was reduced, but still sizable considering it actually belonged to the state.  Anyway, a few years ago, during the coalition government, rUK ("rest of the UK" excluding Scotland) changed the law for anyone moving into council housing after the date the law came into effect.    If you were in prior to that date, you could keep on keeping on, as it were.  Anyone going into council housing after that date will get reassessed every 5 years t make sure they still qualify.  Scotland, under the SNP, is the only part of the UK to keep the old rules.

      Due to "right to buy" and the lack of building of new council housing, there's a massive shortage of council housing.  Also the "right to travel" within the EU, people from poorer EU countries have flocked to the UK, now it's the mass immigration of economic migrants from 3rd world countries.

      Anyway, here's the question for you;

      Even though it's legal (see exceptions above), is it moral, to block a council house/flat that you no longer NEED since you have enough money to afford private housing?

      I say it's scummy to be in a council house/flat that you no longer NEED just because you don't want to pay the higher rents.

      I have advocated raising the cap to full market value and discounting from there based on need and frequent assessments to assure need.

      I say that you are a piece of shit if you are willing to deny someone in true need of a place to live, for the sake of more money for you to enjoy.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • SJWs flip flop on racism

      As the title says, SJWs flip-flop on "racism"; what it is/is not.

      If you see race, you are a racist.

      If you do not see race, you are a racist.

      ++++

      Race is a social construct, according to SJWs.  At the same time, SJWs divide people on their "worth" to society based on their race.  We also see SJWs defend Talcum X (aka Shaun King), Rachel Dohzel and several other for being trans-racial.

      Of course, they support benefitting non-whites, based on their race.  We see this with Affirmative Action, which SJWs love.  They believe that non-whites and non far east asians get benefits because of their race, regardless of their situation.

      Sean "Puffy" Combs qualified for AA, despite going to Mount Saint Michael Academy which has long been listed as 1 of the top 4 high schools in NYC.    He had many advantages that poor white kids in the West Virginia hollers never had and don't qualify for AA.  Even the black kids in the south side of Chicago have better funded schools that the white kids in the WV hollers.

      ++++

      SJWs are guilty of the Dictionary Fallacy by changing the definition of racism, but then they flip-flop on that as the situation suits their narrative.

      In the west, whites are the majority, which is how they scream and cry that everything is racist against non-whites.  On the flip side, in non-white places, they claim that it's racist to hold the non-whites in power to the same standard as white people are held to.  Which is quite racist on the part of SJWs.

      As we see in Africa, SJWs go through some extremely racist mental gymnastics to justify what the blacks in power are doing to the white minority.    These same SJWs scream "micro-agression" simply because a white person asks a black person to move their bag in the bus aisle so the white person can get past.

      ++++

      I doubt any SJWs will have the courage to discuss this, but rather they will hide and downvote me.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Theist vs Atheism

      If god exists, as in the 3 Abrahamic religions, then he's a vile cunt who doesn't deserve to be worshiped.

      posted in Religion & Philosophy
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 430
    • 431
    • 432
    • 433
    • 434
    • 639
    • 640
    • 432 / 640