• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 35
    • Topics 2707
    • Posts 12785
    • Best 808
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: More proof that fact checkers lie

      So I didn't 'try' anything - I said (if you would ever bother to read what I write) that you are either ignorant or a racist… and so you were instead ignorant.  I don't really think that improves anything.  It takes all of 2 seconds to look up someone's name.

      Whelp, that ends our discussions.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Republican official in Georgia shows how an adult behaves

      I think it's time Trump supporters, and conservatives in general, give back as good as we got over the last 4+ years.

      Turnabout is fair play.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Definition of Fascism

      Blah, blah, blah  Your claims are garbage.

      You have no clue about anything, and you keep admitting it.

      You admit that you can believe that some liberals have said it, but you then go on to say that you have seen no direct proof of it, despite you claiming to be so clued in on what is going on.

      I bet you still believe Shifty Schiff's claim that he has absolute proof of Russian collusion or that Antifa is a myth.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: More proof that fact checkers lie

      Let me guess, you got the liberal news version of events.

      Politi-Fact lied and didn't want to change it until Candace got her legal team on it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: More proof that fact checkers lie

      I didn't remember her name, so I described her.

      She did not make a mistake.  She lied.  She even bragged about lying on her social media.

      She is still part of the fact-checkers used by FB and Twitter.

      BTW, I would have called her "that fat white chick" if she were white.  Nice try at making everything "racist" though.  Maybe that's why you think Priti Patel is a racist because everything is racist to you.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Definition of Fascism

      You claimed to be educated and up to date on the news, yet you claim you haven't seen any proof, just CTs.

      Tucker is more clued in than you since he has heard/read the comments you claim you have never heard/read.  Just because you admit some might be like that, you still haven't seen/heard anyone say it.  Clearly, you aren't as clued in as you like to think you are.

      Constantly, MSM ignores crimes that go against the leftist agenda.  That is why people like you don't seem to know anything about anything, unless Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo and Rachel Maddow tell you about it, even if it's a blatant lie, like Chris Cuomo being on his death bed from C-19, despite being out jogging every day and all the other lies.

      2016 - Russia stole the election

      2020 - our elections can't be stolen

      Has the leftist MSM said anything about the lies told by the Obama admin on TV versus what they said in the secret hearings in the bunker?  NO, they haven't because it defeats their narrative.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • More proof that fact checkers lie

      We already discussed that fat black chick from The New Yorker who lied about the disabled vet's tattoos.  She also liked to brag in her social media posts that she often lied to push the liberal agenda.  She is part of the fact-checkers, still, that Facebook and Twitter use despite this.

      Anyway, Candace Owens sued Politi-Fact over one of their fact checks.  Candace said that Biden is not the President-Elect until the Electoral College meets and he is declared by them as such.  She said that the media does not declare who is or is not the President-Elect.  Politi-Fact declared this to be a false statement and refused to budge on that.  Well, that was until she filed a lawsuit against them, as well as Facebook and Twitter.  After being served with the lawsuit paperwork, Politi-Fact removed their ruling that her statement was false.  They also claimed it had nothing to do with the lawsuit.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: How do you identify politically?

      He was warned to stop it a few times, but he continued.

      As I was dealing with his post blatantly taking me out of context, he was posting another "you're a fat ass ugly pig" comment.

      I didn't care that he disagreed with me politically.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Definition of Fascism

      If you actually were as clued in as you think you are, then you would know that liberals have said these things and are not so conspiracy theory.  Tucker Carlson and many others have actually shown these liberals saying this stuff, either on video or in social media posts.  The fact that you don't know this, shows you are just another low information liberal.

      You are just making excuses for liberal media won't report on black on white interracial crime in the same way they report on white on black crime.

      Like most of Europe, Sadiq Khan has called crime stats and crime reporting "racist" because of the facts and figures.  It's why some countries no longer record the races of the criminal.  In the UK, you can always tell if the criminal is white because they tell you, but if they are non-white they leave the race out of the article.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Two More Trans or Gender-Nonconforming People Killed in U.S.

      @bc22:

      Making it at least 36 this year in USA.

      We are up to 39 in the US, as of yesterday.

      The thing is, we don't know the circumstances of their deaths.  At least one of the recent deaths seems to be just random violence.

      posted in Gay News
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Well it looks like we just got some breaking evidence.

      Yet he still felt the need to post a link to that leftist site.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Definition of Fascism

      So, tweets from liberals themselves, not just "conspiracy theories", hasn't been something you have seen.  HUH.

      As I said, liberals are low information.  They don't know anything unless Rachel Maddow and the like tell them.

      You are laughable.

      Dylan Roof became infamous because he was white and shot up a black church.

      Emanuel Samson didn't get the same notoriety because he was black and shot up a white church.

      MSM rarely covers black on white crime.  It's because they want to portray blacks as the victims in everything.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: How do you identify politically?

      His debate style also degraded into him calling me a "fat ass ugly pig" and a few other things.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Well it looks like we just got some breaking evidence.

      @bc22:

      Infowars was mentioned.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfoWars

      Use your own judgement in viewing that link or any link that comes up in regards to that site and the owner/host. Wikipedia itself is of some dispute but it is easy enough to research elsewhere.

      The same Wikipedia that has feminist edit-athons to put articles in feminist slant?

      The same Wikipedia that I proved isn't always factual?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: 1,600 voters born 1900 or earlier voted in NC alone

      The New York Times is a far-left rag, everything they say is extremely suspect.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: How do you identify politically?

      Why did you bring up the ban button then?

      I have banned less than 1 person a year, overall, for the 14 years, I have been staff here.

      If you read the threads in this section, even liberals have said I am unbiased in how I moderate here.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Unwritten rules of this forum ?

      Let's get this right, you had a private convo with her, which you have no proof of, so you label her a racist.

      Ah, so you are a remoaner.

      The EU is shite.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Definition of Fascism

      Hey, you admitted you weren't interested in reading the threads here to educate yourself.

      If you claim to watch news from YouTube, then you should have some sort of idea about liberals advocating tribunals, blacklists, and whatnot to punish conservatives.

      I am very happy to condemn people on either side who have done awful things.  What Emanuel Samson did is awful.  But you're wrong (again) for saying that race is the only difference between the two people.  That's… an incredibly naive thing to claim... and so easy to disprove it's almost childish.  Did they have the same parents? Same upbringing? Live in the same country their whole lives? Go to the same schools? Have the same teachers? Think the exact same way, just have different colour skin?  Clearly... no.

      Typical liberal deflecting from what I was saying.

      You didn't hear about him because he is black and shot up a white church in a racist hissy fit.  MSM didn't cover it because it doesn't advance the liberal agenda.

      If he was another Dylan Roof (aka white racist), then everyone would know his name.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: How do you identify politically?

      @bc22:

      @raphjd:

      If I were to say what I wanted to say, your other account will ban me.

      Excuse me?!

      Despite your BS, we are not the same person.

      If you weren't such an idiot, you would know that from the writing styles.

      You're two different people, despite having a lot of views in common.

      In my opinion, the fact that you do have a ban tool and participate in the forum with the same name makes for an uneven battlefield. The constant I'm right you're wrong can make some frustrated enough to respond in such a way to get the ban. As things stand, you will always win.

      I have banned very few people in the 14 years I have been a staff member here.

      If I was a ban crazy as you claim, then a lot of people would be banned.  A lot of liberals drive me crazy, but they are still here.

      If your only reply to anything is "you're a fat ass ugly pig" in several posts, then you will get banned.

      If you intentionally take something out of context and post it (as seen in the stickied post), you will get banned.

      If you falsely claim that someone called you a "nigger fagot", you will get banned.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Unwritten rules of this forum ?

      LOL.

      Priti Patel (UK Home Office Sec.) is a racist because she is against illegal immigration.

      Typical liberal mindset.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 350
    • 351
    • 352
    • 353
    • 354
    • 639
    • 640
    • 352 / 640