Posts made by raphjd

@bi4smooth

Thanks, but no thanks. I'll trust actual experts.

Even leftist rag NYT admits that the spirit of the law say that it should not be about political censorship. It's even in the 1st section of 230.

The 2nd section talks about a free and open market, which the cabal prevents.

And that is why I call you a swamp monster loving RINO. You, rightfully, believe that life isn't fair, however, you also believe that we should never, ever do anything to make it fair. This is why you voted for swamp scum rather than vote for Trump.

Twitter does force you to agree with their liberal bullshit ideas or get banned. Watch the Joe Rogan podcast with Tim Pool, Jack Dorsey, and Twitter's top legal person. It's clear that Twitter has an agenda and they enforce it strongly. They banned a person for "hate speech" for saying "but they aren't women though" referring to transwomen.

I really think you believe you are much more educated than you really are.

It's like the Betsy DeVos discussion, you knew she was controversial, but you didn't know why, just that you believed it was bad. She was controversial because she was reversing Obama-era shite that harmed male students and other woke crap Obama put in.

You don't know about Twitter's actions. You don't know how they censored reporting about Hunter Biden's laptop, claiming it was "leaked" but allowed discussions of leaked things that they deemed harmed Trump and Co. All the heads of social media claimed: "we made a mistake" when in front of Congress. The mistakes kept happening. Project Veritas showed that those were not "mistakes" or "accidents" but intentional. One liberal admitted knowing that Trump's account was not to be banned, but he did it anyway.

@bi4smooth

They are saying that all acronyms are racist, so they just changed the acronym.

@gerggently

You're an idiot.

I have to question if you still have the coat hanger in your head.

You admit that just because Twitter wrote some shit down, that they don't have to follow it.

Twitter told this family that kiddie porn does not violate their TOS and refused to remove it. Twitter only removed it once Homeland Security got involved.

The fact that you have such a pathological need to fight me over this says volumes about you.

Twitter totally disregarded their own TOS on kiddie porn, but for some reason you need to fight me over this, claiming I am a liar.

EDIT: Looking at this discussion, I'm not sure if you are special needs or simply a troll.

@gerggently

I did not lie.

Twitter told the family that they would not remove the kiddie porn because it did not violate their TOS. Twitter only removed it because Homeland Security got involved.

That is the truth, but you call it a lie because you are mentally ill.

@raphjd

Oddly, a liberal nutjob keeps fighting me in another thread over this.

He claims that I lied when I said that Twitter told the family in this article that they won't remove the kiddie porn because it doesn't violate their TOS.

Apparently, it's a lie because saying what Twitter told the family is a lie because they wrote something different in their TOS.

@gerggently

Yet, you are full of crap.

Twitter said that kiddie porn does not violate their TOS and refused to remove it until Homeland Security got involved.

Your crack headed liberal mental gymnastics won't change that fact.

@gerggently

Did twitter tell this family that they won't remove the kiddie porn because it doesn't violate their TOs in this case?

If so, you are an ass clown that needs to fight.

@bi4smooth

Twitter requires that your posts follow liberal ideological rules or face banning.

That isn't the purpose/intent of 230.

I do love that you are, in your own eye at least, more of an expert in Section 230 than lawyers, politicians, and others.

@gerggently

AGAIN, since you are special needs.

Just because it is written down, does not mean that they follow their own rules.

I said that Twitter says that kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS and in the case I mentioned, I am 100% right. Twitter's stance in that case is that kiddie porn does not violate their TOS.

I know you are too stupid to understand that.

@gerggently

Yet, Twitter told that family that they would not remove it because it didn't violate their TOS.

GOT IT?! Of course, you don't because you're a liberal.

It's funny that you feel the need to fight me over this when Twitter's actions are extremely disgusting in this case.

@bc22

Just because some idiot said something extremely ignorant, doesn't negate that liberals deem everything white supremacy.

YES, to sane people the OK sign and thumbs up are just that, but to liberals, they were parts of white supremacy. People lost their jobs over that because of the liberal cancel culture.

@gerggently

Yet, I showed that they won't remove kiddie porn unless Homeland Security demands they do.

So again, just because you are special needs. Just because something is written down, doesn't mean they follow that.

@gerggently

Ah, so because they wrote it down, that means that is how they enforce their rules.

You're an idiot.

@gerggently

LOL, you are a pathetic clown.

@gerggently

So, you would happily accept being banned from here, without ever complaining about it, because you have no right to free speech here?

Of course, you wouldn't. You would whine to everyone how I'm a fascist because I banned you because of your free speech.

@gerggently

And yet you clearly didn't read my link.

They refused to remove the child porn because it didn't violate their TOS.

They only removed it because Homeland security got involved.

Why are you trying to defend their shitty action?

@gerggently

You have no right to free speech on a private site.

That is your stance.

@bc22

How does that defeat my comment?

It's like how you guys claimed the OK hand sign was the white supremacy sign.

https://nypost.com/2021/01/21/twitter-sued-for-allegedly-refusing-to-remove-child-porn/

@gerggently said in The Lincoln Project and sexual harassment:

@raphjd

Are you saying that a private company cannot set out ToS for the platform it has created?

ToS is not editorialising.

As I already asked, would I be totally in my rights and you would willingly accept it If I banned you because you are too childish enough to say Trump's name properly?

Nah, you'd whine and we all know it.