Posts made by raphjd

@bi4smooth

Are you sure it's not damage control?

According to another article that I just read, they are adding a gender-neutral version to the line-up.

In time for christmas 2021, Mr Potato Head will be gender-neutral. The new name is simply Potato Head.

Mrs Potato Head will be dropped from the line.

Baby Potato Head will continue, as will the Potato Head Family boxsets.

@bi4smooth

It is hypocrisy when they say that whites can't play any other race, but that other races can play whites.

@bi4smooth

You prefer defending your fellow leftists.

@bi4smooth

Ah, so we can't call out their extreme hypocrisy.

@bi4smooth

More excuses from our resident leftist.

If liberal prosecutors refuse to prosecute liberal rioters/looters/criminals, then they are exempt from the law.

You can shit on the streets/sidewalks of SanFrancisco unless you do it in front of one of Pelosi's many houses.

We all know that you will be back with your leftist mental gymnastics to excuse it away.

@bi4smooth

More excuses about liberals being hypocrites from you, who woulda thunk it.

@bi4smooth

NOPE!!!

Over the last several years we have seen the proof that certain groups are exempt from the laws that the rest of us must follow.

When certain groups do it, it's "mostly peaceful protests" or "the summer of love".

Harry Shearer was fired as Dr Hibert by the Simpsons show, for being a honkey.

As I've posted about many times, it's always ok for non-whites to play whites, gays to play heteros, etc, etc but not the other way around.

Joan of Arc was a 17yo ginger chick, but it was ok for her to be played by a 20ish black chick and a 40ish black chick.

Ann Boylen is being played by a black chick in a BBC series that is in production.

A Netflix series has a black queen of England and we know that never happened.

Elliot Page is a trans-man but playing a CIS woman.

As always, "you can only play what you are" only seems to apply to CIS, hetero white male actors, though occasionally it applies to CIS hetero white women playing trans, and some other cases.

@bi4smooth said in Business rights vs the left:

until you get violent or threaten others

But it's not criminal or even wrong when certain groups do it.

@bi4smooth

I read about it on a gay site, I think the Advoacte, and they said it was a gay/bi male-only campground.

Liberals and LGBT activists want it both ways. They want big tech to ban anyone who disagrees with them, like the lady who simply said "but they aren't women, though". They don't believe in the right for businesses to disagree with their dogma, like the ammo company that won't sell to Biden voters.

After an ever-increasing number of blacks attacking Asians, liberals thought they could solve the problem by having a rally to "unite against white nationalism".

NYC has a long history, of a similar problem, of blacks attacking jews and liberals blaming white supremacy.

Besides the blatantly obvious cases of racism in these cases, it's also extremely racist to claim that blacks can't do anything bad without white somehow being responsible. It's called "infantilism".

Liberals love it when businesses crap all over conservatives; ie big tech.

Not surprisingly, they get butt hurt when businesses use the same rights against liberals.

There's a private membership gay/bi men's campground. They do not allow people who identify as women, nor do they allow people who identify as male but don't have a penis.

Liberals claim it's transphobia and they should be forced to allow men with vaginas. Oddly, they aren't claiming that women should be allowed.

Anyone care to explain why liberals have no problem with "Twitter is a private company, so they can set their own rules" but they don't believe the same applies to all businesses?

@bi4smooth

Keep making excuses for Biden's 5 decades of lying about the truck driver.

It is amazing the mental gymnastics you liberals will resort to, to defend Biden.

Just admit it, you have lied the whole time that you are a conservative. You're just some blue-haired, man-hating lesbian Antifa member.

@bi4smooth

I'm not seeing any of the 4 is under investigation, that you mentioned, other than Cuomo.

VA and IL are under investigation for campaign finance and taxes, respectively. There are a few others as well.

@bi4smooth

Once again and I'll type it slow for you.

You brought up "pathological liar" and I countered with my own example of one, whom you voted for and keep defending.

@bi4smooth

I'm not seeing that anyone other than Cuomo is under investigation for C-19 related issues.

I see that other governors are under investigation for other things, like taxes, election campaign funding, etc, etc.

I also see that many, many other politicians are under investigation for various things.

@raphjd

The police did not smell alcohol on him, nor did he seem impaired.

It's odd how you will make excuses for Biden's 50 years of lying about the guy being drunk when even you admitted they didn't do a breathalyzer or draw blood back then.

His wife was deemed at fault for being "inattentive".

Just because his wife and infant daughter died in the accident, does not give him the right to lie about the truck driver for 50 years.

Only a piece of garbage would think it's ok for someone to use their bully pulpit to ruin someone's life based on lies.

You brought up "pathological liar" due to your TDS, then defend a pathological liar.

Coca-Cola made its employees take an online course that told them to be "less white".

They provided a list of white traits, that if said about any other race would be deemed as racist; ie

oppressive
arrogant
certain
defensive
ignorant
not humble
non-listening
non-believing
apathetic

There were more, but you get the idea.

@bi4smooth

You will make any excuse for Biden won't you.

You are the one that brought "pathological liar" into the discussion, so I ran with it.