Posts made by raphjd

@john32123666

4:3 is the old screen ratio.

1440x810 is BA's preferred resolution for their internet content (DVDs and BR's are different, of course). I don't usually see it outside of BA.

@Drwas

Do you mean like the Texas Dems who violated the national mask mandate and flew to DC?

There were other crimes attached to that stunt of theirs, as well.

@Drwas

AND?!

Clearly, Newt wants another 2 years of do-nothing Repubs, like the last time.

@Drwas

If he was a Democrat, he'd have refused to resign.

@hubrys

You still intentionally ignore all the liars on your side that none of the Dems call out.

@orhaqi123

I agree.

The people I'm talking about are trans-"women" who are still intact males.

It's strange that the latest fad is for males to cos-play, in an extremely cartoonish way, at being females.

@hubrys

You are still intentionally ignoring that not a single Dem is calling out any of your liars.

@hubrys

At least Tulsi is saying something about Santos

Who is speaking up about the plethora of liars on your side? No one.

@MrMazda

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64102086

@stdspd11

Ah, became I don't want to allow the left to run amuck, I'm a hateful person.

Yep, that's liberal logic for you.

BTW, have you forgotten what your side has been doing to the world for the last 15 years, but especially the last 3? Now tell me who the hateful people are.

@stdspd11

Hillary had more to do with Russia than Trump did, or have you forgotten the Steele dossier?

BTW, virtually all of the "60 court cases" had nothing to do with Trump. Now go back to watching MSNBC.

@hubrys

How does that change my point?

Your side worships your liars.

At least some Repubs are calling out Santos.

@MrMazda

@Drwas is upset that Santos is a Repub, not because he lied about his background. If he was upset about someone lying about their background, he would be angry about people like Fetterman, Biden, Kerry, etc, etc, etc.

@Drwas

I'll give a shit when the "unindicted co-conspirators" are named, indicted, and prosecuted.

@Drwas

How many don't want Joe or Kamala to run in 2024?

@Drwas

Strange how both parties react to their liars.

Repubs call for their liar to be disowned, while Dems worship their liars.

@Drwas

Politics & Debate

https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/snp-msp-under-fire-paedophiles-25834877

If you read the Twitter thread, linked to in the article, you will see that the claim isn't quite what it appears to be.

SHOCKINGLY, a woman is saying that women are also sex offenders, despite what the media and government try to convince us of.

In the UK, women can't commit most sex crimes because they have a pussy.

Rape, for example, requires a penis, even if the penis is not used in the act. Say a man and woman (as nature made them) kidnapped and shoved broom-handle into the victim's holes. Even though both did the same act, only the person with a cock, despite not being used in the act, is guilty of rape.

Vaginalists are extremely butt hurt that under new Scottish rules, a chick with a dick who rapes will now list women as committing rape. This is due to the "self-identify" law the Scottish government passed.

Oddly, under the new law, trans-man who had bottom surgery inserts something into another, this doesn't count as rape since the cock isn't natural. In other words, they are treating it as a broom-handle in the previous scenario.

Currently, in the UK, women can only commit statutory rape if the person they have sex with is under 16. This is due to the law (1st and only gender-neutral sex crime law in the UK) that says that anyone who has sex with a person under 16 is guilty of statutory rape.

Women, of course, have the ability to have periods and whatnot, due to their natural bodies.

That being said, why are there so many trans-women yammering about tampons, and pads and claiming to have periods and period pains?!

I've heard of sympathetic pregnancies, but can you have sympathetic pussy bleeding out of a fake vag or real cock? What about period pain?

@blablarg18

It's not just the US doing this. Pretty much every western government is doing it.

The UK has been doing it since 2003 when Tony Blair opened up the illegal immigration floodgates. We are to the point where the native homeless are being thrown out of their housing so the illegals have a place to stay.

Scotland officially had over 42k homeless that they could not find homes for, but they immediately found 2k homes for Syrians. Over a few years, Scotland found over 7.5k homes for Syrians, while they couldn't find any for the native homeless. The same situation now that it's Ukraine.