Posts made by myrea

@agis:

oh well maybe escorted by a well endowed Portuguese stallion one could always  make an exception :hehe:

ahaha you put me in a far too high status "stallion" ahaha… but I thought you a mole and see there a hyena

@agis:

So how do you actually face the problems when you study the colours myr?  ^-^

I'm far more in the historical factual and hencefoth the antropological interpretation as quoted so I do not have many problems, basically it would go around to tell the client this was the colours they used dued to a, b and c, if he is interested in others, I might adapt the periods or think if the designs ever overlapped or coexisted. If not and the client really wants a huge mix of styles I use therory of colour so to adapt the tones picked = I call this frankensteining… people which have every single design period or style in their house clashing it all together ahaha.

@agis:

CAMP!! CAMP!! CAMP!!  :cheesy2: :cheers:

Someone wants to go in a countryside trip, maybe lakes or mountains the whole big outdoor adventure?  

Back to topic, with all the bearish videos there too and the diverse media, I get it that there were a few musics not gay or xmasy at all, but just sarcasm it a little, no need to go all grumpy and whiny over it, for people who are complaining about stereotypes isn't that a bit too drama queen? ;D isn't ittttt?
And embrace people diversity, I for once would find it rather downsetting if everyone was an average joe… BOOOORIIINNGGG...

@agis:

Now myr all these things seemed ingeniously constructed but I didn't feel to  be left with a criterion for a choice  ??? …

1. lazy aproach = let the wavelength come to you
2. overworked = go and seek the wavelength
3. romantism = let us meet halfway
4. actually very realistic for the time, the wavelength is emited the attention of perception of the being is too and they meet in  medium, if they could articulate that the medium is the retina to brain process…

Being Camp is now a dangerous stereotype… twinks will be next to be erradicated untill only the straightest men of all gaydom remain... now HOW STUPIDLY HYPOCRIT can a guy get?

@agis:

And, there, I found a  terrible thing: since the colour is there considered as the product of luminous radiations of different wavelength, grosso modo between 390 and 740 nanometers when they impact the human eye (retina) and since we must consider also a chroma (position in the spectre), a brilliance (intensity) and a saturation (pureness in the waves distribution) it was possible to calculate the numerical value of the possible perceived by humans colours. And this value was 7.295.000.  :crazy2: Now tell me what a poor mole could do with you surface mammals  :cry2:

Blinding yourself in science? ahah :hug2: as for the henceforth shoes, well the design is nowadays femenine however it was assexual for millenia, and men wore bows in cloth as in shoes before women ahah somehow I grant that most cloth sexual designations are actually fairly old high medieval times however well to be tyrant about such is a 50's thing… the history of gay acceptance and reject actually is terribly interesting and gays should learnt it more instead of the actual focus on the 20th century only...

As for such as language well portuguese are dead set on not fusing with brazilian and brazilians are dead set on the same, why our govenment's want the union I know not why... Portuguese has become a base language for other countries let them devellop or bastardize it ... same with french and english or any other empire language.

The antropology of colour, colour as perceiver in society regionally, just as you were commenting, it is studies in most marketing, publicity film making arts in general to architecture, by example we can have a whole set of red nail polish and women will be mad about how some reds make them feel.  :cool2:

@uicuic:

Not bein etectable through blood test is not the same as saying that your sperm does not contain significant amount of virus. well at least that's what i read on several prevention sites I went to. As i said i'm not judging, just informing myself any way possible.

As I said it's not 0, I do not recommend it in any way yet it's their choice to take the risk, it's great you're looking for information, that only speacks the best of you has a responsible individual.

@agis:

Ok myr you have been strongly molapproved  :cool2:
Moreover there would be a thing… while the mourning color for western societies is black for japanese society, for instance, is white.
Mmmm of course a mole wouldn't know colors. Her sight world is binary. White/light/on danger/bad; black/darkness/off safe/good.
This colors stuff seems interesting though  ^-^

:love: my work is very much about colour history and yes it's a dream job right now.

I'm kinda seeing the 2 sides of the fence , but… did you know that untill the start of the 1900's girls wore blue and boys a reddish pink... if you go threw most paintings prior to that date mostly women are in blue and men in red... and boys in sky blue are marked as nobility and generally the dark blue in men was not all that well conotated, so this marking of pink as a girls colour only happened after the infamous marking of gay in the 2nd world war... food for thought how a dumb society only gets dumber...

@uicuic:

Are you saying that you actually do bareback with your hiv negative partner? Sorry if I misunderstood. How is working so far? I'm not judging.

If he ismedicated the probability of infecting his partner is very small (not 0) but really small.

Hmm depends on the look, is he glancing just by casually, is he surprised, is he eating you with his eyes in a sec… that would basically tell me if how I should act back... well if you want to find if the cute guy in the straight bar is gay or not and you can't read body language well... just drop the "that guy over there looks gay" and see where that leads you  >:D mwhahah, but for what my friends tell me Dutch people do are more relaxed about it, or am I entering the sterotyping universe again... Dorothy let's go home. :love:

@agis:

Hmmm not sure if we already have matter for a general ahem "law" there. Myr? Bears?…. 

For me the need of "laws" in such matter is only to allow fair and equal financial and tax questions, I do not believe in marriage as a social practice, people are only married in the heart.

@agis:

Concerning me anyway I must admit I've never strongly advocated the gay marriage for the simple reason I'd prefer to abolish the straight one in its actual usual strictly bigamous form which would be always permitted of course but only as one of the possible juridically regulated life in common forms

Well put that is teh culmination of secular thinking, however tho we as individuals are coming to that, the society still lingers to a majority of "retainers" which cling to formatated ways of thinking, I'd go further to say it's a common situation regarding all matters.

:cry2: the sadder thing it is people received it naturally because as you said in many hospitals terminal patients are well… less that taken well care of as a start, to the point you question ethics and deontology of the entire medical class... :blownose:

That is really scary, however at least you have those studies, here our government cut down the funding in cancer and hiv/aids care and research… they have a real strange sense of priorities :afr:

I do hope they cut the funding, if you ever seen documentaries about the country it's abominable, a mix of pure and utter stupidity and hate

Farkme has a solid point yet I have to say by the one hundreth time ever… if you bareback not being with your monogamous partner YOU are part of the problem mister, and spreading the shit like wildfire.

@agis:

uglybadcorruptedshittyignobleportuguesepoliticians but to the handsomegooduncorruptedcleanoblegermanpoliticians. Since it's a science fiction story we could even hopefully think we are not coming  to the bad fado of Sebastião o Adormecido../quote]

IMHO you still have to equationate the alwaysfamousforfuckinguptheneighbourhoodoldUSApoliticians + banks

@AndyZ:

Look at what they do in the medical world – they assume everyone is potentially contagious and use universal precautions as the standard on everyone when handling any bodily fluids.  Anyone who contracts an illness from not using universal precautions is the one at fault.  Why does the regular population think it would be any different for them with sexual bodily fluids?  Wishful thinking I suppose.  But someone who contracts a disease and doesn't use maximal protection is just as responsible when it comes right down to it.

I agree with you on that both are responsible in a generalised situation, however one of them knows an information and is willingly endangering the other, while the other does not know it, dumb yes… however legally that is a basic defenition of crime, you could switch hiv with money and you get a scam or thief, and that is generalisation, you can't account for rapes or coerced sex that way, for people with mental problems and so on... so by that logic we do not punish liers, or people which willingly are set to harm others, we punish the dumb, which by contracting an infection were already punished...