I am stumped why I am able to access THIS site at the pubic library without a VPN, but I can't access any of the other similar sites.
Even more puzzling, I cannot access anything if I turn my VPN ON with WIFI. But, if I connect at the library with ethernet and my VPN, then I can access all websites, but can't download torrents!
My brain is hurting!
The makers of DC comics decided to make several characters of their comic books gay (in a desperate attempt to sell some comic books). That's fine, but what bothers me is.. "Where's the BEEF aka gay content?". I am at the pubic library, and they have several son of Superman comic books that are current.. but i could not find the slightest suggestion in them that Superman Jr. is gay. The closest thing I could find to him being gay is that he is staring at Lex Luthor working out through a window. That's pretty tame!
Where's the storyline of Lex Luthor using a dildo made of kryptonite to lure Superman's son into an underground lair, where Lex then put's the helpless son of Superman in a sling, and then has his way with junior's ass?
Self sucking is hardly "sucking cock"
By that standard, every male that ever jacked off is homosexual.
ANYBODY who is capable of sucking their own cock would do so at some point.
That said, I am sure that Ron Jeremy has topped some guys.
As for raping anybody.. hardly. Some women - whose days in porn ended long ago, decided to cash in by saying Ron Jeremy
raped them.
@pupkinvasya
Pupkinvasya is the undisputed king of gay porn knowledge!
@ivcrn2 Hmm.. so you like to check out the connection made to your own backend? I wonder how common this is. For instance, I have a cyber friend whom everyone in his life thinks is straight, but he shares his gay side with me, and only me. I was the one that pointed out that his last girlfriend was an evil cunt succubus sent from hell.. and he found out the hard way that I was CORRECT. I think she turned him off on females for good.
He seems to have developed an admiration for his OWN body. I wonder how many "straight" guys have taken a look at their own ass with the assistance of a webcam?
Given the choice of GAY, BI, STRAIGHT (G,B,S), how would you describe the following behaviors of men?
Frankly, masturbation could be called a homosexual act. I wonder how many straight men never masturbate?
What percentage of "straight" men take fingers, dildos, or other things up their ass?
Then there is the topic of sodomy.
Is heterosexual sex outside of marriage sodomy?
Is heterosexual sex which employs contraceptives, sodomy?
a lot of "straight women" love to watch gay men fucking.
@MrMazda They must have seen your self made video, and decided that you looked like Zeb Atlas, so they deleted it for impersonation.
Have you tried posting it again?
@krad3434 I don't think they remove low quality videos. That would eliminate all the vintage videos of the 70's and 80's.
@MrMazda Thanks for that information. Up until about 10 years ago, my ISP throttled me SEVERELY even though they assured me over and over that they were not. I know they were, and there was PROOF of it.
The speeds I get are so fast that even when they do throttle me, I still get everything I want (unless it vanishes from the site an hour after it was posted).
@drekkin I don't disagree with you..
but i would point out that a bot is NOT a legitimate entity to be filing DMCA complaints - not that any of the DMCA complaints are legitimate.
BUT it goes beyond that.. because as I mentioned, a moderator of this site created his own original content and posted it here.. and it got taken down with a DMCA violation.. so.. something is gagootz with the system of DMCA reviews.
@eobox91103
I am not disputing that people should not be watching inappropriate things in public... HOWEVER, that is not for the restaurants and libraries to determine. If someone is watching XXX video in a children's playground, haul them off to jail. However, one should be able to access the sites with that porn, and do things like write messages in this forum.
As for bandwidth.. it takes just as much bandwidth to be plaing online video games and watching youtube videos.
I don't see them blocking video game sites nor youtube.
Just because we don't LIKE something doesn't mean we have the right to eliminate it. If we had that right, many of my neighbors would be GONE!
@MrMazda I just remembered something. About a year ago, a moderator of this site posted some content of THEMSELVES that they made, and it got removed for being a DMCA violation! Obviously that was a mistake. I don't even recall which moderator it was.
@VGC I really don't think this site needs to advertise by having it listed on Google. Yet the contents of this site ARE found on Google searches.
This problem of "vanishing torrents" has come and gone many times over the past 20 years or so.. and right now it is becoming epidemic.
@dilemmax the problem with that theory is... let's say there is a scene starring "Freddy Phuk" from "Bentkok Studios". Why is it that ONE scene of "Freddy Phuk" from Bentkok is removed, while several other scenes of Freddy Phuk from Bentkok remain on the site?
@MrMazda I would agree that it is not possible to know that it was not due to a DMCA request.. except for the fact that I have been paying close attention to patterns, and tested it myself with a recent upload. There are instances in which a new torrent appears on the site, but is removed from the site within one hour of it being posted. It is not conceivable that someone uploaded a torrent, and within one hour, someone found that torrent, downloaded that torrent, reported that torrent, and got a moderator to review that torrent. So, there was no request made to begin with.. which means... ?
There IS one legitimate explanation. the moderator could have mistakenly thought that the newly posted torrent was a duplicate of files already on the site. But the problem with that is.. they were not duplicates, and the message sent said it was a DMCA request, and not because it was a duplicate. But.. again, it's impossible that the torrent was found, DMCA request was made and received and reviewed all within one hour.
Perhaps there needs to be a new section...we have ACTIVE, and DEAD.. we should have a DMCA section which lists the torrents which have been removed, and those links are not downloadable. That is what pornolab does (only they have very very VERY few torrents which are not downloadable). That way, people won't make the mistake of uploading the same DMCA violation files again - because they are listed in the DMCA section. Perhaps some unscrupulous users make massive posts - to get download credits, they report their own torrents to get them removed, and then they re-post the same files again to get more credit for them - over and over again.
One other problem could be that the torrents on this site and the comments of this forum can be viewed WITHOUT having a membership. One cannot download any torrents without a membership, nor can one REPLY to messages in this forum without a membership, but they ARE viewable without a membership - which I don't understand.
@pupkinvasya yes.. E B F D C A ...
What are the odds of you keeping a video of a performer you like that contains:
A - solo content
B - duo or three way
C - 4 or more orgy
D - your favorite performer topping
E - your favorite performer bottoming
F - your favorite performer topping and bottoming
For me: A10% B90% C50% D80 E90 F99%
So, I don't care much for either solos or orgies, and I like to see my favorite either bottoming or better yet, topping AND bottoming.
I used to tease people with the idea of having a 90 pound 19 year old twink that always bottoms, switching it up and topping someone like Zeb Atlas.
When at various public "hot spots", you cannot access websites which contain porn. WHY?
Let's back up, and consider the following:
Should it be legal to block:
Basically, the reason is that porn is considered illegal (archaic concept) which is also why it can't be copyrighted. Then there is the issue.. why is that some very old porn IS copyrighted? There is an answer to that. It is not because it is porn, it is because in the old days, porn producers did not have nor could they afford sound systems that would capture audio and have it synchronized with the video. To dramatically cut their costs of production, they would have no sound on the video, but then dub in a soundtrack of music - and that music had legitimate copyrights. So.. the reason those early porn movies are copyrighted, is because they contain copyrighted material - primarily music - of such artists as David Bowie, etc.
There is another twist to this which the police use. There has been a rapid increase in the number of people recording altercations with the police, which then get posted to such online services such as Youtube. The police found a way to prevent this from being done. The police intentionally play coplyrighted music on their radios very loudly, so that when someone records the altercation, it cannot be posted with the sound, because the sound includes copyrighted music - which Youtube's bots automatically detect, and block from being posted! Great idea really.