Posts made by jaroonn
-
RE: President Trump shot, bloody ear, survives
@blablarg18 said in President Trump shot, bloody ear, survives:
Dirty Kamala blew at least 3 power brokers on her way to the top. And is alcoholic.
According to your online "research"?? lmao. You are the Incel Poster Child.
-
RE: Two weeks ago
@lololulu19 The only consequential legislation the GOP has put forward and passed in the past 20 years was a massive tax cut for the businesses and the rich. In the meantime, they have killed any bill that would have benefitted the middle/working class. Yet given the lip-service they pay to irrelevant social issues and their right-wing propaganda media machines, they continue of convince the chickens to vote for Col. Sanders.
-
RE: evidence for JD Vance "cat lady" comment
@blablarg18 said in evidence for JD Vance "cat lady" comment:
You demand I help you sort your feces - your lies.
You can't do it because just starting with the GOPs killing of the Build Back Better Bill, they are all true. And so you predictably resort to childish taunts.
-
RE: evidence for JD Vance "cat lady" comment
@blablarg18 You prove over and over again how juvenile you really are. If your CT sites ever shut down, you'll have nothing to repost.
-
RE: Taking politics way too far.
@raphjd Well, I know a lot of liberals, but none who would agree with that. Statements such as "Liberals want criminals to run free" sound more like a Fox News sound byte or a GOP campaign slogan than anything based in reality. I'm not saying that there are not DAs who are too lenient, but sweeping generalizations are just not accurate. I think there are cases where first time offenders for relatively minor crimes should not just be locked up as it seems the US, privatized, for-profit prison system is more of a criminal training school than rehab. I also think white collar criminals and rich offenders get off too easily.
In any case, as the economy of the US has improved over the past few years, the crime rate has decreased as well. I think criminals should indeed be punished, but I also think that society will be served better in the long run if we try to focus on eliminating the root causes.
-
RE: evidence for JD Vance "cat lady" comment
@blablarg18 You are so transparent.
-
RE: Taking politics way too far.
@raphjd Exactly. So maybe politics has less to do with crime rates than do socio-economic factors? It's fairly easy to see that poverty and easy access to firearms are very important factors. Let's try to treat the disease rather than slapping a band-aid on it.
-
RE: Chill out.....
@raphjd said in Chill out.....:
Strzok
I admit I don't know much about the case; I wasn't following it at the time. I've just read this:
There is no mention of her being granted "immunity," but rather an agreement not to access her emails related to the Clinton Foundation.
I don't really have an opinion on this; as I said, I wasn't following it.
-
RE: Chill out.....
@raphjd said in Chill out.....:
Strok (you should know who he is) granted her immunity
Sorry, I don't know who that is and can't find any reference to him online. Is that the correct spelling?
-
RE: Taking politics way too far.
@raphjd And when you look at murder rates in the US, 7 of the 10 states with the highest rate are very red.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/murder-rate-by-state
Maybe both sides need to come together and start passing legislation that tackles the root causes of crime. Maybe take a look at countries with much lower rates of crime, and figure out what they are doing that we are not?
-
RE: Taking politics way too far.
@raphjd said in Taking politics way too far.:
here's a huge difference between gun control and taking away our guns that liberals want.
There may be are some liberals who would like that. But none I know. I am a gun owner (not here in Poland, but in the US). I would like to see the same kinds of regulations to gun ownership as there is to driving a car, for example. The same kinds of regulations that exist in most countries. where 327 people are not being shot every day.
-
RE: Chill out.....
@blablarg18 said in Chill out.....:
Hillary Clinton got out of going to trial because she and all of her co-conspirators were granted immunity before they were even charged.
Associates of Clinton were granted immunity in and investigation of her (standard legal practice). Why would Hillary be granted immunity when she was the focus of the investigation? You need to stop listening to Trump. He's making you believe bullshit is real.
-
RE: Taking politics way too far.
@raphjd said in Taking politics way too far.:
Most conservatives support some gun control.
Maybe in the UK, but what gun control measures does the NRA and most US conservatives support?
-
RE: evidence for JD Vance "cat lady" comment
@blablarg18 A very Trumpian answer: no facts, so resorts to childish taunts. It's only in your deluded mind that you think you've pointed out where I am wrong. I gave you a list of points above, an abbreviated one at that, of examples of policies that would benefit families yet are opposed by most Republicans.
Your simply stating that half are lies is in fact a lie. Most of what you post here is just fact-free CT from the usual "sources." I am surprised that your keyboard doesn't explode when you type words like "intelligence" and "honesty."
-
RE: evidence for JD Vance "cat lady" comment
@blablarg18 I challenge you to show me which are lies. I also challenge you name any legislation the Republicans have put forward that would benefit children and families.
I know you love to make lists....waiting. -
RE: Taking politics way too far.
@lololulu19 said in Taking politics way too far.:
How does it feel to be wrong about everything, jaroon?
You tell me.
-
RE: Taking politics way too far.
@lololulu19 said in Taking politics way too far.:
The rifle used to shoot Trump was purchased by the shooter's FATHER.
Irrelevant. He was still ABLE to buy one and (obviously) access one. Republicans are against any kind of gun control, so.........karma.