@raphjd said in Jen Psaki, Biden Press Sec, homophobic tweet:
You surrender.
You're missing the point. (Quite a theme with you)
I posted about liberals and you deflected with your whataboutism of the conservatives.
It's only conservatives shrieking about this, it's only conservatives who want her scalp, and that's hollow when they've a caucus and base full of homophobes and dogmatic religious cultists.
Your surrender remains accepted by your continued deflection.attempts from that fact.
@raphjd said in Jen Psaki, Biden Press Sec, homophobic tweet:
DUMB COMMIE.
Anarchists are the ones that make up their own rules and don't care if they follow them.
Your people are supposed to follow orders and fatten up your leaders.
I notice the distinct lack of any words replated to the topic.
I accept your surrender,
@raphjd said in Jen Psaki, Biden Press Sec, homophobic tweet:
Ah, so we can only talk about hating the RNC. Gotcha.
Nope, you really do struggle with following a topic.
BTW, you started the deflection and wataboutism in your very first post in this thread because you tried to make it all about conservatives when the topic was clearly about liberals.
It's conservatives that are shrieking about this, not liberals.
Not a whataboutism.
If you are gonna get butt hurt and screechy, then follow your own rules before squawking at me.
I am. Keep up.
@raphjd said in Jen Psaki, Biden Press Sec, homophobic tweet:
So do I, that is why I bring up the history of the DNC. The fag loving party has been extremely nasty to us over the years and well within my life time.
You bring up history to engage in whataboutisms and deflection, not because they are germane to the discussion.
The RNC hasn't done much to us, despite the lies and hysteria the DNC made up about them.
Sure, just because they haven't lynched you, doesn't mean they haven't tried.
Rudy even pointedly told courts that he wasn't alleging fraud.
This will be used against him.
@bc22
I bolded it, don't know how to colourise here
@raphjd said in Jen Psaki, Biden Press Sec, homophobic tweet:
You refuse to admit the shitty history of the DNC. Even in the very recent past they were homophobic and racist.
The difference between you and I is that I acknowledge the past, but I don't wield it as a cudgel and as a weasel way out of facing the current day reality that only one party is overtly racist and homophobic.
Hell, they use racism to show they aren't racist.
Sure.
@raphjd said in Jen Psaki, Biden Press Sec, homophobic tweet:
You really do have a mental illness.
When you have nothing, this is what you reduce yourself to.
It's funny that a commy worships the Democrats.
I don't.
Kim Jong Pelosi
Again, irrelevant.
As a commy, I'm sure you are aware China and North Korea will take you in.
Nothing to do with my point.
It's aparrent you don't want to face up to the reality.
In today's episode of free speech is not unlimited, we have 3 co-stars who continuously lied about a company and have damaged their reputation.
Oh no, we made a boo-boo, we thought Frumpy would pardon us
Their guilt is apparent, the only thing to do is sort out the settlement.
@raphjd said in Jen Psaki, Biden Press Sec, homophobic tweet:
Remind me again which party was it that gave the US its 3 most homophobic laws ever?
Whataboutism
I'll give you 2 hints, Bill Clinton and the party name starts with a D.
Deflection
You know how you people whine about not being able to get gay cakes and whatnot? Well, you clowns can thank Schumer who authored the bill, and Biden, one of the co-sponsors, as well as Slick WIllie who signed it into law.
Gish Gallop
They also gave us DADT and DOMA.
More Gish Gallop
DOMA violated the US Constitution by violating the Full Faith and Credit clause, even if you ignore the other parts, such as Equal Protection, etc.
Who forced it through Congress?
For 26 years, people have been screaming that the 1994 crime bill was racist, which is kinda true. You hate the guy that reversed most of it and elect the guy who created it because y'all dumb as a box of rocks.
Frumpy didn't do jack with that legislation except tinker with its edges.
...
Now, back to the subject at hand; there is only one party, in the present day, that attends the races for blatant, overt, rampant, and disgusting homophobia.
That party's name doesn't begin with a 'D', in spite of the spaghetti you just flung.
@bi4smooth said in Jen Psaki, Biden Press Sec, homophobic tweet:
Of COURSE not - it's about "Rage against the machine"!!
In a sense, yes.
On a serious note, we held the Trump Administration to a high standard, and the Biden Administration shouldn't be given a pass either. I have no desire for there to be a double standard
I've seen the tweet since, and I think she should clarify what she meant, at the very least.
That said, calling Sen Graham "Lady G" is actually common in LGBTQ circles in DC. If anyone deserves an apology, it's Sen Graham (not the LGBTQ community - who openly embrace this usage!). True, it is intended to be derogatory, but not to LGBTQ people, it's a "dis" to Sen Graham.
It seems that way.
What this tweet tells me is that Jen Psaki has LGBTQ community ties
Possibly.
That said, since the Trump Administration virtually never apologized for his slights to other officials - slights that were grossly more offensive than this one - then I don't think we should expect an apology from the Biden Administration. Equal is equal.
This was my point, conservatives being 'outraged' over this is shallow.
Should she be called out for it? sure
Should we expect an apology? Girl? No!
Yes
Depending on her explanation, she probably should so that it can be put behind her.
I'd like to see this tweet.
Does this mean that conservatives suddenly care about LGBTQ people now?
@raphjd said in The Lincoln Project and sexual harassment:
You're an idiot.
I'm not the one here repeatedly lying.
I have to question if you still have the coat hanger in your head.
Incisive commentary there.
You admit that just because Twitter wrote some shit down, that they don't have to follow it.
Nope.
Twitter told this family that kiddie porn does not violate their TOS and refused to remove it. Twitter only removed it once Homeland Security got involved.
No, you said that "Twitter says kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS". Try reading your own words.
The fact that you have such a pathological need to fight me over this says volumes about you.
I'm correcting you.
Twitter totally disregarded their own TOS on kiddie porn, but for some reason you need to fight me over this, claiming I am a liar.
I have proven you're a liar.
EDIT: Looking at this discussion, I'm not sure if you are special needs or simply a troll.
Merely someone who prefers accuracy more than you clearly do.
@raphjd said in The Lincoln Project and sexual harassment:
I did not lie.
You did, even after multiple corrections.
Twitter told the family that they would not remove the kiddie porn because it did not violate their TOS. Twitter only removed it because Homeland Security got involved.
An indivdual incident does not invalidate Twitter ToS.
"Twitter says kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS" was your statement.
That is the truth, but you call it a lie because you are mentally ill.
I call a repeated lie a 'lie'. Yes.
@raphjd said in The Lincoln Project and sexual harassment:
Yet, you are full of crap.
I'm not the one who lied about Twitter ToS.
Twitter said that kiddie porn does not violate their TOS and refused to remove it until Homeland Security got involved.
"Twitter says kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS"
Yet I have proven this wrong with reference to their terms. You're lying.
Your crack headed liberal mental gymnastics won't change that fact.
Nothing you have said has invalidated Twitter ToS.
Do not allow someone to pressure you into getting a circumcision.
Uncut penisis are not unclean. This is a myth.
I wouldn't dream of having the most sensitive area removed for anything except sound medical advice, but that's just me.
@raphjd said in The Lincoln Project and sexual harassment:
Did twitter tell this family that they won't remove the kiddie porn because it doesn't violate their TOs in this case?
Irrelevant to your false statement.
If so, you are an ass clown that needs to fight.
I'm still here correcting you on your false claim that "Twitter says kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS".
@raphjd said in The Lincoln Project and sexual harassment:
AGAIN, since you are special needs.
Just because it is written down, does not mean that they follow their own rules.
AGAIN
I never said it did.
I said that Twitter says that kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS and in the case I mentioned, I am 100% right. Twitter's stance in that case is that kiddie porn does not violate their TOS.
No, you said that "Twitter says kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS". Nothing else, no qualifiers. Don't lie.
I know you are too stupid to understand that.
I'm not the one who is defending a lie they've been caught up badly on.
@raphjd said in The Lincoln Project and sexual harassment:
Yet, Twitter told that family that they would not remove it because it didn't violate their TOS.
What Twitter did in an individual case does not constitute a revocation of their ToS.
GOT IT?! Of course, you don't because you're a liberal.
My outlook has nothing to do with the fact that your statement was false, and I proved it.
It's funny that you feel the need to fight me over this when Twitter's actions are extremely disgusting in this case.
I'm not fighting with you, I'm correcting you.
@raphjd said in The Lincoln Project and sexual harassment:
Yet, I showed that they won't remove kiddie porn unless Homeland Security demands they do.
So your statement that "Twitter says kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS" remains false.
Got it.
So again, just because you are special needs. Just because something is written down, doesn't mean they follow that.
I never said it did.
Learn to read.
