@bi4smooth said in Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Mask Mandate For School Children Is Illegal:
Removing content AFTER it has been published - without "prior restraint" allows them to be immune from prosecution for the posts' contents. THAT is the "Section 230" you Trumpites love to complain about - but it has nothing to do with what the DO NOT allow on their site! It has everything to do with not holding them liable for WHAT IS on their website.
You are right about not being liable for what they remove. When they remove half the conversation they are sometimes removing the factual information and leaving only that which complies with the editorial narrative they are trying to pass off as factual. Section 230 need to be modified to state that they are still not liable for what is posted on their site but they are liable for any editorial changes made to the content.
The issue is that a medium is used considerably more effectively by one viewpoint than another... Conservatives have RULED talk radio (and Cable TV) for decades.... we can't really complain THAT loudly when Liberals finally find a voice somewhere!
Liberals have a very strong and loud voice it is call the Main Stream Media.