Topics created by Frederick

@Frederick:

Trump may be smart, but I think you have the Comey Tape thing all wrong. The best explanation I've heard is that Trump was taken aback by the level of detail related in the first NYT article regarding the "loyalty" dinner.  That made Trump worry the Comey had taped him, not realizing that Comey was relying on contemporaneous memos.  He put that tweet out to see if Comey would leak the tapes.  That's why he waited so long.  Once he was convinced that Comey had not taped him, Trump realized he could lie about what was said.  It is just a theory, but makes more sense than yours.  Why would Comey lie before Congress when he had discussed what was said with his colleagues long before he knew he would be fired?  Comey is a lawyer.  He would not risk perjury charges that could be proven by a third party.

Frederick, if you state that you are successful I accept it.

But even if I accepted every claim you made about the women around you while growing up – and what appears to be, at times, a challenging home life -- it would not validate your expanding these evaluations to all women.

yet another reason we need to get rid of sanctuary areas

Frederick, I challenge you point out any fact that I have gotten wrong.  I will go head to head with you on a fact check any day.
There is a difference between facts and opinions.  If I say Trump is a bully, that is an opinion.  If I say Trump tweeted that Mika was bleeding from a face lift, that is a fact.

@Frederick:

The guy topping Justin Styles in this video is the one and only DERRICK PORTER, who is Justin's real life boyfriend.  
They will be performing live and in color on June 30, 2017.. at 8PM EST,  5PM Pacific time  on Chaturbate..  It's free to watch.. but I think there is a way you can tip if you want.
They will attempt to make a baby.

https://www.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=f130162088a5484f08da995e632c1e4b72d74a441235647d&viewcomm=262920#comm262920

Make a baby?

What do you mean?

:blink:

@raphjd:

As long as CNN keeps Sourpuss on, the whole network is scum.

It would be like Fox hiring David Duke and making him a major focus of the network.

The last time I brought David Duke into a discussion you criticized me for hyperbole.  There is no comparison between the two.  Now I have some fact-checking to do.
UPDATE:  Done with my fact checking about Don Lemon shutting down a black commentator.  You can watch it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7sTXXi_by4
Also see my comments about it in the Fake News thread.

No, but since you wanted clarification, you're demonstrating exactly the type of behavior I was referring to.

Ok, I get it.

You can call me a racist, but I can't react to it.

@jazuko:

Liberals will call any white person whos proud of their heritage/ lacking white guilt a white supremacist. many things non-white people do that white people will do is considered "supremacist" when white people do it but ok and encouraged if youre not white. ive seen articles telling white gay guys their racist supremacists just for dating other white guys.

There are laws which make punishments extremely severe if a crime is designated as a "hate crime".  This often happens when the crime involves the use of racially charged words.  Seems to me that calling someone a "white supremacist" when they are not should be put under the category of a hate crime.  I remember about 5 years ago, someone I was arguing with on the telephone kept calling me a "cracker".  I had NEVER been called that before.  She got angrier by the second because I acted as if I had no idea what "cracker" meant.    "Why are you calling me a cracker?"  "Oh, because I'm white?"  "Well, then you can call me cracker all you like!"

@Frederick:

Whoopsie!  I made a misake!!!  That is extremely rare.
HOWEVER… there is a contradiction here.. if the premiums are lower.. then more people can afford insurance if they want it.  So, why don't YOU explain why more people would be uninsured if the insurance premiums are lower?

I will explain it.  I have spent my entire career working in health insurance.

If you don't have a mandate then healthy people won't buy it.  People will just go without health insurance and then use the ER when they get sick and never pay the bill.  Those costs are going to get shifted to tax payers instead.  The cost of uncompensated care to hospitals was enormous in Massachusetts and was the primary reason for RomneyCare.  Romney went around for months bashing the "freeloaders" who used the system but never paid anything into it.  RomneyCare and ObamaCare ensured that everybody paid something even if it was just a fine.

The Republican plan will make health insurance optional but if you have a lapse in coverage you will pay a higher premium when you do sign up.  This means that many people who get sick and are most vulnerable won't be able to afford it.

This is actually not a new idea.  Medicare works this way.  You can refuse Medicare Part B when you turn 65.  If you sign up later you pay a penalty every month via a much higher premium that is based on how long it has been since you turned 65.  Some people do this and they ALWAYS regret it.  They are usually stuck paying this high premium when their income becomes fixed because they are no longer working and when their health starts to decline due to age.  There is one key difference though.  Most people do enroll in Part B when they turn age 65 but that premium is deducted automatically from their Social Security check.  The person never has to make a choice between buying groceries (or an iPhone) and paying for their health insurance.  It also works this way for Medicare Part A for certain legal immigrants.

Well, you are correct to a degree, however, it temporarily reversed the decision by the lower courts and showed that their rulings didn't hold water. If there were any actual merit to their lower rulings, it wouldn't have been a question. The fact that it's being temporarily and partially over ruled is a big win because not even one of the SCOTUS has agreed that it's as cut and dry as the liberals have tried to make it out to be. It certainly isn't unconstitutional, because if it were, it would be pretty clear, as the Constitution is clear.

I'm surprised she got fired.

With the exception of the University of Chicago,  western colleges/universities love minority faculty who openly and blatantly hate white people.  The next best is self loathing cuck white faculty who blindly support white hatred.

This is another example of black privilege, because white can't do this.

@pppucci:

As for the high per capita cost of healthcare in the US versus other countries, realize the others have various forms of "socialized medicine,"and care is rationed.

Care is rationed in the US too.

love how these are the same type of women calling men fragile

@jazuko:

Did Warmbier beat someone up and show himself as a violent thug before stealing that flag and then attempting to assault a cop like Michael brown?
you guys still acting like the only difference between these two guys and their situations was skin color? ::)

They're still acting like this, because SJWs are by far the most racist group of people in American society today – both against white people for being unable to empathize and blacks/minorities for the soft racism of low expectations.

This thread being a clear and blatant example of that ugly racism.

Disgusting.

Warmbier was white, Brown was black.
To white people, Otto Warmbier became a symbol of those who suffer under the weight of evil, despotic, dictatorial regimes, as well as an emblem of destroyed innocence that should have never suffered such pain in a situation which was ultimately not his fault.
To white people, Michael Brown became a symbol of society out of control, of a parisitic class of criminally-minded individuals with no respect for authority and who deserve all the misery of the world as punishment for situations usually of their own fault.

OBVIOUSLY, these are not all the differences as already pointed out multiple times.  Putting effort into making a post with cutesy graphics doesn't change your faulty assumptions.

I fully support legalizing some drugs.

This would prevent criminals from adding shit into it to "cut" it.    Then tax the fuck out of it.

Pot was only made illegal as part of the ban on hemp to protect the cotton industry.

He's just lucky Trump didn't turn around, or that fan would never see sunshine again.  Not that our President is anti-gay, but he hates to be upstaged.