Posts made by Frederick

@royalcrown89:

@mhorndisk:

Congrats on 500!!!  :cheers: :love: :love: :love:

A reputation of 500 means absolutely nothing when you preside over a toxic forum where only those who approve of your views have a positive reputation, and where no one wants to participate because of a user like you who mass-posts and spams all day long.  :cheers:

That would be true!  Good thing this forum is no longer toxic, and this group has more participation that just about any other group on the site!

FYI… the latest barrage of back-stabbing, inciteful attacks is coming from Flozen, who doesn't post messages, doesn't read messages, and downvotes every message from people he doesn't like.    How loathsome is that?

@TroopK:

I don't think it's just 'leftists' with a concerted campaign of destroying the reputations of their enemies

The leftists.. like the red lined moonbats, have no reputation to destroy.  They do it to themselves.

@raphjd:

I guess the leftists support the demands, but are too embarrassed to admit it.

Of course, they support everyone else giving up their shit, but they never would.

I love watching multi billionaires, like Sir Richard Branson, coming on tv begging people to donate to charity.   Or in this case, rich black people demanding that whites give up their stuff and give it to blacks.

I didn't realize until about a year ago what an asshole Richard Branson is.

@raphjd:

Secret voting doesn't allow the people to know how their politico voted.

I know.. but perhaps having them vote freely would have better results than mindless forced votes by party.

@raphjd:

In the UK, it used to be that you got a new IP address every time you logged on to the internet.    You had to pay double or more to get a static one.

Now pretty much everyone has a static one, except when they are using hotspots and whatnot.

I switched my provider to one that provided free static IP addresses about 8 years ago.   About 4 years ago, static became the standard.  I don't know of any that offer dynamic still.

Dial up modems resulted in new ip  addresses with every connection. 
The one advantage of having a static ip address is if you want to use your own computer as a server.  When you do that, you could hypothetically keep a server with top secret confidential emails on it in your basement, and if you ever got in trouble just delete them, and since they are not on a remote server, you are safe.

Frankly, having a server in one's own house is silly.  It ties up a computer, is prone to crashing, and eats up your bandwidth.  There are many remote hosting services which are dirt cheap.

IPv4 has a LOT of ip addresses, so they don't need to be re-used much.
IPv6 has so many ip addresses that they would never run out of them.. and each address is permanently assigned to a specific location - hello Big Brother.

What gets me with Facebook is that they want it both ways.  They both demand to know exactly who you are and where you are by your ip address and email address.. yet at the same time they demand more for advertising purposes such as your cell phone number and everything else.    Here's an idea.. when you set up an account.. give them your PHYSICAL address.. then they can SEND you via snail mail a verification letter.

Facebook doesn't fool me.. they are crooks.

Flozen, you picked the WRONG MESSAGE to downvote..

I highly suggest you apologize for that.

THAT message is not one that I will tolerate being attacked.

I promise you that you will regret it if you don't apologize.

The 5 year old case I refer to is directly linked to senior government officials of the country it took place in.  The accused man got convicted because the most senior government official filed one of the charges against the accused, and the government official just happens to be the best friend of the accused man's appointed defense attorney.  You should be thinking  "THAT is impossible!  That can't be true!"   but it IS!

But that is not what this message is about.  There was a publication ban applied to that trial.  The publication ban was ignored except when there was something that favored the defendant.  The evidence to prove the defendant to be not guilty is included within video covered by the publication ban.  The evidence is not visible, unless you play the video frame by frame.  At normal speed, the evidence is impossible to see.  Even when you do see it, it means nothing until it is explained what you are looking at.  I found it because I got the video hours after it was posted, and before it was removed from the internet the next day.  I played the video frame by frame looking for something else, and spotted something completely invisible when played at normal speed.  I made comments about this on Facebook after the accused man was in custody.  The actual killer responded to me in private messages.  The actual killer had begun messaging me BEFORE the accused man was in custody, and continued t message me AFTER the man was in custody.  At first, he thought I was the man he had framed.  When he found out that I wasn't, he taunted me and was always trying to prove that he knew more than I did about the murder.  He is the one that explained what it was in that video that I was looking at.. and also explained that the victim you see in the video is NOT the actual murder victim until halfway through the video!   The posted video was a compilation of 2 videos made several days apart!  When I posted that, everyone thought I was crazy.. until 2.5 years later.. in the trial, they ADMITTED that the "victim" in the first part of the video was STILL ALIVE!  I was right all along. 
BUT!   the jury were never told anything about the video.

It has always puzzled me why there was a publication ban, and why that video was pulled from the internet.  It is not very gory.  In fact, you don't see any blood in the video!   The reason was, because the video - if analyzed - would have cleared the defendant!   And.. as I have said before.. the evidence was not even considered.. because after being doped up on enough psyche meds to kill a horse for 20 months, the defendant agreed to pursue an insanity plea - which requires one to not deny committing the crime.  You can't claim that you are not guilty by reason of insanity AND you didn't commit the crime.  He did plead not guilty, he never made a confession but he did not DENY committing the crime.

By the way.. the moonbats will love this.. because this massive fraudulent injustice that occurred in a different country was the result of a corrupt CONSERVATIVE administration!

Facebook has all sorts of excuses for demanding information from you, such as your photo id's, physical address, phone numbers, social security number, etc.  They claim that they need this information to verify that you are the owner of the account.

BULLSHIT!

They can easily verify whose account it is by looking at your IP ADDRESS  My IP address has not changed in 8 years, despite begging, pleading, and threatening my ISP to change it.  They store your ip address every time you log in.  In fact, if you log in from a different location they hit you with another demand to verify who you are because you are logging in from a different address!

So, even though they KNOW that it is me, they demand information from me, and even when I give it to them, they still don't accept it and disable my account!  Why?  because I post things that conflict with their moonbat philosophy.

The idea that someone has multiple accounts is also nonsense.  People living in apartments and condos often share a COMMON IP address via Wifi.  People at public hot spots are sharing an IP address.  Mike, Carol, Alice, Peter, Bobby, Greg, Jan, Marsha, Cindy, and Oliver all share the same IP address.  Therefore, Facebook has no reason to believe nor prove that someone has multiple Facebook accounts.  Maybe they do, but how are they going to know that?

Flozen downvoted my message above…

Obviously he didn't even read the message.

I have the answer to this which I am including at the end of this message.

Why would someone resign from their Trump appointed positions?  If they disagree with him, how do they get their ideas considered if they resign from their posts?  Would Trump want people who find him unbearable to be working in his administration?  Of course not.  
So, why would someone resign and give a reason for resigning as being something like "I don't like Trump" ?

====

The reason is, they are not really resigning.  Trump asked for their resignations to avoid embarrassing them by firing them.   A lot of them are jumping on the idiotic idea that Trump is racist.   As people go, Trump is quite UN-racist.   Certainly Hillary and Obama are FAR more racist than Trump.  The only president less racist than Trump is probably Jimmy Carter.  But even then.. Jimmy hates Jews.  He didn't hate Jews so much when president, but afterwards.. because he blamed them for not cooperating.

@royalcrown89:

But when you bring up someone not tied to the discussion at all whatsoever without even explaining how they are relevant, that is a derailment attempt.

Here is why you are wrong.  You have consistently attacked Trump, yet refuse to acknowledge the actions of anybody else in history.  You ignore and exclude the mistakes, controversies, scandals, lies, and bad decision of everybody else in history.  You give a clean slate to outrageous failures such as Hillary, Obama, Pelosi, and Schumer.. while at the same time invoking them to attack Trump at every opportunity.  This is why you and other moonbats have no credibilty.

@royalcrown89:

@Frederick:

@royalcrown89:

@raphjd:

As far as I know, Trump didn't say that there are some good racists.

You're going off of "as far as you know" while I'm going off of the actual words that came out of his mouth on LIVE TV.

Now back to the point of this thread, can we come to an agreement that direct attempts at deflection and/or derailment should be an automatic admission of a failed argument? Can we also come to an agreement that mass spam posting about Harvard cancer study conspiracy theories or other things that have absolutely NOTHING to do with politics be moved to other sections? We should work toward some sort of mutual conclusion so that this civility thread can finally be closed.

You aren't doing yourself any favors by trying to distance yourself from Hilary, Obama, Pelosi, and Schumer on one hand.. while at the same time flooding the group with those 4 fake monopoly cards of Hilary, Obama, Pelosi, and Shumer.

Those cards are to put an end to deflection; hence why the word "deflect" appears in each one. Unless the discussion is directly about them or valid comparisons can be made using them, deflecting to them is an intention to derail an argument and an automatic self-admission of a flawed or failed argument. This isn't about me "doing myself any favors" this about you not being able to make your argument without invoking irrelevant people into said argument. If we're discussing the lies of President Obama and you go off on a rant about Hillary Clinton using bleach or Michelle Obama being a man, that is derailment and an automatic admission of having a flawed or failing argument. Why not state the lies, debate them and conclude your argument? Why is it so hard for some of you to make your argument and defend it without deflection and/or derailment? I still have yet to receive an answer from any of you on that question.

You keep mentioning Trump saying something on Live TV..  yet you never provide a link to it.  Youtube has links to everything that Trump says.

You think everything is misdirection.  You are like a narrow minded horse with blinders on who can't deal with anything unless it is spoonfed to you. It reminds me of someone with alzheimers.  I am quite the opposite.  I keep an open mind and constantly find relevance in the strangest places.  Just last night while searching for some information about that idiot in Charlottesville, I stumbled upon a site that archives social networking sites so that even if someone's account gets removed, it still exists in their archive.  That archive will help me get someone out of prison who has been in prison for 5 years on false charges.

@Shami94:

Well it is an interesting example of what is driving the "alternative facts", "fake news" political environment in the USA which got a failure like Trump elected and which is destroying the reputation of the USA worldwide.

People think that freedom of speech means freedom to lie and freedom to believe and express whatever opinion you happen to like, regardless of the facts.

The economy and jobs are doing GREAT again.. I don't know what else you want out of Trump.

Who would you have voted for if you lived in the USA instead of in a 3rd world cesspool?

@royalcrown89:

This is a very strange occurrence and the fact that it's happened multiple times within a few months span is troubling. It could very well be a coincidence but it just feels strange. I doubt if it's anything done wrong on the Navy's part. We have a competent military that rarely screws things up. If it is something that's being done intentionally, I believe it's coming from higher up within our government. I have suspicions but as of yet, they're 100% unfounded so I'd rather not state them until more is known. Like I said, it could very well be a strange coincidence.

I found it odd that the commander of the 7th fleet was scheduled to retire in a few weeks.. but instead of waiting, they dismissed him NOW.

I have noticed that while there is no shortage of people attacking Trump on TV, radio, newspapers, the internet, etc…
Nobody will admit that they voted for Hillary. 
For a bitch that supposedly won most of the votes, it's odd that nobody will admit voting for her.  Makes me think that quite a few people voting for Hillary were in cemeteries or illegal immigrants.

You voted for Hillary?  HA HA! 
Youtube Video

It's pretty obvious that members of Congress vote along party lines.  It makes Congress fairly irrelevant since the members are pretty much forced to vote a certain way because of their party affiliation.

How about this idea..  the actual votes cast by members of Congress should be CONFIDENTIAL / done anonymously.  In that way, democrats and republicans could vote on what they think is best rather than being forced to vote with their party.

@royalcrown89:

@raphjd:

As far as I know, Trump didn't say that there are some good racists.

You're going off of "as far as you know" while I'm going off of the actual words that came out of his mouth on LIVE TV.

Now back to the point of this thread, can we come to an agreement that direct attempts at deflection and/or derailment should be an automatic admission of a failed argument? Can we also come to an agreement that mass spam posting about Harvard cancer study conspiracy theories or other things that have absolutely NOTHING to do with politics be moved to other sections? We should work toward some sort of mutual conclusion so that this civility thread can finally be closed.

You aren't doing yourself any favors by trying to distance yourself from Hilary, Obama, Pelosi, and Schumer on one hand.. while at the same time flooding the group with those 4 fake monopoly cards of Hilary, Obama, Pelosi, and Shumer.

@mhorndisk:

Turpentine cures cancer. Stop denying it.

Drug companies like Merck often take chemicals such as turpentine… and process it to remove or add something insignificant.. and then put some new name on it like turpedildo on it, and charge 1000 more for it.

I am sort of an investigator that things tha attract my attention.  That 5 year old case is the perfect example of that.. and it's origins go back 17 years.  Quite a bit of the many people involved are documented online
The problem there is.. online accounts often vanish from the public internet that you see when you go poking around on Google, etc. 
There are many sites on the internet which are "portals" to historical content that used to be on the public internet, but is now gone.  I don't quite understand it myself, but one guess I have is that when certain public accounts are "removed" they are not really removed, but placed in hidden archives which are not visible to the public.

QUITE OFTEN, something happens which forces me to alter the way I do things, and that results in finding new things that are very valuable. 
A couple of days ago, I had the 8TB hard drive I use for backing things up CRASH.  I have software which can recover files off of a crashed drive which is completely inaccessible without having special software which is made in East Europe.  It takes several days to recover the files, and still hasn't completed.
Because of that, my favorite Windows computer is tied up doing that recovery.. forcing me to use my combination laptop/tablet which has the Android operating system (which has a new version coming out this week).  I am not a big fan of the Android operating system, but it never crashes, and produces different results than searches done with Windows.

About an hour ago, I began searching for something related to that Charlottesville fiasco.  While doing a search for the guy who drove his car into that crowd…I found an archive site that I never saw nor heard of before when using Windows based software searches.  Just for funzies.. I entered the name of the guy accused in that 5 year old case that goes back 17 years.  I got a DELUGE of new informatiion!  It's quite interesting too.  I just started looking it over and barely scratched the surface, but the first thing I found was the archived Myspace account of the guy I have been researching for 5 years.  His Myspace account was removed by the police after the 5 year old crime - and I never saw it.. until NOW.  It is a very interesting archived Myspace page from 2009.  The man is so nice.. a 100% contrast to what the media portray him as being.  His main influences are Jesus Christ and Madonna.. and his goal in life is to help people!    Keep in mind that this Myspace page was slightly over 2  years before this crime.  In fact, it is completely consistent with everything else I have found out about that case.  Basically, since 2000, several people became extremely jealous and envious of this man.  They tried absolutely everything to embarrass this man and ruin his life, but nothing worked!  His enemies - similar to moonbats - are malcontents who are miserable, and can't stand that someone else is successful and happy.  Moonbats tend to love war, are stimulated by hate, are never content with the status quo, and can't stand to see anybody having success and happiness.  The same applies to this man's enemies.  His enemies are people who envied him, but then came to envy him in a "Fatal Attraction" sort of way.  It drove them completely insane that he continued to be happy and successful, while they suffered in their own misery.  One of his enemies attempted suicide about 9 months ago.  The murderer committed suicide about 5 years ago.  Meanwhile the guy falsely convicted of the crime is VERY happy, likes the food in the prison, and even got married while in prison!

@mhorndisk:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucna–FLRMw

Turpentine cures cancer. It's pine oil, but you probably remember it from Roger Rabbit DIP. So the FDA says it will kill you.

Curing cancer is usually finding a way to kill cancer cells before killing "normal" cells.  I'm sure there are many things like turpentine which can kill off cancer cells.