Posts made by flozen

A 21-day water-only fast, so that your body receives none of the necessary, daily vitamins and minerals?  For three weeks?  Well, you'll probably be hospitalized before the end of it, if that's your goal.

I can't write a nutrition essay here, but a lot of people succeed by eating three small meals a day, from "whole" – not processed -- foods.   Eat some lean protein each day, so that your body doesn't literally consume its own muscle, as well as the fat that is probably your focus.  Vegetables have fiber and are thus filling; and overall, low in calories.  And your body needs all this.

I'm a little stunned that a 21-day water fast would even be considered an option if you have spent time reading about diet and fitness from reputable media.  You appear to be having trouble distinguishing between healthy and harmful regimens.

Three weeks of a water-only fast is simply abuse to your body.  Do a little self analysis.  If you might be prone to problematic eating habits or disorders, CONSULT YOUR DOCTOR OR A THERAPIST about your diet plans before you begin anything so radical!

@PUTIPUELCA:

Another sociopathic liberal making depraved jokes about murder, shocking!

I don't like the Ken Jennings post either.  But, I highly doubt that Barron stumbled upon the admittedly fearsome TrumpHead while he was in class, or at home watching CNN (as pre-teens just love to do), or if it popped up when he reached a new level playing hours of Grand Theft Auto 5.

More likely, the Trump family/advisers saw an opportunity to drum up a bit of sympathy for the besieged kingdom of Trumpland, and out went the tweets and press communications.   Can't be proved or disproved, but seems like the Trump style, and of course, I'd be remiss without clamoring "Fake News, Fake News, Fake News!"

https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2012/10/31/how-to-report-a-computer-crime-unauthorised-email-account-access/

@Frederick:

@Frederick:

Anonymous sources have leaked what may be an image of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg exposing herself on Instagram.

I used to work with a guy in an office who was 21 years old at the time.  He left home at 16 and thought he was so mature because he already had a wife and child.  The last I knew of him, he had been divorced TWICE by the age of 24.. wow.. how mature. 
He was this ultra liberal snot who actually believed he was some kind of genius.  He despised me, because I was the only one in the office that saw right through his façade.  In fact, I knew many things about him, because I knew how to access other people's email accounts, etc.  Here is a short list of what I found out about this guy.  He was screwing his wife's best friend in the clubhouse of his son's little league baseball team that he coached.  He regularly beat his wife.  He had a fetish for elderly fat women.  The older and fatter they were, the better.  I'm sure that some of you don't believe me.  Somewhere on one of 50 hard drives laying around here.. I have the pictures of this guy posing with a fat elderly woman of about 72 - totally naked, fondling her breasts.

You know, Freddy, once the moderator (many thanks) took down your disgusting photograph of a 90-year-old woman who appeared as if she had been stripped naked for some laughs by a caregiver, I was pretty eager to let your sick joke and this thread dissolve into some greasy oblivion.

But then I happened to read your last, whimpering response, and I realized that you are, truly, "the gift that keeps on giving."

Because in your self-defense, you boasted about seeing naughty granny-porn collected by a co-worker – photos you only uncovered after ILLEGALLY HACKING into your employer's email system and the guy's account.

What a great criminal confession.  And even better when we consider your unhinged fixation on Hillary and her -- wait for it, wait for it -- EMAILS!!!  The irony, and your idiocy, are beautifully paired.

So please, find that hard drive -- the one with the photo content you stole from the young man and your employer -- and go down to the local police precinct and turn yourself in.

As you've proven, computer security is imperfect, so who knows what will be revealed, and to whom?  It's entirely possible that soon, the authorities will give you the attention you are seeking.

Sleep well, princess.

@raphjd:

It will still be me.   So you will have to deal with it.   :hug:

Telling you to "fuck off" over some liberal BS  :crazy2:, isn't the same as reporting violations/issues on the site.  :police:

I'm not petty like modern liberals.   :cheesy2:

raphjd, I am encouraged by your response, and the effective use of emojis.

I'll write it up, and if you're on the other end when I press the 'Report to moderator' link, it will be so.   :cool2:

@raphjd:

@flozen:

I've worked in the health care field most of my post-college life, including managed care and home health care departments, where more than half the patients are elderly and are shuttled between various forms of inpatient and outpatient home care as they age.

In this first post by Frederick, this woman's expression – once the photo is enlarged -- is glazed and vacant. She shows signs of lethargy, is slumping over, and in truth, you could knock her down with a feather.  Yes, I would judge her as incapable of being a willing sexual participant.

Moreover, it's clear the photographer, sitting in a chair before her, has positioned her in a voyeuristic way, of which I doubt she is aware.

I know that this discussion is wildly out of the norm for a gay torrent site, but can't we take this thread down, out of respect and compassion for this woman?

Is there anyone out there who agrees?  Or, am I missing out on a hilarious joke?

Yet, you didn't report the thread.

First, raphjd, I wanted to get a few opinions from thread viewers, to see if my perceptions of the photo seemed reasonable.  But I see your point about not waiting too long, and although I've got work now, I will, indeed, report my concerns later in the day.

raphjd, while I don't know your full range of contributions within GT, I would ask that you not be involved in the determination concerning the thread, if only because you've called me a "fucker," or was it "to fuck off"?  I forget.  Let's allow other administrators to handle it.  Thanks, and bye.

I've worked in the health care field most of my post-college life, including managed care and home health care departments, where more than half the patients are elderly and are shuttled between various forms of inpatient and outpatient home care as they age.

In this first post by Frederick, this woman's expression – once the photo is enlarged -- is glazed and vacant. She shows signs of lethargy, is slumping over, and in truth, you could knock her down with a feather.  Yes, I would judge her as incapable of being a willing sexual participant.

Moreover, it's clear the photographer, sitting in a chair before her, has positioned her in a voyeuristic way, of which I doubt she is aware.

I know that this discussion is wildly out of the norm for a gay torrent site, but can't we take this thread down, out of respect and compassion for this woman?

Is there anyone out there who agrees?  Or, am I missing out on a hilarious joke?

@mhorndisk:

Oh NOOOOO!!!!  :afr:  Victimhood card played again! How dare we make fun of one of you liberals! We are victimizing you! How dare us! You're a victim, I forgot! I'm gay but NOT a victim, so it doesn't affect me. Sorry. I don't feed into being a victim. I'm STRONG.  :cheesy2: I don't get victimized by silly jokes. I guess I'm just better than that…

It's not about me or liberals being a victim, you dolt.  It's about the appropriateness of posting a photo of a confused, naked elderly woman on this site, and whether it should be reviewed by moderators if enough of us feel the same way.

@Frederick:

Anonymous sources have leaked what may be an image of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg exposing herself on Instagram.

The very old woman in this photo clearly does not look like she is in full control of her mental faculties.  It appears as if she was stripped down, and has little idea of what's being done to her.  Nothing in her demeanor suggests this pose is something she's doing to be "sexy" for a partner.

This is almost certainly an example of "elder abuse," for your information.

And you missed (or ignored) all these obvious clues, and used her in the context of a political joke.  Well done, goober.

@raphjd:

LOL, you are really that fucking lazy to look up Milo Stewart, aren't you.  Damned useless liberals.  No wonder you guys are always so clueless.

Do a bit of work for yourself once in a while, instead of demanding that everyone spoon feed you everything.    Grow up and stop demanding momma breast feed you.

We have never had a direct conversation where I have mentioned Milo, or illustrated a lack of information about Milo.  You are either thinking of someone else's conversation, or just throwing out name-bait as an aid in writing a 45-second response.

Cursing is also a nice way to represent the site in your stated capacity as forum administrator, or is that something you get via sheer keystroke volume?  F-word moderators get no props from me, sorry.

Your reply comes at a great time, as your pal, in the post above you, is simply consumed by the simple existence of the word proof, extruded multiple times and in "CRAZY CAPS," with no topical focus.

You're not at that level, thank god, but at the same time I'm not your librarian, and you can't rely on some magical "fact archive" as you make one dubious post after another.  Like a math test, show evidence of your work/claims if you expect to get credit.

@mhorndisk:

@flozen:

I appreciate your point, karashi, but there is a certain usefulness in calling out posters – like raphjd -- who make spurious claims without any evidence, even when you ask repeatedly for reputable sources.

At the very least, new members get an early start on identifying the local "political idiocy" -- the single-minded defenders of our corrupt Trump Administration -- whose diatribes are either uncited, or from alt-right sources that, ironically, hate our kind.

As well, writing sane and cogent responses offers some relief from the sad and purposeless man who just posted above me, who believes the magical incantation of "Hillary" turns any unrelated topic into spun gold.

For me, that's enough reason to type.

Nah, there is literally NO proof behind your CLAIM. Hillary on the other hand, there IS proof, that you want to deny. Like deleting 30,000 emails AFTER a subpoena!!! But you don't want to address that, do ya!? Literal proof, vs no proof. BIG difference. Your propaganda isn't going to work!

And you make our day a little brighter by going right back to Hillary.  Bless you, the self-fulfilling prophecy that just keeps on giving.

I appreciate your point, karashi, but there is a certain usefulness in calling out posters – like raphjd -- who make spurious claims without any evidence, even when you ask repeatedly for reputable sources.

At the very least, new members get an early start on identifying the local "political idiocy" -- the single-minded defenders of our corrupt Trump Administration -- whose diatribes are either uncited, or from alt-right sources that, ironically, hate our kind.

As well, writing sane and cogent responses offers some relief from the sad and purposeless man who just posted above me, who believes the magical incantation of "Hillary" turns any unrelated topic into spun gold.

For me, that's enough reason to type.

Yes, it was getting a bit less challenging to skewer the Trumps/Kushners every day over "just" Russia.  (But of course, we will continue as it unfolds!)

Thanks, Drwas, for shining a little light on their slimy visa scheme in China – and still, so many of their other, sketchy foreign activities yet to cover!

@raphjd:

Proof Trump needs to join Bill Clinton on the list of impeached Presidents.

How time flies.  It was only yesterday that you complained about liberals not offering detailed responses about Trump, his administration, their collusion with Russia, and his greasy slide toward impeachment.

So, soon after your challenge on the thread, "With Friends Like Those," in reply #18, I wrote a detailed summation of these points, with citations.  If you didn't get a chance, you now have an opportunity to read and respond to exactly what you asked for.

Tick, tock.

Doing that would be so much more useful than the silly image above, which would make little more than a refrigerator magnet.  Whether you're just lazy or out of defensible responses, it is being noticed.

Gee whiz, magentas, thanks, especially for the surprisingly fit O'Malley!  Had no idea he had all that going on underneath that dress shirt.  Is it too late to change my vote?

Now that Obama has returned to civilian life and beach vacations, well, that man has kept it in shape, as well.  He probably eats whole grains, low sodium and 1-percent milk – the dietary improvements the Trump administration is taking away from America's schoolchildren:

https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-05-03/trump-s-new-school-lunch-plan-allows-dangerously-high-levels-sodium

And then there's ol' "sweaty teats Trump."

As far as Trump's own eating habits and body issues, a whopping two of 10 nutritionists offered positive comments in the following slideshow:

https://www.thedailymeal.com/healthy-eating/10-nutritionists-weigh-donald-trumps-diet

Even the Pope greeted Melania with questions about Trump's physical fitness:

http://people.com/food/pope-francis-questions-melania-trump-diet-potica/

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/760299757206208512/photo/1

Melania, when you feel the poke of that belly, and the "crotch pinky" hiding underneath, just close your eyes and dream of Slovenia (or better, Trudeau/Macron/O'Malley, and if you're a very naughty girl, Kushner).   >:D

@Frederick:

@sutieday:

But, I guess facts don't matter so long as we can make up some conspiracy.

There you go folks!  A libtard admitting what they do!

Oh, rational friends, it seems like Frederick is coasting on this topic, having contributed a mere 10 words (which, admittedly, is two words more than his own reading average for our posts).

Is the guy still dead, Fred?  Is he now a zombie, doing Hillary's bidding?  If so, YOU have nothing to fear.

They eat brains.

@csucker69:

Hey, i've got a bunch of hardcore, domination type - paid audio files (over $1000) worth of content, from warpmymind, niteflirt, a few other places. Also, some premium xtube clips, not many, the previtus hate crime porno 2 to trade, for similar paid kind of files, audio or video, thanks. Looking for dominant, verbal kind of stuff, thanks.

It's your first post here, so, of course, welcome.  Perhaps it has been some time since you went on a site with a "porn community."  The concept of trading porn disappeared quite some time ago.  In countries where it is permitted, people (gay, straight, and all else) upload and categorize their porn.  This site uses a "torrent" methodology, which may be explained in the FAQs, or easily learned via Google.

Without a doubt, you will find individuals with your porn tastes, and whatever your bedroom inclination, hopefully you will both give and receive.  No need to spank … er, I mean thank me.

@Dene:

That is their prerogative to thumbs down, not sure why you bring it up so much, especially since i am sure the non "libtards" also downvote what they do not like.. but we cannot see that, so we are are at a disadvantage to you. In fact I am surprised less left inclined folk speak out..

I agree with you, Dene, it's disappointing when someone complains that liberals don't respond, and then you DO respond, and you either get nothing, or just someone screaming eight words at you in ALL CAPS, or banging on about Hillary when the topic is in no way related.

On the preceding page of this thread, I took a half-hour – time I could have spent with porn!!! -- to offer an assessment on why Trump is heading for both obstruction charges and eventual impeachment.  It's the middle of the night here in the U.S., but I wonder if any of our conservative friends would spare some time tomorrow to actually address the points I raised, without grinding their teeth on some old, discredited talking points.

It may not happen.  Their leading posters tend towards brief and narrowly focused attention spans.  We took a poll, and they listed their favorite novel as "Reader's Digest."  But a man can still hope, Dene.

A man can still hope.

Hi there!  I’m not one to hide.  And I'm glad you're comfortable with the concept of obstruction of justice as it relates to impeachment.

Nixon resigned before he was sure to face impeachment stemming from obstruction charges on Watergate.  Bill Clinton was impeached for his alleged obstruction of penis activity concerning Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky.  He was, subsequently, acquitted of the major charges by the Senate in February 1999.

And now we have Trump, whose actions and directives are truly raising an already high bar on presidential obstruction.  Comey, and other high-ranking officials, are good and ready to testify about Trump's multiple requests that they go lightly on his administration's many sketchy, and quite-likely illicit, ties to Russian officials, bankers and old-fashioned spies, both pre- and post-election:

http://www.cbsnews.com/live/video/former-fbi-director-james-comey-set-to-testify-before-congress-on-russia/

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-kushner-russia-backchannel-ties-2017-5

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/22/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-community/

Perhaps Bill Moyers summed it up best in his article, "‘RussiaGate’ Has Become a Catastrophic Failure of Leadership — and a Debacle from Which the Trump Presidency Will Not Recover":

http://billmoyers.com/story/trump-russia-scandal-investigation/

In fact, some of the newest articles raise the question of whether several of Trump's or his inner circle's Russian cooperation plans and meetings rise to the level of "espionage," which makes obstruction look like failing to curb your dog.

Trump getting out of this with his job intact?  You've got a better chance of finding a unicorn in a pasture, chewing on four-leaf clovers.  And sorry for the excessive length of this response (more than eight words), which has proven to be a real obstacle for some of you.