Let's see just how many e-mails, how many paper records, etc did Donald Trump destroy after multiple subpoenas over how many decades? WAKE THE F*** UP PEOPLE AND REJOIN REALITY.
I'll state this bluntly though. I do NOT support Trump being impeached,for one simple and obvious reason that if any moron with two functional brain cells would be able to reason out. WHO REPLACES Trump if and when he 'steps down' or is impeached?
Let's be honest here. Both apply equally. Anyone who claims otherwise… well let's just not start that argument up. The Nazi flag and Swastika is another example of something that is both.
Then again, the Swastika is stole image and icon.
In the end it all comes down to a few simple things. 1) Be respectful. 2) State that it's a personal preference. 3) Be prepared for the more extreme idiots that exist out there to bash you for stating a personal preference.
That's pretty much all that it comes down to. There will be those, with little to no common sense, intelligence or good manners, who will attack you for stating a personal preference. Why we attack people for not liking a particular person or even group is beyond me, but it is what it is.
Barring death via natural or other means, I don't see him lasting beyond one term. I say that as I don't see the rest of the morons in power kicking him out of power, unless he crosses a line that would force them out of office when they're up for election as a large group rather then as a few individuals. Of course the fact that the good old days of MAD are back once more and the news is ignoring it doesn't help either.
The fact that Trump and Pence won the election, is to me personally, beyond terrifying. Not JUST as a gay man. We've elected a person who has less self control then a two year old child, who can not control his temper, who does not respect women, who can not run a business. I'm sorry, you've had how many bankruptcies? I know more then enough about how it's 'legal' and a way to 'redistribute debts', etc. That said, it indicates a degree of incompetence at a staggering level. I'm not even going to touch on the rest of Trump's issues.
As for Pence shudders
As a HUMAN BEING they terrify me. I could easily see under their leadership and the backlash they're whipping up fifty, sixty or more years of social progress wiped out. I can easily see the issues of the Cold War returning with a vengeance and MAD being a reality, and not just a potential threat.
This… this is what we elected. I voted for Hillary Clinton, not out of any agreement or approval of her as a Presidential Candidate, but because the alternative was even less tolerable. I voted for Bernie Sanders, as he was the ONLY Candidate that actually CARES about the regular person on the street.
I can only say this, when we look back at this day in history, we'll mark it as a major turning point in history. And I don't see it as a turning point for the better.
Let's see. You're from TexASS, and not Florida and apparently only listen to FAUX News… So how could you not be misinformed.
Dark Matter is very good and starting it's second season, as is Killjoys, again entering it's second season as well. Both are very good shows and plenty of eye candy as well
By and large in the US at least, one is required to give signed permission for HIV testing. Or at least that's been my experience. They have fairly strict rules regarding any type of STD/STI testing, because of privacy laws.
Now granted there are exceptions, but those are rare.
I don't see why not. It would all depend on your religious faith of choice. Personally, I'm far more self identified as 'spiritual' then 'religious', but that could be splitting hairs shrugs To me, spirituality and religion are intertwined, but individual things. Others will disagree.
In the end, it's a personal choice of being religious, spiritual, etc and dealing with the issue(s) that arise out of ones sexuality and sexual identity.
There are plenty of faiths that accept homosexuality. Some require one to be celibate, others don't.
It's Can-Am's Pro Sex Fights series. The one in the red trunks is Michael Vineland. I believe it's Pro Sex Fights 1 and his opponent is the luscious treat of Landon Mycles
Do I believe in 'God' as most modern religions define him? snickers No. Especially as no two sects of Christianity can even agree on 'God'.
Do I believe in a Divine Presence, by whatever name you choose to label it? That I definitely do. I also see no reason for a priest, minister, rabbi, etc to tell me how to worship the Divine. How I interact with the Divine is up to me.
I'm not agnostic or an atheist, instead I'm more of a spiritual eclectic pagan as far as my path goes.
And I'll also say this as regards organized religion smirks the majority of organized religion started out as 1) a way to explain what people did not understand and 2) a way to ensure the survival of the tribe. Look at the laws in Judeo-Christian-Muslim faiths, all of which share a common core root, and consider them in a culture which at the time did not have the scientific knowledge and understanding that we do today. How many of those laws are designed to protect the tribe as a whole and preserve life? Just something to consider.
I'd love to tap Woody Fox's ass, especially as he's now bottoming on occasion. Pin him down and pound him hard and deep. Hunter Conan from the now defunct Drake Rock site… he's such a pretty boy and he's such a moaner when he's getting fucked. Richie Fine is definitely very fine, as well and a delight to top from the few times that I've seen him bottom on video.
Aryx Quinn... such a pretty muscle boy.
I'm personally a spiritual, eclectic pagan.
As for one person's comments on 'Why God doesn't make it clear'… snickers Why would he? We create the divine, as much as it creates us. Even the Christian Bible and the Old Testament which forms the Torah of the Jewish faith acknowledge that there are other deities.
One would also do well to keep in mind ANY Holy Book, of ANY faith, creed or belief, is created, edited and maintained by mortal beings. Do you really think they aren't going to put their own slant on it? snickers in amusement The Christian Bible is a carefully selected, carefully edited collection of Old Testament and New Testament Gospels. Plenty of books were left out of the 'New Testament' and even more were edited to make it fit the viewpoints of the Early Christian Church. That doesn't even take into account the issues of translating a primarily vocal and tonal inflection language into a written form.
The word that is translated in the New Testament as 'Rich Man' could equally have been translated as 'coarse yarn'. Which makes more sense?
Well other then the relatives giving you both the hairy eyeball… snickers Seriously, it's not that bad or that redneck. You're only related via completely unrelated relatives who married. No real issues there, you can't have kids, so again, no major issues.
Yeah, it's a bit weird, but no weirder that step siblings, or twins who share a partner.
So the question you really have to ask yourself is this. IS the relationship worth the weird looks from various relatives?
Christianity, rarely bothers to acknowledge it's own internal hypocrisy. Nor do they acknowledge, that the Old Testament is not part of Christianity, 'With me a NEW COVENANT IS MADE. All things old are passed away.', a direct quote ascribed to Christ.
That also doesn't touch upon the fact that multiple books of the 'New Testament' have been pared away, research the Dead Sea Scrolls, the 'Apocryphal Books of the Bible', etc.
That also does not touch on the fact that there are religions OTHER THAN CHRISTIANITY that have defined marriage differently for longer then Christianity has been around.
I could go on and on, but that's more then enough to start with.
Let's be honest here. There IS a good reason why such laws are on the books. And no, it's not aimed as an anti-gay or anti-lgbt measure.
There have been, more then a few cases in the past, where people have DELIBERATELY and WILLFULLY infected multiple partners with HIV because they felt since they were infected, everyone should be infected. That is where the laws stem from.
That said, I think the laws in question need a fair bit of tweaking and consideration.
There's a vast difference, to me at least, between DELIBERATE, INTENTIONAL infecting of one or more partners and UNKNOWINGLY infecting a partner. There's also the issues, with in all communities regardless of gender and orientation, of the stigma of being HIV Positive. Far too many folks are undereducated or uneducated in the realities of HIV and AIDS. In the differences in exactly how safe 'safe sex' is. The differences between positive and detectable vs positive and undetectable, etc.
There's a whole spectrum of issues to consider. And sadly, far too many of today's youth, see HIV like the common cold snorts Oh I get it, I take the meds, I'm good.
I'd definitely have to bend Tom Cruise over and take that pretty ass while he howled. I can't see him as more then an occassional bit of fun. For a real deal, hmmmm I'd say Ben Browder who continues to age oh so wonderfully and Victor Webster meows Oh damn… those boys are too delicious.
There's plenty more, but why be greedy 
Many thanks for the two wonderful shares. Would love to see more of them. I'll keep on seeding them.