Posts made by Dene

@raphjd:

@Dene:

@raphjd:

@quangtran:

I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.

The same can be said for your side.

Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think".  You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.

Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.

It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.

It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.

It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.

It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.

It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.

It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.

Yeah, who's really the bad side?

"It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.   "

no.. but the domestic violence that occurs on a daily basis, where men are hurting women is ok? you ok with that? Because it sounds like to me you are pointing to 1 off or minority things, that are bad but are done by silly extremists.. i'm sorry but both sides have stories like this they could tell all day

e.g.

"It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened"

but what of the vast majority that DID happen? Are they ok? no, they are not. Who did those ? Who knows?

look at both sides - there are extreme 1 off things on both sides..

That is your full reply (post #47 in this thread).

Please be kind enough to show me where I misquoted you.

That post shows that you gendered domestic violence.   You did not say "spouses".

if i do will it matter ?

no.. because you twist things & have no intention of ever listening..

As I said it was in response to your comment re: violence - you said a few men get hit and i said so that discounts women?? THAT was my point - I have said to you 100x - it was IN CONTEXT

I stated many times that I said spouses to Fred's comment, not yours,  which shows I understand it is a two way street - not sure what else to do except say - I proved my point and get over it

@upfrontbear:

turns out he was a vicar and a relative of one of my neighbours had died, I could have died on the spot, I said sorry you must have the wrong flat, so I let him out, but even worse the neighbour was stood outside my door giving me evils, I quickly shut my door and went and died of shame on the bed LOL, pity though, the things I would have done to that vicar, I bet he had a juicy cock and a well furry hole LOL.

Of all the chances.. it being a vicar! LOL - lucky you didn't say anything.. or who knows, he may have come by later LOL

I also believe there will be attempts, as much as I want to believe this issue is over. I am concerned that some may take the Election win as some sort of green flag to drag it all through the courts, win or lose, again.  But as you said, if they do, it will not be without fights, boycotts and drama and they would really need to think about if it is worth it.

I am hoping they simply take Trump's attitude - at worst. Trump has, recently, said : “These cases have gone to the Supreme Court. They’ve been settled. And I’m — I’m fine with that,”  - He has not gone as far to, recently, state his views exactly but has pretty much said it is not on his "to do " list

Sean Cody actually generated a lot of talk amongst people re : pulling of certain models, pulling stuff he was personally in etc

Reasons given were varied and came from too many sources to even verify the who/what/when/why of it all

• The story goes that some asked and he just said ok, some asked but had to pay to have it removed, he apparently got sued by a couple and just decided he would remove and not fight but then some say he DID fight a couple and still had their videos on the site etc

@raphjd:

@skizzage:

You sound like a god damn child throwing around the word cuck. Holy shit. Who's really the cuck around here? It's you. You're the cuck. The absolutely unoriginal and cliche of a stereotype of a cuck, snagging your arguments and insults from the cuckiest of all cucks. "Don't wanna be called a cuck then stop being a cuck" Fuck you sound stupid and any possible credibility you could have had is just washed away down the cuck sewer. Just a poorly aggressive internet tough guy. And now my phone knows the word "cuck" and I'm so upset with you for that. Yeah

:police:  Posting just to do personal attacks is not allowed.   :police:

That said, you showed you have absolutely nothing to rebut my arguments, so you resort to name calling.   It's typical with SJWs.

ROFLMAO

but personal attack in context IS ok?

You are one name calling other posters and using inflammatory language - but if others do it you put up the police emoji - if he was attacking others that disagreed with you you be clapping for them

fucking waste of time.. thanks for ruining the political section and turning it in to the  "let's just bash anything remotely left " fan club

Fred and I may not agree on a LOT but at least he is not rude and personal… well 99% of the time LOL - he states his argument and moves on, you use stupid (with some vile swearing) words like cuck and feminazi and vaginalistic or whatever that was - as well as some really awful out of context quoting etc then get all high and mighty when people react - you want people to react because you then get power on them and can be all awesome etc

congrats you won - no prizes though, except some ill gotten pride

anyway - the thread was derailed so i will take my leave on the Pepsi ad conversation lol

@raphjd:

no.. but the domestic violence that occurs on a daily basis, where men are hurting women is ok?

That is what you said in response to my point, which had nothing to do with domestic violence.   This brings up 2 lies, yours and RoyalCrown's.

You gendered domestic violence, not me.  You didn't say "spouses".   Keep your facts straight.

You brought domestic violence into this thread, not me.  That's RC's lie.

Feminist "facts" aren't the same as real facts.

++++

Do you really believe that there are only 298 false flags by your side?  Really?!

I do love how you played the "pouring piss on a woman reporter's head is nothing compared to gays being murdered in the streets daily" rubbish.   A bunch of the major media cases have proven to be hoaxes.

The above is how you excused away the sins of your side.   "Yeah, well, whatever" is all you can say.

I'm starting to think you are Don Lemon and Simone Sanders rolled into one, the way you brush off the points I made.

That is your response ? How about when people write things you read EVERYTHING they wrote.. i said SPOUSES - I wrote the above in direct response to you making it like women are only at fault - it is called CONTEXT

You are misquoting me and lying AGAIN

not one ounce of "oh maybe i went too far" ? You have big balls but no self respect

@gaynight:

Apple Cares About Your Privacy, Unless You Use iCloud | Popular Science

Testing quoting of seperate lines

@gaynight:

http://www.popsci.com/apple-cares-about-your-privacy-unless-you-use-icloud

YAY it worked

Just wanted to say - My god he is sexy!!

Haven't watched his Chaturbate yet (not my upload, I just happened to find him while searching for something)

Anyone know if he has done anything else, other than Chaturbate ?

The overwhelming majority of raphjd's opinions are wholly irrational based on wild generalizations. He uses the same exact examples to back up many different arguments, such as some situation where black students made white students walk through a creek or something and BLM protesters interrupting a Bernie Sanders rally. He uses very, very rare instances to generalize whole populations of people; hence, why I consider 95-98% of what he says to be wholly irrational. That's basically the best response you can give to him on here because once you try to bring rationality into the argument, he deflects. He's often deflected to arguments that have absolutely nothing to do with the topic, which is why this thread (that he started by the way) was about the Pepsi ad and you're now arguing about domestic violence, feminism (he hates women with a passion), and gay bashing. I just use the typical 95-98% irrationality statement with him because it's basically the only response you can give to almost anything he says. Very rarely he'll make sense, but most of the time it's like trying to have a discussion with a real life Archie Bunker minus the occasional sympathy.

I have definitely noticed a few of those things.. well picked up! I did get way too caught up in defending my words.. just blew me away at the tangent + the venom - wont be getting that caught up again.. funny - I deleted twitter because of this kind of stuff then came here lol

@brianboru72:

Gaga made a huge splash and became one of the performers I really admire- but there's just no way she or almost anyone, can compare to the amazing accomplishments of Madonna.
Madonna has successfully reinvented herself so many times, and stayed relevant over decades, it would be hard for any performer today to live up to her level of success.

I'm just glad I live in a world where I can enjoy the music of both talented artists.  :love:

I love how diplomatic you are lol

For me it is Chalk & Cheese - but if i had to pick one - Madonna due to early years

@Frederick:

@Dene:

In fact, one could argue that Trump has done more in 1 month than Obama did in 8 years.

One could also argue that statements like this are a crock of shit…

As for Hillary.. you are the one that keeps bringing her up.. most of the rest of us are more concerned about right now

I was happy to forget about Hillary, but she then started contemplating running for mayor of NYC.  That lasted a week or two and went nowhere… so she can go back in her cave.

LOL

I think - regardless of anyone's opinion of her - 2016 kinda sealed it for her

@raphjd:

How am I enabling domestic violence?!

Telling you to do your research DOES NOT enable domestic violence.     You making domestic violence a gendered issue is what enables women to abuse their partners; male or female.    This shows everyone that you are a self loathing feminist/vaginalist cuck.   70% of one sided domestic violence is by women, not men.

I fucking hate domestic violence with a passion.  How fucking dare you tell me I enable it by telling you to look at the facts.

++++

There's a long list of false flag hate crimes, even before trump.

In Charlotte, we had a White Supremacy hate crime incident.   Oh wait, it was a black guy who did the hate crime.

We had 2 cases of head scarf hate crimes, but they turned out to be lies by the girls.

We had the muslim woman whose car was grafittied.  Oh wait, she did that herself and was caught on CCTV.

It was a black member of the church that set it on fire.

Let's not forget all the rape cases.

Tawana Brawley and her mother was 30 years ago and fake hate crimes, for whatever purpose, have exploded.

Here's a site that lists 298 fake hate crimes in the US, but they admit it's no where near all of them;  http://www.fakehatecrimes.org  In fact, #298 is the Charlotte case mentioned above.

I was the victim of a hate crime 25 years ago.   These scum that you are excusing makes a mockery of what I and other real victims went through.

I did not excuse anyone… tell me where i excused anyone for this stuff (and tbh - how dare YOU mate, I never excused ANY behaviour, so do not ever say that again - in fact I ABHOR all of it but you seem to only mention small parts of it)

wow.. thanks for nothing - so much for debate

298 fake hate crimes out of millions that have occurred and you want me to suddenly think all victims are lying ? - I have seen hate crimes AND Domestic violence first hand - you aren't the only victim in the world

do your own research on BOTH sides - not just 298 extremist situations

I NEVER made it an gendered issue.. I said SPOUSES - read what i wrote to you and fred.. seriously.. you are yelling and being freaking obnoxious and accusing me of things i never did or said - that is not on at all - argue with me about things i said but don't ever say i said it was just a man on woman thing - i am more than aware of both sides not being angels

thanks for nothing

As many have mentioned - look up the word cuck.. you'll see what you are saying.. ironically, to gay men.

I hope you are happy with yourself.. what you said was way out of line.. angry or not - "not a safe space" or not -nothing i said deserved being spoken to that way or making me out to be some kind of apologist for hate crime or domestic violence by misinterpreting my words

my guess is most of you will either laugh or call me a snowflake - couldn't care less - don't attack the writer, especially for things they never said, attack the argument/opinion

Kylie has been around a LONG time - here in Australia she was queen of everything, in the 90s anyway lol

6ft 2 - Pecs are long gone memory (back to the gym topic lol)

TPBM has facial hair

Erasure - Generally they are gay songs - great retro band

Oh L'amore is so sweet - unrequited love from a random sexual encounter

@Frederick:

@Dene:

As for domestic violence.. there is no justification for it EVER - and that's it. Thousands of people around the world are victims… but you want me to "research" stuff that then would justify your enabling of the domestic violence ? nah.. i'll pass.. i would rather be seen as a person who opposes it and wants to actually stop it, instead of not facing up to the fact that it occurs and and justifying with skewed research that makes the perpetrators feel justified in their actions

I wouldn't go that far.  I knew a child many years ago that picked a tiny dog up by one leg, breaking it, and laughed for several minutes.  The same child had a passion for breaking all sorts of things, and knocking things off the shelves in stores.  She was a hellion, and still is but in a different way.  When someone is being destructive, a swat on the ass works wonders… but should be a last resort.  I see many children getting smacked around for no reason other than for the parent to show whose boss.

ok.. well in my mind swatting a child's butt for an indiscretion of behaviour etc - once in a blue moon - is not exactly "domestic violence" but I was strong in my language, so I get ya

the last line you wrote is more my thinking - the power play of 1 spouse to another and/or to their children is where the line blurs and becomes a mess

LOL

guys - you misunderstood his question

look at his response - he meant "Do you like them?" not "Where do I find them?"

As for domestic violence.. there is no justification for it EVER - and that's it. Thousands of people around the world are victims… but you want me to "research" stuff that then would justify your enabling of the domestic violence ? nah.. i'll pass.. i would rather be seen as a person who opposes it and wants to actually stop it, instead of not facing up to the fact that it occurs and and justifying with skewed research that makes the perpetrators feel justified in their actions

Gay bashing is mostly false flags?

Really? Read what you just wrote.. you said that most gay men that get bashed are lying and it is not a hate crime - or they "seem" to be lying - why? because if they aren't you have to face some harsh reality about "your" side ?

That is pure generalising  and now I get where you are coming from re : politics and sides etc - thanks for the enlightenment

You assume anything said to be a hate crime is false and they must have somehow done something to get hurt.. hate to break it to you but most hate crime occurs simply because they exist and you just belittled them and basically said they were lying as to why they got bashed/hurt?

You do not believe "your side" has any flaws so put the blame on victims and because a very small minority you hear about that are false flags we must ALL be lying

In my book that is called enabling - you are basically taking the responsibility off the actual perpetrator and putting it on the victim

@raphjd:

@quangtran:

I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.

The same can be said for your side.

Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think".  You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.

Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.

It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.

It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.

It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.

It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.

It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.

It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.

Yeah, who's really the bad side?

Gay men/women get bashed and/or killed by right wing fanatics every freaking day and your big argument is "we" are pouring urine on a reporter's head