btw, 2 key claims, worth breaking up.
- Claim that Russia hacked USA election computers.
USA intel agencies disproved it, rejected it.
Yet Dems & RINOs said, again & again & again, "Russia cyber-hacked election, changing outcome"
blatant deceit of USA public
- Claim that Russia hacked DNC emails, gave them to Wikileaks, turned people against Hillary.
Not only FBI, but NSA too, assessed that
as true-ish -with "low confidence"-.
Where "Low confidence", means "no confidence". Because if NSA & FBI career analysts believed it, it would get higher rating.
"Low confidence" is their code for, "Emotional people insist it be said, despite 'evidence' that, under scrutiny, looks faked, or at least unimportant."
Also, even those "low confidence" assessment had nothing better to go on, than "Crowdstrike" analysis of DNC..... .......and Crowdstrike CEO said he had no evidence, no as in "NO", of Russia getting into DNC - except in his imagination he sure could imagine possibilities.
as other forensics showed DNC internal leak. (disgruntled employee)