@eobox91103 You wanted opinions. For most people, any ratio above 2 is prob a hoarding disorder.
Exception could be if someone runs a large, unattended server for weeks at a time while they ignore it.
But 2 is well out of the danger zone and an intermittent, ordinary user worrying about their ratio beyond 2 needs to get out more.
@hubrys In the real world: Fox long, long ago banned on-air reporting of the 2020 election fraud that happened. To say they "promote" it is silly.
Thus, it would - once again, nothing unusual - be The New York Times lying to you.
P.S. Ask yourself why NYT isn't doing an investigation of their own Russiagate reporting.
You know.......... how CNN, MSNBC, and yes the NYT itself knew all along that Russiagate was a fraud, thus knowingly lied to your face with it. (& prob still do)
@raphjd This is presented as vaxx-injury activism, does it look real? https://www.bitchute.com/video/FRoYdnl9En94/
If yes: would it be "niche" activism or something that normies are beginning to notice?
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1625350340663992320
For the naive: "difficult" interviews are pre-arranged or else the subject walks out.
Meaning Damar surely wanted to be asked the question & surely wanted to give a huge pregnant pause for people to interpret as "the vaxx caused my heart to stop", before his refusing to answer.
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream
Seymour Hersh is a journalism legend.
He broke My Lai story, as well as Abu Ghraib.
Any gay lib who wants to criticize "anonymous sources" can brown-nose me. (Str8 ones can suck me.)
But enlighten me by all means, if Russia done stuff like this to the USA or other NATO country.
Heh.
As long as we're doing humor...
![img_8462[1].jpg](/assets/uploads/files/1676304772911-img_8462-1.jpg)
![img_8517[1].png](/assets/uploads/files/1676304940009-img_8517-1.png)
OK just to answer the headline question "Does this [study] finally put the mask debate to bed?"
It SHOULD...
but no it doesn't. https://twitter.com/NationalNurses/status/1610416237581836288
Hard to believe the Mask Zombies still trying in 2023, but there they are.
To be clear: FUCK. MASKS.
Apart from hospital operating rooms: the social and medical harms - the denial of human rights, harms to child development, and forced breathing of unhealthy self-contaminated air - must always outweigh the 5% benefit.
FWIW, I find that Topaz output is very nice provided that you don't upscale - only do the AI sharpen, noise removal & artifact cleanup at original res & frame rate.
And I know this will make y'all cringe but.... Topaz's file bloat can be handled by Handbrake. Pick a Handbrake quality just high enough to where your casual eye sees no difference on a decent computer monitor, and it will still cut the Topaz bloat by half.
Problem is, one Topaz run takes DAYS on a conventional laptop - so the question asked here, about AI enhances being subject to duplicate rules, is a problem I can't even have, yet.
@frostycab bits you addressed to me -
"he has repeatedly and consistently sidestepped anything people ask" - if you say so; but in this very thread, I see @raphjd answering your question.
"refusing to engage with anyone who challenges his assertions beyond telling them they are liberal puppets" - ditto. In this very thread, he's engaging you quite a bit more than you just claimed.
"I was trying to say I'd like a direct answer" - But your original phrasing (now way above) was an attack, and indirect at that. Indirectly - and out of the blue - you called him farfetched, abusive, uncivilized.
So why should he give you a direct answer? What example of being direct and friendly and clean, did you set here?
Did you consider saying no more than "I'd like a direct answer here, please" ? and then letting him hang himself, if he's so bad?
This is an anonymous debating backwater, not a law court. Even IF your statements about him were facts (not just feelings) - even IF you could convict him - you do not need to convict him. Stop working so hard.
@frostycab I can't speak to your past interactions with @raphjd and don't claim to.
(Read the above, twice.)
That said: In this thread the "abuse" or implied personal insults..... are first from you.
But how can that be? How can a person claiming to be against insults & personal conflicts be the person, in this new thread, who starts dishing them?
Can people not be what they present themselves to be?
Is that even possible? Since when?
Also MTG ripping Yoel Roth, same topics, also his enabling child porn at Twitter: https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1623461360075145216
The look on his face: priceless.
https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1623354955728912384
A sign of these topics getting mainstream.
We only need @hubrys to try George Santos as a diversion, and it'll be perfect.
More lying from @hubrys ! I have always said Santos is awful.
@raphjd this is the midwittery I was describing, in a comment to u above. Midwits are all about denying context & perspective. Anyone who restores them, is then lied about.
@raphjd Doublethink. Every year it gets cruder, more shameless.
@hubrys Lie alert! I routinely say Santos is awful - and you've seen it before.
So here you are obsessively tracking the obscure lies of some small politician - while yourself lying!
HAHAHAHAHahahaha!
Here's some whataboutism - What about your lies?
@nix54 I call bullshit. OMG but do you guzzle the propaganda!
I don't want to get "biographical" or pull credentialism, so let's leave it that I been following medical issues for decades....and 99.99% of people never heard the term SADS before 2022. And never saw athletes drop dead.
Because, before 2021-22 ie. before THE VAXXES, unexplained sudden heart stoppage in young adults happened, like, one-in-a-million per year.
Traffic accidents, drug overdoses, suicides, shootings (inner cities), rare cancers, even military deaths were always much more common in younger people.
Only in the last 2 years is heart death suddenly happening more to younger people. And hmm, how could that be?
What changed, not in 2020 mind you, but only starting in 2021?
Saying SADS has been "an acknowledged...syndrome for a long time"..... oh my dear what a piece of B.S that is!
BEEeeee....ESSsss!
What's really sad (no pun intended) is how "they" - media programmers & Sciency-y Establishment - are still refining & changing the definition of SADS, I'd say to maximize the smokescreen - the obstacles to Critical Thinking.
When the SADS propaganda term was released in 2022, at first it didn't mean traditional heart disease; it meant only these unexplainable heart deaths suddenly popping up in younger people. These frequent new mysteries.
But if you look up the SADS definition now in 2023, "they" have since changed it to cover traditional heart disease.
So that - like you @nix54 - they can now, suddenly pretend "Oh it was always with us, oh we always been talking about it. If it happened only after your vaxx, that's a coincidence. If impossible numbers of people are having these coincidences now, that's a coincidence."
Similar to what they did to the defiinition of "vaccine".
It used to mean, treatment with weakened organism creating immunity, in most people, to the real organism.
To make people swallow the mRNA shots, "they" altered the official CDC-FDA definition of vaccine to mean any sort of treatment stimulating any sort of immune reaction, whether or not that means immunity or any success at all.
Sickening.
@NF16 PS. Newsweek of all places, has a recent editorial for you: https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630
