"I love how the non-lawyers...." - Sorry, your dumbshit authority games don't work here. You cited one decision where Preamble was rejected - which in NO way proves you are, or ever have been, a lawyer. Meanwhile, at many other points, Preambles are indeed cited by actual lawyers & legal commentators - as they find convenient at the time.
And spare rest of us, your pretense of caring about Free Speech.
You don't.
Except of course when satan, or, pornographic children's books - your only times. Know what that makes you @hubrys ?
No honest answer eh? You'd rather not admit it?
My only 'L' would be that, until now, I had forgotten to mention your apparent support for pornographic children's books along with (we now see) the other.
PS. Coincidental RFK quote: "“Trusting the experts is not a feature of science. It’s not a feature of democracy. It’s a feature of religion and totalitarianism.”
And again - hubrys I have zero reason to believe you even are one. You sure don't argue well, or with any intelligence. I don't believe your self-claims, and you're further stupid for trying to set up your self-claims in anonymous forum where NO ONE should believe ANYONE's self-claims.



![original_satan_1[1].jpeg](/assets/uploads/files/1702593862070-original_satan_1-1.jpeg)

