Yeah, you can share clothes and other stuff (provided you are roughly the same height, weight and have similar tastes).

I am rarely in the mood for real incest.
I prefer stories with step-dads, step-sons etc. Even step-sisters etc if the guy is hot enough!

But to your question: rarely does real incest porn with actual relatives not feel forced.

Plus fetishes change overtime. I used to love the more sensual Kristen Bjorn stuff, now I like amateur bareback hardcore stuff.

I think a lot of people move in the "spectrum" of their general political viewpoints in such a way in order to mirror what their imagined opposition is doing.

Almost out of spite. It's like being as radical/extremist/loud as possible makes you more visible.

You can see it in content engagement throughout any social media platform. I've noticed consistently that moderate discourse that stays away from snark, insults, conspiracy theories that pop up just to top the previous most popular at the time, low blows, ad hominems etc tend to get less feedback whether positive or negative.

Whereas if you say something shocking, controversial, snarky etc you both get much needed attention and its easier to form easily digestible identities (I'm patriotic and you are not, I respect tradition and you do not, I am woke and you are not etc).

They might actually be. I can not think of a reason why so many guys would just claim to be straight while they are actually gay in order to do gay born in the 2021.

I mean they are already recorded doing stuff so it makes no sense to assume they are ashamed to admit they are gay.

In any case it is a huge turn off for me, thats why its been years since I've watched a Corbin Fisher video… bleh...

I dont want to rent someone, whether they are a pornstar or just an non-famous escort.

It takes away from feeling that the other guy is really into you in my opinion.

I literally feel nothing exciting when someone is touching, rubbing, fingering, licking etc my asshole, so… yup.

It took me a while to develop a "fetish" for rimming though.
The weird thing is that when I was still a virgin and highly inexperienced, I thought I was definitely going to bottom, but I was probably influenced by the nonsensical stereotype that gay guys bottom for other "straight"/bi guys.

@raphjd:

@Grotomode:

I do not have to have an explanation for something you claim, dude.

But that was scrutiny is. You make a claim, people express their reasonable doubts and then its on you to prove your point. Prove it then.

No honey, this is you turning every disagreement into a political "debate".

I get it, its an easy way for you to dismiss anyone that calls you on your baseless claims, but you have to grow out of it at some point, dont you think?

And yet again, you claim I'm wrong, but you can't explain why I'm wrong other than you don't like my explanation.

You didn't make any REASONABLE doubt, you just said I was wrong.

Maybe you should just link me to AOC's Instagram page so you don't have to spend so much time typing gibberish non-sense.

I am not making a claim dude. Get your head straight.

You claimed that one person preferring another person of their own "race" is "natural" (and you further clarified that for you natural = the way we are wired, alluding of course to genetics).

I asked you why you claim that. You provided some studies thinking they support your claim, but they dont.

Its as simple as that. If you actually have read those studies, I am sure you will be able to quote the part where they support your claim that the conclusion is some sort of genetic predisposition is at play, right?

Unless you have no idea what the studies actually conclude, which would make sense, since your first and only "rebuttal" to me stating the obvious (that the studies' findings do not support your use of the word "natural") is to say that the disagreement is about finding racism everywhere.

Again, try to leave logical fallacies outside, and actually present data that support your conclusion.

Alternatively, you could tone down your commentary on social and political issues by using modifiers such as "I believe", "in my personal opinion", "maybe", "perhaps", "I could be wrong but…" and so on.

I do not have to have an explanation for something you claim, dude.

But that was scrutiny is. You make a claim, people express their reasonable doubts and then its on you to prove your point. Prove it then.

No honey, this is you turning every disagreement into a political "debate".

I get it, its an easy way for you to dismiss anyone that calls you on your baseless claims, but you have to grow out of it at some point, dont you think?

I had the exact same fear when I was 15 about those white spots, I was terrified and went to a doctor to check lmao…

Oh man, how inadequate sex ed is in most countries, right?

Hm not sure if it qualifies as a rosebud/rosebutt/whatever but I do like it when a hole is loose and the lips are exposed.

The sensation is awesome!

I'm 1.76 (5.8" I think). So not very tall.

I am experienced though…

What about you?

Hmmm… short, smooth, big nipples, good kisser, experienced (I cant stand to feel that I am causing pain to someone even in the first thrusts), and I do not care that much about body type so long as they have ample butt and  thighs.

For sex that is.

In general, I could not tell you, all my previous relationships differed quite a while. The only common denominator is the height I guess. I go for guys shorter than me.