FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter
-
This is another case of the science doesn't matter when it suits them.
Treatment, on the lowest dose, is about $1,200 a week.
That figure does not count the frequent brain scans needed to detect the common side effects of brain swelling/bleeding.
The FDA's science review panel said to reject the drug, but the FDA's board approved it anyway.
This is Biden's FDA board that approved it.
It was Trump's FDA science review panel that said to reject it because it does more harm than good.
-
Biden is hoping that they have an Alzheimer's drug that will work for him!
-
@lololulu19 said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
Biden is hoping that they have an Alzheimer's drug that will work for him!
ROFL - I appreciate a good joke
-
@bi4smooth It's not really a joke though... is it?
-
@manhandler said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
@bi4smooth It's not really a joke though... is it?
I think you should consider Prochlorperazine - a leading drug in the treatment of Paranoid Schizophrenia ... but, then again, I'm not a Doctor (and neither are you).
I have as much business diagnosing your mental illness as you do anyone else - including Biden...
But dude, seriously consider your proposition: IF Pres Biden had Azaheimer's, eventually (very soon) Kamala Harris would become President! Do you think that would be BETTER
I do not...
Stick with the compliment on the joke...
-
@bi4smooth said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
@manhandler said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
@bi4smooth It's not really a joke though... is it?
I think you should consider Prochlorperazine - a leading drug in the treatment of Paranoid Schizophrenia ... but, then again, I'm not a Doctor (and neither are you).
I have as much business diagnosing your mental illness as you do anyone else - including Biden...
But dude, seriously consider your proposition: IF Pres Biden had Azaheimer's, eventually (very soon) Kamala Harris would become President! Do you think that would be BETTER
I do not...
Stick with the compliment on the joke...
You voted for them, knowing full well that Camel Toe the Ho has a very real chance to be President in the next couple of years.
Do you have clue how stupid you sound when you say crap like that?
-
@raphjd said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
@bi4smooth said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
@manhandler said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
@bi4smooth It's not really a joke though... is it?
I think you should consider Prochlorperazine - a leading drug in the treatment of Paranoid Schizophrenia ... but, then again, I'm not a Doctor (and neither are you).
I have as much business diagnosing your mental illness as you do anyone else - including Biden...
But dude, seriously consider your proposition: IF Pres Biden had Azaheimer's, eventually (very soon) Kamala Harris would become President! Do you think that would be BETTER
I do not...
Stick with the compliment on the joke...
You voted for them, knowing full well that Camel Toe the Ho has a very real chance to be President in the next couple of years.
Do you have clue how stupid you sound when you say crap like that?
Dude, do you remember when we had Dan Quayle as our VP? (Mr. Potatoe Head!)
Do you remember voting for John McCain for President (I did), knowing that the VP would be that dingbat Sarah Palin? (I wonder if she still stares at Russia from her house these days?)You don't choose the President based on their running mate and what-if's... and in America today, you vote for a major-party candidate, or you throw your vote away... that's just the way it is... So, most of us (the vast majority?) have to choose between 2 candidates we don't like - but we have to choose.
- You chose a candidate you liked - good for you
- I chose a candidate I did not like, because I was ashamed of my earlier vote for the other candidate, and I didn't want to repeat my mistake.
Imagine it like this: Assume you don't like rice, but your choices for dinner are:
- Sushi
- Chicken and fried rice
Lose-Lose, but you have to make a choice... given that the last time you had sushi, you threw-up for 2 days, the fried rice is the obvious choice - but it doesn't mean you suddenly like rice!
So, you don't choose your Presidential vote based on the VP candidate - but, you do chose your actions today based on what would definitely be the outcome of those actions today.... and if, for any reason, Biden is removed from the Presidency today, Kamala Harris becomes President.
I shudder to think... and you're apparently dumb enough to wish for it!
-
How idiotic.
Of course, you need to consider the VP.
I do love how you need to use mental gymnastics to justify voting for the person that holds the same values you do.
You keep reminding us that you are a liberal collectivist, not a "conservative libertarian".
When a vocal advocate for cancel culture gets caught, you actively defend them to the hilt while never saying a word as that person actively cancels a conservative.
-
@raphjd said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
How idiotic.
Of course, you need to consider the VP.
I do love how you need to use mental gymnastics to justify voting for the person that holds the same values you do.
You keep reminding us that you are a liberal collectivist, not a "conservative libertarian".
When a vocal advocate for cancel culture gets caught, you actively defend them to the hilt while never saying a word as that person actively cancels a conservative.
More of the same-shit, still in the same bucket.
I don't support cancel-culture when used against Liberals, I don't support cancel culture when used against Conservatives.But let's go farther:
- I don't support cancel culture when used against Nazis
- I don't support cancel culture when used against Socialists
- I don't support cancel culture when used against pedophiles
- I don't support cancel culture when used against murderers - even mass murderers.
I do not like Cancel Culture, I do not like it, Sam-I-Am!
That doesn't mean I don't think people who do bad things shouldn't be punished... I just don't think "cancel culture" (where the general public, just on anyone's whim when it happens to "go-viral", decides on a punishment) is an acceptable way of determining the level of punishment.
The fact that I decry cancel culture when you support it against a Liberal doesn't mean I support the liberal - no, only that I do not support trying to use "social media" or "public pressure" to meet out punishment...
Indeed, I would posit that I don't *even support cancel culture when used against YOU!
-
And yet, you only ever call out cancel culture when I bring it up against a liberal advocate of it, saying they should get a dose of their own medicine.
You also side with social media banning conservatives because it's a private platform.
-
@raphjd said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
And yet, you only ever call out cancel culture when I bring it up against a liberal advocate of it, saying they should get a dose of their own medicine.
You also side with social media banning conservatives because it's a private platform.
I don't decry the waste of good hamburger meat at McDonalds (where they simply are incapable of grilling a decent burger)... but then, no one ever brings that up, so there isn't much point in it.
The problem here is you LOVE Cancel Culture when it goes against Liberals, and you hate it when it hurts Trump... I dislike it all of the time, no matter who it's aimed at - including Trump!
-
I am against cancel culture UNLESS it is used against a person that has practiced it themselves against others.
You, on the other hand, believe that it's ok to use CC against others, as long as you are a liberal. Once you are found out to be a piece of shit, you must be shielded from CC because you are a liberal.
I believe in equality and you believe in special rights.
-
@raphjd said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
I am against cancel culture UNLESS it is used against a person that has practiced it themselves against others.
You, on the other hand, believe that it's ok to use CC against others, as long as you are a liberal. Once you are found out to be a piece of shit, you must be shielded from CC because you are a liberal.
I believe in equality and you believe in special rights.
You are illiterate.
My quote JUST BEFORE your claim that I like Cancel Culture was literally
- The problem here is you LOVE Cancel Culture when it goes against Liberals, and you hate it when it hurts Trump... I dislike it all of the time, no matter who it's aimed at - including Trump!
So, your claim that I believe it's ok to use CC against others is farcical on its face.
Your tactics of purposefully putting other words into my mouth (e.g. dressing me up to be your straw man) is getting old, repetitive, and boring.
-
@bi4smooth No, you see, the problem is, you say one thing, but then out of the other side of your mouth, you reveal yourself. Why bother? You're not convincing us. The Democratic Party is the most disgusting, the most filthy organization to exist on the face of the planet, next to the Vatican. Nobody is putting words in your mouth. Every time a liberal does something shitty, you either have nothing to say, or deflect. Why don't you answer the post about Lori Lightfoot's Chicago? Why not about Uygher Genocide in China? Just for starters. You don't because you're complicit in the coverup.
-
@manhandler said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
@bi4smooth No, you see, the problem is, you say one thing, but then out of the other side of your mouth, you reveal yourself. Why bother? You're not convincing us. The Democratic Party is the most disgusting, the most filthy organization to exist on the face of the planet, next to the Vatican. Nobody is putting words in your mouth. Every time a liberal does something shitty, you either have nothing to say, or deflect. Why don't you answer the post about Lori Lightfoot's Chicago? Why not about Uygher Genocide in China? Just for starters. You don't because you're complicit in the coverup.
You are moronic and (again) incapable of reasoned conversation.
I've never once claimed any intention of convincing you of anything! You may as well try to convince the Pope that there is no God!
Your entire reason for living right now is knowing in your heart of hearts that your Lord and Savior, Donald Trump, isn't a failure and a loser, but in fact was the victim in a broad (81 million voter broad), far-reaching (aliens, if i'm to belive some Qanon fanatics) conspiracy.
But that doesn't mean I'm going to sit back and let you bad-mouth honest, America-loving Republicans who have come to the unwanted, but true, conclusion that Trump lost the election in 2020, and for the first time in Presidential Election history, did so while his party WON in a majority of lower-level balloting.
So, you keep spouting your lies and I'll keep answering them (to a point)... you really are getting to the bottom of your intellectual capacity, which starts to make this just sad and boring...
-
@bi4smooth And what part of what you just said is factual? The part where you think Trump is a loser? Nobody gives a fuck about your opinion. It's like a snowflake, or an asshole.
-
@manhandler said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
@bi4smooth And what part of what you just said is factual? The part where you think Trump is a loser? Nobody gives a fuck about your opinion. It's like a snowflake, or an asshole.
You are moronic and (again) incapable of reasoned conversation.
Twice is enough.
-
@bi4smooth You, are sad and boring, and pathetic. Nothing you've said contains numbers or charts or anything other than you 'think Trump sucks. LOL. You're a joke.
-
Yeah, but you forget that you claim to be a "conservative libertarian" while at the same time demanding that everyone be part of the liberal hivemind and create shrines to Honest Joe.
There is not a bit of liberal dogma that you won't defend.
You have defended more than a few liberals who actively pushed Cancel Culture from getting a dose of their own medicine when they get caught being hypocritical scum.
You want them protected, while I want them to get the equality they keep screaming for.
Clearly, you are a typical racist white liberal who thinks blacks have no agency.
In my life, I was mugged at gunpoint twice (Chicago and Miami) by black guys. Your world view is that they didn't actually mug me, but my whiteness oppressed their guns into my face as they demanded my wallet.
-
@raphjd said in FDA approves Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm - the science doesn't matter:
Yeah, but you forget that you claim to be a "conservative libertarian" while at the same time demanding that everyone be part of the liberal hivemind and create shrines to Honest Joe.
I am not the straw-man you are looking for
(waving hand calmly in front of your face)
I have never said I supported Joe Biden, only that I preferred him over the Authoritarian-Fascist that is Donald Trump... only in your twisted mind are those the same thing.
In your dogma, anyone not completely faithful to Trump is a RINO and a Liberal... your labels do not hurt me, because they do not "stick" to me...
There is not a bit of liberal dogma that you won't defend.
Obvious hyperbole - and being anti- "The Big Lie" doesn't make me a liberal. It makes me a realist.
You have defended more than a few liberals who actively pushed Cancel Culture from getting a dose of their own medicine when they get caught being hypocritical scum.
I have never - not once - supported Cancel Culture attacks against people - including Donald Trump. Your claims otherwise are sad, pathetic attempts to make me your straw-man boogey-man...
You want them protected, while I want them to get the equality they keep screaming for.
I believe that 2-wrongs do not make a right (though I do sometimes think Karma can be a bitch... Hear that Donald?)
Clearly, you are a typical racist white liberal who thinks blacks have no agency.
Another straw-man label. I swear, you think of me as your own personal Boggart (reference: Harry Potter monster who takes the form of your biggest fears)... I suggest you learn that I have no magical powers and I am not every form of evil that you fear in this world...
In my life, I was mugged at gunpoint twice (Chicago and Miami) by black guys. Your world view is that they didn't actually mug me, but my whiteness oppressed their guns into my face as they demanded my wallet.
I am sorry you were attacked... Since you only harp on a TINY FRACTION of my World View (the part that does against some of Trump Doctrine), you would have no idea what my views would be on that matter.
As with many other topics on here, you spout off (stupidly) against your Straw Man mask that you put on top of me...
