Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025
-
https://principia-scientific.com/most-who-took-covid-vaccines-will-be-dead-by-2025/
Scientist outlines scientific articles and says very plainly as though it's Occam's Razor, that those who took the vax will most all be gone by 2025. I know, you don't want to hear that. I expect you to reject any scientist who doesn't tell you what you want to hear, it's human nature.
-
Liberals love to call conservatives "science deniers" while they themselves deny the science that doesn't fit their liberal narrative.
We are approaching 8 years until the planet completely dies. It could be 6 years, depending on which liberal politician and/or activist you listen to.
Of course, we have "a woman's penis is biologically female".
-
So, you guys are full-on anti-vax retarded, then?
-
@hubrys Nope, I've had about 20 vaccines in my life, and this one is not by definition, a vaccine. It's just not. It modifies the genes and is totally different. It's not what you think it is, and you think that way because trillion dollar drug companies told you so.
-
@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:
@hubrys Nope, I've had about 20 vaccines in my life, and this one is not by definition, a vaccine. It's just not. It modifies the genes and is totally different. It's not what you think it is, and you think that way because trillion dollar drug companies told you so.
You moron. The mRNA vaccines do not change the genetic material in your body!
The mRNA is how they make the vaccine, not what it does to you!
The resulting mRNA material is specially designed to "teach" your immune system to recognize a very specific protein as an "intruder"... that protein isn't the virus itself, just one component of the virus... but, since your body's immune system is already "attuned" to that protein, when the virus DOES invade the body, the immune system is "ready and waiting'.
Indeed, one of the reasons the vaccine is injected deep into your muscle (usually in your arm) is to prevent it (the vaccine itself) from spreading all over your body... the pain most people feel in the muscle where it is injected is because that's where the immune response is, and part of that immune response is inflammation.
If they wanted it to "course throughout your body" it would be injected into your bloodstream - like antibiotics are when you get them via "IV" injection.
And if I'm going to be gone by 2025, and literally HALF the US population is as well, then you're going to need an awful lot of immigrants to come in and make all this shit work! LOL
As for the crackpot who made the projection that those who took the vaccines would be dead by 2025, well he made an incredibly stupid remark given that the vaccines made by Moderna & Pfizer - while both utilizing the mRNA technology - are different (target different proteins), and that they are wholly unrelated to the "traditional" vaccines made by Johnson & Johnson, or the Russians, or the Chinese, or the Australians, or the Indians... indeed many other countries developed their OWN vaccines - ALL of which would be different from each other.
I'll begin to worry when reviewed research shows there are problems.
In the meantime, I'm protected from COVID-19, and a whole lot of Trumpites in Red States are getting sick again!
-
@bi4smooth Oh, sure! You sound like a spokesperson for Big Pharma. You literally act like they're "science," when science changes every day. I'm not even reading everything you posted because you start out with nonsense nonsequitor bullshit. Oh yes, I'm sure you'll wait for the "reviewed research," by the same people that spout off all day that there are too many people and we're overpopulated and we're killing the Earth. They certainly are most definitely interested in your well-being and not their corporate trillions. God damn you're dumb.
-
@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:
@bi4smooth Oh, sure! You sound like a spokesperson for Big Pharma. You literally act like they're "science," when science changes every day. I'm not even reading everything you posted because you start out with nonsense nonsequitor bullshit. Oh yes, I'm sure you'll wait for the "reviewed research," by the same people that spout off all day that there are too many people and we're overpopulated and we're killing the Earth. They certainly are most definitely interested in your well-being and not their corporate trillions. God damn you're dumb.
I am educated enough to know about how dumb I really am... you, however, are just sad... is there any crackpot conspiracy theory you DON'T believe?
I must say, if we were to take as fact that we're both delusional, I'd much rather live in my delusion - where there aren't armies of cannibalistic pedophiles in positions of power trying to inject me with DNA-altering drugs...
I'm just saying: your life - your world - as you describe it, really sucks!
I'm glad I don't live in that world... -
@bi4smooth Again, nobody cares about your opinion, and to add, nobody cares about your feelings. Sorry. Big Pharma is a disgusting institution that you THINK is run by scientists, but have corporate boards, which you just don't get. You just don't get it.
-
@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:
@bi4smooth Again, nobody cares about your opinion, and to add, nobody cares about your feelings. Sorry. Big Pharma is a disgusting institution that you THINK is run by scientists, but have corporate boards, which you just don't get. You just don't get it.
If getting it means I have to live my life in fear of all the evils you have articulated over the past weeks (much less months), then I'm happy to live in oblivion...
Like I said: your life - as you describe it - really sucks.
-
@bi4smooth Yes, you are oblivious. To all the crimes that Pharma has been CONVICTED of. I don't care if you "want" to believe it or not or if it sounds like poopoo.
-
@hubrys said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:
So, you guys are full-on anti-vax retarded, then?
I love your version of "discussion". Name call and bolt.
Typical liberal.
I know you just listen to whatever your favorite liberal "news" personality tells you without ever actually looking for yourself because that's what liberals do.
There are links in this section to CDC and WHO pages that show there are some problems. We, not the liberals, have linked to them. You ass clowns just call us names and run away without ever looking at the evidence by the very scientists you demand we listen to.
It's like how the WHO says that no one under 18 is supposed to get any of the current vaccines. The CDC, however, says that anyone 12 and over should have them.
It's also like how we found out, not through public announcements, but through data buried in reports, that mostly young males (namely those under 35) are having heart problems due to the vaccines.
BTW, I'm fully vaccinated. So go fuck yourself and your ignorant liberal bullshit. Stop getting your "truth" from sniffing Pelosi's panties or watching AOC's Instagram.
-
Our resident fake conservative, like his liberal brethren, loves to ignore the science while calling us science deniers.
They refuse to believe the very scientists they demand we believe. The CDC and the WHO have both reported, though not outwardly publically, that people born with penises have a pretty high chance to get heart problems from any of the current vaccines. This is especially true for those under 35.
People born with vaginas are far less likely to have heart problems from the vaccines.
It's all in the WHO and CDC reports and liberals and fake conservatives deny it, because the only science they like is the science that fits their liberal, cultural marxist agenda.
Let's not forget how their side scare-mongered the vaccines while Trump was in office, with no evidence to back them up.
But we are science deniers for using WHO and CDC official documents.
We live in a liberal fucking clown world.
-
@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:
https://principia-scientific.com/most-who-took-covid-vaccines-will-be-dead-by-2025/
This "principia-scientific" website is a festering swamp of baseless conspiracy theories. No educated person takes it seriously. The linked article, which is unsigned, does not have any credible references. It lists some web domains, but no links to papers.
I expect you to reject any scientist who doesn't tell you what you want to hear, it's human nature.
No, it's the reaction of dogmatic non-thinkers. We have examples of that in this thread.
-
@eobox91103 According to who? You? And who are you? Are you an expert on anything? Thanks for your opinion.
-
@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:
@eobox91103 According to who? You? And who are you? Are you an expert on anything? Thanks for your opinion.
As to the quality (or lack thereof) of the "principia-scientifica" domain, you could look at https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ . You will also be able find a host of other garbage-quality conspiracy theory websites that you will likely enjoy.
As to the lack of references in the article you link, you can see that by clicking on the link.
As to dogmatic non-thinkers in this thread (and many others), you can likely find that on your won.
(As for who I am, and my areas of expertise, it is established net etiquette that a person asking questions of another answer those questions themself first. Ergo, your turn. But you needn't bother; I don't care who you are, and I doubt that you have any areas of expertise.)
-
@eobox91103 Right, so you don't believe the inventor of the mRNA, the inventor of the PCR test, or the former Vice President of Pfizer, all saying the same thing. Because those guys are clearly conspiracy theorists. Just for starters!
-
@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:
@eobox91103 Right, so you don't believe the inventor of the mRNA, the inventor of the PCR test, or the former Vice President of Pfizer, all saying the same thing. Because those guys are clearly conspiracy theorists. Just for starters!
Please provide references for these. They were not in the anonymous article you linked in the first post.
-
@eobox91103 Yes, the inventor of mRNA was cited in the article, for one. You think HE'S a CONSPIRACY NUT? HMMM? I don't think so, and he echoes what the former VP of Pfizer said, as well as the inventor of the PCR test. It's all singing to the same tune, and you are playing ignorant because it doesn't fit your belief system.
-
@manhandler said in Terrible News for the Vaxxed: by 2025:
@eobox91103 Yes, the inventor of mRNA was cited in the article, for one. You think HE'S a CONSPIRACY NUT? HMMM? I don't think so, and he echoes what the former VP of Pfizer said, as well as the inventor of the PCR test. It's all singing to the same tune, and you are playing ignorant because it doesn't fit your belief system.
PLEASE learn to read. There was no reference to a source. For a web page to assert something without any backup doesn't count. Show me an reference.
But you can't. You're the one with the fixed (i.e., broken) belief system who doesn't believe in fact.
Responding to your trash posts is a fucking waste of time.
-
@eobox91103 A name IS a source. All you have to do is look up the inventor of the PCR test, to start. But you're too lazy or too lame to be capable of that apparently.
