@in2fun yes been a month no one fix
give up i think

I'm having the same problem. I see from your post that this goes back 24 days with no resolution. It looks like we might be SOL

@john32123666 You wrote: “It should only works if both torrent has a seeder.”
Actually the rules say otherwise.
CapturFiles_158.png
It is enough that the original torrent has seeders; which was the case.
As a matter of fact, some hours after this conversation the duplicate was removed (thanks to MrMazda).

@john32123666 thanks for answering. 🙂

Oh well!… The worst thing that could happen is that I give a few people twice. Too bad I don't have enough to give everybody twice, though…or maybe I do; it says I've given less than half I currently have remaining to give.

🤔 Thus, if… 2( <½ ) 🍌 = 1( <1 ) 🍸
Makes sense 🤓

Thanks again!

@Noh1does

provided that the torrent has active seeders or even if dead, there are members who have completed the download for it to be revive.

@john32123666 Thank you!

@bluemisiek You can do your search by going to Torrents > Browse. Then use the advanced settings you can pick 1 or more main categories and 1 or more required subcategories.

firefox_e5dIQ8iEpb.png

@john32123666 Fair enough 😆

@GutPuncherKO The amount of people complaining about thumbnails is alarming... It makes think it's less likely the uploader's lack of determination to present good quality content, but rather an technical issue.

It's really improbable that all of a sudden everybody started to mass upload really low quality images. And when you put into the equation the fact that the upload tool has had multiple issues since the migration to a new domain, with many of said issues regarding to image uploads, it really looks unintentional and definitely something for the site administrators to investigate.

If torrent request failed means the torrent is no longer active upon request : ...
write to helpdesk : https://www.gaytorrent.ru/helpdesk.php
In order to resolve this matter ...

@kalayaan Indeed TYVM ... back to normal 👍
GREAT JOB !!! ... 🙂

@raphjd

Better than before 👏 👏 👏

@feetsox You're very welcome. I hope your success rate with reseeded torrents is better than mine!

@UserFriendly I find that the torrent search engine treats multiple words as being conjunctions, i.e., searching on twink kyle turns up all only those torrents with both terms in it. I just did that one and got 7 hits. Putting a minus sign in front of a term (such as twink kyle -orgy) gives 6 results, leaving out the first hit on the previous search that had the word "orgy" in the title. So the take-away message is that a Boolean "and" operator is not needed, and a minus sign prefix will handle a "not" operator. I don't think there's an "or" operator, but perhaps there's some syntax for that.

I haven't tried much with wildcards, but searching for twink kyl* gets additional hits for when the term kyler appears in the title. Note that searching on kyle does not return records with kyler in them.

Intra-website search engines are difficult to implement. I appreciate that the engine here assumes a conjunction with two or more terms. On another torrent site, "twink kyle" would be interpreted as "twink OR kyle," making useful searching almost impossible.

please write to helpdesk so they can point the proper way ...
select Donation from type of inquiry
https://www.gaytorrent.ru/helpdesk.php | https://www.gaytor.rent/helpdesk.php

If you save @ bookmarks click on 3 vertical dots @ top right of your browser ...
[If you haven't downloaded it yet ...]
Looks like this >>>
bookmarks.jpg
or @ your wishlist:
wishlist.jpg

@Boredbored said in The new search cannot display pages past 10001-10050 aka page 200:

Basically the title, manually editing the search bar to a different page past 200 still shows page 200 for some reason

I've also noticed this phenomenon--but it hasn't been a problem for me. If I'm doing a search, it's usually because I'm looking for something in particular--maybe a torrent in the "military" category with the name "Kyle" in the title or description. That's not going to get many results, and I can go through them easily.

If I do a search that has >10,000 results, my search parameters have been too vague, and I'm not going to sift through even 1000 results. While it would be nice to address this "feature," I think it's probably rather low priority given the many other issues that pop up on a website this complicated.

@Douseikekkon I wonder how you got to the conclusion that that's how you compare duplicates.