This sort of allegation is unfortunately very damaging for any kind of celebrity or entertainer that makes a significant portion of his bank on straight female fans. Anyone in One Direction definitely qualifies. "Heartthrob" status is only attainable, for some bizarre reason, for a male celebrity that is at-least-in-public interested in women. What he does behind closed doors, if it involves men, has to remain secret for the sake of that image.

I've never understood WHY … do these girls honestly believe they EVER had a shot in hell with these handsome movie stars, musicians, models, whatever ... REGARDLESS of the guy's sexual orientation? Just because he technically fucks women doesn't mean he was ever going to fuck Plane Jane Doe from an Illinois suburb.

It is what it is, though. I don't think this is him, for the record, but it was clearly someone out to damage him a bit. And it'll probably work.

Simon Rex's career was ruined in part because he simply permitted a bunch of gay guys to watch him jerk off on CAMERA. That was enough. I know; I heard a bunch of my female friends talk about it in shocked tones about how he's "so gross now." Ricky Martin, too ... remember him? 😛

First there's resistance in the female brain to the idea ("OMG that's not true at all, I don't believe it!") .... but the moment there's acceptance, interest is gone immediately.

This is ridiculous. She probably lost custody because the court found her to be unstable. Hey, her husband was interested in guys and contemplating leaving REGARDLESS of whether or not same-sex marriage was ever legalized or possibly legalized. What about all of us who have never been married yet who might marry someone of the same-sex if possible? Who are we hurting? This woman just wants to rationalize her homophobia.

I think sometimes same-sex relationships have special difficulties but not because of roles or anything. Actually, I think two guys who are very masculine or two guys who are very fem would have it easier in a lot of ways.

Well written. I never heard of this guy before and I will check him (on the net  :P). I think I'll like him.

That does not seem a lot of money to me.  There is a $2,600 tax burden surplus per capita in Idaho.  That means the court costs were paid for by using taxes from 175 taxpayers in Idaho.  $455,000 / $2,600 = 175.  In Missouri, they have a tax surplus of $3,800 per capita.  That means that the court costs were paid by using only 9 taxpayers.  $31,875 / $3,800 is approximately 9.

http://www.statedatalab.org/library/doclib/2010_FSOS.pdf

Hope you doing good… 😛